Rimmy: Yoink!

Rimmy: hold my rice

@@mohammedeladli6863 i hope you're not iranian

*Wako Pirates has entered the chat*

@@fakdaruhani5067 and whats the problem if he is

Kim Jong-un how bout u give us rice Lord Kim Jong-Un?? The North Korean People are starving my leige!

@@mo.ryu04 you fool you've angered him by making him think about anything but himself, we all now must suffer

@GAMING OF RED ARMY Why RICE?! When you can always eat your fellow man.

I will eat you kim... 😑🍚

Kim I will give you 33 rice if you de nuclearize.

You’re one in a billion 👍

Dylan Morgan literally

Bullshit. There are no men wielding weapons that are twice their size and also no scantily-clad warrior girls in this game. This game isn't historically accurate.

Woosh

@@zennoix9984 ah fuck, sorry bro i read you original comment wrong

I believe the term we are looking for is "Chinese bullshit".

it's kind of broken though, you should atleast not be able to instantly cancel the trade without giving back the territory^^

@@tommerker8063 well too be fair if i offered to pay you a bag of rice for your mudhut and then you give me the mudhut first and i dont give the rice now that i own it i dont really have to give it back unless ya make me

Sun Tzu still fought. Rimmy didn't. Therefore, Rimmy > Sun Tzu

Conquer with capital

It wasn't actually one turn. I have no idea why he randomly said "in one turn" you can clearly see that it's not just 1 turn.

he specifically said “in 1 turn” at the 12 minute mark. Which I’m guessing is the source of the confusion. Indeed it wasn’t in turn 1.

@@thespanishinquisition4078 I believe he was referring to his southern and northern most territories, both of which he acquired in the same turn.

@@thespanishinquisition4078 he meant he annexed enough territory in one turn to propel himself far enough to instantly be able to lay claim to the empire

@@52nerfguy It's kinda funny though. I mean in 115 turns if you play the game normally you'll have a much bigger empire.

Like somalian pirate captain when he sees a nice fat oil tanker.

@@MrVlad12340 i am de capten nao

FuckFaceUnstoppable or an African when they see a European farmer with food

@@placeholder8768 hippity hoppity that farm is now my property

That's innacurate as f bro. Everyone knows that the African warlord laughs as his slave child soldier strikes gold.

ur literally everywhere man

whattup cuban Justin Y

How many channels are you subscribed to wtf??

You sneaky british brat

Opium, what?....... *OH HOLY MOTHERFUCKING SHIT*

Hold my rice bowl

They have to go through the west and east roman empire to go to britannia.

About 1700 years later.

I'd say hold my rice wine...since that is most certainly what he has with all the rice just pouring out of his ears at this point.

@ column formation is actually much easier while doing the worm.

Xiahou Dun: Am I a joke to you?

Sun Jian: I have a highly capable family.

Jane Hrahan I play Medieval 2, I’m not sure I get it. Does the AI not cheat there?

@@rivaldi3956 All Total War AI cheats when it comes to very hard/legendary difficulty, but the Medieval 2 AI is the most held back by the core mechanics of the game unlike in other games. For example, the AI has to abide by the recruitment system the player has, so they can't just shit out entire stacks of high tier knights like they could in say Shogun 2. Here's a better explanation, the time stamp is 11:53. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/b6pdhaaLnNLacmw.html

@@kill4monney213 Though their eco "if left unchecked" will make a fuckery out of you. Basically you cannot hang back and play smooth in any Total War.

That’s why medieval 2 is the easiest total war game

**Laughs in Mongolian**

Killing a fuckton of sparrows is Mao and shit until the locusts come in swarms and rekt all those crops.

I remember once that as russia, i saw the maratha becoming powerful having taken over most of persia, i took i think 3 or 4 stacks of men through persia and took over all of india, cause i was bored and i had already taken over most of europe at that point and had converted them to othordoxy. Then i handed over my inidan territory to the mughals or the punjabi, cant remember, but the Maratha eventually rebbeled in their cores and omce again took everything over so i had to go back there and do the same, but this time i kept it. Hell i remember that when i invaded the first time i took a world map that i had and drew on it the direction my armys where going to take and my exact way of advance Btw after this comment i found the map and it still has pen markings in india and pakistan.

@Ice why

@Ice No loyalty to great Korea, no rice

peacefully? lol

I wouldnt say it was "peacefully" xd

Hey I got nuc, want some ?

Lol

Hopit they also need to rebalance buying territories alltogether. But this is CA we really shouldn’t ever expect their AI not to suck.

I agree with your suggestion that doing a double cross should create a permanent rivalry with that person, and a huge impact to others who know about the deal. Secondly, the AI should probably be more stingly about specific provinces - for example, if it's low on rice, don't trade a rice province. But I don't think the overall price of provinces is the problem - it's more about the AI's memory.

Yeah I can see this being an easy patch. Just exponentially increase the diplomatic penalty of prematurely canceling agreements in a given time span.

Just some tweaks - and the trustworthyness effect should probably be more harmful(but be greatly diminished or erased in those catch 22 situations where you vassalize and have to defend your vassal or break the vassalize which can both be untrustworthy). If trustworthyness also caused more corruption and a public order debuff(say -1 for every 5 untrustworthyness) in your areas it may help stop you from breaking deals. And breaking deals should clearly have a bigger untrustworthy effect, it means you are a greedy liar and that shit should come back to haunt you.

rjbonkow agreed, especially in a period of war, where promises were the highest guaranty you could give. The Ai should treat you like Jamie Lenister after wards: „Sure you saved the kingdom from a tyrant and put us in his position, but you also broke an oath, thus we wont ever trust you again and never really respect you.

Eat the rice, pay the price.

"I'm altering the quote, pray I don't alter it any further"

Not really. It is only true when you are the first one become Emperor. When Ai become Emperor before you, things still progress normally. That's what happened in my campaign.

That is such a dumb system. How is it not immersion breaking when some with half of your territories gets the same title.

@@Fankas2000 Because Emperor is not the highest title you can get. If you become the undisputed power in the land, you become Emperor of the Three Kingdoms. It's historically accurate. When Cao Pi forced Emperor Xian to abdicate and dissolve the Han Dynasty to form Wei, Liu Bei--who definitely had half the territory that Wei had--responded by declaring himself Emperor of Shu-Han. After that, Sun Quan--who had around 2 thirds of what Wei had--declared himself Emperor of Wu.

Fankas2000 And besides, the things required for emperor declaration doesn’t really include number of territories. So technically, it’s very much possible to play tall in this total war game and win solely through client states and trade. Not immersion breaking at all in my opinion.

Wholesome Nuggets don’t forget to steal their delicious tea

They would love it so much they started sharing the opiums with the fishes!

Kodok Warrior can you imagine fishes on opium haha

too soon

Ghost I bet you think you’re funny

TSB will need to find a way to buy countries not even programmed into the game now

What’s this about elector counts?

Cao Cao* and welcome to the rice field!

Fool me 3 times fuck the peace sign

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gdWVgqyJ2s7Ygmw.html

Hans*

That’s why he’s a really fat fatty

A real Cao Mengde! Though, how should the sparrow understand the ambitions of the swan?

that's because KoeiTecmo has lost all sight of how to make a good dynasty warriors game ever sine 6 came out.

No, there's no food in communism.

@Rui Rui true.