It's refreshing to see something other than groveling to Elon musk, and his many child bearers that he dates.

Ouch, sorry you have to suffer that.

Haha just realized that my loose threads were pulled together by telos-bound :D

Mine does too

Thanks for the thoughts! Nice connections.

I think you are confusing hypostatic origin with hypostatic manifestations.

@@joseephkhoury9420 not at all my friend, hypostatic “manifestation” is an idea that only comes about when you separate God’s activity with God’s essence, but the essence of God is his one perfect and simple activity/energy of being who he is (the most Holy Trinity). The distinction only occurs in creation, since creation are acts/energies by participation, the creature’s essence is a coarctation/finite limitation of the one infinite energy/pure act of God in a specific mode and grade, so in the creature the essence is the particular coarctation given by God + the participated act that is given by God to that coarctation/created essence, the bifurcation is a metaphysical bifurcation that separates the created from the creator, and in the creature his essence and his energy/activity are really distinct… If the procession of the Spirit is happening eternally and the reciprocating is also eternal, then the procession is eternally from both hypostatically. In God each hypostasis is not given by distinct essential features of the persons (that would separate God and make him a composite), but they are only a relational distinction, so each hypostasis is basically a subsisting relation. To defend the monarchy of the Father you simply need to understand that he is the only one who is not begotten nor spirated by anyone, so he has Primacy in that sense, but that it’s a relational distinction, so the procession of the Spirit comes from the Son also not because the Son is also unbegotten but because as begotten he is doing the same one activity of the Father, so he is spirating the one and only Spirit that proceeds from the unbegotten one to the begotten one, only completing the relational essence of God thus giving hypostatic reality (subsisting relation) to the Holy Spirit.

This only points to the Filioque if you want to see the Filioque in there. Nothing in what's presented here necessitates what you've said This is even aside from it having very problematic theological implications for the Trinity

@@RevengeOfIjapa in the video he speaks about the instantanious eternal reciprocation of love of the Son to the Father, this happens in a perfect, intensive and personal manner in eternity, so the love of the Father to the Son and from the Son to the Father is a personal one, and that person of Love that is shared by both is the Holy Spirit, and it's not an energetic procession or a manifestation, but a hypostatic reality, the difference lies in the fact that the Father is unbegotten so he spirates underivatively, and the Son does it derivatively because his essence that allows him to spirate back the same Spirit was given by the Father, you can read my answer above.

@@AprendeMovimiento all these statements about (love, wisdom, glory...etc) are manifestations of the person's of the Trinity and how their unity is not just in terms of essence but such manifestations. So when the Son is described as the wisdom and Logos of God or the Father, that points to his manifestation and role as the wisdom and Logos, that does not mean the Father and Spirit are not wise, for such is the economy of the Son, same with the Spirit when called the Spirit of Love, that's the economy of the Spirit, and the reciprocation of such manifestations or energies are shared by the three hypostases. And the love of the Father through the Son in the Homy Spirit is simply the economy of the Trinity; the Father is the source the Son is the means, and in the Spirit they find their completion, so it has nothing to do with the filuoque. The Father is the sole principle and cause (in the loose analogical sense) of the Hypostasis of the Son and Spirit.