When Tesla cultists try physics: this video. 🤡🤣🤪🥳. He's also selling kits and free energy generators. The jokes writes itself.

1900

Lol, and people thought a pet monkey was driving the boat

Engineering to create more technology*

***** Second greatest genius in my opinion, I'd put Leonardo da Vinci as number 1 :) - undoubtedly the number 1 or 2 in the greatest painters of all time, probably the greatest mechanical engineer of all time,discovered newtons third law of motion 200 years before newton was born and his notes hint that he may have discovered evolution 300 years before charles darwin.

YTEngineer I disagree. It is Leonardo Da Vinci who invented useless contraptions. Not one invention of Da Vinci's is used today in modern technology. Not one! Yet Tesla is in every modern gadget today. Every! True genius!

John Smith Not one eh? How about the ball bearings that are in almost every machine on the planet? Even in Nikola Tesla's electric motors and generators ;).

***** Do you remember which book? I'll give it a read. :)

Sujit Joshi Alas, no. I had read two or three books about Tesla at the time.

m8

Feliz láser

Tesla generator

I drive a honda and i find this funny. Tought the same

Lol

theLuigiFan0007 Updated model with even more capabilities - Nikola Tesla's Turbine

yea who asked him? the CIA or the military?

jokerrabit Both ... right after they took all of his good stuff and hid it from the public. His Wardenclyffe Tower scared the hell of of them. Energy from the solar wind. Free unlimited energy. They put a stop to that in a hurry.

Ramon Preston Nothing is "free", there is always a cost. Try running a powerful tesla machine in your home with out stuff plugged in.. The tesla coil powered everything that wasnt plugged in, raised hell with computer stuff. In the time when his lab was shut down people were not ready for the concept of free energy. Yet it isnt truly free. You still have to create power to run a tesla coil. You get a better free from solar or wind power. Yet you still have to create solar panels or live in a windy area with a created wind turbine.

Ramon Preston "they" hee hee.

dlwatib I believe that but No he didnt. Do some research. Hitler sent out two SS Generals acting as reporters. Nikola was murdered, made it to look natural, which is easy watch CSI...they then stole all his research. The General who did it even admitted to it

Ron Wylie not forgotten but hidden from the public

@@WheelieWheeliePink Exactly.

I wonder if he wasn't so far ahead of his time that we are still not able to understand his works

He was forgotten because he knew about free energy for everyone ,,powers that be !!

Forgotten and/or hidden - yet he not only has a Wikipedia page (I'd guess about 6-7 printed pages), but Wikipedia literally has a separate "Nikola Tesla in popular culture" page of probably about 3 pages printed. No question he was a brilliant guy, but spare us the conspiracy theories ...

TheGlitchyCorgi Cool thanks for that. I must look into critical speeds.

Does the speed in which these critical speed thresholds happen, sustain a diminishing returns kind of pattern? ID: 25,000 = critical speed 1, 50,000 = critical speed 2, 75,000 critical speed 3, 80,000 critical speed 4 yada yada? Or does it pattern in the opposite direction? 25,000 is 1 50,000 is 2 and 3 is 200,000?

Robert J. Wiltshire The first pattern (25k, 50k, etc.).

So you might be able to give me some insights into turbine design?

+RobwithaB Tag the person you want to respond so they do! I would be glad to give it a shot in helping you, although i doubt your inquiry was directed at me

The Tesla Turbine gets plenty of torque. Charlie Solis has proven it with the Tesla turbines they make, even with just room temp compressed air. Real 3.75hp and 6.22ft-lbs of torque at only 4150 from a dyno test and real sustained 1.2kW electrical load outputs on all the way down to 70psi even. At low rpm AND it’s geared UP to the generators too. Not down like everyone insists you have to with the Tesla turbine. Tesla never says you have to spin them fast for them to be efficient. That’s a misnomer about the Tesla turbine. He only says that it working as a pump sees increased performance as rpm is increased, just like ALL centrifugal pumps. But for the turbine Tesla says you must reduce the slip to increase the efficiency. This is done by increasing the surface area, and decreasing the discs spacing to get laminar flow regimes between the discs even with gasses. “Because irrelevant of the viscosity of the fluid, ALL FLUIDS, liquids and gases, can be forced to flow in highly efficient low Reynolds number laminar flow regimes given the right initial conditions and “flow cavity” parameters, such that turbulent boundary layer slip is eliminated, stream separation and counterflow is eliminated, rapid pressure changes from turbulence resulting in noise losses that can lead to early fatigue on discs and parts is eliminated, etc.”

Most air powered dental drills turn at 400k on a simple fan style turbine. Speed isn't the big factor. Torque is what's needed to perform work. An air dental drill's speed drops by around 40% as soon as it touches a hard surface. An electric hand piece only travels at 200k but has no noticeable drop in speed when it contacts a surface.

frank_f thats a neat story you got there and all but I was just saying for essentially a toy 80k is pretty impressive. I was just saying in this scenario I was thinking like 20k tops

I was surprised that it didn't fly apart at that speed.

@@dbmail545 Yeah - I was backing away from the screen when it started to go above 10K rpm. Wow.

@@StCreed You can watch it safely, no need to back away from your screen. Americans....

I was thinking that to. i wonder if u can drift it with a engine/motor of some sort and use it as wacum sucker to create wacum ?

I was thinking replacing jet turbines with this. Think Ram Jet on steroids. 97 to 98% eff. good gravy!

What was the psi at the inlet?

lwblack64 This engine type have practically no usefull torque/power. Yea it can spin light object rly rly fast. But the moment it try to move anything even a bit heavier or of there is actual resistance it just die out. So generally this turbine is just for being pretty much art not anything usefull. And some electric or combustion engine must power air pump firstly. So why waste power o weird system it's much better to just connect electric engine directly to fan.

+Czorńy Lisek G'day, Well, y'see, traditionally, the way Engineers deal with Contraptions which produce Stitpotsfull of RPMs with buggar-all Torque, like say for example Gas-Turboshaft Engines..., they generally fit a whopping set of Reduction-Gears, so their Turbine is free to spin at 60,000, 70,000 or 90,000 RPM, while the Airscrew revolves at 2,000 Turns per Minute, or so, and the Heligoflopter Rotor achieves 300 - 500 RPM... The challenge, apparently, is to cobble-up a Wind-Turbine to drive an Air Compressor, maybe using a length of 2-Metre Diameter Gas-Pipe as a Tower/Air Reservoir..., feeding a Tesla-Turbine running an Alternator, as a way of storing Wind-Power to generate Ekectrickities ON DEMAND, as "Dispatchable Power"... This has great possibilities, if nyet pissabolities, at the very least. Such is Life, Have a good one, ;-p Ciao !

a 3 foot turbine disc turning at 80k rpm would have it's moving along at roughly 8,563mph a little over mach 11.

FOAD RIGHTNOW what about Newton?

and kanye west?

FOAD RIGHTNOW Donald J Trump

lol newton ! lmfao

+FuckYouGooglePlus .....huh?

And Viktor Schauberger

You mean the guy who designed hundreds of flying machines, but failed to discover the Bernoulli principle? This motor is just as useless to power, as Da Vinci drawings are to flight. Once a load is applied this motor fails; just like all fairy tale KZfaq energy videos. Their basis of continuum is momentum.

@@bornfree2237 I believe his successes in AC power generation, motor design and invention of the radio are enough to warrant my accolades.

You should also read about the ancient scientists of india

Davinki??

😎I understood that... nice

Egt rapidly rises through past 815

Well, that's part of how it would work. In essence, he was proposing to use the atmosphere as the dielectric and the earth as the conductor in a huge coaxial cable! Hit the right frequency, and the Earth/atmosphere system will resonate like a tuned circuit. Or a singing wine-glass. The energy exchange would be pretty good, but for it to work there could be no radio broadcasts. Any strong localized broadcast would disrupt the sky-field, and the transmission effect would become unsteady or even cease. You could have had free power broadcast all over your World, or you could have had only Radio. Guess being entertained is worth more than free power.

Jason Duffy nice concept, the first one ive seen what could be applied beyond a theory that makes sense

@@pirobot668beta Advertisements will destroy the human race.

@@pirobot668beta except that the system resonant frequency wouldn't be affected by frequencies above that. Besides, Tesla's wireless power was to use the longitudinal wave to pull power and radio uses the transverse. Radios would still be able to work, but Tesla's system could be used as a carrier wave to transmit programming along with power.

little baffled but somehow it makes sense considering that crystal radio circuits I read on work on EM wave energy when they are in proper resonance somewhere somehow that might be possible

Edison hired brilliant young engineers. They made the cool toys, not Edison. His genius was in matching the right people to the right project. Edison also had a very good grasp of what the public would like to see re: modern miracles. Only two Edison patents are know: Using electromagnets to separate iron from trash and a type of collapsible concrete forms for making houses. They both smart, but in very different ways.

It's statements like this... two things. it makes you seem smarter than you are, but only to people dumber than you. It tells the people as smart or smarter, that you're not only dumb, but willing to prove yourself so in order to... what?

Yes,and he got nothing.....

If you possess the knowledge for good. You are entitled to share such knowledge. I am a very strong man physically. people expect me to help lift push and pull things all the time because of my skill. You have a brilliant brain? you better share it punk. 70-80-90 + years of life goes very fast.

Correct. That is why we do not see it. Simple.

AnonymousTubes He was a great man, among the greatest of men. Check out this updated version of the turbine, it shows all of its capabilities - Nikola Tesla's Turbine

Tesla turbine generator - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/msypiqVlvdulhIE.html

Great idea, take a lot of electricity, turn an electric motor with it, use the motor to turn a compressor and then use the air to run a Tesla turbine hooked to a generator that will produce way less energy than you started with to run your compressor. What would be the point?

Won't work

Even Tesla’s initial prototypes got out 100-200 HP, nevermind what what they can do with modern materials. Edison nuked Tesla’s investor possibilities back then, and Modern indistries are just super entrenched on blades.

Charlie Solis has proven real power and torque outputs even at low rpm. 2.75kW and 6.22ft-lbs of torque at only 4150rpm on only 150psi room temp compressed air and 1200watt electrical load output tests on all the way down to only 65psi... all on a plastic and aluminum Tesla Turbine prototype…. AND it’s geared UP to the generators too. Not down like everyone insists you have to with the Tesla turbine! For the turbine Tesla says you must reduce the slip to increase output and thus the efficiency. This is done by increasing the surface area, and decreasing the discs spacing to get laminar flow regimes between the discs even with gasses. “Because irrelevant of the viscosity of the fluid, ALL FLUIDS, liquids and gases, can be forced to flow in highly efficient low Reynolds number laminar flow regimes given the right initial conditions and “flow cavity” parameters, such that turbulent boundary layer slip is eliminated, stream separation and counterflow is eliminated, rapid pressure changes from turbulence resulting in noise losses that can lead to early fatigue on discs and parts is eliminated, etc.”

I would imagine so yes, the rotation of the air would center the discs.

What you used for air force pls?

And WHO confiscated ALL his writings, documents, the works? With respect to you friend. Think "deeper."

I also wonder if there was a lightening storm the time of his death.

Dont know about lightning storm but murder maybe

Edison was a fraud. His assistant lewis latimer was a genius but via jp morgan, edison stole the credit for all things electric in those days.

@paul austin at the Time When Tesla invented AC electricity , Edison used to electrocuted animals ( An Elephant ) in public using AC electricity to show How dangerous it is. Just to over through Tesla that much cruelty is shown by industrialist. Radio is invented by him, Marconi was his apprentice during invented radio, Marconi patented that on his own name

Tesla designed his turbine to have a tesla valve at each inlet to prevent backflow. At this scale it does not matter but a larger turbine would need something.

Awesome, thanks for replying!

could you provide the blueprint? i would like to make one my own :)

YTEngineer the valve he made was designed to use a fuel source.. he even shows how you can get around the pressure issues by having a spark chamber, the valve was a flashback arrestor

It may seem like a cool turbine, but it's terrible for actual purposeful work because its efficiency plummets under load.

jason vallance ,

jason vallance Yeah sorry as some one who un the turbomachines, i have to say the tesla turbine is... Not great to put it nicely.

Charlie Solis has a few dyno acceleration tests that show the power and torque curves of his Tesla Turbine builds. 3.75 horsepower and 6.22 ft-lbs of torque at only 4150rpm. As well as real electrical load output tests up to 1.2kW.

@@nono547 the Tesla turbine works just fine. Just because other people don’t understand how to design it properly does NOT mean it doesn’t work well or effectively. Charlie Solis is proving all the common myths about them wrong. Real power and torque outputs at low rpm. AND his is geared UP to the generators too not down like everyone insists it has to be used because “it only gets low torque at high RPMs, but since you have to gear it down there’s too much losses for it to be practical…” he’s already proven all those claims are completely false.

+gageoninja Hehehe, gotta love VTEC POWER BABY! I'd love to revive VTEC on a massive American engine one day, I love Honda all the same, but I can't imagine how practical and badass a Ford Coyote engine would be when VTEC kicks in.

3:51 and then add some NOS

+gageoninja yo!

+gageoninja VTEC YO!

4 years late but I am laughing my azz off bro!!!!

You’re right a pylon bearing impregnated light weight ceramics place in perfect nth degree race in - race out+ 36 volts turning from my 12 volt drill thus itself plus 4 ratio

@@keitharnold1381 lmao

If you design them correctly they produce plenty of torque even at low RPMs. Charlie solis has proven it with Tesla turbine dyno and electrical load tests. Peak 3.75 horsepower and 6.22 ft-lbs of torque at only 4150 rpm and 150 psi room temp compressed air. AND real sustained 1.2kW electric load tests on even all the way down to 67psi!

It would only be good as a hybrid motor, it's not good for directly running things.. the goal was to reduce friction so power generation is more efficient, it wasn't to make anything move directly.. you can modify it and add fins, but that drops it's efficiency

Draka Von there are ways to reduce eddy currents down to almost nothing or even have it work in your favor if you do things in the right way

@@greenthizzle4 where do you get the idea it isn’t for driving Anything directly? Tesla applied for a patent on a car powered by a Tesla turbine. It was turned down with needed revisions and he never resubmitted it. It’s in the “Unresolved Patents of Nikola Tesla” book from the museum. Also he has 5 improvements patents for the turbine that he patented in 1921, 10 years after the original and a decade of R&D. Patents GB 186,082 (improved discs stack, It DOES NOT include “fins” or blades to get added torque, what everyone erroneously claims are needed), GB 186,083 (improved combustion + steam turbine with recoup boiler on the exhaust), GB 186,084 (combustion steam super heater and multi fluid concentric mixing nozzle for the turbine where the steam jet envelopes the combustion exhaust always drawing a slight vacuum on the pipe to counter centrifugal head in the turbine), GB 174,544 (hybrid Tesla and Parsons reaction turbine for recouping the “reheat factor” and increasing overall thermodynamic efficiency. This one is meant for ships and boats), US 1,655,114 (VTOL Aerial Apparatus powered by Tesla turbines that counter rotate from the main lifting propeller to cancel out any gyroscopic effects of the prop that even helicopters still have to counteract). I think there’s one more I’m forgetting too but anyway… Tesla 100% meant for them to directly drive loads. Charlie Solis makes real actual working, power and torque outputting even at low rpm, TesTurs that are more than capable of directly driving a load. Dyno’d at +4.25kW between only 6000-8000rpm and peak torque of 6.22ft-lbs of torque at only 4150 rpm all with a plastic and aluminum TesTur run on room temp compressed air and never going over 40psi at the nozzle either 🤭 Even did real electrical load and efficiency tests all the way up to 2.65kW at 9500 rpm and never exceeding 20psi at the nozzle.

I suspect at 'peak efficiency' the air pressure coming out is nowhere near sufficient. It sounds like there's an exact pressure to achieve maximum surface drag. I'm confused why these aren't used. Why wouldn't you just have a compressor fill a tank and then stick a generator on it.. and have the generator power the compressor to keep the loop. Obvious there's energy loss and you'd eventually need to plug in the compressor to keep the tank pressurized.. so you swap the tank. Compressed nitrogen costs pennies. Why aren't there portable generators using this?

@@sammadison1172 because you live in a planet controlled by the oil industry's

@@sammadison1172 because energy density is a big problem of engineering. Compressed air does a poor job of energy density, and compressing the air costs more energy than you can recover from the gas. It's more weight, size, and cost efficient to run AA batteries than pneumatic power. We used to do pneumatic power where applicable for big jobs. For instance, a trompe being used to power pneumatic tools for a nearby mine. It's simply more effective to use electricity.

My thoughts exactly, perhaps adding a vacuum could make it even more efficient

@@jordanruark3993 if they implemented a vacuum wouldn’t that increase the output force caused by the air?

FordBoy332 lol