death0intj It’s kinda funny lol because I would react the same way.

@Siahj The Sleepy Sorcerer now imagine being in small room, with delicate machinery around, where you can't walk off the cringe :)

and physicians

@@A-Ls1 I was reacting the same way

10:16 The dude shows his evil here. And the professor responds in the correct manner. Cringe. Just as if someone was insuinuating he was going to poke someone in their, well... ita obvious. Ew btw.

He really has😁😁

Not once, not twice, not even three times.... but severally.

@@thevalueofn6994 Haha that's what i was thinking!

🤣🤣

Do you maybe mean *severely?

Loses*

Tightens*

These are the people that have brought you channels like Numberphile and Computerphile.

Tis a brilliant channel from the professors of Nottingham university

lol

James Adams I could not agree more!!

M;H of course, cause Gordon doesn’t talk.

Bit insecure about the hair though.

@@ankavoskuilen1725 His personality and generally healthy looks more than more add up for the lack of hair. Phil really is a character. :D

Absolutely, right! Those fuckers are just as much charlatans as snake oil salespeople, faith healers and psychics. Just taking money from the gullible and ignorant.

@@hulldragon it actually makes me sad that they got enough money from those types of people to make this show

"energy" to them is VERY different than to people in science. They chuck that word in every "thoery" they have for anything

The word force is abused by these frauds almost as much as energy

exchange "energy" with scam and it begins to make sense.

Your real name is Biff.

Now Sherlock knows his weakness

His whole energetic field just changed very fast lol

I mean, don’t call that ridiculous, that’s a real thing.

@@lawrencecalablaster568 ah yes for sure. Demons are pretty real and scientific

43% of people believe anything when you put a number and a % in the mix

@@richardtickler8555 that only works 69% of the time. 42% of everyone knows that.

Ain't this the truth

@@richardtickler8555 60% of the time, it works every time.

sad truth, sometime even high school level scientific jargon is enough to fool people who are supposed to know high school level stuff

Yeah at times in the video I was questioning Brady's stance on the whole voodo magic

The dynamic between them both is hilarious

That was a fantastic interview actually!

He had more patience with Brady's comments than I could possibly have 🤣

And a Golden Raspberry for his idiotically hyperactive camera work.

Oh, come now, one can't be too reasonable.

Angry science rants are indeed awesome..

@Sandcastle • true, but he has got a point about scientists sometimes getting far to much traction/media attention for their personal unsubstantiated ideas due to their accomplishments in the field. You can trace a lot of the vitamin c woo right back to Linus Pauling and his weird personal obsession with it for instance-curing cancer/the common cold etc

Just shows Hollyweird is so out of touch.

The moment they said subatomic or double slit experiment lol

Trump

Reminds me of (insert political figure I dislike).

Why the Corona nonsense will become very dangerous in a nutshell.

@Gus Erland trump fits the quote.

@@dewdop 98% of modern politicians some are just not as overt as say others are

And probably do some jail time because of malpractice and endangering patient lives. But hey, in this crazy world we can expect that this will not happen to Paltrow.

1 guy with a pseudo PhD wrote a book on how vaccines cause autism and published it on Amazon. Look at the world now- as if having a verifiable doctorate matters; it's what the people believe, not what all other professionals think.

@@Hysteria98 I think that guy had a real phd but published that nonsense, lost his phd because of that and now he is still preaching that dangerous hypothesis, I am not sure. Anyway it just proves how gullible people can be.

But that's why there are clinical trials. To take a hypothesis and show its efficacy. The trials are done with controls and placebos to see if the results are being influenced by the experimenter or the subject. Prof. Moriarty is saying that's the standard that should be held to the guy at Goop.

If they would be just waiving their hands in the air, well, then would be not that much harm but to steal money from gullible patients.

@@fugreek reasonably tho xD

Open-mindedness is the last thing I would associate with him.

Dude, spoilers!

i've never heard him say that before xD

If only he had resisted for two seconds longer.

I thought the same thing lol

I just threw mine in the dishwasher with some Finish Quantum.

Damn my sub atomic paricles have left me glued to my couch

Well, he did worse to Sherlock.

calling philip moriarty professor moriarty is more cruel! haha

Lol, it did look like it was physically hurting him to listen to it at parts.

Moriarty deserves to get taken down a peg or two.

@@raykent3211 - Why?

exactly!

I was incredibly impressed as well

was super impressed! and all these points are extremely useful in terms of having a philosophical/spiritual discussion but as many people including Phil pointed out, it's problematic when it's framed as scientific consensus or even bearing scientific characteristics

I found it distinctly unimpressive - as well as highly annoying. It was basically just a phenomenological hammer to the forehead, saying "But how do you know you know?"

@@charcolew It's important to present a rebuttal like this in order to encourage a scientist to explain something complex in a tactful way. The goal is to inform people who might be less rational than a scientist in a way that doesn't consider them less intelligent. The path to a rational future is not only paved by exceptional education, it's paved by exceptional communication too.

Well, he didn't ridicule "every thing", just one.

He couldn't deal with the shear pretentiousness

he didn't say he wouldn't ridicule it, he just said he didn't want to come across a certain way

Well, think how he would've reacted if he _didn't_ care about that

Dang, with two sentences you changed my opinion entirely of that work. Yeah, if someone gave me the space and suggestion to get all goofy with my body, it would feel kind of freeing and therapeutic. No woo necessary.

Hope that went well

Wtf?why is your daughter watching goop

It’s never too late to put your children up for adoption!

Benjamin McCann To be fair, it isn’t anything intelligent women are watching either.

Time to have a serious discussion with your daughter.

and then silence.

the goop lab is fully operational

My blood moves, I'm magic! 👋😈 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I can feel the energy field of those angry brain cells

But they have been energetically cleaned of their energy, so now there’s nothing left for them to cry about. They are just empty little sacs waiting to be filled with some other goopy nonsense...

Lol yeah

he was talking about the frequency of urination.

That is exactly the moment I decided to up vote the video.

I was not expecting to hear "that's bollocks". I mean, it definitely is, but I wasn't expect him to say it in so few words :P

I'm gonna borrow this whenever I want to say BS

Stu McCabe Unfortunately my body is also travelling the fourth dimension too.

@@grenangle Do you have watched Interstellar too much?

Hans Noor who has the time?

@@grenangle I see what you did there.

@@grenangle We Tralfamadorians experience all points in time simultaneously.

Insofar this guy is right he can interact with the field of other people. Even over the wire. He's making the prof cringe by watching his video 🤣

A "Devil's advocate" perhaps? And I could sense the high blood pressure through my screen, like a thermometer...lol

haha "ignorant's advocate" is a great term for it XD

I was going to say something of the same sort! I loved Brady's devil's advocate role as much as the frustration of the Prof. :D :D

Ignorant by choice or not?

Someone has to do that in every context. If we don't, we could miss out a fuller understanding of the subject.

Pauli Exclusion Principle?

Intelligence is attractive.

It must be due to his “positive energy” lol ;)

In fairness, the energy guy is NOT handsome and I have no idea why they keep saying that.

YES. Science daddy can get it.

He does not have a ring. Maybe he doesn’t believe in it or is committed.

You could say out of goop...

John Galt it's "Zilch" according to the subtitles and google

Why 40k? Tzeench already existed in Warhammer fantasy.

$$$

People love trash and controversy. Not "us" .... but enough people.

I mean....we live in a neoliberal system, you know? profit has way more importance than so-called truths

It's a show? I thought it was just a disinfomercial.

It's intentional misinformation about science, sponsored by the owners (China).

But the 3rd dimension is only one dimension, it is different from 2d, 1d even 4d so even then they are wrong

@@phaeton5394 But you can't access life multidimensional without the body & since we didn't disprove ghost's yet, the statements stands. Even if we know, it does not work like that. The body is multidimensional, hence our sense development. If we were only 3 Dimensional, things like visions or dejavu's would not make any sense, since we couldn't "leave" our body. How many folds does your brain have, how many make up one dimension? And if the brain is part of the body, isn't the body multidimensional? I dont think much of these "labs" but the rethoric of the scam is pretty decent and uses every grey area to nest itself in. Gotta love marketing.

@@Chrisisplays Time to drink the goop

Chris;is The body isn’t “multi-dimensional.” We simply exist within 3 physical dimensions (up, down, forward/backward) and one temporal dimension (time, although there is much debate on what “time” actually is, though we experience and can measure it similarly to the three spacial dimensions). The word “dimension” literally describes physical space, not “layers of reality” or whatever. Further, though this wasn’t brought up: the allegory of “flat world” is used as an analogy to help describe what a higher numerical dimension might look to us in proportion to what our three physical dimensions would look like to a “second dimensional” being. It in no way validates the idea that “flat land” is real or even could be. It’s used to paint a mental picture and that’s all. So, no, literally nothing said has anything legitimacy at all.

@@atmassylphen6785 So is water not the 4th physical dimension, or does that only go for movie science? I don't know what you had in mind, but it is a given, that words are often theories until proven through experiments, tests, readings and countertests. Given, that, as you say, there is no 4th dimension our body exists in, the theory of goop still stands, that the 4th dimension can effect our body. In order to test that, we would have to be able to measure the 4th dimension, right? I think you're to biased and eager to see this as a fluctual input, but I agree, this stuff is often used to market products or services in the name of science nobody actually needs.

In the pure context, they are and it is-that's a bit of the many reasons that in the applied context, they aren't and it isn't.

ah yes, devil's advocate, an unsung job.

The camera guy was told to kind of give them the benefit of the doubt.

your basic science communication (y)

Same reason I like Joe Rogan even though he's a moron in a lot of different ways.

zippy zappa zeppo zorba zoolander weird nine is wasted.

Any inanimate molecular matter has an 'energy' field. Atomic Bonds have energy fields.

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call, suicide by words!

You must be the most effective energy storage device ever zippy =D

You just wait till he starts using it. Oh boy

That isn't necessarily bad, atl if they didn't lie about it.

@@Elmithian They HAVE TO LIE ABOUT IT to get the placebo effect. It's just bad. It's disgusting and unethical.

@@nunliski Not really? You just say this is a form of hypnosis that can help the body. No lie there.

@@Elmithian Wtf are you talking about? You're describing something other than what is depicted in the video. It's not salient to make the point that if they completely changed what they were doing then it might be ethical. Duh. Also, that's still a lie. There is no "helping of the body" occurring.

@@nunliski ...you really don't know what placebo is do you?

Funny, but I actually think you’re correct 😂

@@robertw1871 I know right! I swear he was actually trying to wind him up. It was pretty funny tho 😂

He was having a field day whith Phill! He was having so much fun messing around with him XD

He's using EXACTLY the type of arguments that these people would use. And I think Phil is responding very well regardless.

As a reformed woo believer, those are exactly the things I would have said when someone tried to debunk my woo.

Exactly, a catalogue with articles. THAT'S about it.

at least their title accurately describes the content.

Snek oil

So is most television nowadays. Cant stand watching any of it.

It's worse than nonsense. It's a grift, a con, a money-grab. And science-ignorant people and more than happy to believe it. Humans are born with the innate proclivity to believe in magic and superstitions. The only antidote to a conman like the goop lab is evidence-based knowledge.

this joke has made my day.

this is gold

Lol, nice one.

Pretty close to the orange coloured clockwork ....

"Anger is an energy" - John Lydon (lyric, book title)

BinaryReader the iPad is my favorite device on the planet right now.

@@gonzalezm244 cool, did you just arrive from the past? 😁

@@orlovsskibet We've all just arrived from the past. Where did you come from?

Wow gadgets are amazing

I got a Sony Tablet Z like 5 years ago. Was as thin and as light and to some extend had the same capabilities - lately it was used for streaming services on a daily basis. It died three months ago a horrible screen cracking death on my kitchen floor as I was washing off dirt (since it was waterproof), but it was slipping out of my hands.

While an ounce of gold actually is heavier than an ounce of feathers

Technically a kilogram of steel is slightly heavier than a kilogram of feathers - it would weigh less on a scale weight is a force and kilogram is mass, and feathers are substantially less dense than steel and thus displace more air and weight less due to buoyancy

@@AngDavies The weight wouldn't change because of displacement. Weight is the force that gravitation exerts upon a body, equal to the mass of the body times the local acceleration of gravity. Just because it's floating doesn't mean it isn't experiencing a force.

@@AngDavies It was a reference to a viral video "1kg of steel VS 1kg of feathers ". Also, technically buoyancy is an additional force acting on the feathers, which you only observe if you're in atmosphere. You can talk about weight with or without atmosphere. It's like if I said a Ford F-150 weighs 2200 kg, and you said "Well, it weighs more if it has a trailer attached". Yup. Nailed me. :)

🎵 Wrong way down a one way stree-eet.

Best comment in here ... I don't know if enough people saw it to appreciate the pure V-ness of it.

@@xyz.ijk. 🤣🤣🤣

I can smell the electrons!

@@zach6643 Hahahahaha!

This is classic comment lad

This little dance had me on the floor😂

Lol

13:21 when his frequency started descending! 😂

Phase transition 😄

You, sir, have earned a troll sticker for this comment

his shirt looks to like its a very dark green tho

19:02 Is where it's at

THE SHADE 😹

Moriarty: "I will give him that. The man has got a key sense of style and sartorial elegance." 😆

The people he's scamming are affluent and have nothing better to do with their lives, don't worry.

And he knows what he is doing, let's face it but I disagree with the notion that 'they are rich so let them be scammed' think of the people that would see this and know that celebrities or others like them are buying into this, suddenly this becomes the new understanding of human physiology and biomechanics

@@WelsheDragon Agreed. Looking at the recent wave of anti-vacc'ing.

@@Goreuncle Is scamming wrong because it's wrong or is scamming wrong only if the person being exploited is poor?

@@Goreuncle Define affluent, life savings are a lot more than annual income, and people who have a terminal illness and are desperate can lose their life savings.

He nearly popped

And very possibly pooped

You probably should bleep that. :-)

I lost it at this point. Absolutely brilliant. Leave it in! :D

Golden words to live by

I am pretty sure that is more expensive :)

lol yeah, is this in a same tech class as a sports car, l0l

He's swear checking himself...

Paweł Adamski it’s my favorite dish at the local indian

If the Goop were Gwenyth Paltrow making slimes I might actually watch that.

With all that tin foil and tangled wires. Looks real, in a quantum sort of way.

Sadly, they're going to use the disclaimer as their defence. It's the idea that "a rational person should see the bit at the start and know this is bunk." In order to win, you'd need to prove that they knew this stuff was harmful and that people would follow what the video was advocating to the financial benefit of the people making it. It's kind of like suing the tobacco companies in the 70's and 80's.

$$$$$$$ Talks m8 !

@@jackielinde7568 I think I clearly heard this "healer" literally advocate/claim that his actions have beneficial/healing properties, and hence this show does by extension. Having a disclaimer upfront does not change that. In fact, this disclaimer is like shouting "this is not a robbery!", while executing an armed robbery of a bank. It has no meaning whatsoever. The reason why this show and Netflix don't get sued out of existence for this blatant quackery has little to do with legality, and everything with how the US legal system is fundamentally broken when it comes to serving justice the rich and powerful (not even remotely a new phenomenon either). This is not a legal problem, it's a cultural one (of which the USA has plenty).

@@jackielinde7568 the disclaimer said its not medical advise... Didn't say anything about it not being physics advice when they were spouting bollocks about the double slit experiment and quantum

oogrooq: Agreed

It was that section where you can see a clear change in his body language. He was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt up until they crossed the line into 'physics is just magic!' territory.

That was the dance of a very offended physicist lol

I would say that the guy from the video showed, that he definitely can influence the physicst's sanity from another place and time in the universe without touching him.

@@wonderpope Huehuehuehuehuehue

😂😂😂😂😂

Aaron John 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Accurate

Had to think about that for a second...makes total sense.

Underrated comment!

I do that all the time when my arms are loaded with groceries and I need to get the house keys out of my pocket.

"Without a shadow of a doubt" does not mean it's always true. It just means they didn't waste any time doubting it.

@@RFC3514 hahahaha

I know what you're talking about but it's not contradictory at all. It's hyperbolic and perhaps redundant, but doesn't contradict anything.

@@TheJerbol Yes it is. Empirical data can only at best promote one explanation over another. A sizable accumulation of uncontradicted data supporting one explanation gives you a pretty solid theory. And that's as goos as it's ever going to be. Nothing's ever proven in physics. I can never prove to you that the sun will rise tomorrow. Some yet unobserved fifth force could act during the night and throw our star towards the other end of the galaxy. But it's an unfalsifiable claim so we usually don't bother too much discussing it.

Empiricism is a process (cycle). Facts must be verifiable by other means than our senses. A fact may still be dynamic due to paradigmatic change in verification method. Doubt is a state of mind, not verifiable, but instrumental in the empirical cycle. Even so, doubt is not admissible to a verified fact, only to the paradigms of the verification. That alone does not change a fact. My opinion is that the OP’s quote is indeed contradictory. 😅👍

@@existenceisillusion6528 You recalled correctly ... Hence, in astronomy, you frequently hear reference to space-time as a single entity, as time, especially when observing anything over large enough distance, matters ...

@@existenceisillusion6528 Yeah, but most people don't really have an intuition for time as a dimension. In everyday contexts, it's often either forgotten because of how differently we perceive it in comparison to the others, or simply ignored (or measured separately) for the sake of convenience. So you might be only counting the spatial ones. You won't have decoupled them, you're just forgetting one or, more likely, counting what matters for your purposes.

*String theorist enters the chat* "Actually..."

I, as an astrophysicist, usually call it 3+1, due to the special properties of the temporal “dimension.” Also yes, we can’t decouple them as far as distance goes, but we can see that time has special properties as a dimension, that the other three don’t. See: the Kerr, Minkowski, and Schwarzschild metric, which I recall all having a sign change.

@@nigelft Yeah, but that doesn't mean there aren't 4 dimensions. There are 4. 3 spatial and 1 of time, right? The fact that they're linked doesn't mean they're the same, right?

I think it's funny, because he uses "bollocks" which is really quite severe ;)

@@jollyjokress3852 I think the word "bollocks" is the reason he said that

One of the best comedy lines ever... ............. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣

@@dookiedooks8378 what?

@@BanHelsing it is from a Dara Ó Briain comedy show. Paraphrasing "People often come up to me and say 'Science doesn't know everything', which is true. The thing is Science *knows* it doesn't know everything, or else it'd stop."

@@wendighoul oh ok thx

Beat me to it. :)

As a medical doctor I can totally understand his frustration. They are playing with people's lives