Appreciate Sigma downsizing so many lenses, would love to see a pancake for X mount that competes with the Fuji one

I always appreciated the 'holy trinity' of APSC lenses Sigma had, but coupled with some other lenses and a zoom or two, that's a lot of gear. So I always hoped, especially after the excellent 18-50 f2.8 zoom, that Sigma would create a holy trinity of zooms. I wouldn't need anything else if those lenses were good enough. So I'm really glad to see this hope beginning to come true... Now waiting for a 50-150 or 50-200...

Loving that recent sigma witchcraft, I'd love a tiny 18-35/2 now

They’ve got a great formula for videos. I’m looking for an ultrawide for the XH2s and of course I naturally gravitate towards their reviews.

Perfect gimbal lens, well done Sigma!

Desperately need this for Canon

Another practical review of an excellent wide angle lens, for my a6400, in a way slightly torn between the Sigma and Tamron, however given how helpful Sigma has been to Sony apsc owners, will be purchasing this lens when it becomes available in Australia.

Nice review! I'd be interested in seeing a comparison between this lens and the Tamron 11-20 when both are focused farther than 1-2 meters. Using test charts is great for most lenses but for UWA ones you really need to get up close to them which puts UWA optics at disadvantage as they don't usually perform at their best when focused up close.

You two are just masters of your craft!

Ah, the Plena unit of measure. (chef’s kiss) Great vid as always.

Nice photos and video work in this one ☺the performance of this lens looks good enough to me!

The boys are at it again! Looks like a decent small lens 🎉

It was tested and compared that the A6700 sensor is just the A7RV cropped. I’m sure there was an article out there. If it’s not the exact same it’s close enough according to those tests.

I routinely shoot 26MP RAW (m) mode on my A7RV with Sigma 16-28 and it’s excellent. Would be interesting to see how this smaller lighter lens compares in crop mode with same resolution. Looks like a great travel lens!

The a7R5 really is two cameras in one. I just went to a wedding and since I was traveling with a lot of stuff I brought my a7R5 and only apsc lenses to save room. I brought the Sony 10-20mm f4, Sigma 18-50mm f2.8, and the Sigma 56mm f1.4. I kind of wish I had brought the Sony 135mm f1.8, but the pictures turned out great anyway. I'm wondering how the image quality of this lens compares to the Sony 10-20mm f4. I really like the Sony 10-20mm, but being an f4, would I still recommend it or the Sigma to my friend.

After watching Christopher Frost's review of this lens I start to wonder wether you did not get a bad copy.

😊Whew ! I just bought the Tamron 11-20 a week before the Sigma was announced. I am glad that I made the right choice for my a6700. I have it paired with Sigma 18-50 and am travelling with it now. It is wonderful to be able to reduce the weight and the space . I also had room for Tamron 's 70-300 and a couple of small fast primes in my carry-on luggage.

This lens would not compromise any Nikon Z one. It's incomprehensible why another Sigma lens in this situations is not released for the Z mount

Seeing Chris’s face next to a hood free lens is what makes me click a video

I got the lens today , yes it's a very good lens as long as you are not planning to zoom in/out , especially when recording video. It loses focus terribly when zooming in/out on XT5 , and exposure is all over the place if you zoom no matter what your setting are .

idk guys, if judging by youtube reviews, Tamron 11-20mm don't seem like a better choice, it breathes noticeably, some reviews shows that it's less sharp than Sigma, and it's more expensive ;c but the sun stars seems to be better

Sigma are ones aware that people going for crop want a smaller, lighter and cheaper package. Overall been really happy with my other sigma lenses, so im sure this would be good also. Thanks for the review.

Classic great review saving a product contrast till the end.

i think all these crop sensor lenses that has X-mount needs to be tested on the 40 megapixel cus I mean why not... lets see if it works great or not

It's really interesting because I'm a landscape photographer and yeah I'm probably professional well less I am because I sell images and I also teach landscape photography. Sunflare is such an overrated attribute for a lens because there's so many times when we don't shoot into the sun it's such an overrated thing that I constantly see people reviewing. I could probably count five photos in the last two years where I've pointed it directly at the sun to get a flair. It's just not a thing that I rate in lenses and this is coming from someone that shoots landscapes three times a week. No, that's my little tantrum out that way. I think this is quite a good lens I use the 8 to 16 mm which is a fantastic lens. I also have the Viltrox 13 ..... Which I think is the most underrated wide-angle lens that Fuji make, and I'm using that on a Fujifilm XT5 for my Astro work and close at work, and I'll say a bokeh shot -I think it's a great lens to add to the Fujifilm collection I'm thinking, but I know they're making it in other brands as well

Sheesh, 2.8. Kinda 16-35 f4 full frame but that small and kinda weather sealed.

Compact With Some Compromises - dat what ma girlfriend says every evening

The last of the fall colors? That’s wild. Down here in Georgia, they haven’t even started yet. We still have summer heat on those days.

I looked at your review of the Tamron 10-20 (other review) and using screen shots of your bank note resolution tests (from both reviews), I see that the differences for Tamron and Fuji (in the other review) were not that dramatic. But for the Sigma (in this review) vs Tamron or Fuji, I see DRAMATIC difference in corner resolution in the wide angle, in favor of Sigma. (I paid special attention to the area behind the queen's head in the corner. In the Sigma, the verticle lines making up the background are clearly seen while for the Tamron and Fuji they are smeared. This was so different I thought they were different banknotes, but the serial numbers matched, so not different.) So it looks like I will go with the Sigma, but make sure not to get it wet. :-)

Thanks, Chris. I have it for my Fuji X-T5 and I really like its size. But I've not tried closeup like your leaf and droplet; I will now.

That'd look good on a Z50 or Zfc!

Grate review,thanks❤

How does this lens compare to the Sony E 10-20mm f4 beside the pricing, for landscape, Astro and video?

Great review PP guys!!

I watched my first sony Alpha6000 from your video review years ago.

Dammit, Sigma. I know it's a silly gripe, but I really wish they'd put the zoom ring the other way around. The majority of manufacturers do it that way. I had actually been thinking about picking up the Sony 10-18 f/4, but this makes a good proposition.

wow, nice lens and very useful review, thanks

But I wanted to hear Jordan talkaboot it too

IF this Sigma sharpness will be close to my Sony 15mm, F1,4 then will get one, definitely more versatility. Thank you for incredible introduction.

I'm in a state of shock, like Jordan must have been during this lens review video...Chris three or four times caught using a tripod...was this something that was written into his PetaPixel contract when he moved over from DPReview, must use tripods, and been recorded/photographed doing so. I thought from past comments, tripods were evil as far as Chris was concerned 😂.

Nice review, this lens is impressively small. I don't understand Sigma's thing of only putting a rubber seal on the lens mount but not elsewhere around the lens, what's the point? They've been doing that on many lenses recently, and on a lens that seems tailor made for landscape photography out in the field, it's a very strange omission.

How would compare to the Fujifilm 10-24?

Loved the fall colours…what did you record this on? Did I miss that? Looks like a great lens, especially for travel. And Chris; you need to do more cardio..try a series of 30 -60 second kettlebell swings starting with a pood and working up over time to 1.5 pood.

08:13 so Tamron. Wink, wink. Got it. Thanks. That’s what I was wondering; I get that you can’t be more clear about it for sponsorship / product sakes.

Bruh tamron and sigma are both missing a tele apsc for mirrorless I don’t get why it’s like they want to make the perfect kit minus one lens

The L mount version of this lens has been added to my wish list 😊

Now that there will be an RF version, it's time for me to pay attention!

I am a little sad this is not coming to MFT

How does it compare to the sony f4 pz 10-20mm?

Seems there is qiute a bit sample variation since the reviews are so different. C Frost for example says its razor sharp already at f2.8

I want to know the image quality comparison between xf8mm and sigma10-18.

Hi there! Great video! We’ve been using the Sony kit lens 16-50 for our music videos and are not dissatisfied at all but was wondering is this lens would give enough of a noticeable quality jump for shooting in lower light situations? What do you think?

Im impressed with this lens

An 18mm F2 pancake prime would also be amazing for Sony APS-C...Hoping that's coming soon.

can it be used in full frame mode like the old sony 10-18mm f4?

Definitely getting it for my X-H2S.

Awesome video! When are we gonna see the APSC-battle royale though?

Gran trabajo, por favor, para un usuario de Fujifilm, xt3, cuál es más recomendable en cuanto a calidad de imagen, este Sigma o el fujinon 10-24? Muchas gracias!

Nice video thank you! I just wanted to ask you if Tamron was better and you answered me! 😀

Flaring is the worst at 18mm, at 10 it subsides quite a lot, which wasn't mentioned. The sun stars at f/22 are also quite amazing as per other reviews

Great review - are you sharing your sample shots ?

How is the distortion for street and architectural ?

The breathing thing was slick

I seen both of your reviews on sigma 10-18 and 16-28. I'm shooting on S1h. Which lense would you recommend out of those two?? Looking forward to your reply!

This is far from perfect, but it might have to be my ultra-wide choice due to the Samyang AF 12mm prime being a little too unrefined at this time. At $600, it would be the most expensive of my 6 Sigma contemporary lenses. My collection would be: 10-18, 18-50, 16, 23, 30, 56.

Most times I do use s35 lenses on ff Sonys for video and when ever I do it i use CIZ and everything works at 1.2 to r c 1.3 which is sick 😮‍💨😮‍💨

I wish canon allowed third party lens like this on their RF mount what a shame

Great review 🙏

Sounds like I keep my Fuji 10-24/4 better. Thx for the objective review.

This lens doesn't get vignette when it mounts on a full frame when using aps-c mode?

Great value 😁

you already have the 70-200 DG DN Sport on your hand, Right?

I wonder if this works in FF mode on a FF kind of like the Sony 10-18mm does at 13mm...

When does it come.out or is it already?

Would this lens good for real estate photography?

Can it be used on Olympus E-MkIII or OM 1 bodies?

what was that camera at 0:09 in the background?

Is it better than the 18mm from Fuji?

where is Jordan? that was not a question!

I want it in Z mount for Z30

Hold up, what'd you shoot this video on? Something new coming soon?

thanks!!

Hot crossed bun ghosts. Band name?

Can anyone imagefine having this as a full-frame option. That would be dope...

I can't get it out of my head when he called us "pedophiles" 😂😂

Help me understand. Who is the costumer for this lens. Less than 2x zoom so most cameras will have enough megapixels to make digital crops. Sony 11mm f1.8 gives more light.

I was hoping for Tamron

How would it perform in a FF sensor? 🧐

How is the manual focus ring? Is it capable of linear speed and repeatable focus? Knowing that is crucial for video applications

This would be such a nice lens for MFT!

I dont get why tf no one reviews how the zoom action looks like on video.

thanks for the video. I’m 16-35 GM user. How do you think the difference between the two? Is 10-18mm comparable to 16-35GM?

Best APS-C Sony mirrorless camera is.. a7R5

Wow.

The dammed PLENA reference, nooooooo.

Noob question. Does this lens fit on a Canon 80d. I know it works on APSC, but I've searching the webs to see if there is anything connecting this to an 80d, with no luck, so it's making me wonder if it doesn't. Appreciate the help.

nice!

Anyone else wish this is available for M43?

The tamron has pretty bad field Is curvature

Would there be a business case to being out for canon m mount? Surely it doesnt cost much to add a mount version.