People all my life have spewed hatred for the ruling class, and yet many of them want to hand them more and more power.

Vladimir Lenin summed it up quite nicely about 100 years ago when he said "The goal of Socialism is Communism."

Migrants being sent to Ireland as well even though the public complaining saying NO. The UN needs to be stopped NOW!

It is all about EVIL vs. GOOD. If you do not believe that we are in a fight for our lives, against evil, then you are not paying attention.

Americans are so nice and kind that they have given their country, our home, to foreign illiterates.

“Human beings are born with different capacities. If they are free, they are not equal. And if they are equal, they are not free.” ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

It took them 100 years but it looks like they're very close to fulfilling their aims...

Its ancient evolutionary battle between peoples who learned cattling and farming and started building, vs people who never learned that and had to rob for a living.

Most people miss the fact that modern Western socialism are Mensheviks. They split from the Bolsheviks and decided to gradually transform the Western civilisation into a Marxist utopia. Bolsheviks wanted to burn down, abolish everything with terror and militancy, and rebuild everything from scratch, like what the concentration camps of Xi's China where they re-educate and force China language on other ethic groups. The Mensheviks became modern social democrats, then from them the greens, the postmodernists, and finally the seemingly last metamorphosis, the Woke. I am from the Nordic countries here in Europe and I can tell you we are in deep shit, we will soon become like Cuba. Economic growth now is mostly zero and below, debt is growing exponentially. The free education and healthcare is no longer sustainable. Most of the EU parliament, more than 70% is lefty, they've managed to totally replace free speech with hate speech laws. Strong communistic regulations have been preventing growth everywhere in the EU. We're almost done with Enlightenment values, we have now Woke values. [the commie AI of google keeps deleting my responses, why would you delete below?!] There's no such thing as "pure capitalism", you either have it or you don't. Capitalism is not a manifesto written down by ideologues, it's basically free exchange of goods and services. Capitalism doesn't mean don't help the poor, don't provide free meals, but it means if you did, then someone had to pay for it. The idea that the lefties contributed to the human progress, including rights of workers, is basically silly and has no data backing it up. The easiest way to understand this is by reading history. You don't wish to read history? Ok then, take a good look at the socialist systems around the world. My point was, I was talking about a hidden, political agenda by the Mensheviks; they've been using Marx's so-called theory of alienation to slowly change Europe. First they introduce a small change, then enforce it, re-educate the young, the most vulnerable class in the society in terms of exploitation, to accept the change as the new normal, then move on to the next change; immediacy -> alienation -> re-appropriation. What are the changes? Mini steps toward a fully fledged Marxist autocracy. Now we've more laws against "words" than ever before in Europe. Words that have been redefined, distorted in such a way that discourage you from speaking them. Silencing the mass seems to be the ultimate goal of the Mensheviks. You don't get this until you suddenly find yourself in the mostly-lefty-courts of Europe.

"Communism doesn't work because people like to own things." ~ Frank Zappa

The only reason these Traitors haven't been given the dirt nap is the rest of us don't want to rot in prison.🙄

Those criminal fools are lost in greed…

It’s literally the philosophy of pride, envy, anger, and sloth.

Envy seeks to destroy the other rather than improving one’s self!

The great irony of socialism is that for all the ‘People’s Republic’ of this and ‘People’s Republic’ of that, it’s never about, by or for the people, is it?

This is being proven true by the events in UK right now.

“The problem with socialism is you eventually run out of everyone else’s money.”

Students need to be taught, "Great minds think for themselves."

the reason we have traditions is that what we learn from our mistakes must be learned by future generations.

YOU HAVE TO FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOMS

Communism, socialism, marxism, modern liberalism, collectivism, and so forth; all have at least one thing in common: ...they appeal to those who want something for nothing !!!

100% spot on. One hundred years of failure, and it's still, literally exactly the same.

Australia is going down that path the last 10 years, they squandering what was built over 100 years. Very sad after immigrating to here.

The problem is that it's much easier to cry and claim you're being oppressed than it is to actually work and create a good life for yourself.

“Watermelons,” green on the outside and red on the inside. I’m definitely gonna be using that one 😂

The euphemism of "socialism" doesn't name the enemies of humanity. It obscures it. "If you don't know who you are and don't identify your 🥸 enemies, you will lose EVERY battle." Sun Tzu

Many opposition leaders in India talks of social justice, equality but would never allow a downtrodden to occupy their chair.

"Build Back Better" Its right in our faces.

I did a Sociology & Philosophy degree about ten, fifth-teen years ago. I put Marxism into my email search bar for a laugh and found an essay on Class Polarisation and Marxism. It's stunning how impressionable you can be when you are ignorant.

"Some decades before the first big feminist revolution, a German economist was sitting in a posh London library, furiously penning a book in which he swore up and down that one day, factory workers, abused and oppressed by their bosses for so long, would rise up, throw the bosses out, and take over the factories. He and his coworker died without ever getting to see their vision enacted. As World War I ignited and sent Europe up in flames, those who had read the pair’s work and become enchanted with its utopian vision watched with baited breath to see if the prophecy would be fulfilled. And fulfilled it was...in Russia. For the moment, it would go no further. Through the late teens and early 20s, Europe picked up the pieces, mopped up the blood, and with somewhat mixed results, tried to get on with their lives. There were no workers’ revolts. There were no poor people eating rich people. There was just plain work. To be sure, some of it was supervised by evil bosses, and some of it was done by children. But there were still factories, and those factories still had workers and bosses. What went wrong? Well, for one thing, the workers had just spent five years shooting and bombing each other. There were considerably fewer of them than there had been when Marx wrote Das Kapital. But there was a bigger problem. The few workers that were left just weren’t interested in socialism; especially those who didn’t work in factories. The jobs they had were not great, and frankly their bosses weren’t that great either-but they were surviving. In some cases they were even thriving. Many of them had grown up in poverty, and fought bitterly to escape it. Biting the hand the fed them did not seem like a great idea. Marx was quite nonchalantly disowned by the very demographic he had claimed to speak for. So a tiny cabal of German philosophers, certain of Marx’s veracity, decided on a different pathway to get his influence to the masses. Marx himself had waited for it to happen naturally. Lenin and Trotsky had brought it through a messy revolution. Neither would work with the peoples of the West. Capitalism was too deeply ingrained in the collective psyche. The group of philosophers, known as the “Frankfurt School”, blamed this condition, naturally, on those who had suborned it: Coca-Cola, Ford Motor Company, A&P, Radio City Music Hall...the list goes on. There was no way they would be able to release society from the addictions it had created for itself. The whole system would have to come down. Only then could something new be built in it’s place. The thinkers of the Frankfurt School were under no illusions that this would be an easy task. The destruction of five thousand years of tradition would not happen overnight, and it would not happen by itself. The first step was to get people to not like their society-to see it the way the Frankfurt school did. Having been rejected by their original audience, the Frankfurt School thinkers needed a new proletariat. That hadn’t worked in the microcosm in which Marx had tried it. But, why, the thought occurred to them, stop with just one group? What if they could create many proletariats? After all, history had given them plenty of other collective grievances and class struggles. The Civil War was only about six decades gone. The working poor in their arguments could be expanded to the poor in general, who could then be turned against the robber barons. And of course, the suffragettes were still embroiled in their struggle against the patriarchy. So Herbert Markuse and his Frankfurt School companions set out to make their case. They began by advocating for the end of everything that seemed too “normal” to them: marriage, jobs, music, philosophy, art...if socialism hadn’t produced it, then it was evil. The very world around you, they would say today, is an illusion; a gilded cage, if not created, then at least aided and exploited, by those in power to keep you blinded to the fact that you were a serf, enslaved by a powerful elite who would always enjoy power and privilege at your expense, that you will never have access to. And just who were these mysterious oppressors? That depended on who these new socialists were talking to. If you were poor, it was men like Carnegie, Rockefeller, and the bands of powerful corporate executives who followed them. If you were black, it was the whites who had enslaved your grandparents, and would have enslaved you if not for the brave progressives that had fought for the Thirteenth Amendment. (It was, in fact, Republicans who had fought for the Thirteenth Amendment-I’ll discuss the progressives’ chameleon-like ability to change political positions a bit later.) And if you were a woman, it was the men in your lives who had deceived you into marrying them, forced you into roles decided for you by society, against your will, and were routinely having their way with you at night. These progressive thinkers possessed a unique ability to figure out what made you as an individual angry-to find your mental weak point, and then tell you a story that you could relate to; that pressed the right buttons. Then they would offer you their antidote to this oppression, which was always revolution, followed by Marxism. Steinem and her misandrist followers were a product of this movement. The feminism of the 1960s, and the feminism of today, are not really feminist at all. They were just one of many disparate movements that had been co-opted by the progressives, and amalgamated into one big proletariat. No longer was socialism a workers’ movement that sought control of factories-it was now a struggle by anyone who had a grievance, against whoever had aggrieved them." From my upcoming book, "Silver Towers and Flying Cars: The Illusion of Progressivism, and the Reality"

There is one who creates and one who destroys and those who follow each.

Because the greedy wants everything for them but not for everyone else.

Never forget that one of the S in USSR stood for Socialist. And somehow people still think socialism is a Good Idea.

Why? Because socialism is essentially envy politics as shown by Marx's best criticism of capitalism: that it is exploitative. Compared to what? Socialism is vastly more exploitative, as it wont share even with the middle class, which it calls the petty bourgeoisie. Envy seeks to tear down the other instead of improving oneself.

Marfret Thatcher said socialism works fine until you run out of other peoples money.

Little Boy: "Mummy, when I grow up I'm going to be a Socialist!" Mother: "Well, make your mind up, son. You can't do both."

This should be taught at all universities!

Venezuela, Cuba, and now Argentina used to be rich, vibrant countries; now, everyone except for those at the top, is POOR. Their wonderful countries were DESTROYED by Socialism.. I notice many of those quotes from the Communist Manifesto seem to be Coming True in the United States, as promoted by Congress. Not much difference---poverty, lack of freedom. CRT is the worst crime ever fostered on our innocent children, although changing a child's body to match their twisted sexual ideas is a close second. Tom DiLorenzo has a very clear mind and a very enjoyable sense of humor (something that is rare these days!) Thank you, Prof. DiLorenzo!

The enemies within

Thomas Paine put his finger on Christianity and Colonialialism.

they don't call it socialism here in America here they call it democracy.

I'm surprised yuutoobe didn't ban this video. How refreshing. This speaks to my heart.

Hey, I live in South Africa. I’m watching all this happen in front of my eyes. It’s not fun.

Total control and power through the annointed ones.

This should be mandatorily taught at high schools and colleges/universities nationwide!!!

I read in a Wilber smith novel many years ago that socialism creates the perfect society, as long as you have a capitalist to pay for it, in my opinion it summed it up so simply and perfectly

Private property is at the very base of ALL our Freedom and Liberty. It is even recognized as such is books 📚 like the Holy Bible, and older!

4 years later and we're past the "want to" part directly in the middle of the actually"doing it" part

"The goal of socialism IS communism." Vladimir Lenin Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face." Dr Thomas Sowell

Diversity of culture in close proximity equals conflict.

Exactly the same in the UK

It's not Socialists, it's Communists. It's not the same.

Remember Lenin said "The best & the quickest way to undermine any society is through it's music" Now go listen to any piece of "modern"western music.

This speech sadly is more actual than ever, cheers Sir!

This is crazy, living in 2024 I only see the acceleration of these ideologies especially because there going into our university’s and elementary schools it’s just crazy to think this might be our future. But that’s why I have faith in Christ and that he will keep all of the world safe during these hard times ❤ 🙏🏾

Thank God for truth tellers like him. I really REALLY hope it is enough to reverse the evils of post-modernism in the West.

This should be mandatory viewing in all high schools.

They tried in 1939, and are trying again now. Nothing really changes.

With capitalism, people are allowed to accumulate wealth through hard work and wise decisions and use it as they please. With socialism, the government owns everything and the leaders accumulate wealth through greed and use it as they please.

This is my Country's manifest. Much respect from Toronto Canada 🇨🇦

This needs to be shared by everyone who can.

There is no system that can adequately integrate human individual desires and natural urges with that of the collective good or vice versa. We simply go through historic cycles trying to get this balance held in perpetuity. But it cannot last in perpetuity. Generationally lessons are forgotten, and over time all things decay, and all things regrow. It is only our hubris that assumes that we reside outside of such patterns because we managed to separate ourselves from other animals and build defences against nature of intricate complexity. But this is all simply karma and dharmic lore unfolding. Empires rise and fall. All things have their beginnings, all things have their endings, all things flow from one state into another. The progressive embraces changes, the traditionalist fears them. Neither one is correct in their ways, they are simply a mutual arising, a coincidenta oppositorum. One polarity invokes the other. The socialist arises due to the abuse of the employer and the mistreatment of the worker from the aristocratically wealthy. It is the evils within master and slave dynamics, within hierarchical structures whereby tyranny invokes rebellion, rebellion invokes a demand for security, security invokes a demand for justice, justice distorts into inevitable tyranny. Consider that in today's world most people in the US and in developed nations work more hours and more days in a week than a medieval peasant. In a world where efficiency is supposed to be king, how then are people more over-worked and more under-valued? Without socialism as a counter to capitalism/conservatism then you end up with atrocities like the Ludlow Masacre. And don't forget that the nazis had above the entrance to concentration camps "Arbeit Macht Frei": "work will set you free". The establishment creates the pirate. Establishments become restrictive and by their nature create the need for avenues of freedom and autonomy. Consider that tech companies rose to such prominance due to the restrictions of the medieval system. Likewise the British Empire arose due to the restrictions of the Catholic Church. Progress is simply liberty from the old. Left field movements bring about such catalytic changes. Their mistake is in thinkkng that their model will be permanent, rather than see that they are simply a point of change, and not "The Change". Society did not know how to adjust to industrialism. Just as it does not know how to adjust to digitalisation. As E.O. Wilson aptly said "The real problem for humanity is that we have Paleolithic emotions, Medieval institutions, and God-like technology. And it is terrifically dangerous, and now approaching a point of crisis overall". We currently have medieval minds weildingbthe state powers of digital technology in very anti-human ways. Likewise we have many people using technology in very paleolithic ways i.e. the meeting of primal needs and desires. Very few are adapting to this shift from a higher-mind perspective. And it's companies like Vanguard and Blackrock that are shaking hands with the Pope... So take from that what you will. Likewise "king" Charles is deeply embedded with the WEF. The WEF likewise has grown out of Fabian Society ideas. So this friction between technocracy and that of state, and between globalism and that of national interest rises. And it likewise causes friction between sectarian globalist models that have had a prevelance for 2000 years. Roman Catholicism was infact globalism 1.0. The allure of digital technology is that every megalomaniaical ideology and institution wants to weild the truth stick. And to a point that it becomes so frenetic and pernicious that it infact threatens to topple all stabilities. No trust can maintain whilever no truth can be upheld. And this too is proof that divine lore supercedes any contraption or system that the human mind can create. God's lore is ultimate. And no one religion can fully comprehend it. Dharmic lore operates far differently than those of peevish minds and black hearts can ever understand. And they too are simply used by divine forces to bring about the necessary changes within our dimension. If the energies of a nation turn dark, then it is for a reason. Only the hubris of a natiins leader or it's people's assume that it is their will that determines the fate of their nation once it begins to collapse, whereas they will always deny that it was their will that caused it to collapse. Houses divided do not stand. When corporations and the aristocracy refuse to pay good wages, work their laborers fairly, pay taxes, and allow for prosperity for all, then ultimately the people become disenfranchised with the state, will refuse to work, skills and education declines, and a nation's morale is weakened and it's soul lost. Depression, addiction, mental and physical health declines and then comes the inevitable collapse of state and law and order; justice becomes tyranny. The US model of egoism and individualism above all cannot last, it has met with it's effects. The socialist model has likewise met with it's own insufficiencies to create a stable model. Theocratic models also have been disasterous. We are moving into a technocracy, and a fuedal technocracy at that. Where it is corporate syndicates and supra-national organisations which hold control over how the world functions, and no one government has the means to prevent this. Global technologies are in direct opposition to nation state leadership whilst at the same time beneficial to their economies and infrastructure. This has nothing to do with socialism or capitalism or any ideology, but all ideologies become a factor that can rise to prominence within those networks. Even the Catholic Church has been insurrected and reformed, so that should give enough indication of the fallibility of ideologies and institutions. Yet we trust is all such things as though they are permanent and solid constructions. When fairness is eroded in favour of monopolisation then there is inevitably going to be a counterswing of disgruntled people that must then fight back against the tyranny. The industrial age created two extreme evils: Fascism and Communism. Somehow we have not yet fully understood these perils, and further still never fully understood a significantly larger concern: Technocracy. Technocracy is a social model that was considered too extreme by Hitler. But at the scales of complexity that our societies have reached then it's outcome becomes inevitable by cause of necessity. The alternative becomes wars that push our species back into the medieval era at best, or into the stone age at worst.

How very appropriate considering what Canada has been subjected to for the past nine years.

Marxism, Communism and Socialism never end well. The Soviet Union, Cuba, Venezuela are just a few examples, more will follow as time moves on.

Excellent analysis. They do not change!

Anyone who doesn't believe that the goal of Socialism is to 'destroy', just needs to to take a quick trip to any Latin American country, or African country, or Asian country. All you need to do is look at the sidewalks, and the electrical infrastructure, and the way they (don't) maintain any private property.

Spot on !

The universities are lost.

Step 1: Destroy everything Step 2: ? Step 3: Utopia

WHY are everyone in the room laughing?? This is no joke!! The only joke is the one in the Whitehouse

No one needs to destroy a society that destroys itself. They just need to move in when the damage is done and the survivors care little who governs.

Gramsci had an admirer in U.S. academia who translated his works into English and formed a society to promote his views. He was a professor at Notre Dame University. His name was Joseph Buttigieg. And, yes, he was the father of our Secretary of Transportation and sometimes Presidential hopeful, Pete Buttigieg.

Nice to hear the truth of socialism

I have asked myself the same question about Capitalists who seem to want to destroy Western civilization. And Christianity must be accountable for its self-inflicted destruction.

Now everyone knows what the phrase " Build Back Better " means. In order to do this, they first have to destroy whatever is already there.

Stalin banning the Grapes of Wrath movie is so ironic. It was meant to side with communism.

At about 5:10 he talks about a student that said, "I didn't know there was more than one school of economic thought. I have trying to get people to see how the SCHOOLS only taught one kind of "Economic thought" for decades. Let me tell you, the Schools teach "Keynes" was right about everything". On top of that, it is AMAZING to me how LITTTLE of economics are even required for someone to get a degree in most anything. If they teach Economics at all they teach Keynes and Socialism GOOD, everything else BAD. They teach we must have EMPLOYEES of a secret Elite that own the worlds Central Banks "know what is best for us". They want THEM to set LOW LOW interest rates and have the "CREATE Money" from thin air and CHARGE INTEREST RATES on this non existent "money". The "Keynesian Scheme" is our downfall among other things. Another thing that amazes me is how our system has evolved to the point Americans and Academia are AFRAID of the Market system, They are scared to death of "free markets" and Free Trade. This is ONE or our INFLATION problems we have all of the time. Like Milton Friedman said, "Inflation is the Cruelest TAX of all". That is really what it is a TAX you cannot avoid on COUNTERFEIT MONEY.

"SOCIALISM MEANS SLAVERY," John Dalberg-Acton

Sounds like Labour and Conservative political parties. Vote REFORM UK

I loved this speech! Thank you Sir! I was the only non-Marxist/Maoist in my Honours Sociology studies---I was a functionalist and my Advisor was, as an elite theorist, the only non-Maoist gaculty member....until they got him fired, that is. 'And then there were none'. Needless to say, my dissertation never got past the defense.

"The problem with socialism is sooner or later you run out of someone else's money to spend ". Margret Thatcher

I've always seen the socialist types as the losers in society. They learn at an early age that to succeed in life in Western culture, you have to work hard and earn the things you want in life, such as a house, car, etc. They don't want to do that. They want someone else to do the work, and then they want to steal from them in the name of equity. No country has survived socialism intact, and I marvel that people are still falling for it. All I can think is that they know is doesn't work but don't care as long as they can take from the people that actually produce in society.

I'm a Univ of Alabama grad. Hate when we lose games to Auburn, but I have to give kudos to the Aubs for the Mises Institute. Wish Bama would start a F.A. Hayek type institute, then we'd have a lock on conservative economics throughout the U.S.

This guy Mises was quite the clairvoyant. 😊 DiLorenzo is brilliant - and great to listen to.

Save the Western history, Western hemisphere, and protect our Judeo-Christian values and traditions!

That is definitely what Trudeau is doing to Canada.

100% correct!! #labour&conservative!

I'm ashamed my fellow Brits could have fallen utterly under the thrall of such stupidity!

Happening in Ireland 😢

The early Guilds actually did oppose the factories. Their members' knowledge was passed from father to son, guaranteeing a continuous skilled working class in the village (and mothers, likewise, taught their daughters the domestic arts they knew, guaranteeing the continuation (to the degree possible , given the fluctuating exigencies of life) of family survival. The village on the whole saw threat from factory mechanization and also the fragmentation of skill to where a worker did not know how to make an entire object, but only one or two parts, making the villagers dependent upon the factory and increasingly disconnected from all aspects of production. I only mention this to say that some factories were burned by ("working class") villagers, so they weren't welcomed with open arms. Eventually as the factory system gained greater ground, they were seen as a necessary evil which nonetheless became an agent of mass change, some if which was also a good.

Cuba - or at least Havana - was run by the Mafia until Castro's revolution. So it seems to me that evils can come from either the Right or Left Wing. This rant against 'socialism' is far too generalising, and it's common among Americans especially to sweep under the title of 'socialism' anything they dislike, for example, social welfare, a national health service in which everyone has at least some care without having to empty their bank account (if they have one at all). Just a modicum of 'Socialism' is appropriate in the right place, so that one still has mostly free enterprise. His example of Sweden - or Scandinavia - speaks volumes as to how simplistic he is here. Those countries have the lowest infant mortality rates in the world, and put America to shame, and their high taxation in voluntary in the context of a democracy. They are not Marxist at all, so his blanket definition is ridiculous - unless you're an American.

One could say they're achieving their goals.

I think we could boil down the desire for socialism to something simple: Any economic system will have more losers than winners, and the losers will favour any system that gives them free stuff.

The government is supposed to work FOR the people not just do what they want against their wishes

Traitor is another word for outlaw communists and socialists in a country where freedom is the mainstay. Revolutionary is another word that fits. Neither belongs in America.

Please publish the document, it is very valuable and needs to be circulated

We have most of this in Finland. Already at 120k€ yearly income your direct tax goes close to 60%.

Playing out in front of our eyes.

Freedom is not free

Under the Biden administration or should I say Obama three ,we have an odd form of authoritarianism. The crackdown seems to be on political descent, not on criminality. We could use a little more authoritarian, policing of theft and property, crimes and a lot less on thought crimes..