There is something very fishy about this whole trial! Time to tell Judge Boyd goodbye.

That poor man got a life sentence, and she basically got a get out of jail card. 😕 I hope she breaks her parole and goes to jail. She was only apologetic at the very last time for her sentencing. I don't believe she meant it. Judges skulls look at the social media of these felons...

Agree 100%. I wasn't buying her "remorse" for a second! I usually agree with judge boyd, but I definitely don't on this one...

Even if it's at least 6 months for each month, he spent in the hospital. 6x10= 60 months, just for starters!

​@@onespoiledpup2019IKR! I have no doubt she'll screw that parole up within 3 months‼️

She totally did !!! and her defence attorney needs to retire he is clearly unwell and should look after his own welfare now. The defendant was entitled and all about herself she showed zero remorse for what she did to the driver of the other car she devastated his life and she didn’t care. Jail was were she belonged!!

That was not an option presented to her. Judges rarely rule outside of established plea deals, because is undermines the trust in the attorneys and the proceedings of the court.

I agree. No excuse, #1 for drinking and driving. Someone suffered physically because of her negligence, and probably will again, because she will still drink and drive. No excuses for her. In jail she won’t be drinking and driving where she can do harm to someone else.

Q​@@wendystewart3270

I 1000% agree with you! I thought Judge Boyde was going to throw the book at her but, she didn't! I'm so confused! -;(

I’m so sorry for your loss. 😔

I'm so sorry. My Granny was killed by a 4 time convicted drunk driver

We lost two families members to a drunk driver who literally mowed them down as they walked along together. In court he said it was their fault for being out at night (I kid you not) he was three times over the limit. He got two years. Turned out he’d done it before. Not killed but badly injured someone when drunk driving so he knew that there was a potential consequence. Someone tell me why they are allowed to drive ever again. And tell me why wiping out two lives are only worth two years of which he’ll have served at most 18 months.

❤

😢❤

I agree!

I also did not get that - why it was sequenced after. Poor Julio does not catch any breaks…

Judge Boyd is one of the only ones who does it this way. No idea why there’s no point after

I strongly disagree. I don't think victim-impact statements belong in court at all. If the victims have pertinent facts, they should present them from the witness box under oath, and should be subject to cross examination. The Constitution says the accused has a right to confront the witnesses against him.

While emotionally it's hard to agree with what you said.But logically and legally you're a hundred percent right so i've got no complaint.

Often it’s better to get restitution. People that commit crimes don’t have anything worth suing for.

The problem is. he will receive nothing from her

The victims can sue the bar if it's proven they over served her...

Was her car insured? Because if so, they will at least pay the maximum allowed the insurance company.

@@lylekru2208 Thats when you sue for Judgement/lien and then file for Income garnishment.

Sorry to hear that ❤

I'm very sorry to hear that.

Never met my father because of a drunk driver.

@@FreeChild777 😥 So sorry. Something that is so avoidable but happens way too often.

@@jenifercalvert3399 This makes me sick also! No excuse for this. So sorry you had to lose your mother this way.

Why? That's literally what every Christian does. Hell, there's never been an organization that's abused more children than the church. This is typical "Christian" behavior.

As a Christian, it really fires me up, too. Don’t drag Jesus into it! He’s not your magical Uno card or “Get Out Of Jail Free” card 😤

There's rumor that Jesus tends to turn water into wine. Maybe that's the problem here?

It is awful and wrong, yet so called, self proclaimed Christian's are often the biggest liars and hypocrites going

She’s a Christian that likes to model nearly nude and post it online for everyone to see. 🤦🏻‍♀️

Maybe they are knock offs.

@@lisawatson9570 Not a joke the guy still might lose his leg.

She was also driving an expensive vehicle

And very expensive ‘self care’ items!

That’s the courts issue not hers. They allow it. She should be in jail until her court date she could have killed to ppl. But her rights deserve higher acknowledgment than the victims.

Absolutely agree. She should have got jail time.

she is friends with the defense attorney it looks like

Yes, I agree. At least a couple of years.

They have a lot of older lawyers. .😢

He said he was recovering from I guess backsurgery. Believe me I spend many a day on my "last leg".

Knew a lawyer in Newark so old and worked till he passed, Sidney Swirsky, they dont make them like that anymore.

@@florencedebear1576 did you watch the rest of the video where he was caught with no pants on and smoking a cigarette?? he needs to retire or be forced to

He's on his last leg because of his choices. His back surgery recovery is severely hampered by his smoking. 😊

She will be. And judge Boyd knows it. 10 years of probation is a LONG time and keeping herself clean for that long is going to be rough for her.

@@markc13579Thank you! It is like no one understands plea negotiations or what they mean.

Clearly what you don't understand is she's currently NOT going to jail. That means she got no jail time. You're assuming she's going to continue to be the POS that she currently is within the next 10 years. What we're saying is she definitely would be in jail if the judge gave her jail time today, not in your dream world of maybe some day.

​@@LawNerd23Nah, this outcome was extremely appropriate. Just use your brain for a second. 1) She has to pay restitution to her victim, which is what's most important. If she's in jail, she can't make money and give it to him. 2) She has probation for 10 YEARS. That mans if she messes up AT ALL for a decade then she goes right into prison to serve a ten year sentence. Alternatively, if she never does a single thing wrong for a full 10 years, then I'd say she's proven she doesn't need to be punished any more. That's the best thing for society, for everyone. 3) If the judge tried to sentence her to prison, what do you think would happen, little buddy? She would withdraw her plea and they would need to go through with a whole trial. None of the admissions she made as a part of the plea deal would be legally admissible in her trial, and she may very well receive absolutely no punishment at all, genius. But even if she WAS convicted and sentenced to prison at the end of it, the victim would have to wait for probably YEARS before they began to receive compensation. They would have this hanging over their head, unresolved, for years. They would need to go through the retraumatization of watching the trial AND being interrogated on the witness stand. The prosecutors would need to spend an enornous amount of time on this case, and they only have a finite amount of time. That means less time spent on murder cases or cases like that cop that raped an infant. The courts also have a finite caseload they can oversee, which means that many other people would have their own justice delayed while they waited for this to finish. And then, the best case scenario? Taxpayers need to pay for all of this prosecution, and then they have to pay to keep her in jail. Those jails also have a finite amount of space, so the more people like this that go in, the earlier we have to release other people who are even worse. All of that, just for the chance that maybe some random juror thinks she's pretty and they refuse to convict. You never know what's going to happen when something goes to an actual trial. The prosecutors and judge did the absolute best possible thing here. I shudder to think what our justice system would look like if someone as stupid as you was in charge. Maybe just keep your big dumb mouth shut in the future whenever the big boys are talking about a topic you don't understand.

@@psn64sat63 you make great points. why so mean though?

Probably because the defendant is cute and the judge probably thinks she would get assaulted in ten minutes if she sent her to a real prison. Cute chicks usually don't last long in prison.

@@mharris5047mmm i don’t think her looks have anything to do with it. It’s probably more that the jails are full. I’d rather my tax dollars go towards more prisons than to the Ukraine

My guess is it's the Jesus stuff. If you lie to Christians, just add a couple "I love Jesus"'s in there they'll go soft on you.

​@@Ladywolf2263genuine question, are you OK with your tax dollars going to Israel?

As a man who is the former director of corrections for a state once told me, “you rarely see a good looking white woman going to prison. It has to be a pretty heinous crime for that to happen”.

I'm sorry folks but WHY do girls ALWAYS WORRY about what another girl is wearing???? Did you look at her shoes also???? Really really PATHETIC... just saying 😱🤔🤨🫤

its usually given before sentencing.

Our insurance jumps up, the victims will never be the same does she have to kill someone before jail????

Very well said

The jails and prisons are overflowing as it is! What would you like for her to do!?

@rachelr.n.3563 I guess when one has a family member who killed another family member driving drunk they ask themselves..who matters more..the one sitting in an overcrowded cell for a little while or the one who is dead because of them. Of course, previous judges thought enough probation finger waggings would do the trick and save on the cost of incarceration. I mean, until someone is killed by shooting a gun in a crowd, essentially what driving drunk is, what's the big deal to keep shooting when one knows the threats of jail are empty as long as the jails are crowded.

@@Lomojo31 Unfortunately, I'm not the judge! I don't agree with what she did. Maybe people should stop being Shi++y human beings and we wouldn't have these problems!

She is selfish

Did she even mention the victims in her original apology? She mentioned that she was sorry, woman of God, two kids but I heard nothing showing me true remorse for what she did to the innocent people in the other vehicle. She is a piece of shit, her lame excuses for the SCRAM triggering were terrible and I’m shocked Judge Boyd considered them. She has jailed other defendants for less!

And that red bikini pic with the car was tragic beyond comprehension. 🤢🤮

100%! She should have to sell her SUV and give the proceeds to the victim!

The judge was SUPPOSED TO DO SOMETHING BUT DID JACKSHIT, Boyd practically spit in that victims face and laughed, with giving out the bullsh_t slap on the hand sentence that IR did!!!

Agree, she's probably gonna dance right out of that courtroom when she finds out that she got probation, I have no sympathy for her whatsoever. The judge was too soft on her. I had a friend hit by drunk driver. And he has permanent brain damage and the guy got basically a slap on the wrist for it.

White with money

Judge Boyd is great but treats whites totally differently than POC. I'm not sure if she is married to a white guy or something or if that even matters but I've noticed the same thing.

Probably bribed her with a purse.

What money? She’s broke. Her kids are on Medicaid and food stamps.

​@@Magnus_Magnusson_702 Are you serious? Have you watched Judge Boyds hearings? I've watched so many I couldn't count. I think you're racist BS is wrong. This woman probably had a clean history. I think people are acting towards her with jealousy. If she were ugly we wouldn't be reading these crazy comments. I think she's a narcissist, but if she's testing clean and they let her get away with the early positives it must have been questionable findings. I'm sure she's paid heavy fines and deserves to. She's also showing for her hearings and pretrial appointments. Some people no show repeatedly.

Amen amen amen

Apparently she's living in a shelter and working as a hotel housekeeper. You can dress really well on a tight budget, I did it for years.

Maybe if she quit partying she'd have money to pay her court and attorney fees!

@@ppw2393 if clothes were a priority over housing you might want to start rethinking your life choices

The judge was too soft on her.

You're absolutely right. It is disgusting that she got a slap on the wrist. A friend of mine was hit by a drunk driver has permanent brain damage and the guy that hit him got a slap on the wrist. Also, these judges are too soft on these people.

The thing is this case alone should've received cps involvement and if he was a great parent or anything like that he would've received full custody. Spazing out in the chat saying how shitty of a person she is as opposed to fighting for his children makes me think that he was denied custody.

@@Zaners82123 I said I think he was trying to get custody. He may have already had custody. He was there to follow the case like the rest of us because he was an interested party. He never said if he was the father to the older child or the 2 year old. He never said anything horribly bad about her except that she had a bad drinking problem-which was evident. The only other thing I clearly remember is that he was going to be watching every hearing as he wasn’t able to attend in person and it was important for him to know how it turned out. If they had joint custody CPS wouldn’t automatically be involved in his life - SHE would have a CPS case plan but that doesn’t mean he would. If the child was removed from her custody at all by CPS - they would call him first. Anyway - the chat was shut down before the case concluded. Mostly he just talked with us other court watchers about our opinions on the other cases. And I guess I shouldn’t assume it was her soon to be ex - it was one of her exes - because that’s all I know for sure.

Agree with your comment. I thought she was very fake and I think the judge was too soft. Pathetic.

A lot of people live double lives. The one is reality and the other is social media. It’s why I personally only have YT as “social media”. I give the biggest eye rolls and side eyes at people I know irl from what they post on FB etc (I looks at my hubbys when he’s on there scanning updates from friends lol)

Yes um learning social media is fake

@@Sue-gq7xv slow learner hahaha

🤣

Her social media presence should have gotten her a year on probation.

I know lol 😂 I was like who’s this person in the zoom meeting? It doesn’t look anything like her pictures

Absolutely!!!!!

No excuse for leniency on this case! Judge Boyd is usually tougher than this...don't know why she dropped the ball on this.

@@MG_turtle A man would have been sentenced to time in jail, no doubt.

She's still in her 304 phase, her 2 children don't matter.

I’ve seen Judge Boyd give harsher sentences for what seemed less , can’t agree with her on this one , this Diva is the definition of a Narcissist 😎

So sorry - hope you have healed from all the trauma.

Agreed. I am so tired of all these criminals using their childhood trauma as an excuse. I know way too many people like you, and like myself, who went through horrendous trauma and abuse and managed to live crime free lives. In my opinion, I had the perfect example of what not to do. I also was called a slut and told to go f myself when I was 9 years old. I wanted to prove to the world I was not a slut. When I was pregnant with my son, my first thought was that I didn't want him to grow up on welfare like I did. So I went to beauty college while I was pregnant. I passed my state board exam when he was 2 weeks old. I ended up not loving the profession, so I went to college full time at night while I worked full time during the day to get a degree in business. I did the opposite of what was done to me. I did not spank because that could lead to physical abuse. I tried not to ever yell, but have to admit that I do have a snapping point when I get pushed too far, so I did yell a handful of times. I never tried hard drugs because I knew the only way to guarantee I wouldn't end up addicted to drugs like my mother was to never try them. I think I did OK because my son just got his PhD in Bioengineering from U-Penn, and landed a 6 figure job. He has zero debt, not even a car pqyment, and he will never have to struggle financially like I did as a single parent my whole life. The fact that he absolutely loves his work is icing on the cake. I feel like my life mission is complete. I broke the cycle of welfare, drugs, trauma, abuse, and neglect.

Thank you for sharing your experience, I was raised by mom who never said much and an alcoholic father, that was an anger drunk! Punch me till I passed out for about 12 years! Now happily married with two kids, God Bless you for being stronger than your abuser!

Absolutely agree with your comment. I don't care about her past. She made bad choices and now. She's just getting probation what a joke the judge was too soft.

Thanks for making this about you

i agree

Nah, this outcome was extremely appropriate. Just use your brain for a second. 1) She has to pay restitution to her victim, which is what's most important. If she's in jail, she can't make money and give it to him. 2) She has probation for 10 YEARS. That mans if she messes up AT ALL for a decade then she goes right into prison to serve a ten year sentence. Alternatively, if she never does a single thing wrong for a full 10 years, then I'd say she's proven she doesn't need to be punished any more. That's the best thing for society, for everyone. 3) If the judge tried to sentence her to prison, what do you think would happen, little buddy? She would withdraw her plea and they would need to go through with a whole trial. None of the admissions she made as a part of the plea deal would be legally admissible in her trial, and she may very well receive absolutely no punishment at all, genius. But even if she WAS convicted and sentenced to prison at the end of it, the victim would have to wait for probably YEARS before they began to receive compensation. They would have this hanging over their head, unresolved, for years. They would need to go through the retraumatization of watching the trial AND being interrogated on the witness stand. The prosecutors would need to spend an enornous amount of time on this case, and they only have a finite amount of time. That means less time spent on murder cases or cases like that cop that raped an infant. The courts also have a finite caseload they can oversee, which means that many other people would have their own justice delayed while they waited for this to finish. And then, the best case scenario? Taxpayers need to pay for all of this prosecution, and then they have to pay to keep her in jail. Those jails also have a finite amount of space, so the more people like this that go in, the earlier we have to release other people who are even worse. All of that, just for the chance that maybe some random juror thinks she's pretty and they refuse to convict. You never know what's going to happen when something goes to an actual trial. The prosecutors and judge did the absolute best possible thing here. I shudder to think what our justice system would look like if someone as stupid as you was in charge. Maybe just keep your big dumb mouth shut in the future whenever the big boys are talking about a topic you don't understand.

@@psn64sat63 I know a lot about the process of the justice system. I myself, am a crime victim. You should not pick and choose who to send to prison. Keep your child-like insults to yourself!

@@loriwelch9015 it is an absolute requirement that judges pick and choose who to send to prison, dumbass. If everyone who committed a crime went to prison, we would not be able to house them or pay for them

In Texas, every day in court is totally different. Not even lawyers that go before the same judge daily can never guess the outcome.

Nothing is wrong with Judge Boyd. I think all so-called evidence was not presented. This horrible woman will screw up and be put in jail....soon.

Don’t forget the camel toe yoga pants at hearing #2

Watch your mouth regarding Judge Boyd

It’s not the Judge’s fault. The defence lawyer delayed the cases and the defendant was twice positive for alcohol. The judge would have preferred to get it over and done with but she didn’t have adequate defence and that would have allowed the defendant to appeal.

No she’s fantastic !!! Not her fault it was the defence lawyer!

me too i do not understand this outcome any update ?

That's hard core, but I'm not sure I disagree

@@jamesmonahan1819 having lost a few, dui is Russian roulette. At the end of the day, driving drunk is a choice.

And completely selfish and are irresponsible aholes 🤨​@@mydobie130

Always don't drive if you have been consuming alcohol. Don't break the law in any way.

⁠@@mydobie130: NO! Driving drunk is Attempted Murder! My two boys were killed when a driver hit them head on at night. He was drunk and they are still dead! Miss Priss here, the party princess doesn’t care about anyone except herself.Her license should be revoked permanently.

She'll probably screw up, especially with that suspended license. Then she'll get the time she deserves.

Nah, its extremely appropriate. Just use your brain for a second. 1) She has to pay restitution to her victim, which is what's most important. If she's in jail, she can't make money and give it to him. 2) She has probation for 10 YEARS. That mans if she messes up AT ALL for a decade then she goes right into prison to serve a ten year sentence. Alternatively, if she never does a single thing wrong for a full 10 years, then I'd say she's proven she doesn't need to be punished any more. That's the best thing for society, for everyone. 3) If the judge tried to sentence her to prison, what do you think would happen, little buddy? She would withdraw her plea and they would need to go through with a whole trial. None of the admissions she made as a part of the plea deal would be legally admissible in her trial, and she may very well receive absolutely no punishment at all, genius. But even if she WAS convicted and sentenced to prison at the end of it, the victim would have to wait for probably YEARS before they began to receive compensation. They would have this hanging over their head, unresolved, for years. They would need to go through the retraumatization of watching the trial AND being interrogated on the witness stand. The prosecutors would need to spend an enornous amount of time on this case, and they only have a finite amount of time. That means less time spent on murder cases or cases like that cop that raped an infant. The courts also have a finite caseload they can oversee, which means that many other people would have their own justice delayed while they waited for this to finish. And then, the best case scenario? Taxpayers need to pay for all of this prosecution, and then they have to pay to keep her in jail. Those jails also have a finite amount of space, so the more people like this that go in, the earlier we have to release other people who are even worse. All of that, just for the chance that maybe some random juror thinks she's pretty and they refuse to convict. You never know what's going to happen when something goes to an actual trial. The prosecutors and judge did the absolute best possible thing here. I shudder to think what our justice system would look like if someone as stupid as you was in charge. Maybe just keep your big dumb mouth shut in the future whenever the big boys are talking about a topic you don't understand.

State did ask for 10 years in prison.

the survivor was at EVERY hearing, he held the gate open for her at the last hearing. He's a true class act. She deserves so much more than what she got, Ive never been so disappointed in a judge.

What is a SCRAM??

@@bridgetclement2968per google, SCRAM Systems provides alcohol monitoring and location monitoring solutions for community corrections and evidence-based practices.

@@bridgetclement2968 the GPS ankle monitor that detects alcohol in sweat.

​@bridgetclement2968 an ankle bracelet that monitors your sweat for alcohol.

Hugs to you!

I’m so sorry.

I'm so sorry that you had to experience that.

Wow! You should have never had to deal with this. Commend your strength for being so unfairly devastated by someone else’s horrid actions & still being able to even watch a clip like this & be measured in your response. Very graceful. I wish all good things for you.

Blessings

I agree. Apparently it's a Texas thing.

Let me help you understand it. There was no sentencing phase. The case didn't go to trial. There was a plea deal. She pled guilty before a trial. The sentence was already determined prior to the plea, so there is no possible way that a victim impact statement could have affected things. The victim has already made their feelings known to the prosecutor, and the prosecutor is the one who camr up with the sentence when they proposed the plea deal. The victim impact statement is being put on the record now so that it can be taken into account if there ever is a sentencing for this crime in the future. You see, she's on probation for an entire decade. That means that if she messes up at all, a single time over the course of the next ten years, she will go to jail for a decade. The judge, when formally sentencing her after she messes up, will take the victim impact statement into account then. If she goes to jail and tries to get released on parole, then the parole board will also get to hear the victim impact statement before making their decision. This is all extremely appropriate and true justice. If she never messes up a single time for an entire decade, then she has demonstrated that she does not need any harsher corrective action to make her a producitve member of society. The most important thing is that she oays restitution to her victim. She can't possibly do that if she is in jail and not making any money. You would take food out of the mouth of her victim just to satisfy your desire to punish her? That's a little fucked up. Not to mention, if the judge goes against the plea agreement and sentenced her to jailtime, she would just withdraw her plea. None of the admissions she made about her guilt as a part of the plea deal could legally be used to convict her, so there is a very good chance that she would go free without any punishment at all. Even if she was convicted, you force the victim to live with the uncertainty of the trial for probably years. They are guaranteed to not receive and compensation for that entire duration. And they would be retraumatized by having to watch the trial and be interrogated on the witness stand. Then there is the temendous cost to society. Taxpayers need to be an enormous sum for the trial and her incarceration, but that's by far the least impactful part of it. Courts and judges are a finite resource. The time spent on this trial means that pther people will have to wait to get their own justice. Prosecutorial resources are similarly finite. Every minute that a prosecutor spends on this case is a minute that cannot be spent on the numerous murders, rapes, and child molestation cases that they constantly see. Much more terrible people may go free because of that, or they will offer even more egregious plea deals to real monsters because they just don't have the manpower to be certain of a conviction. So, please, before you get all agitated about some perceived injustice, or you want to offer some advice about a complex topic like this, think to yourself: do I actually understand this topic well enough to have a valid opinion about it? And the answer will invariably be no, because you're clearly a fucking moron, so you should leave things like this to the big boys from now on.

@@psn64sat63 wow.... rude much? I have a degree in AoJ. In the jurisdictions in which I have served, the impact statement is delivered before the sentencing. My statement was never agitated, dear. I was simply noting the difference. Have a blessed day.

@@MommeeMadre1 holy fuck. You have a related degree and you still don't understand something so basic?! Hun, the impact statement comes before sentencing in ALL jurisdictions. Sentencing just didn't happen here, little guy

Exactly. She made the choice to drink and drive. I have no sympathy for her whatsoever.

Yep. But she will just get away with it again.

Oh, I don't see how she won't be back.

​@@stormygal67I was just about to say that.

Agree 100%

10 years on probation. She'll violate probation guarantee it !!!

Exactly, she's only worried about herself.

she does not feel any remorse for what she did to that man physically and emotionally. that child will forever have trauma from the accident and after seeing what his father went through.

I couldn't agree more. Maybe it's time for the judge to retire. It appears as though she's just going through the motions without genuinely caring about the victims.

I agree. This is now the 3rd video where Judge Boyd has said she's going to revoke if the other 2 criminals didn't follow her direct orders, in both of those cases, neither did. Including a pregnant woman w 2 toddlers who kept giving positive drug tests while pregnant, left the jurisdiction, the 1st CPS worker stated she had a couch infront of the front door & the house was a mess. She goes on to have the baby, who suprise had drugs in his system & that "mother" picked up 2 more CPS cases, 1 for SA accusation & I forgot the other & Boyd didn't revoke then either, she gave her a month to get back to Bexar County. I use to respect her, but it seems she's not protecting society, toddlers & newborn babies. That makes me sick

Yep, time to unsubscribe.

Agree with your comment.

If that was her mom, or any of her loved ones, she would want the max penalty.

After this case I hope that Judge Boyd, doesnt go this soft on anyone again

Exactly. The judge has been soft the whole time.

I almost vomited over the sentences,

I agree. I am very disappointed in Judge Boyd.

These two survivors will have to carry the weight of HER choice to drive drunk for the rest of their lives. She gets to walk away. 2 years license suspension, and half of the term of probation only for the interlock. im so upset by judge Boyd dropping the ball on this big time.

I agree with your comment. Just disgusting that she got a slap on the wrist and then out there posted like it's no big deal. She strikes me as very cold-hearted and only seems to think about herself. And her apology did not sound sincere at all. And I don't buy it when she was talking about the lysol. Situation, give me a break can't believe the judge fell for that 1.