Had Sony released this exact camera as vlogging camera, reviews and comments would be raving on about how amazing it is for the price.

This is a camera killer, for sure. Is like a mini z9 with a smaller sensor but even more capable in some parts. Cost 70% less and can give similar results if you know how to play with the camera. I know all of you will say this sensor can't fight a fullframe one but man this specs are crazy, ill buy one and check myself. And video is almost the same than gh6 without fan to cool down the camera. One of the best hybrids available on the market it seems

Great initial review, as always. I was hoping for a slightly smaller form-factor, but if this is what Panasonic had to do to be profitable with it, I understand. I hope the body size doesn't turn people off to the m43 format. I would love to see a flat-out high speed tracking comparison between this and the OM 1. And given some of the dynamic range boosting technology Panasonic is using, I would love to see a high iso comparison as well. The GH6 was criticized for its DR, and I know this sensor is modified in that regard, so any improvement is welcomed. I know this is cross format, but this is priced right in the range of some good apsc/ff gear as well, maybe even a quick comparison, or just your thoughts, on the g9.2 vs something like an r10/8, or the new Sony 6xxx would be interesting as well. There's a lot of great gear in this price range. We are fortunate, even in a declining market in general, to have a luxury of options here.

This is a very well-balanced feature set. I passed on the GH6 when it arrived without PDAF. I'm glad I did. It is great for what it is, but my next camera WILL have PDAF, and this just might be it. It seems to have all the still and video features I need. I'll know after watching and reading around 30 reviews! Thanks, Gordon, for this first look. Your assessments make sense.

22:27 I have watched ALL the g9 II review videos and none answer this question - until now! Thank you Gordon! going through the menu systems while explaining briefly is brilliant.

Gordon, thanks so much for your excellent and detailed early review of the Panasonic G9 ii using pre-production firmware. I am convinced that the G9 ii is an awesome upgrade from the original Panasonic G9 in nearly all respects. However, with the new 25.2 MP dual-gain sensor on the G9 ii, I hope you might publish information about how the G9 ii image quality (with final production firmware) compares with the OM-1 and the original Panasonic G9 - across all ISO settings. You've asked viewers what they'd like to see in your next review of G9 ii with final firmware, and I am sure that most photographers are interested in what this new 25.2 MP sensor delivers in terms of image quality. Thanks again for your awesome videos; they are super-helpful to photographers and videographers!! I will probably upgrade my Panasonic G85 next year; not sure if I will get the G9 ii or the OM-1; both are very good tools !

Great and detailed review that only felt like 10min. Good and very informative watch.

I'm definitely ready to refresh my 43rds camera from the original OM-D E-M1 so I am looking forward to your G9ii vs OM-1 comparison. I'm primarily a photographer as opposed to a videographer so it's the still image performance that will interest me primarily. Good review as usual, Gordon.

I agree 100% with your comments on the top screen going away. I use mine on my G9 quite a lot and it makes it look like a higher end camera.

A good review Gordon. Well done Panasonic. There's nothing here to make me switch from my OM-1 but I can see the attraction for current M43 Panasonic owners and the video capabilities will appeal to some as the OM-1 is less than stellar in this department. The real winner is the M43 format with 2 excellent flagship body options now available.

Long time no see! Love the review. I love MFT high-quality compact lenses. Been hoping for something like this for a while. Just wish it had been available before my trip to Egypt in 10 days ;-) I'm not sure I'm a fan of the missing top screen or lock on the top dial. Moving the on/off might be troublesome for my forefinger, but it just might have to get used to it ;-) I truly can't image going full-frame with innovations like this and the software advances available for post processing. There is quite a penalty for full-frame bokeh balls, IMO. The OM-1 comparison will be interesting. Maybe some videos on using these kool features? Cheers!

Very nice review as usual Gordon, i have to say i really love how your review just flow from one topic to next to next. So smooth and natural. I watched the whole review before I realise it

For me, the biggest advantage of this camera over the OM-1 is the HUMAN detection. With OM-A, as soon as the subject turns his/her face away, it seems that the OM-1 does not detect him/her anymore. The G9ii keeps the tracking on the subject moving to its HUMAN detection. Very useful feature for a bunch of applications where the face may be hidden by a scarf or momentarily turn his/her face away

Thank you Gordon, great review! In case you are going to test it more in the future, I'm interested in knowing more about the ISO 100 and the dynamic range of the sensor, especially when set to i.Dynamic. I'd also like to see a performance test of the Panasonic 100-300/4-5.6 II lens, since that can be a major differentiator for me if I decide to continue to stay in the system. Regarding the AF system, does it support the Sony's tracking mode, in which you select a random object/person and the camera then tracks in across the frame? That feature is very valuable since it prevents changing the AF settings and also moving the AF target.

Another thorough camera review from Gordon. As far as people commenting in the forums about phase detect autofocus finally coming to Panasonic, I think they worry too much about the gear and not enough about their own abilities.

Great video! Perhaps a good combination for shooting vlogs is the G9 II with the PanaLeica 9mm f/1.7 and electronic stabilization on HIGH. I don't even think a gimbal will be needed and there will be no trace of that annoying jelly effect. In a future review, when the camera is on sale and the firmware is more polished, it would be great if you could delve into how the Raw files behave in photos. How well they recover highlights and shadows.

The launch of the G9II is a significant boost for the m43 community. Recently, I've made a full transition back from Sony FF to m43. Virtually everything you can do with Fullframe can also be achieved with m43, but with less weight (which becomes increasingly important as you get older) and less intimidating to the surroundings. The video quality of the GH6 is impressive and fantastic to work with. However, compact and yet excellent cameras like the GX9 are pleasant companions for a day out. Naturally, the G9II (with its much-improved AF) is on my wishlist, along with the highly underrated OM5 from OM systems (420 grams). The latter camera is a hybrid marvel when it comes to both photo and video (4K and 120 FPS HD) in a small and lightweight body. Try capturing a handheld video with panning using a Sony (e.g., the zv1 or the a7c); it's quite challenging. The OM5 can do it, and, of course, the G9II can as well. Hopefully, Panasonic will continue to innovate and soon release a GX9 mkII and/or a G90 mkII.

Brilliant detailed review mate. Thankyou.

No way Mr Gordan Laing you’re still going. It’s been a long time since I last watched any camera reviews due to personal reasons but I’m back. The first time I discovered camera labs was the n 2007 when I was building up to purchasing the Olympus E-510 twin lens kit. And I remember devouring your reviews of it and reading them over and over again along with Wrotniaks website and excellent E-510 review. Good to be back.

Thank you for this video Gordon! Can't wait for the samples, I would really like to understand if this camera paired with the 12-35 can produce detailed images such as an a7iii with the 24-105 (given the comparable focal lenghts) with a smaller and lighter lens

Impressive review Gordon! A huge amount of detail for a first impression!

Very thorough, very helpful. Thank you!

Looking forward to your in depth review as I have an original G9 and this looks like a worthwhile upgrade for me as a stills photographer. How about a comparison test between the G9 II and the Om-1 ?

Great review! I look forward to the updated review once you've had longer with it. Do you know if there is HDMI RAW output? Thanks

I love my m4/3 lenses, and would love to learn more about low light performance and af in low light! Thank you very much for your great work👏👏👏

I have a G9 and use it mostly for photography. I never check the LCD display on the top of the camera. Won't miss it.

"The OG9". Nice one, Gordon!😁

I think with the video upgrades in the G9II we can expect that Panasonic will go even more above and beyond for the GH-series.

Great review of an interesting camera

Gordon … It’s always great to see your reviews ! Thank you ! 👍

thanks for using the 8mm, idk, i really like the unique look of a fisheye with a little bit of background blur. it looks really good. especially with the ibis of this camera. probably the best ibis I've seen so far. 👌

Great review! I have been testing my new G9ii and one of my favorite new features is the countdown display of how many seconds are left in a long exposure. Just a small quality of life surprise. But can Panasonic PLEASE do a firmware update to allow Fuji-like shutter speeds to go past 60”!

as a 'bird in flight' shooter and current owner of the OM-1 and 150-400 I am interested mainly in pure AF performance/keeper rates and what IBIS/IS losses (vs the OM-1) I will suffer with the 150-400 if going with a G9II. every little bit helps so every little loss will no doubt be a noticeable detriment. --i'm not likely ever going to use 60fps but i'd like to use 30fps, or higher, once in a while. it appears the G9II has the same limitation as the OM-1 with regards to choosing sequential(with AF for each frame) shooting speeds. i am stumped why, with the OM-1, my options are 25fps and 50fps. are there only two options with the G9II, being 20fps or 60fps? if so why? why can't i/we select any speed from 20fps up to 60fps? i've seen the G9II's IBIS/IS specs and, more importantly, what lenses and focal lengths they are derived from. They are similar enough to those of the OM-1 but well short of the 150-400's 500mm. Again, I have to consider the 150-400 and really need to know how well the G9II's IBIS will perform with the lens at full zoom with the 1.25X active because I often use the lens at 500mm. ***finally...my biggest, most frustrating, and, longest ongoing annoyance with Olympus/OMDS is having to have attained Master's degree in camera settings in order to just try to set the camera up for it's best performance. I'm still not sure if I have the camera (OM-1) set up correctly to achieve the best BIF results possible. Rarely, if ever, has an email (or a 10 email chain) to Olympus/OMDS helped in figuring out best setting choices. --regarding BIF and the G9II, am I going to have to spend a year or two of countless hours on youtube/web forums/emails trying to figure out how best to set the camera up for BIF?

This is the best featured M43 camera so far.

Great review Gordon! Comparisons to the OM-1 would be much appreciated.

I'm interested in seeing more content on this camera... just to let you know.

Having switched to Nikon and found the video stabilization a bit meh. Now packed and ready to go with my Nikon gear and finding the backpack heavy, I may have to have a serious talk with myself about the G9ii....

So happy to see Panasonic do this.

Great review Gordon!!! Thanks so much for the shoutout ☺️📷🙏

I have a G9 and I definitely plan to upgrade to G9 II as soon as it is in stock.

Love the samples shown here of the Olympus 75 mm portraits and Leica 100-400 at the safari park. My favorite lens on wish list is Leica 200 f2.8 for long distance. Have original G9 with Leica 8-18 F 2.8 - 4 and Voigtlander Nokton 42.5mm f/0.95 Happy G9 updated with pdaf, put that to rest.

Hi Gordon, than you for the video. I have two questions : 1- How about the IBIS performance in open gate and 5,7K compared to 4K ? Since the S1 and and GH6, very high resolution modes like 5,7K, 5,8K or 6K, (especially in open gate) have lower IBIS performance compared to 4K or C4K. The IBIS of the G9II seems improved compared to the GH6 so I'm very interested to see if the Open Gate IBIS is improved as well. 2-Also, the GH6 has sadly lot of details smearing in low light with non log profiles compared to previous cameras, fortunatly V-Log has much better details rendering and almost zero detail smearing so I use it almost everytimes. However, the DR BOOST who give a sharper image, better DR (better highlight recovery) and less noise is only available at ISO 2000, so even if the DR Boost improves noise, the non DR Boost V-Log at ISO 250 is cleaner. The fact than the G9II can use the V-Log DR BOOST at ISO 500 is great, but is the quality is the same than on the GH6 (no smearing/chroma noise reduction) ?

hoboi cant wait to see what they bring to the gh7

As always, a very thorough review. Many thanks! I would like to see you test video bird detect autofocus at 4K 50p and 4K 100p. Thanks!

Thanks for this great first look! In it's own right this is an outstanding camera, however I feel some conflict here. I find it curious as to why both the GH6 and G9 II have been released without BSI sensors which for the the format and photosite density you'd think would have to be leaving low light and dynamic range performance on the table with a higher noise floor. The GH5s was a massive success in this regard. I also find it curious that they choose their photo centric body to introduce PDAF where DFD is not nearly so much an issue as with video. So now there are truly useful video features like 12-bit ext BRAW / ProRes RAW recording and Dynamic Range Boost stranded on the GH6 while the G9 II has the PDAF and insanely good video IBIS. As an ex GH5 video centric user (now on Sony FF) I think you summed it up perfectly that this IS the camera for those deep in M43 either on a G9 or GH5 and looking for an upgrade.

This is the wildlife video camera that I wish the gh6 was. Apparently there are rumors of a gh7 coming in November. If so I hope it’s exactly what the gh6 is but with pdaf (I love its body design - yes, even it’s size/weight). The gh6 is still a very enjoyable camera, and I’ll keep using it, it’s just not great for filming small animals in motion though (my primary use unfortunately)

Thanks, Gordon. Actually, I happen to like the G9 I's hair-trigger shutter! I'm also bummed that they didn't go with the 5.76MP EVF and lost the mode dial lock (and top screen). Other than that, I almost pre-ordered one but I'd still like to see a test with production firmware as well as tests of the new lenses, as I have the current versions of both the Lumix G X 35-100 f/2.8 "Mk 2" and Leica 100-400 f/4-6.3 and wonder if they're worth upgrading.

Great review

I do find the CF Express card slots annoying as a photographer who likes to shoot dual slots. I guess if you're not mirroring saves to both cards, it won't matter. You can save to the faster one first, and then let images spill over to the second if the first runs out. I am curious how this camera compares to the OM-1. I was a Panasonic user for years. Then I gave up on them coming out with a replacement for the G9 and picked up an OM-1 last year. Of course, that's when Panasonic releases the G9 ii. I'm not sure what to do. I've really enjoyed using the OM-1, and am "finally" getting used to the entirely different ergonomics when compared to Panasonic. Though this updated G9 appears to have more in common with the OM-1's layout than my old G7 has with it. I certainly look forward to your further experience with this camera. I'd love to know how it goes for you, and how it compares to the OM-1. Thanks for the in-depth, hard work, as always!

Well I had watched this when you released it and now watching it again, you've sealed the deal my friend. Guess who's getting a G9ii... 😉

This camera looks like a great update for g7/85/95 users

Thanks Gordon for all your work. Glad you're testing the G9ii with Oly lenses because it's a major question for me (poor experience with oly 25 f1.8 on G85 by example). 2 questions for you : 1/ One thing i've learned from reviews on cameras in general, is that tracking is a thing, sharp focus may be another. So, the tracking seems really good, but, at the end, are the pictures sharp ? (especially in hard conditions, moving subjects, low light) ? 2/ is there differences on autofocus ability using mechanical shutter (=> black out) compared with ES (thus without blackout) ?

I agree that a primary target demographic are people already in the MFT eco system - I've looked at the Canon mirrorless system but my canon lenses are EF so would need the adaptor, looked at the Lumix S series... but no lenses so would need the Sigma EF to L adaptor but I've a silly amount of MFT lenses as I've been able to pickup even highend lenses cheap (including stuff like the 42.5 1.2 and the 75 1.8) - that and these still make a smaller overall system (my I had my G9 MK I with the 100-400 lens with me when my Sony shooting friend was bragging about how his new A7c was "smaller than the G9" yeh but you've got the SIGMA 150-600mm on it (a lens I own in EF mount so I have years of experience lugging that around) and all up it's much bigger and heavier than my G9 + 100-400

Great review. Will you be doing one on the new 100-400 and how that compares to the old one.

I watched your videos from the review of the Lumix Panasonic DMC-FZ50

FWIW, I shoot with Olympus cameras exclusively. And I think the G9II is a winner. Lumix users should be very happy indeed.

The 12mm walking shot like gimbal shot. 8mm is suppose to do better giving such wide angle but come out a bit shaky.

An excellent review as always! I am looking forward to your next videos on this camera. I hope they will next give us a GX model, that is what I am looking for ultimately.

Gordon! Missed you, so good to see you!

Hi Gordon could you help verify if the camera shoots 14 bit RAW stills in both electronic and mechanical shutter? Also as an offbeat check, does the camera live view feed when connected to the Panasonic app switch from vertical and horizontal if the camera is mounted up top facing straight down (E.g. for a “flat lay” shot)? I had that on a previous M4/3 Panasonic model when the camera’s gyro(?) doesn’t detect well or is on a stand that is locked off but not 100% vibration free. On the app it just constantly switches between horizontal and vertical live view. Lastly, wonder if you have a speedbooster and can test with your DSLR lenses (maybe Sigma 40mm?) on how they perform with the G9II? Thank you!

Interesting review Gordon and I think you are right about the video capabilities which are rather impressive. Although I have other systems as my main ones, I do have a G80 and G90 plus lenses as one of my lightweight carry options but fond of those as I am, I'm not sure that I would spend this amount of money on this new body as there would be other choices for me to think about. When you do some more testing, I would be very interested in how it handles as an action/wildlife camera, cheers :)

Would be interested to see whether G92 can track human’s face and eye like Canon and Nikon where you can put a box and stick to it? Currently, OM-1 does not do that well at all.

I've been battling the urge to bite on the S5IIX due to the necessity of purchasing lenses. With my G9 and GH5II + eight M43 lenses, this is exactly what I've waited for. The PDAF alone is worth the upgrade for me. Great review Gordon

I want one. I love MFT because with my lowepro 450 aw back pack I can back 2 cameras and 6 lenses with ease and will have room for my lav mics, shotgun mic…etc

Any more G9 II videos that we can expect in the coming year? Would love to see it go head to head to the OM1, Sony A6700 and R7

With CFexpress type B and a fan like on S5 II it would be literally perfect. I wouldn't even miss timecode of external RAW recording. But is still so good that I will definately buy it. The only thing that concernes me really is overheating in 5.8K 30p when powered from mains and recording into SSD (aka long format indoors recording like concerts, lectures, ceremonies etc. in hot climate). Even that worse-than-OM-1 rolling-shutter performance will not stop me from buying it.

Great and extremely thorough review. 👍

Hi Gordon. Could you include a test for rolling shutter when shooting stills please? As a wildlife tog who mainly shoots BIF it's one of the prerequisites for me when choosing a camera body. Anything worse than the OM-1 would be unacceptable to me.

Lots of great reviews on this camera…and yours is one of the best! Richard Wong also did AF comparison tests to the original G9, the GH6 and the OM1. The 9ii was the best of the bunch, but the GH6 was quite close (and a few times faster to me) and what surprised me was how well the original g9 did. Moving into frame it wasn’t far behind the OM1 (both took a second to focus- he was using a Pan. Lens on the OM1 I believe) and if in frame (just moving within) it was often as good as the others. Looking forward to more tests!

Great video thank you! Can you tell me if the continuous autofocus works well while you filming slow motion in 4k 120fps or only works with manual focus mode?

Would like to know if the G9II is better at wildlife photography than my OM-1. Looks like the G9II has an impressive burst rate, but maybe more rolling shutter due to not being a stacked sensor?

As an owner of the physically similar S5, the camera is no looker. However it is the most instinctive layout of any camera I've owned, with all the controls in the right place. It isn't as efficiently bland as the Sony's and retains the right amount of quirkiness to keep things interesting.

Excellent as always Gordon, the only tube to come to for cameras, I just pre-ordered mine from WEX upgrading my GH5M2 :)

Hello again Gordon, there is no 4k photo mode. Is the Post Focus mode gone too? There is no incanera focus stacking? Also, for vidoe there was a 4k live cropping mode, is that still present?

Gordon, are you sure about your description of iDynamic? Previously it was just single exposure with shadows rised.

Is buffer clearing time for burst photos shorter when using SSD recording as opposed to SD V90 cards? BTW it would be nice to have also an option of SH30 and SH40. With the lack of fast media (CFexpress B) ability to choose some middle ground in burst mode would be nice.

Whilst it's not a deal breaker, I originally decided I'd purchase a G9 II because I thought - amongst other goodies, that it too would have a top screen so I'm disappointed with that. In addition, I liked the feel of the G9 when I tried it out in store because it felt so much like my Pentax K-3 II. However, I'm not in love with the new design, it being too square and with a seemingly much smaller grip. Mind you, it hasn't stopped me laying my money down and placing my pre-order. I suppose I'll just get used to it. Can't wait for the back end of November. Wouldn't it be really nice for a manufacturer to release a high spec camera solely for photographers with no video capability.

I’m a GH5/GH6 shooter and I’m loving the G9II it feels like the true hybrid successor to the GH5 (no fan and dual SD). It’s the perfect B-Cam to my GH6 until the GH7 with pdaf arrives.

Interesting and featured packed review as always, but what I want to see is your review of the Sony A7CII and the R version which I looked eagerly for on the day of release and is still missing !

This is truly for somebody that is already committed to micro four thirds. Makes no sense for a newcomer to buy this camera body over the S5 II when it now cost $100 less than the G9 II.

The Legend returns!

Greetings from New Zealand. In the 100 megapixel mode can flash be used to create an image? Imagine that probably flash won't work at all because several flashes would need to fire in sync. Thanks for the great reviews.

Does the G9ii have an automatic de-fish filter like the omd and emiii? Was wondering when watching your footage with the Oly 8mm, which I own

To clarify, are you saying that the new Pre Burst features is a substitute for the 4K/6K Photo feature? That was something I used on my old G9 and missed when I bought my S5 II. I need to better understand how the PreBurst function will help me capture those fast moving, unpredictable subjects like Hummingbirds in Flight. 4K/6K Photo did a great job with this.

I think people make a bit too much of sensor formats when comparing cameras, especially since most of us aren't making large prints. Panasonic has invited it here though by making the same body in two formats. They even have (nearly) the same resolution and price. Something that may not be getting quite enough attention is the autofocus burst rate. I think its 60 FPS is the fastest on the market. Despite its stacked sensor, the OM-1 only does 50, and that's limited to certain lenses. The G9 II has a larger buffer as well, something I found limiting when I tested that burst rate on the OM-1 with swallows in flight. Going to larger formats, the Fuji XH2S manages 40, and I don't think there's a full-frame faster than 30 (in raw, anyway). That, combined with the compact and moderately priced long telephoto options for M43 makes a good argument for the G9 II over the S5 II and other larger-format options for sports and wildlife. I shoot birds, and I have my eye on this camera. For more general-purpose photography though, I do think it's hard to justify the size and cost relative to larger formats. I'd love to see a new GX model next, and maybe an update to the 20mm pancake.

Hi Gordon, great review. If you get opportunity could you test the camera out in a proper sports environment, say football or rugby perhaps. Be great to see some photos/videos and how the AF performs. No one has reviewed it in this way yet. Thanks

As a gh5 user i want this camera very badly

I see in the S5ii menu that they dumped multi-exposure mode.....how about the G9ii? I use the multi-exposure mode with flash for real estate photography, it saves me from having to bring extra flashes and tripods on jobs, and has been invaluable on the S5 mark i.

I am still a MFT shooter with a G95 and a GX9 but I still figure out one thing. How to shoot with flash on but with the display showing only the preview without flash. What I mean is for the camera to shows only the preview of what the exposure is like based on my setting iff I didn't turn on the flas. Anyone can help me here?

Does the Panasonic assemble high res photos in the camera the way that Olympus does? When I switched to Sony Olympus that was one thing that I really missed.

@6:00 This is what most G9 owners want to hear 🎉

As a GH6 owner this one is a tough call .. i like the GH6, but the auto focus in video is just not good enough to be used. The times i have tired to rely on it it has failed every time. So right now i use it with manual focus mostly, so this could be worth it for that alone. But there are rumors that the GH7 might be announced before the end of the year, and i would hate to buy a camera just to find out a month later i should have waited for the next in line.

Thanks. This looks great but I could not bring myself to pay $1,900 for a M43 camera in 2023. Especially when you can get a used G9 for $500 these days. I don’t see anything worth paying an extra $1,400 for but I may rent one to check it out.

If it is a photo-centric camera then why did they remove the top LCD camera beloved to photographers on that camera?

Hi Gordon, Thank you for creating this valuable video🙏. I'm interested to buy G9II in my country once it is available. In past I was using Lumix G85 for 4K video with decent IBIS but shifted to Sony system for video autofocus and low light noise free ISO range (till 1600) starting with camera a6400. If I'm not wrong , I had watched in your past videos that you are using a6400 to shoot youtube videos in real world outdoors. So, with this G9II video I'm sure that you are the best who can answer my querry or questions .Sorry for my bad English. I am using APSC sensor because I want deep depth of field plus medium blur ( achieved with aperture level f4 with sigma contempory 16mm-f1.4, 30mm-f1.4 lenses respectively) and ISO range without noise upto ISO 1600 on a6400. For extreme dark conditions with a6400 Cine1,Cine4 tuned profiles, I am fully satisfied with Sigma 16mm,30mm of aperture level f4 till noise free upto ISO 1600 and with noise upto ISO4000. Now, MFT can acheive deep depth of field easily as I know from G85 camera in video with best IBIS handheld. My question is based on new Lumix G9II and old Sony a6400 video comparison related to low light ISO performance outdoors in low light dark nights(example:with street lights). Is G9II ISO at 1600 and 3200 are equivalent (or better) comparison to Sony a6400 ISO 1600 and 3200 at low light nights outdoors with G9II auto dynamic boost auto on for 15-20min -10bit 422 video shoot with IBIS? I will use Lumix 10-25 f1.7 lens at any aperture at night with G9II. I'll be very thankful to you🙏, if you answer this ISO related video query based on G9II and a6400 comparison as there is huge years technology gap between these two cameras for ISOs in low light videos.

Does the metabones speed booster fit the g92 ? Thanks

Weather sealed? And sensor protection when changing lens? -- friendly thanks

Nice, could you tested with adaptor and 4/3 lenses?

21:45 Notice how both the 1080P at 100p and 4K at 100p have a micro jitter which none of the other modes or frame rates have.

What does "S&Q" on the dial do? Did this replace the Art mode on the dial?