Great review. Wish you would have hit some woods with it though

And I pulled the Trigger. Thank you. For the Awesome Review

The surprise/amazement in your voice when comparing both devices is funny--I was just as surprised as well. Great video. Looking to get one of those PRGR to help out with data gathering. Thanks!

Excellent video. Thank you! I can tell you put a lot of thought into the content rather than mindless talking like a lot of others do. I loved how you broke it up into 3 sections. Very helpful. Very professional.

Very thoughtful review - thumbs up! And if you don't mind me saying, I'm blown away that on your 90 second Final Thoughts you NEVER blinked at all - WOW, I'm not much of a blinker myself but you easily beat me so without watching more videos I'm definitely Subscribing and kudos for your confident and sincere performance in front of the camera! Happy Trails, Michael

I love the PRGR. I've used it for swing speed training and its also great for prepping before a round if you've only got nets and not an actual range. Only slight downer is, as you say Luke, that it struggles with wedges/shorter shots. I place it on a head cover or similar to raise it slightly and it seems to like that better.

Much needed review. Another channel tested the device without switching club settings. I appreciated you breaking it down in 3 parts and being totally honest (good and bad). CLEARLY the GOOD outweighs the BAD. Thanks to you I see one of these in my near future.⛳

Comprehensive professionally presented, very clearly articulated review. I've got one of these for speed training but following this I will use to hone my pitching distances too. Thank you.

I have owned a PRGR for past 2 years, it has served me very well, be careful though keep the unit perfectly level for accurate readings. I use a small tripod £7 ebay with level mount, other axis used is a pocket bubble ebay £1. Worth the effort of 1-2 minutes to set level.

Love your Reviews. Spot on Mate.

Good review. What would be even more interesting would be Trackman v Trackman to see the repeatability/consistency of the flagship product. As a former software engineer who programmed various precision measuring systems I suspect the results would vary by a significant amount. The manufacturer wouldn't like it though. lol

Excellent stuff very professional. Thanks 😊

Not familiar with "speed training" nor how this sort of gadgetry actually works, but based on what I saw here in your fine review (and comments related to club selection method with the gadget), it looks like the dern thing doesn't even require that a *ball* be present! *Wonderful*! Rob Cheney, the brilliant Singapore based fellow on KZfaq, has convinced me that learning how hard to swing a gap wedge to generate all the carries between 30 and 80 yards is something that I *really* want (and need) to know. And I am willing to put in the practice time on it. I *must* have this thing, as it appears that there would essentially be no *limit* on how much this could be easily practiced. Just gotta find a source for bulk battery purchase. :-) Thanks so much for sharing!

Good review

It has a facility to set which club to measure. It does 9 iron to 3 iron (I). No 2 iron unfortunately. It does U3 to U6. I'm assuming this means utility clubs, which I would hope in turn would include both irons and hybrids because there isn't a separate category dedicated to either. It does PW, AW and SW, but no Lob Wedge, so considering the number of short clubs available it is a bit limited. It does W1, W3, W4, W5, W7 and W9. I assume these are for woods, W1 being the driver. I use a lot of hybrids which are only numbered by their loft. In some circles these could, I suppose be deemed as woods and an estimation could be made to decide what wood they represent to use for input. Similarly though, they could be termed as iron replacements, certainly for the longer less lofted hybrids. For instance, a 19° hybrid equating to a 2 iron which could and can only be input as a 5 wood. But does that work? There are possible anomalies with the PRGR in this respect. I would like to understand why the numbering of the club needs to be entered in the first place. How does it calculate for each club, or is the input only for data storage and subsequent analysis and comparison? I mean, could I obtain all I need to know from swinging a 5 iron (5I) on the driver setting (W1)? I don't know much about the expensive launch monitors and their flexibility but the PRGR also has modes for baseball, (batting and pitching), which are frankly pretty much redundant. The device could have been designed to be a dedicated unit for golf with possibly more information being made available. I have one and it is quite useful but it is limited in its versatility.

Excellent video. I wouldn't be too worried about it not picking up wedges. Does anyone really use a launch monitor for anything under 100 yards?

Great video! Can PRGR be connected to some form of display for golf course simulation?

you didn't show the driver swing comparing the PRGR and the Trackman. was it also similar? Did the PRGR read the swing speed around 5-10% slower? was the carry distance the same ?

what about reading the data? Does it give you an average on every club too?

Accuracy of swing speed with no ball pretty on point?

Can you use them hitting into a net?

how does it do with distance clubs?

Only downside is it has limited accuracy in terms of reading carry distance with driver shots and often overestimates driver carry by 10 yards or so.

how do i change from meters to yards

No good without a driver test