I appreciate that the interviewer let McKenna speak without too many interruptions.

Pat McKenna needs to get on more podcasts STAT

This great stuff. Pat McKenna needs more air time! F. Lee Bailey’s right hand man.

Facts! Pat McKenna is the man.

Oj's entire house inside and outside was IMMACULATE...Nothing out of place. Yet these pair of socks lying at the foot of his bed smh. Obviously planted. And they didn't find the blood on the socks until months later with EDTA. Our blood does not contain EDTA naturally so the logical conclusion is the blood came from the test tube.

So happy people who actually investigated this case and had an active hand in conducting keep sharing the truth. It is so irritating to hear folks who "just KNOW he did it" and refuse to review the facts that are so well documented.

One of the worst things I've heard during the trial from the media after the verdict was, well those black jurors wasn't going to convict OJ because they had to go back to their communities and live. And I was always yelling at my TV well what about the two white jurors on the jury. Since he's been found not guilty is nobody worried about them going back to their white communities. Won't they be ostracized by the white community for voting not guilty. OJ didn't commit those murders, but when I was hearing lawyers who were so called expert lawyers saying on TV saying that about the black jurors as if they couldn't have made an intelligent decision if they thought he was guilty so because they had to go back to their black communities they let a killer go free. These were lawyers saying this after the verdict. And it pissed me off, because that jury gave up 9 almost 10 months of their lives to serve on a jury and do their civic duty but lawyers were on TV trashing their decision because they didn't agree with it smh.

This is one of the BEST podcasts I have ever enjoyed!

Everyone felt that “something isn’t right” about Fuhrman. I was a kid but immediately felt that creepiness when he was on the stand.

In the prelim hearing, Mark Furman testified that he saw “them” (referring to two gloves). Then during the trial when he was asked about again, he changed his testimony.. Bailey caught him in the lie.

Why won't people look at both sides of the case?

I love Pat McKenna. He's unapologetic. He will argue you down about OJ'S guilt because he put In the work. I feel sorry for the Brown's and Goldman's loss but if the man's innocent he's innocent. He went on Kim Goldman's podcast and stayed true where as lon Cryer and Don Aldana folded. Even Scheck has since folded

I always thought that lying detective lied about alot more than just planting the glove.

She was killed by drug dealers. RIP

Everyone overlooks all the deep connections to Scientology and the Tate murder case from 25 years earlier. Marsha Clark for example had been married to a high ranking Scientologist while the defendant OJ Simpson also belonged to the Church at one time. Charles Manson had also been a Scientologist.

OJ maybe an a hole and not a very nice person. Personally I never liked him but after watching the entire case I was convinced he did not kill these people. He is just didn’t have time or skill to kill two people and still go golfing in Chicago. Things just didn’t add up.

I would love to see a JFK type movie that focuses on Pats OJ investigation

Furhman also had a friendship with Nicole that was never brought into testimony. They were friends

Solid George Floyd metaphor Mr. McKenna!! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 R.I.P. to Mr. F Lee Baily!! #juicesjusticeleague

Serial killer Glen Rogers had been working for and partying with Nicole. He admitted to killing them.

I was really young when the murder happened and I honestly don’t know who did it but this is interesting

I had a bloody nose recently and it took two days to get all the blood off of me I was finding it on my forearm and other random places. How could you cut someone's head off and be clean on a flight in 30 mins.... How!?

Fuhrman has prior incidents of planting evidence? I can find nothing about that online.

Why does it matter if he’s white? The question was incoherent and not relatable. Mr. McKenna’s race religion is not and was not on trial and he’s already addressed. I’m logging off now bc of the female call. Great show. I’m happy I caught it.

Loved the juice when I was a kid read/watched just about everything on this case over the years and I’ve always been open to every theory I’ve heard of. One thing that I don’t understand are OJ’s actions after the murders occurred after the police questioned him. [im not all in on OJ being the murderer nor am I all in on OJ being innocent] When he was staying at R Kardashians house; If you were innocent, why would you want to kill yourself? Anyone else would do everything they could to let everyone know that they were in fact innocent. Instead he told AC to drive him to Nicole’s grave so he could kill himself there. He couldn’t drive up to the cemetery because they had quite a few police officers there. He was on the phone telling Tom Lange he was going to kill himself. At that point a lot of people were pointing the finger at OJ and he was informed of the blood evidence tying him to both scenes. If he didn’t do it, and everyone’s telling him he did it, that could possibly drive someone crazy enough to act like that. So at that point, He could be thinking everyone thinks I did it so it doesn’t matter anymore I’m done anyways. But I’ve always thought someone else could have done it but he was there and possibly intervened at some point. Or someone told him what happened and he drove over to the scene. He was always rolling by Nicole’s house to see if she was home and with somebody, maybe he just happened to come by during the struggle and the reason he hasn’t said anything was because he told someone to go over there. Anything could have happened but he had to have been there regardless.

Is this the guy who was with Casey Anthony after her release? If so I wouldn’t give his video the time of day

Things that the prosecution never tried to investigate or prove. If the bronco was not parked out on Rockingham, when Simpson was getting in the limo, then parked it on OJ flew to Chicago and before the detectives arrived at O’Jays residence? This is something the prosecution never considered. The cut on O’Jays middle finger on his left hand was so small its impossible for that cut to drip all that blood droplets the LAPD claimed. They found Bundy and Rockingham. You can tell by looking at that cut that that was not from a knife blade that was razor sharp. You can see the cut has some jagged edges in it and are so thin Which in fact comes from getting cut by glass. In fact, O.J. cut his own finger on the murder weapon. It would in fact opened up the wound to the thickness of the blade. He also would’ve needed stitches. If OJ did not park the bronco outside as residence, how did he drip blood from the back of where the bronco was parked through the Rockingham gate and down his driveway? And why didn’t he drip blood inside his house on the carpet if he in fact was the dark figure who Allen Park witnessed walk in the house? Oj did not kill Ron Goldman. If OJ in fact had killed Ron Goldman O.J. would have had a swollen face from getting punched by Ron. The prosecution claims that Ron’s had many defensive wounds on his hands and arms as we can see in the photos. However, if you look at the defensive wounds on Ron he has rounded - like gouges on all 4 of his knuckles. Those gouges did not come from hitting another human being in the cranium and, or face region. That’s impossible because OJ would have suffered similar damage to his own head and face. The scraps on Ron’s hands came from him tussling around in the dirt and tile area, most likely punches that missed the assailant(s) face and skimmed a rougher surface like the ground or trees. That just doesn’t happen with someone’s knuckles in a bare knuckle street fight unless they skimmed concrete, brick, and or asphalt of some type. The Bruno Molly shoes. The prosecution could approve that O.J. in fact owned a pair of those shoes. They tried to use photos of Simpson, wearing some type of dress shoe to prove their point, but they never could in fact prove that he owned a specific pair that match the impressions at the crime scene. The prosecution acts like OJ is the only one in the entire world that owned a pair of Bruno Molly shoes in California. And why didn’t the prosecution introduce the other footprint that was found at the Bundy scene that was a size 10 1/2 with a completely different impression pattern? One of the topics at the LAPD, corners office and prosecution completely. We’re not experienced in was the understanding of sudden death combat and how it relates to edge weapons (knives). How the murders took place, who was killed first, why didn’t anyone here the victims screaming, the use of one knife or two, how it was held, and more.

Oj cut his hand before before Chicago

I wish Gus would engage the caller a bit more instead the long dead air. It’s weird Why does it matter if he’s white. This is weird

Someone was behind Kato's room right after the murder, who was that if not oj. We would have to believe that was not in any way connected to the murder. Clearly this was not Furman at 1050

After 10 months sequestered I would have my opinion formed and got out from there too

Twenty Years Younger and a Blackbelt in Karate

Not only did OJ did not have the time to do this, but even if he tried to do this within that short time frame, you’d have to be so lucky to have everything worked perfectly. Meaning you couldn’t get one red light driving back to Rockingham, what if he would’ve gotten beat up by Ron Goldman there are so many things that would have to perfectly planned for him to pull this off in that timeframe

Could you have gotten a better English speaker to give opinions. OJ was there. But he did not commit the crime. Glen did, possibly paid off by Kardasian Kardasian was still angry about OJ’s fling with his X.

The most startling video of it all: m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fNGVmriW08zRo6M.html

When will I be allowed to remove my mask 😂

49:50

Doesn't Casey Anthony work for this guy?

The argument now is that the Bruno magli footprint proves oj was guilty. A saw an article in some major media source I don't remember which one, with a writer conclusively stating oj is guilty due to the footprint

It always make me laugh that there are still people saying OJ Simpson is innocent. At this point I just want to say to them "Give it up." You can't even call the OJ Simpson case a whodunit. A whodunit means the evidence points to more than one suspect. In the Simpson case not a shred of evidence points to anyone person except OJ SImpson.

Furhman also had a friendship with Nicole that was never brought into testimony. They were friends