Maybe she was a Barrista.

She was a very average barrister, everyone knows. She was good at photocopying though. Google how she said she was involved in things when she wasn’t. ‘’Suella Braverman has been asked to clarify her academic bona fides after a barrister rubbished the claim that she contributed to his legal textbook. Braverman’s profile on the website of No5 Chambers, where she worked before becoming an MP, claimed that she "is a contributor to" the 2007 bestseller, Gambling for Local Authorities, Licensing, Planning and Regeneration. But Philip Kolvin KC, the book's author, told the Big Issue and confirmed to RollOnFriday that Braverman "did not make a written or editorial contribution to the book". The extent of her involvement was menial, indicated Kolvin, who said that "on one occasion I asked her to do some photocopying for the book, which she did".

@@brendawilliams1687 I wouldn't even trust her to make my coffee

If she was any good at it she wouldn't have gone into politics, obviously.

@@garyt.8745 she will make even more money rinsing the taxpayer for the tories tho.

Hoyle being one of them. He's the worst leader of the house EVER.

@@jake751 Dude seems scared of his own shadow, Bercow kicked ass.

he had his own agenda as well.

Brexit voters sadly

Because we live in an elected dictatorship.

Yes, and apart from a few well off Gary Lineker types. Most of us are sick of economic migrants.

@@alien4422 What makes you sick of that? I've seen no evidence that it's a substantial threat to the UK either culturally or economically compared to much larger social and financial issues over the last 10-15 year.

@@alien4422 Gary Linekar earned his money. I have no problem withj that....seems you do.

Not true. Plenty of working class people let themselves get fooled by right-wing Tory ideology and vote against their own interests.

​@@alien4422 "Most of us" .. spare us the populist bollocks.

Working class communities need more and more and more and more Albanians.

​@@evolassunglasses4673 Typically dishonest comment.

And my too 🤭🤭🤭🤭

​@@dondoodat 🤡

@@evolassunglasses4673 Give us those numbers of Albanians coming in there, would ya?

@@georgewarner5496 NO cos you are a rando w4nker on the internet of no importance to anyone.

​@@georgewarner5496 are you bound by Parliamentary rules?

@@matthewfoley3929 Do you understand parliamentary rules?

​@George Warner Funnily enough, despite what you may think, 'George from KZfaq' doesn't have the same position of power and influence as an acting Home Secretary of the United Kingdom.

@@georgewarner5496 chap. 4 sec. 190 of Parliamentary rules. Read it and learn. And for full disclosure I knew it existed but I had to look up the actual section..

She was asking labour to apologise in her original statement, she wanted them to apologise for stopping them illegally deporting someone who allegedly murdered someone in the uk after the failed deportation

@@daniwalmsley611 Thanks for the explanation.

@@daniwalmsley611 fails to mention her own tory mp’s who also blocked it under human rights issues… dreadful selecting of the facts as usual from Braverman.

​@@daniwalmsley611 he did so she did .not have to apologise it was fact

​@@kevingreen1305 she's not allowed to mention it as the case has been appealed. Doing so could prejudice the outcome. As home secretary she should have been well aware of that, so it was either extremely careless or simply shows she has no respect for where she is or the position she is in.

Integrity in shreds...

What he means is that a trained KC would know better. She was given hers as an honorary title because she didn't get it by merit.

She does know better.

@@daveclarke6481 indeed and therefore we should be reviewing why she hasn't been disbarred for such fragrant breaches of the law

How very true.😊👍

She didn't earn it. I believe the title is automatically given to an Attorney General whether they previously earned it or not - her case.

Wow, that's damning for the barristers.

@@TheRB888 Same as Raab before her

She was only made a QC/KC when she became Attorney General. Up to that point and when she first became an MP her practice experience as a barrister was a mere few years.

STARMER WIS ONE , whit dis he look like wae that wig on when he wis yunger a brainless twit in a wig.

​@MadManRob he was head of CPS

@@MadManRobStarmer was one of the best lawyers in England, Rob. Was a key figure in heaps of important cases. Braverman is just a social climber with very little pedigree.

If you have ever been on trial then you would know! The BEST lying piece of dirt is Keir Starmer, his job was to get GUILTY terrorists and paedophiles off. How do you think he managed to do that?

@MadManRob Starmer was a ferocious lawyer, he headed up the CPS for a reason, it is why nobody on the Tory side bring up his record much or go after him on it, as they know it will blow up in their face. The people who complain about grooming gangs should love Starmer, it was him as head of the CPS that created a specialised task force within CPS to deal with prosecuting those offenders and help the girls affected by it, he it brought in a world leading specialised lawyer to lead that team. In contrast Raab and Braverman are well known to be terrible Lawyers, part of why they act the way they do in government is to take out their frustrations on the legal profession they both think unfairly scorned them. Braverman being the worst, she is/was part of a Buddhist cult whose leader died accused of multiple sexual harassment cases against boys, she has a pathological hatred of human rights courts and thinks all judicial oversight should be run through elected ministers, not independent courts. She is a horror of a women and a stain on this country that Rishi Sunak is too weak to control.

about time Mr Speaker became a Speaker BY up holding Constitution LAWS .

And deported her to Rwanda

Hoyle , a complete stuttering fool . Ideal for the job ..

​@Petyr Kowalski why Rwanda?? Why not to where it is least accessible?? Preferably Antarctica.

Could it be that she was unaware that the case had been appealed?.

​@@ElCampiador She's the Home Secretary and it's a high-profile case. If she doesn't know it's under appeal then we should question her competence.

​@@ElCampiador it's possible I suppose but that would underline, again, the staggering ineptitude of this government. She is reading a pre-prepared written answer to a question of which she had prior written notice. Surely someone thought to check their facts first!!!?

Certainly helped. But you see, she doesn't care, because that will give her yet another dog whistle about lefty judges or something.

Which was possibly her objective.

"If Labour MPs had just ignored the illegal bill then this wouldn't have happened..."

@@derges It’s absurd, isn’t it? How dare political representatives of the people or the independent judiciary prevent us from breaking the laws which we push through?

@@georgiameadows That sounds to me like a good argument. I wonder if there are any precendents?

Thankfully because it's not in the manifesto the labour majority lords will hopefully slap it down.

That was cameron's game all along. He complained about ECHR in 2007, wanted it to be replaced with a UK bill of rights in 2015. Put up the brexit vote, and would have then claimed that although people voted against brexit, there is wide spread support for his bill of rights. But the things changed. ECHR is not part of brexit, because it already existed since 1950.

@@lonelyone69 The Lords cannot deny its right through the House they can send it back twice only, if it comes back the third time with a government majority they must let it pass through as far as i am aware.

@@pistoleer3572 yes but the bill cannot be brought up until a new session of parliament. So it takes a maximum of 3 sessions of parliament for the bill to pass. If the policy was in their manifesto then the government could force the bill through after only one session.

Nest of vipers all of them

Odd that her family didn't choose Rwanda as their destination of choicewhen they emigrated from Kenya....since she seems to think it some kind of paradise.

She raised a good point though, Labour actively want terrorists in the UK, Labour are responsible for many deaths across the UK especially with their lousy policies towards knife crime. Embarrassing party.

@@puddyvalentine A paradise that's also a punishment and a deterrent, apparently. Nevermind, at least we'll be getting some Rwandans coming to the UK as part of the deal.

It's almost like she knows nothing about the law. Given her leagal skills & knowledge, plus that of Rabb, I really must get myself off down to the 30 minute law degree college in order that I can set up my practice next week. Fancy a career change 🤔

@@puddyvalentine Especially when one considers that Rwanda shares French as lingua franca with Mauritius, her mother's country of birth. (More than can be said for the Afghans, Eritreans, Yemenis, etc. she's wanting to ship off to Kigali.)

Her KC is honorary, she didn't earn it.

@@dondoodat ...and it should be withdrawn if she still has it.

Pathetic cancel culture comment. Get a life

Not even qualified. Only honorary for the fact she was appointed AG.

@@SimplySketchyGT seems feasible. Doubted that a qualified lawyer could be so vacuous.

Fascism?oh dear,what a stupid comment

The fascists of the future will call themselves anti fascists

@@netcurtains quote - Fascism is generally defined as a political movement that embraces far-right nationalism and the forceful suppression of any opposition, all overseen by an authoritarian government. Fascists strongly oppose Marxism, liberalism and democracy, and believe the state takes precedence over individual interests. Suppressing opposition - voter ID and redrawn boundaries Opposition to Marxism - self evident in what they regularly say, particularly when referring to BLM Opposition to Liberalism - ‘lefty lawyer’ spouted left right and centre Opposition to democracy - unlawful Prorogation of Parliament, repressive legislation such as the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts act, Nationality and Borders act, systematic assaults on trade unions, etc Sums them up pretty well, but happy to hear your opposing argument on why they’re not…

Or indeed the BBC now. GB News presenters inexplicably get interviews on the BBC with zero pushback. They may as well be the same entity.

They are both as bad as each other bbc and GB

Probably the only place that will employ her after this.

Why wait, enough other standing Tory MP's have been given slots.

Ime surprised she isn't on the comedy channel GB news they seem to have half the tory party on there now even an Oswald Mosely copycat begins with N

Oh I don't know. "I am sorry that you have taken offence (snowflake!, implied)" is the usual style HMG apology.

'philosophy'? That would imply that Enoch Powell managed to string two thoughts together

Nah Father Jack would be better than this guy, Father Jack had a spine.

@@helphelpimbeingrepressed9347 Which is more than can be said for the Cabinet.

He's still daydreaming of his peerage, rather than actually doing his job

@@66PHILB I would heartily accept extreme alchoholism over moral depravity

Probably covered under Parliamentary Privilege. You can't be held criminally liable for things you say in the chamber.

and who to replace them because labour started this mess

The whole Government need to apologise to the whole country for what they have done. Some compensation wouldn't go amiss either.

Why should she apologise for telling the truth

@@twistedsister2568 the legal term used was *_sub judice,_* truth is irrelevant in this case.

Not at all that pure. Pure SCUM is more like the truth.

Which they already said would only happen if boats stop coming. So, like, not at all.

Apparently to be rolled out after stopping the boats. So if A) the boats don't stop, no safe routes rollout. B) if the boats stop, quietly drop the safe routes rollout. As there will no longer be a pressing need to do so, as it will not be suggested as a way to stop the boats.

Or is put out to pasture to let some with a bit of authority and presence to do the job.

OK Komrade. "I look forward to an apology" that didn't sound like a demand to me....

@@tysay8170 we have different interpretations of the verb "to demand", I don't really care about yours.

Calling out her bullsht is a start .... Good job, Speaker.

@@runklestiltskin_2407 I am happy to educate a Russian, non native English speaker. 🤣

@@runklestiltskin_2407 he has several options, right up to locking them in the cell under Big Ben, and then he has the option to refer them to the Courts.

Fossilised twig 😂😂😂😂😂 comedy gold

I cannot wait. 😊👍

She raised a good point though, you can’t argue against it. Labour literally campaigned to keep terrorists in the UK. That is unforgivable.

She did put her name forward a man is now dead.

@@alan4291 please explain

Great to see a comment like this on such an awful channel. We will not forget.

@@RobinoftheHod the so called Left back big Phama narratives.

@@RobinoftheHod everyone responsible for *the message* will be legally held accountable.

@@stumble_leiner By whom, and in what forum?

@@nigelsynnott7344 these things happen organically

Because he didn't resend the comments attacking another member of the house.... The same way if a member is named by anyone in the house. Fun fact that tradition comes from pre reformation and was designed to hide the identity of MPs from common folk while also allowing common folk to understand who their MP was by the name of their constituency.

Patel is probably glad that it's Stella's turn to do the right wing bonkers parliamentary performances.

You might be correct, she may be grandstanding to appeal to the right. Or it could be that the conservatives have now lurched more to the right. Many party’s drift to the fringes of politics when they have run out of ideas. But there is nothing the conservatives can do to prevent their downfall. A sinking ship will not stop sinking, it will never float again, it will just continue to sink.

not only that but she was tripping over her words as she sped up her speech and attempted to move on to another thread faster than the speed of light.

No doubt Keir Starmer will jump on that in prime ministers evasions on Wednesday.

How terrible 😄lame comparison

@@netcurtains Is it? Always blame others Never answer an accusation or even a question honestly Immediately go on the counter-attack Seems like a close comparison to me. Only she wasn't taught this by Roy Cohn.

I like em both whatever ,

@@andrasszabo1570 Isn't that Boris Johnson's MO?

Given the numerous committees over bullying in the cabinet it won't be surprising that she's collected quite a lot of complaints...

She is right. Asylum seekers are dangerous

Criminals because they enter the UK illegally. They should apply for asylum in the first safe country, which is generally the one they came from in the case of Albania, which is a safe country.

@@samleboeuf6993 is that an attempt at humour? I should inform you it's failed.

@@samleboeuf6993 no they're not. Some may be. Some people in shops are shoplifters. So what?

I think shes spot on

nope, she's a lowlife, like the clown, the bully, Patel, invisible rishi etc

A rarity for him to show backbone.

Too late now. 😪

@@soulsaver369 haha agreed. Probably not his own.

@@jake751 he wants to be a lord

Because even in the 30s we stopped them coming....the kindertransport, those kids site would have loved their parents to have been allowed to come.

Pathetic uneducated comment

​​@@verystripeyzebra exactly. "We will take only the children. The Mums and Dads are not welcome. They must be left behind to the gas chambers. And we will only take up to 15,000 children. No, 10,000. That is enough." Literally the government plan in Britain in 1938-1939. They actually chose to limit the number of children and knew their parents would killed, devastating the children. And they passed it into law. Neville Chamberlain, Conservative Party - the Tories made it law then as they do now.

@MadManRob People come here illegally, because the legal routes are completely fucked, and if someone needs to leave there home country quickly, they are screwed. We need an Australian Points based system and easier ways for migrants to come in, with proper inspection of course, this is a process that should take a few month, not years.

@MadManRob a holiday is different than wanting to live and work here.

@MadManRob Nope- that does not follow.

@MadManRob no no, they have, but those fleeing country's that could do them harm have the difficult task of needing a quick exit, many of which don't plan for or can't due to the time constraint, the way our legal migration system works does not really support those people. Hence the boats, trucks, lorries, and other methods of entry into this country being used If this government think "stopping the boats" will help they need a reality check.

@MadManRob No - your logic doesn't follow.

Yes. And none of her initiatives, zero, have legal pragmatism built in. They did not even try to understand if the Home Office can win any possible cases that are surely going to be brought against it if/when her proposals become law. Given that she did argue and win cases as a lawyer, this means that her proposals were not designed for the purposes they are supposed to have, but something else.

She was given her KC as an honorary title because she didn't have it when she became Attorney General.

She's definitely a C.

@@adamcole4623 An FC surely?

Worked at kfc, yes ... why do you ask?

Lets just hope the damage she causes before the general election isn't too disastrous