25k?

@@flat6fever680 I chescked and your right, more like 55K, now

@@jackjohnsen8506 I have a lead on one, an E model, for 65k between friends. Seller asking 75 but will do 65 for friend. It needs interior and the paint is an older re spray. No rust. Looks good. The motor has not been freshened up but runs well. So this one in what I would call fair to good is in that 65k range. To get up to the next level there is a quantum leap in cost.

Agreed!

I am wondering aswell. 🙄

same

😂😂😂 And Phenomenal, and spectacular

I was just about to ask "why"? Thanks for clarifying

add the Bronco to the list, and the 2door Jeep wrangler. :)

that one had 191 hp, and went like a rocket, for the day...

I still have the 53 year old Uniroyal "Rallye T3" spare in my '70 E, something about the nostalgia.

I'm resurrecting a Beige-Grey 1970 E, Targa, any chance this was yours?

@@jimsjeep91 Mine was an anthracite gray coupe. I sold it to some asians that were planning to ship it to Tokyo and resell it for $25K. I currently have a 2004 40 year Anniversary edition 911 with 22k miles but still miss my 1970 like an old girlfriend.

Move to New Jersey. Plenty of new gas stations are opening up and the state is very welcoming of classic cars. No emissions test required for cars 20 years old.

Don’t worry once governments realize that the ice bans are virtually impossible to implement without destroying their economies they will back off and all those car bans will be reversed/delayed indefinitely.

@@overbuiltlimited Sadly China dictates the end of all combustion technology they control all western governments

Uhhhh , sounds like plans . I believe somebody might plan that but the level of disruption to pull that off will be remarkable . I could be wrong but like most things I think they make It sound worse so people complain less when whatever they do happens . The logistics of everything you just quoted are wild . Living In NY I can't even begin to see how that could happen regardless of laws . The actual physics of it and change and adaptation to make that happen is nutty . If it were the case it isn't for any reason about ecology or the atmosphere . They would first stop making passenger cars that weighed as much as 10k lbs if anybody was actually serious regardless of how it's powered . There's a million ways to reduce OVERALL CONSUMPTION but it means stopping all sorts of companies making money so I will believe it when I see it . GM just invested a mess of money into the next generation V8 that will make more power then current V8s burning less fuel cleaner and without cyl deactivation. I cant see they would invest if that was coming to NY and CA the 2 biggest markets . Somehow I think the lawyers and bean counters at GM have some bead on what's coming over a random post saying don't invest in anything with an engine . A porsche like this with 40K ORIGINAL miles is not a problem compared to a new 10klb hummer that goes 0-60 in 4 sec or whatever insanity using batteries. The electricity to push that hummer that fast comes from burning something or burning something to build a windmill made of stuff being pulled from the ground . No actual reason to get rid of much of the old stuff . Changing new stuff sure . But some of It, what your saying is people talking , you can make laws that people can only breath their own farts , but I dont see how you enforce them .

Yes and I hear they will next cap all the worlds volcanoes, climate changers you know .