In complete agreement with your observations.

👁

Did you not just meet him here

Move to India

Yes! The Aramis learning center is spiritual and is becoming the new school's. Not these brainwashing indoctrination camps called schools.

A three year old is best taught by her mama. Become the highest version of You and take it from there.

young children are selfrealized. They only begin acting seperated when ego tells them they need selfrealisation .

Read "Who am i" by sri ramana maharshi. The Maharshi is papajis guru.

Yes, Poonja was free to say whatever he wanted to, but there are many things he said that deviated from Bhagavan's teachings.

I think he's for advanced students of Ramana.

@@soul17169 I’m afraid he twisted Ramana’s teachings, or didn’t understand them in the first place. What people don’t always realize is that Ramana never declared Papaji to be realized. Ramana also never asked him to teach, or gave him permission to teach. Papaji is only a self appointed “guru”. So, Ramana didn’t endorse Papaji at all. People shouldn’t let the big Ramana photo make them think that he was somehow officially recognized or condoned by Ramana, or Ramanashram. If we’re interested in Ramana’s teachings we can get the from Ramana.

@@clearseeing5755 He said no teacher...no method, no path. Your own heart is Arunachala. Ramana said there is nothing to realize, no one to help. I am with you always. Be still. Both seemingly paradoxical, far reaching comments. Very similar to each other. Ramana said it is a subjective experience - (Be as you are) The real teacher is said to be within but I do have faith in Ramana and Papaji

@@soul17169 well, Papaji borrowed that from Krishnamurti, but if he really believed it, he wouldn’t have allowed “disciples” to gather at his feet. I agree 100% that your heart is Arunachala. Ramana was often moved to tears speaking about it. Papaji never even mentions Arunachala. People might think they point to the same thing - ‘you are the Self’, but on the subject of HOW this is realized, Papaji was diametrically opposed to Ramana. Ramana taught that only ceaseless, ardent sadhana and effort could remove the vasanas. Papaji was infamous for being completely anti-Sadhana. Here’s but one more example of how Papaji taught and said things completely opposite to Ramana: “I don’t recommend that you read any sacred books or books about saints” - Papaji ------- Question “What are the aids for realization?” “The teachings of the Scriptures and of realized souls.” - Ramana Maharshi Of course if Papaji’s “non-students” listened to his “non-teaching” about never reading any ‘sacred books or books about saints’ they would have been essentially instructed to not read about Ramana, (a saint) or Ramana’s teachings.(which Papaji claimed he was a “channel” for) If they DID read about Ramana’s teachings, they would have realized how opposite Papaji’s statements were. My advise is for people to study Ramana first. After that, you won’t need anything else, snd if you bothered to check, you’d see how different the so called non-teaching of Papaji was.