Hebrew was the same before the 60's too lol

I like to call it: The Zombie language

the parent language of today's Italian, Spanish and Portuguese

@@EngPheniks …lets not forget French and Romanian.

​@@EngPheniksAnd also Catalan, Arragonese, Galician and Basque.

Currently learning Latin in school

@@HaydenTalcott is it hard? I'm currently learning Latin by myself

@@TheCesso3 it’s definitely a tricky language. Not only because it’s a dead language but also because the grammar is just so complex. My teacher created a website for our class to help us learn peer-to-peer. Latin lexicon is a great website to learn the paradigms

Andre Mooij and that we keep Gregorian chant as the usual mode of church music.

Valde bonum!

Not true lol where’d you read that? Catholic Catechism?

@@gussmann6580 History. If you don't like Saint Peter as the first pope, still the second bishop of Rome was in the first century.

Attendebamus Sanctam Missam in Civitate Vaticanae in Iunio, MMXVII. Laetiori sumus in Missa pontificalis pridie cum cardinale... :)

Biggus dickus

@@chuuchuu6317 *Penis magnus

thegreatbutterfly longus shlongus

@@chuuchuu6317 phallus maximus

Why don't you pray yourself?

@@gussmann6580 We do that, too.

@@gussmann6580 Because the prayer of those less wreteched is more effective. Besides, have you never asked a friend or family member to pray for you?

***** So he's a bad pope?

***** Who started freemasonry and what is it's purpose?

That would be hilarious

He won’t thou

Regnum is pronounced Renyum

+Alice In Salt Land Original language doesn't exist, language changes.

Paul Anthony Yes, I'm aware of that. I was just expressing my wish to hear someone speak the Romanised (as in spoken in the time era where Rome were victorious) version of Latin

He's speaking ecclesiastical latin, I think it has been around in the church since the middle ages. It's also difficult to get rid of that Italian accent (church latin= latin + Italian accent).

Alice In Salt Land There are much more subtleties to Reconstructed Latin ("original" is not a correct definition) we can't even begin to discuss here. The speech was then marked by syllabic quantity and not as today. Ecclesiastical latin however is more understandable by today's sensibility and even Gregorian Chants rely on it to be correctly heard and sung. A change would be useless and undesireble.

Einstein's grandma's wet kiss True, but pope Francis is Argentinian, not Italian. Then again, Argentinean Spanish has been heavily influenced by Italians.

Sleep is good therapy

That's the correct pronunciation in ecclesiastical latin, which has been the case for centuries now...

There are 2 major ways of pronounciation, I can recommend the video of Metatron.

He is from Argentina, so he would be trilingual. I doubt he is fluent in Latin tho.

Sergio Prieto Solēsne pronuntiātiōnem Ecclesiasticam utī? Paulō difficile erat mihi intellegere sed nōn impossibilis.

Lo dijo perfecto en la Lingua Latina Ecclesiastica , dejá de ser un contrarierista infeliz .

@@vincentius9311 Ecclesiasticam pronuntiationem bene intellego nam etiam italice loquor. Ambae aequae sunt inter se sed isti haud bene loquntur latina linguam.

@@oolooo Erras, modum verum ad hanc linguam loquendam hoc non est. Ne quidem ut eclesiasticam sonatur secundum me.

Joshua Lapura yeah that’s what I got outta that too

Liturgical material is always read at mass, not from memory. Same with any other ceremony.

It was not a liturgy, he was announcing the dates john paul was cannonized.

@@louieluis8840 I’m well aware. You think he should memorise everything?

I disnt say he shld memorize it, the thing is nothing comes out his chest, everything was read from a paper you dont know who wrote it. LoL

stfu

Exactly

Christ was a middle eastern jew who spoke Aramaic 😅 not exactly the image of christ

Benedict XVI Papst Press probabiliter rēctē dīcīs. Fortasse scit nēminem eum intellegere.

Che?

No, Romans spoke classical Latin, and the Pope speaks ecclesiastical Latin (Medieval Latin). For example, in the movie "the passion of the Christ", they used the ecclesiastical pronunciation due to the number of Italian actors and directors (i suppose), which is historically inaccurate. Romans pronounced v's as u's, and c, g always as k, g (as in go). Ecclesiastical Latin is not that much different from the classical one grammatically speaking, though being more organized. (in classical latin you can place words wherever you want)

Actually Vs are pronounced like Ws in Latin. Also yes the Romans would probably understand parts of this. While Latin grew and developed over time, it didn't really change much from when it was first created until the point it was considered dead. Also Classical Latin does have structure, you can't put words anywhere. Latin is a language that uses noun declensions, they don't have words for a, the, and all other definite articles. That is for all Latin. Yes, more modern late Latin did use a semi different structure. Instead of placing verbs at the end if sentences they were mostly moved to follow the word, yet even in the Roman times not all people would put verbs at the end of sentences, it all depended. The Roman empire was around for a long time. Latin will no longer evolve, and like said back then really didn't evolve much. Our modern languages that come from Latin still d change daily. New words are added when needed. I mean in like 1900 computer would never be said by anyone, now today it is a common word for people to use. Not to mention the fact Ecclesiastical Latin is not the same thing Medieval Latin. Take the phrase Puellae Pecuniae, meaning a girl of money. Well it would be the same for all Latin forms. the ae means it would be genitive, in this context anyway, and genitive usually means of and the war for money is an adjective so it has to match the noun thus getting the proper sentence.

Einstein's grandma's wet kiss but would they still understand?

غوتشي I think eventually they could adjust to the accent

@@saintcelab3451 I thought the Romans spoke Vulgar Latin.

like your father. heretics are not welcome here. only children of god.....

Francis non est Deo

​@@cassiusquintilianustiberiu6889 Recte Francis non est Deo; sed quoque uterque ave Deo et Papa Fransiscus recte est.

That's ironic -- Paul seems to be agreeing with them in a way.

@@riccardonoce4832 They're not.

truthaboveagenda triggered prosentant