I think this is one of the very few times I have actually seen Zizek let anyone else speak

I wish there was more of Peter Sloterdijk on KZfaq, in English.

"Truth is more important than life."

YEEES !!! I LOVE PETER AND ZIZEK IS JUST TOO FUNNY

I love that Zizek always pleads for more time to speak and interact with people. You know that he is there for the discussions and the talks. Besides, I had not heart much of or about Mr. Sloterdijk yet. I interested to read him and hear more of him now. Thanks for the upload Mr. Sloterdijk.

The most interesting and rich conversation I heard in a long time, honestly.

thank you for this recording

Being a Zizek fan, I think Sloterdijk had the greatest insights here.

16:08 the fact that she misunderstood Sloterdijk’s literal words so crucially makes me wonder what else she misheard 😅

This is so good They actually talked

"The only distintive about the West in regard to colonialism is that the West developed the tools to fight it": Z finally said it.

Sie in der Mitte,ich hätte meine Häkelsachen mitgenommen,das ist so goldig und das Gespräch wunderbar.Thank you.Super Niveau.Philosophie must stay.

power couple

Wow, this was great!

It's been so long since I read nietzsche that it really felt like the clouds parting hearing the idea that it is a point of modesty to propose a hypothesis.

Great conversation

Great 👍

This debate is like dream come true.

crossover of the century

36:10 the counter-transendence of renouncing the immersion into the world of phenomena

It is good to be native German speaker, i could never learn this hell of a language to a point where I would be able to enjoy this massive literature and philosophy entirely

Me like Sloterdijk's giggling from time to time. But not only this. His idea of _a civilisation of culture_ is both at the same time : Intriguingly seductive, but a dead horse at same time. The moment we try to apply the process needed in this case to be started we undoubtedly will meet the full force of resistance of culture and traditions themselves. *Eher geht ein Kamel durch ein Nadelöhr*

2 most important contemporary continental philosophers.

finally

The message: leave your miserable and little world of percepción, and incorporate reality to it…. Make room for contraintuitive world….

what is zizzek views on john dewey educational philosphy? can anyone tell me

the last joke was perfect

Yes, I thought this was quite interesting, although they didn't talk much with each other. Still both philosophers shed one or the other beam of light on some of the phenomena we're witnessing or have witnessed. Great event! Also kudos to the Goethe institute and it's representative. Most recently it was reported that the German government intends to close down some of the world wide Goethe institutes (Bordeaux, Curitiba, Genoa, Lille, Osaka, Rotterdam, Trieste, Turin, Washington D.C.), allegedly or maybe even actually out of financial considerations. What a shame! Now, regarding the discussion section I was unpleasantly surprised that almost all of the questions came from native American speakers. The Slovenian students should speak up also, instead of being so shy; it does not matter that much when you struggle a bit with the language, dear friends!

Meine Lieblingsphilosophen😍😊 Hat Zizek wieder eine Sonnenbrille auf? Leider etwas weit weg die Kamera. :) "Everything is Ideology"

Truth is a modern cosmology of counter intuition

40:00 Dasein = lebensvelt re-immersion of thinking into reality

4:58 start

Finally a publication on this channel which isn't decades old. I shall listen very carefully whether he has recovered from being a nwo tool of sorts _(even if that be a misunderstanding, but just like with Nietzsche, that is all they want: forms of expression with a 90% likelihood of being misunderstood in favor of their agenda; addendum after finishing the video: he didn't really say much, so hard to tell)_ and how much of his formulative genius is lost when speaking english _(a lot !)_ . I hope this woman isn't going to interrupt much _(after finishing the video I was very pleasantly surprised by her in filling the role !)_ . If this swedish law she mentions becomes the norm everywhere, people like these two might consider holding a dialogue over a coffee table instead of on a stage. 37:10 - 44:05 This Gottfried Benn's categorization of people into monks and criminals is an extremely helpful sweeping generalization which relieves one, much more than without it, of wanting to convince others of _any_ truth. _Any_ conversation should start with some innocent sounding test questions to determine to which camp the other one roughly belongs. If he is a "criminal" there is no point in talking about _anything_ below the superficiality threshold.

Hello, can someone translate this video to spanish please? , thanks

Sloty ist unmöglich zu verstehn auf deutsch……haha!

I don't feel the need to defend the Slavoj's US case. Just because they're deciding what others decided first, and arrange after, social movements to argument the decisions as they've been initiated by the citizenship, it doesn't make you democratic and yes, the end groups of the populous never had and will never have access to the exercise of power. He disagrees with the mistifying truth, maybe that was a key to unlock his statement. He's always cunning like that, a psychologist. I appreciate him mostly for that, I can visualise his intentions, which seem too raw to not wear make-up. I don't agree with Sloterdyijk's sedimentarian approach, a Nietzschean type of fundamental romantism, but I do appreciate his case. You see, like most things, Truth is a journey, not a destination. You can't anchor yourself in a precise, made of dense matter future and pull your entire weight towards it. You need to sail like a Portuguese towards it and make sure that others can also see the stars you're guided by, and not point only towards the barrels with supplies. Truth looks more like sincerity because truth is the main slave of relevance. A common direction is important but more importantly, a commonly agreed relevance is empiric. That's how I would describe Peter's Truth that is more important than Life. You wanted to look for truth in the past? Yes, I would try self-scepticism without the poetry of the circumstantial present. Conviction is not a good thing if you're interested in the absolutist rhetoric that you should be followed instead of making yourself understood, yet, immaterial conviction is necessary. I would dare to say that modernism was never achieved, yet, most people already want to slaughter it. The reductionist side of syncretism dillutes the memory to the point of utter delusion and molests the sceptical method by translating it into eternal leftism. They refute the entire collection of ideas and policies for purely individualistic purposes. What is worse, they're fundamentalising the being and directs the ideological fundamentalism with the attitude that nobody else in the past ever doubted anything at all. For example, I do want to defend myself from the fatality of the identity politics. It is odious to contemplate at the fact that disagreeing becomes illegal again with the disgusting scent of some sort of neo-humanism that tends to protect multiculturalism and kills the human interest. Therefore, it is true that pure behaviourism is the only proposed education by the inherited Victorians, the only proposed virtue being virtuality. Like, the Americans go to the comedy store to laugh, not to get amused. I do fear a pandemic of psycopathical projection, they're not aware sympathy is just that and the lack of empathy.

Ein Prachtstück an tiefgreifendem Gedankenwalzer. Herr Slotterdjek zusammen mit dem entrücktesten Denker hat es so wonnevoll gefunden. Inspirierende Schönheit.

Why the hell are al l interesting Videos in damn audio shape

1:12:00

So you're tellin me that you ain't G.K Chesterton?!

Questions 1:24:04

11:16

the moderator reminds me too much of my postgrad advisor

they might be really brilliant, but they suck at making their thoughts clear and coherent

The police sirens 😂

Great start with the first question. Sloterdijk: "What if God himself turns out to be our most persistent lie?" Žižek: "what?" MODERATOR: "What if God turns a more persistent liar? Time to reply!!" at 16:08 wtf

Sloterdijk praat soos n ou man, ek hou van hom.

49:45 zizek's dirty joke

sorry, but I don't think you were really able to engage in a conversation, although it would be difficult indeed for that to happen; Zizek is rarelly clear about his own thinking when speaking in this kind of context...

What is it lately about these immensely incompetent interviewers?

28:56 this joke 😂

incredible conversation. i'm sorry for the next thing being the only thing i give a f+ck to write here, but it is really itching in my brain: that mediator is so out of her element. during all the first 1 hour and 20 min, it's so cringy to notice her. most of her laugh responses are so absolutely obvious to her unconfortability with the things being said, which in my opinion is entirely because she is much more close (in the sense of running from truth) to those specific ecologists zizek mentions and despises than to these two respectable human beings talking about things

6:11 neo-what-ic ??

Samma hat der Peter die Socken vergessen?

Wieso leuchtet Sloterdijk?

die zwei großen grauen prädikativierer treffen sich auf einer bühne - schön, danke dafür! if perception is a seduction, i'll just keep seducing ... the ontologist in me would rather offer to think about the term distortion instead. further more yes, there is no matter of things, but most certainly material things...

31:05 "There were no white people who went to Africa kidnapping their slaves". This is false. Europeans absolutely engaged in slave raiding. "Why this focus?" Because the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade was uniquely horrific. Not only were millions starved or drowned across the Middle Passage, but slaves on American plantations were cut off from their own languages and traditions and could not marry, unlike domestic slaves in Africa, for example. "The West was the only civilization which systematically developed a movement to abolish slavery." Sorry, also false. Ancient China attempted to abolish slavery at least twice, during both the Qin and Xin dynasties. And many societies, like the Inca, never had slavery. Comrade Žižek has been reading too much Douglas Murray.

Die Philosophie ist tot!!

I'm from Germany and I have to admit that Sloterdijk and the German philosophical talks shows never catched my interest. Too dry, too academic. My adult ADD didnt help either I suppose. Zizek on the other hand was and still is an engaging and interesting orator and thinker of our modern age, hence why I like him.

Not a great idea though by Žižek, to lump fascism with Chinese Confucianism, in my opinion.

Everything going on in the world and transphobia is Zizek’s biggest concern. Such a boomer

Yes the west did and does many horrible think.

Lets be real. Sloderdijk won this.

Is this philosophy?

HaHaHa Misses Baerbock as anchorwoman

It is slightly sad to see that two eminent thinkers mistake the expression of an emotional need for recognition beyond a mere understanding why by a trans person for an intellectual habit. But then they are old.

This is not philosophy, this is the asylum of vanity. This is a monologue of two men who are totally disconnected from each other and totally immersed in playing a wise clown.

Hannah Arendt ihr Englisch war Schlechter,aber sie kontaktierte dies auch.Wenn man einen gewissen Bekanntheitsgrad hat,sollte man darauf Beharren auch die Muttersprache in Diskussionen zum Besten zu geben.

1:42:00