Can you upload Federer vs Coric Indian Wells 2018 highlights? Thank you :)

Match already requested. ;)

Impossible to upload here: www.patreon.com/posts/indian-wells-sf-103923772?Link&

Overall in 2005 and 2006, his confidence was sky high... that he used to go in this zone or 5th gear... some commentators termed it "the mighty Fed" - that is just out of the world flow mode of tennis. Yes, Nadal on clay was the only thing troubling him - but it definitely was out of the world experience to watch.

@@kalyantpv Federer is the perfect example of hard work + immense talent orchestrated at the highest level. Once he won his first Wimbledon title in 2003 which he always dreamed of winning as a kid, unlike most players who fall off after relieving themselves of all the pressure and stress, Federer kept consistently disciplining himself to get better and better as not just an athlete but also a great tactician on the court. And once he started to win major after major in his "zone" with the ridiculous streak, it became a routine for him. That's why if you watch many match highlights of his 2004-2006 seasons you rarely see him get animated like Rafa on many of his points won against his opponents. There's no doubt that in his mind he felt great after winning those points, but he clearly was not the same player after Peter Carter died, being able to turn off his emotions at his will. That's actually very scary. Federer was already a ridiculous kinetic-chain tennis monster the moment he decided to get rid of his short-tempered habits after Peter Carter died. It just took him about a year and a half to unleash all of his potentials starting at 2003 Wimbledon.

But even at his prime there 2006 he did his first backhand winner in the very last game.

Can't argue with that. He's the reason why I started to play tennis seriously back in 2005-2006

Federer is the perfect example of hard work + immense talent orchestrated at the highest level. Once he won his first Wimbledon title in 2003 which he always dreamed of winning as a kid, unlike most players who fall off after relieving themselves of all the pressure and stress, Federer kept consistently disciplining himself to get better and better as not just an athlete but also a great tactician on the court. And once he started to win major after major in his "zone" with the ridiculous streak, it became a routine for him. That's why if you watch many match highlights of his 2004-2006 seasons you rarely see him get animated like Rafa on many of his points won against his opponents. There's no doubt that in his mind he felt great after winning those points, but he clearly was not the same player after Peter Carter died, being able to turn off his emotions at his will. That's actually very scary. Federer was already a ridiculous kinetic-chain tennis monster the moment he decided to get rid of his short-tempered habits after Peter Carter died. It just took him about a year and a half to unleash all of his potentials starting at 2003 Wimbledon.

でもジョコビッチなら対策して必ずフェデラーに勝ちます

In 2006 Nadal was already at this peak. With his booming serve, and flat, penetrating groundstrokes, Federer still won in straights! This version of Federer set him up for colossal success against Nadal in the coming years!

20 yo djokovic beat him literally enxt year which was still in his peak btw

Djokovic is GOAT

Don't forget about the court speed. The court played really fast in that match. The problem was that they started slowing down the speed of the courts in 2008 - what played a huge factor in Fed's performances later on. AO 2009 was shitty slow. In comparison AO 2017 court played ultra fast (plus lighter balls), which helped Federer a lot.

​​​@@user-en1pq3ib7eyou're wrong and have no proof of what you're saying except your unshakable love for Federer. Courts started slowing down in the mid 90s due to matches being too serve dominated. The Paris masters started slowing down its surface after the 1993 final. Wimbledon changed the composition of the grass after the 2001 edition.

Federer played at a very high level during the 2009 AO final except in the 5th set, I suggest you rewatch it. And if you don't see the level, well sue your optician. AO got more spin friendly in 2008 ? Probably, yes. You can see to the naked eye balls bounced higher and both finalists were players who are very comfortable hitting at shoulder height. But slower ? I don't know, you have no proof. Let's use the stats that we have to figure out what the surface change modified in terms of playing conditions. Two important stats to estimate the speed of a surface are the average rally length and the ace rate. A fast courts will encourage shorter rallies and more aces while a slower court will generally do the opposite. For the 2007 AO, I managed to calculate the average rally length of 6 matches : final, both semis and 3 of the 4 quarter finals. The average I got when I aggregated the numbers was 4.47 shots per point. I did the same for 2008 with the same amount of matches played at the same stage of the tournament, and I got 4.36. So rallies were actually slightly shorter in 2008, but 0.11 is too small of a difference to tell if 2008 was faster. Now let's look at the ace percentage. For the 6 matches I used for the 2007 edition, the ace % was 8.82 while for 2008 it was 8.57. So this time, there were slightly more aces in the 2007 matches than in 2008. But again, the gap is too small. Based on these stats, we cannot assert that the Rebound Ace was faster than the Plexicushion, at least not from 2007 to 2008.

@@user-cy6xl3vd3f Did you actually rewatch these matches and counted?

@@smathieu it depends. Some of these matches were charted on a website called tennis abstract where you can see every bit of stat from the winners count to the type of shots used during the match. One tab was dedicated to the shot by shot description of the match. For rallies being at least 4 strokes, the rally length was directly indicated below the description making it easier to calculate everything. So I basically counted every point and shot and then divided the number of shots by the number of points to get the average rally length of each match. Some other matches weren't charted on this website so I had to look them up on KZfaq and watched them entirely, writing down the rally length of each point and then calculating the same way. For example that's what I did for Nadal vs Nieminen, AO 2008 QF.

Thanks!

But almost all the bh winners Fed hit in AO17 final are towards Nadal's forehand after engaging in crosscourt battle

Federer first in his group, Nadal second in the other.

😂😂😂😂 how this nadal 20 ans Federer 25

Nadal was 20 here and had won the FO twice in addition to having made the Wimbledon final. Maybe you should watch the video instead of writing whatever suits your opinion, because the tennis showed here is hella good.