Please excuse Dr Malcom, he suffers from a deplorable excess of personality for a mathematician. (Smth along those lines)

Sounds like something the Joker would say

​@@weaniesuckler you never watched Jurassic Park?

@@kugelblitz1557never watched it before…

@@weaniesuckler it's a decent movie. The animations in the old ones are clunky by modern standards, but the storyline gets boring in the new ones.

phrase the me all the way off...

@@joshuaohuka7719bro speak english

It explains me so much 😂

Its neither, its entirely predictable

There is no randomness. The world show design and order everywhere. What we call random is a manifestation of ignorance not of real randomness as randomness just doesn't exist.

sciences are merging in the weirdest ways these days...

It's all in the prime radiant

​@@joshuaohuka7719Always has been

​@@joshuaohuka7719 this isnt new by any means, statistics has always been integral to sociology. Im a sociology major and the only math class i was required to take was statistics bc its such a big part of what we do.

@@jennifervasquezbut it says something that if a company is going to hire someone to make an analysis on a sociological subject, they’ll probably hire a statistician over a sociologist

I didn't even expect to learn statistic from this channel

I know! This is my absolute favourite "Sciency" channel on KZfaq!

@@robjohnston1433 same here😉

@@phabidz you didnt learn anything about statistics here

stock market 🙄

I wouldn't call it a paradox

@@peganin442 it is a kind of paradox

@@30secondsTHESIS not really though, it doesn't directly contradict itself

Any close-to-shore landing where exactly 2 boats can tie-up at any 1 time is by definition a paradox.... 🙃😁

@Christopher Grant yeah thats what history repeats itself means

Its harder not to pull that off

Is that new? I haven't touched the game in years. Good times running trials carries with my friends back in the day.

@stringz4862 don't go back. My brothers still play and they only have bad things to say about it.

@@eddieford9373 as does every destiny player XD. Thats what gives it its charm

brainrot

Thank you for introducing me to this true pioneer of the future. "And then, the Earth being small, mankind will migrate into space, and will cross the airless Saharas which separate planet from planet and sun from sun. The Earth will become a Holy Land which will be visited by pilgrims from all the quarters of the Universe. Finally, men will master the forces of Nature; they will become themselves architects of systems, manufacturers of worlds." From his book in 1879. Really the biggest solve to the puzzle of man is to remember the words of House M.D.; Everyone lies.

Nicee

Wow Sh*ts getting deep this morning!😂🤔

Try me.

The collective conscious

Francis Galton who he quoted in invented eugenics

@@edwingrove1442 so, case in point? :P

That's a different definition of chaos that has nothing to do with this.

610th like (used to be 609)

This is why I love the internet 🤣

We all are

We're not in a game, so there are no players So yes, everything is an npc, even my pet rock

Life is a game

non problematic cars?

Go on sir ....wutchu u got

Ein malcham be like

let's goooo

nudge theory :)

Stop spreading misinformation.

I dunno ... I found 'Foundation' a little dull. Very INTERESTING, but lacking a continued & consistent viewpoint -- with all the characters changing with every "time jump". Something the Apple TV show has tried to correct -- but changed the plot SO significantly, as a result, that it might as well be a completely different story!

@@robjohnston1433 I haven't seen the show yet, and I understand that Asimov's style of storytelling isn't for everyone. But I love his work

@@robjohnston1433 I agree, the foundation books are pretty mediocre in terms of story, but very strong in concepts. I think the his robot series does a lot better in that regard. Still has cool concepts, but a lot better storytelling imho.

Only know about it from the show. But I was thinking the same thing

Muh sci shit book

Coin flips are totally random. A roulette wheel is random. Nuclear reactions are random

YES!! “the number of determinate conditions are too many to easily keep track of.” It’s very possible that things which we currently believe to be random (like coin flips) are things we simply haven’t identified ALL the determinate conditions involved!

@@roch145wrong

@@idontknowyouthatsmypurse We know that isn't true. That's what "the EPR paradox" and "Bell's Inequality" actually prove. You can prove that the "initial conditions" aren't determined until after the randomness has finished being random, basically. Look up those terms for details.

@@roch145 you could know with certainty if a coin would land on heads or tails if you knew all the initial and external conditions. If you set it up so that everything was exactly the same, you’d get the same result always, same for a roulette wheel. In everyday life this is impossible and so yes these events are essentially random for us, but they are still technically deterministic. Quantum mechanics on the other hand IS indeterministic, e.g. you would not be able to tell if an electron is spin up or spin down until after measuring, even if you knew all the initial and external conditions. If you repeated the same experiment with the same initial and external conditions the result may not be the same.

Reminds me of the Central Limit Theorem

Reminds me of the hermetic law of cause and effect. Chance is simply a law unrecognized.

That's beautiful

Reminds me of standard deviation in a curve

Thank you.

What will your degree be used for

@@elijahgavin6706 It has a large variety of uses. The ones I can think of off the top of my head are: testing the effectiveness of medicine, identifying specific patterns like symptoms of a disease, computing for the odds in gambling, testing the marketability of new products by interpreting the data gathered from surveys, analyze past data to make projections. We are also taught how to phrase our survey questions and present the data and results in a way that everyone can understand.

@@Knightwalker727 yes statistics is relevant to everything I’m asking you if you know what field of statistics you want to go into

Ok I just sit here to know more about this subject.

@@elijahgavin6706 basically data science

No, you💜

@@nocontender6409, XD

@@nocontender6409 wholesome

I found a way i found a waaaay

@@elbiliyin6756 😏😌😉

But you only have 2 data from flipping coins - heads and tails. How is that distributed as a Gaussian curve?

@@leizero I think what he meant is that when the chances for either option is 50%, mapping one option - of the same side of a coin appearing - out will probably look like a falling curve. Just because getting the same coin flip 10 times is less likely, than getting it 5 times in a row. And this concept is one way of explaining the result of this video. I feel like I didn't explain it well either, I hope you understand what I'm trying to say tho? :D

@@leizero You have a collection of states, a combination of lefts and rights. Each collection of states will move the ball to a particular line. A collection that has more lefts in it, will drop the ball to the left. A collection with more rights, drops it further right. If it has equal left and right, it gets dropped in the middle.

@@leizero You could easily get a graph similar to that by flipping a 30 coins 10x each and plotting it based on the heads vs tails of each coin (think of it as one positive and one negative).

It's just a binomial distribution with 1/2 probability of success.

Yet not many people are interested in being labeled "average"

@@marcusr0y ergo, on average, a person likely does not want to be average according to this.. hard to beat science I know

P. T. Barnum in a nutshell to some extent.

@@cmzshalom no single person is the average. Average is an emergent property of many singular things

@@marcusr0y But they are!

Basically?

And I felt very tiny

Travis scott

@@angelamercer5176 crush

im happy to be the six hundred sixty sixth liker

We are and that's how WEF will feed us insects soon.

First

More like ”Life finds a gay”, am I right? Hahaha, up top, anyone? No? Okay.

@@atmatey comment this in Twitter and you're dead

says the isle's experimental rex

@@atmatey 😂 broo

Also a quote that I like " There are no mistakes in chaos".

@@bluescreen3877 I edited my comment. An alternative correction would be "There's no mistake in chaos". Typos, grammar, and spelling errors happen when you comment hastily.

Nice. Lol

@@dottore3870 it's essentially another way of saying "method in the madness" and I think that's cool lol

@@dottore3870 periods go before the quotation. Also that quote is trash, just cause the word chaos sounds edgy and cool doesn’t mean you gotta write down quotes with the word in it lol

Same, this video screams Hari Seldon Psychohistory.

Was looking for this comment

😒

​@@goodgoyim9459 He explained systemic racism just now, I believe.

@@TheFireStarter1215 yes ni.. i mean blacks are systemically racist towards everyone else, well said.

I hate that they did that

@@Corn0nTheCobb Well, you can't dislike the idea though

Someone should make another website that just keep the track youtube dislike, like you can mod it with your app or browser thus maintaining the record of how moronic the content was.

They took away dislikes because it would definitely discredit the news clips even more than they do to themselves, plus they are attempting to silence any evidence against the mainstream train of thought so pop culture will probably dictate rules that YT will directly be influencing through a lack of pop culture noncompliance.....

They don't care about the "opinions of the masses", they did it for money. You and I do not make KZfaq money. Users do not make KZfaq money. Advertisers make KZfaq money. That is the only thing that matter to them, the users will stay regardless of how they treat the site, which is a whole thing in and of itself. But advertisers are less likely to want to put their ads on controversial videos/content creators. Removing dislikes removes the publicity of a content creator's/video's negative appeal, meaning mega-corp advertisers would have to do individual research into who they're putting ads onto, and they're not going to do that because it's all controlled at a massive scale, not by individuals. So the money gets shoveled where they want it, and into KZfaq's bank.

Exactly. I’m always amazed that people can’t understand that and it’s such an easy and demonstrable concept

BLM Abortion Crossing Border Illegally Coved 18... The list goes on. All of these rely on anecdotal rather than large sample studies.

@@mr.o523 What?

@@aenetanthony BLM Abortion Crossing Border Illegally Coved 18... The list goes on. All of these rely on anecdotal rather than large sample studies.

@@mr.o523 Please use commas

The drop chance for a piece of loot: 5 % Someone: Gets drop on first try Someone else: finally gets drop after 200 tries. This makes sense in a terrifying way...

@@arraywaves They say the odds of a plane crash are lower than getting in a traffic accident. We could start there 🤭

@@a-wingsgaming9162 bro- 💀☠️

It doesnt work like this. Lootbox drops depends also on how much money had you spent in the game. The game mechanics tries to get your money as much as possible and uses your human weaknesses. The best is not to play in games with lootboxes

@@a-wingsgaming9162 the odds of winning the lottery are lower than getting struck by lightning 💀

Great example lmao

One of my favorites

Ahahahahahah

"I'm interesting person with good humor"

- The one ball that falls out of the glass

A branch of Economics, Econophysics works with this premise (that capitalism is a chaotic system) creating statistical models that seem very promising compared to the deterministic models that are currently taught in academia.

@@KevinOrePflucker lol we don't need "econophysics" to understand humans will self organize through voluntary interaction

@@KA-vs7nl Econophysics explains the shape of this "self-organization". It explains prices, rates of profit and income distributions much better than previous economics. There is much more beyond the dominant ideological notions of society that need to be addressed. That is the task of social sciences.

@@KA-vs7nl you might as well say we don't need physics to understand that things will fall down to the ground or that the sun will rise every morning, but then what are you doing at a physics channel?

It will blow your mind even more to learn that sir Francis Galton is the father of eugenics who originally coined the term, so knowing that this same person who basically knew how to control human beings like insects was a eugenicist back in I think the 1800s leads one to ponder what kind of tomfoolery is about during times like these.

That spunds pretty interesting you might be the first person to get me to read in like 15 years

They made a show adaptation, highly advised to watch!

@@MrUtherellus Would name it for me....

@@SamiUllah-nr4ex psycho pass

@@MrUtherellus although plot wise it's become a pretty far cry from the source, but such is the destiny of most adaptations to the screen

It's because you always switch the TV remote thing.

@@TheAdventurerAndDiscoverer sadly, I can verify that this is not the reason, lol

​​@@alexadascalitei7431it's cuz your the yeller beller weller schmeladoodleamakadoo

Lol! That's one reason why TPIR requires you to drop one at a time!

@@westonding8953 hmmm

And participation in taking vaccines. Through great market research, propaganda and coercion. Vaccine sales have reached the predicted target of 95% of the population. Through freedom of choice sales would have been only 30% with good marketing up to 70% but with grest coercion tactics, the 95% sales target has been hit. I don't know the expected sales targets for boosters. But I know the vaccines companies are placing orders with governments for 100% population coverage with governments taking the losses when the consumption rate is less than perfect 👌 predictable humanity. So easy to control by fear and propaganda

aka #shib

@@BatMan-to8im 🤡

@@neondemon5137 u the 🤡 buddy

I am an extremist. I won't take the experimental vaccines. But the globalist predicted this knowing only 5% of the population would not be coerced no matter what. Those predictions have been quite accurate. And is why the globalists had the conviction to pull off such an evil plan.

@@BatMan-to8im 🙄

@@BatMan-to8im In some european countries there is over 50% of "extremists"... Vaccine and mandate for it is extreme and we shouldnt let extreme people to ruling positions

@@Inkkari9 coming from Europe myself I completely agree. Look at Australia, most are complacent and get ordered around, brought to these camps - where have I seen this before - while the few "extreme" will fight it, the other few extreme will impose it on the rest. Sydney Watson is a great channel and she sometime ago broke down in tears when she saw what's happening to Australia. Well, once a penal colony always a penal colony. I mean they shot dogs in rescue shelters so that people wouldn't gather there, for crying out loud. What's next, orphans? They also say those camps are voluntary, yet 3 people tested negative escaped them, were hunted down by the police and brought back in, meanwhile only workers get to have hazmat suit, while said 3 people were brought back into a highly infectious area ffs! It only takes a suspicion you were in contact - off to the camp with ya. People at homes now cannot go buy food, only allowed to leave in case of an medical emergency, so their dogs are what? Peeing and pooping in the house?

@@belladonnahigh9206 As a double-vaccinated Queenslander, I'd just like to say, what in the hell are you talking about?????

Call me a Mule but i dont believe that

@@herscher1297 it's a series of sci-fi novels, you don't have to believe it but it does raise some important questions

@@angelicat8540 ...have you read them?

@@herscher1297 I have just finished the first book actually.

Loved the show. I hope it keeps going

that’s a really nice one!

Except quantum mechanics. That shit is 100% random (probably)

@@spoopy9689 *"THAT person is making an opinion!"*

​​@@DatOneGuy- *They have a heart attack in their sleep*

Also some guy on YT: I won't breathe until MrBeast replies to this video

my prediction : someone might interact with this comment but i won't react/reply

"THAT person is going to breath" *instantly dies*

If u were dumb you wouldn’t brave come up with such a cool creative unique KZfaq username

@@gabriellerosewood7850 what

You hate to see it

Yeah and make sure she has not done engineering otherwise it will be obvious to her

ya killing me! 🤪😊

I’m dead 😂😂

took way too long to find an ian malcom reference

As a Ian Malcolm fan I'VE BEEN SUMMONED

@@jpb620 I was looking for one too 😂

If its the kast video I'm planning to watch, i go yo history and scroll and watcb

@@anonymoususer602 Yeah but some people like to stay in the loop of shorts and not leave

Can you fast forward and rewind shorts?

@@TomCruz54321 if you open them from main channel

@@stepstony3683 mhm

knawledge

Haha, yes exactly. I am one of those in the 5‰ they knew would not be coerced or tricked into taking the magic potion. I have watched closely from Australia. At the begining the target was 95% of the population to take the potion. That target reduced to 70 then increased to 80 then back to 95 The statistics from the government propaganda arm the ABC were shown to be 30% against 30% for and 40% either way. So the 70% target was easy. Of the 30% against it was predicted 25% would fall under coercion. And that prediction has been spot on. With excellent psychological manipulation and threat of loss of work and freedoms of movement the original 95% target has been almost hit in one state in Australia, We'll done globalists!

So you’ll be joining TikTok?

Get help

Yes, nature is probabilistic in atomic level. Big objects look deterministic and simple but are made of undeterministic components.

me as a nano student : yeah, our study is chaos for sure

Can u teach me? It's seems like a useful ability.

How?

Senpai, please enlighten us 😭

I know I have it on phone. I kinda actually forgot about it lmao. One guy made a real working clock. I still dont understand how tf he managed to do it but ok.

@@InsufficientYarsago The game is Turing complete, so you *could* theoretically train a neural network in it, but uhhh... bad idea to try.

@@InsufficientYarsago I never knew you could run it on mobile! Is it like a mobile app or website or something?

You can even use Conway's game of life to build (a much slower) Conway's game of life. The traffic thing sounds a little fishy; I'll bet they have to use a different rule set if it's true. There is a generalization of the original Conway game where you can specify the rules of the game on I believe 16 bits. 8 specify which numbers of living neighbors will cause a living cell to die, 8 specify which numbers of living neighbors will cause a dead cell to come alive. The original rules are just 1/65536th of the game, and it's really hard to believe that they would just happen to be a model for traffic. The game is a fine example of deterministic chaos, but it isn't a very good example of statistically predictable chaos. There aren't any patterns in population or any other measurable property. Not with the original rules. Largely because the life and death rules are asymmetric and non-conservative. If you have a consistent number of cells, or if the fate of each cell depends only on the state of its neighbors and not its own state, there are obvious ways to make general predictions. If you _really_ want to go down a rabbit hole on systems of cellular automata like the game, read anything Wolfram has been working on for the last ten years or so. Wolfram is the guy behind the indispensable Mathematica software, and he is way off the deep end about describing literally everything in systems like this. It's not real fundamental physics and it never will be, because nature just has more state than that, but it's still interesting stuff, and sometimes useful in modelling.

@@davidhand9721 "The traffic thing sounds a little fishy; I'll bet they have to use a different rule set if it's true." The game with the original ruleset is turing complete, so using it to predict traffic is entirely possible. Unless you somehow have a specific reason to suspect it would be particularly difficult with the original ruleset, yet not be so with another (which I'm sure would be an incredibly complex mathematical task on its own), I'm not sure you can suggest this.