less of the old woman but i know what u mean 😂😂😂

And if you complain they’ll have ex police officers review your complaint!

You can by law defend yourself against anyone.

yes.. in third world countries.. not in UK.. its rare in UK.. you are happy to have police like this with majority of them with body cams..

@@johnman8554 It happens in the USA it will happen here. It is happening here, look on You tube. Thank god for the I phone.

@@glenearl9506 not fully defend yourself

There is no law specifically prohibiting smoking on the police premises such as outside buildings. There may be a policy, but as every auditor spouts out, "policy isn't law"

@@HoratioChinn you never seen the no smoking signs I guess not you boot licker

If only we could punch them there's a few who would get it 😂

to hit anyone for any reason is unacceptable other than self defence. don't be part of the problem.

They literally can’t give comments! I took journalism for years. Literally anybody within any organisation anywhere cannot give a comment about things like this especially when it’s still under investigation. Even someone working in a Tesco wouldn’t be able to give a comment about another staff member, if the staff member did something in the public eye and was being condemned for it.

Mako Furiosa I've seen it happen, praise for one & silence for another. Appreciate the comment though & can see why now perhaps is the reason.

@Steven Parker well said 👍

It’s literally a charity…

Literally they can’t comment. If these people worked in the local Tesco and their manager got exposed for being a fecking pedo they wouldn’t be able to comment either… it’s literally a policy for anywhere ypu work

@@chrispollard6568 that's got nothing to do with the task in hand Pollard.

... however, it becomes a criminal offence ... ... with theft. ... with criminal damage. ... with aggravation. ... with a large group of people (anti-rave in a field)

If you had evidence of a crime you’d likely be able to decide… what does that even mean? Also it’s supposed to be an unbiased group of people who will be presented all the evidence and then decided together who is guilty/innocent… the officer asked isn’t a jury member and doesn’t have all the evidence presented to him…?

Also I'd think by now they would at least have been versed in the matter. Even if it's just letting people film 🎥 freely in public.

You two are so funny !

They don't care it also shows the contempt they have the people they police, and you hear the filth talking "your not entitled to my opinion"

Three....

I read _soiled their souls_ Which is probably more accurate.

if that were the case then agreed.

So she assaulted him then. She has no right to lay her hands on him, especially when he is already dealing with someone else who is being aggressive. How is he supposed to know what her intentions were.

@@OakieDokey31 Bootlicker.

@@OakieDokey31Any use of force has to be necessary and proportionate. If someone touched you on the shoulder in the street and you immediately responded by punching them full force in the face twice then you'd likely get arrested for assault and battery, and rightly so. But because this guy was a copper, nah you're all good. Thin blue line gang coverup in full effect.

Well said Baz what about the halal slaughter factory camera cowards

Mass audit my arse childish prats

This WAS a mass audit. And it was a dismal failure.

Their address has nothing to do with it. Once people leave the station gate, they are on private time, even though we know they don't clock off. Turning up at somes home and frightening small innocent children is the sort of sickness we are fighting against. There is nothing to be won sinking to the murky depths of WYPS and emulating what we are fighting against.

@@timboatfield that’s a fair point. Need a mass audit at the station he works at then.

They can’t comment because it’s literally the law of any organisation that you can’t comment on such incidents. If you worked at the local Tesco and your colleague beat up a shoplifter you wouldn’t legally be allowed to comment anything to anyone… even if you yourself had witnessed it. I mean unless you wanted Tesco to sue you/fire you immediately.

@@Dee-V-Dee You don't know what a Law is, if you think companies can make them. Companies make statutes, like The Crown does, with it's parliament(BoD). Passing off these statutes fraudlently as real Law, like any of us have to care about them. *It's a Criminal-Justice System or just simply a Criminal-System*

@@timboatfield it’s not a law, but when you start a job, unless it’s an under the table paid job you sign a contract, part of that contract is about not misrepresenting the company/organisation… so you can’t make comments on things by yourself on behalf of the company…

@Barry Stead Yes. There is always an exception to the rule. The Greeks knew that thousands of years ago. Unfortunatly The English language is the language of to be or not to be and nocent or innocent, but reality isn't. Rule of thumb, anytime you make an absolute statement, you are wrong, except this one of course. Nothing in this reality, is whole, perfect, complete. If you can figure out what that really means, you might just end up looking at the face of God. I'll give you the answer in a really simple form as a clue. +1

Yeah a symbol which is also a logo for a charity which offers mental and physical support as well as paying for funeral arrangements 🤦🏻‍♀️ this isn’t America with blue lives matter….

@@Dee-V-Dee -LOL! It's all the same crap. They use the charity as a cover. It is good that they use some of the money to help with the funerals of their victims...

@@Had_Enough_Media I mean I don’t sit there going through their social media and watching everything any spokesperson says about stuff. But for the most part charities try not to say inflammatory shit or engaging in bad behaviour. Though yeah you do get shitty charities like Autism Speaks who spread dangerous shit around and dangerous ideaologies about people with autism. Something representing a organisation like the police however definitely shouldn’t, as yeah it’ll lead to major issues and definitely bad exposure which in a really bad case will have the government moving in on them and shutting that shit down. If it ever started to openly stand for oppression and nazi mentally like the idiot group in America then the government would have to deem it a terrorist organisation. England don’t stand for that shit whilst America land is rife with fecking KKK members openly walking the streets and being in a job were they have the chance to be openly hostile to members of the public.

It doesn't look good for them as they look as if their hiding something.

Female officer said "we were not working that day" Knows what day it was, yet doesn't know anything about it.

@@DMWBN3 Most of them said they seen the video. Not sure if she said she did, but I would bet you they showed the video in their morning meeting.

Stop Injustice she said something like not sure about it or what happened, but I wasn't working that day.

Body cam footage and interviews with members of the public plus any videos the public took at the time…

@@Dee-V-Dee Yes, I get that. The point is the ppl investigating wasn't there either. They will rely on that same vid the officers said they saw. So why can't they comment about it cuz they "wasn't there"?

Black eyes peas.

Unfortunately they wont

Think it's not in uniform on public property. He's not on private land. I've no idea there are any policy/law surrounding it, just a reply to your question. Maybe we'll find out the reason later in comments etc. 👍🏼🇬🇧

@@DMWBN3 Who exactly _Privately_ owns this land?

Tim Boatfield public.

@@DMWBN3 Wellit;s actualy The Secretary of State, for Police Stations at least. The important bit in Law is who paid fo it.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r7aDlpd6zJfbdas.html i think

Heard of google?

@@DaveCB1000R many thanks dave

Justified action by the officer taking the totality of the circumstances.

cype man I looked and couldn't find it.

It’s a charity… so they have permission this is not blue lives matter, it’s not America…

@@Dee-V-Dee They don't have permission from us. Maybe you can answer, Who gave them permission? It's not a demeocracy either.

Are you the British government?

Any charity has to apply to be a charity with whichever government they fall under, otherwise anyone would be able to say I’m a charity and steal peoples money, which sadly does happen and if they get caught out in it they get in major trouble about it

@@Dee-V-Dee I am more than the British Government. *_I am The People._* Government Vs The People. The people win by defailt. It's how a democracy works. Even with this _mockery_ of a democratic government, The people win even more. Simple question to you. Who do _you_ think is power in this land or any land?

Aha 😅 PC Cooper

Agreed. But there is no Law involved at this point, its all just concentual intercource. Silence is often a great answer to police questions. Why take the bate? Answers mostly lead to more questions. Second best to silence is vaguery empty statements. Silence is also very efficent as you are doing nothing but it is very frustrating to be ignored. Especailly when you feel powerful.

@@timboatfield Indeed... Thoughts OCCUR!

@@ThomasTheWankEngine1 If you mean presumptions. then statements like _you are taking video or criminal reconisance, You were seen burgling a shop on the high street, needs to be countered, for obvious reasons. Other whise these presumptions may be acted on, if only silence is given.

@@timboatfield Try again please!

My new word for the day is acquiescence. 🇬🇧👍