Mad respect for you and your comment. I salute with honor

Salute

Salute

You sir, are spitting facts

What a fantastic point

Skill points! That's so sweet lmao

My god, this is so funny.... Cute too.

Lmao your son is a master comedian

Put him in late-night talk show, you have yourself gold mine

SKILL POINTS OMG

I think the point his is making, is that fart particles are much larger than viral ones, so if they don't filter poo stink, how are they filtering smaller things?

Smelling a fart through your pants is okay. It's smelling other peoples farts that's a problem.

Why are they holding their pants to their face?

Well it's a good thing we don't fart Covid all over the place lol. Not to mention farting would encourage social distancing 🤔

@@ksara2883 We can't be sure we don't. The gut is a perfect place for SARS-CoV-2 to infect. Maybe why China have been using anal swabs to test 🤷🏻‍♂️

It’s unfortunate people were so unkind. All we parents just do the best we can with the information we are given and it’s not our faults that we are lied to by powerful interests . Lots of parents have reversed their kids’ diagnoses of autism with dietary changes and heavy metal detox. Focus on your child’s health first and foremost and watch the symptoms diagnosed as autism disappear! It can be a challenge because so much crap food is engineered to be addictive but it can be done. I know this for certain.

@@iadhdki9535 As someone with autism, you are wrong. Autism is not something that can be reversed, nor would you want to reverse it. It is a genetic condition that alters the structure and pathways of the brain. Nothing you do will cause or stop the presentation of autism. The reason the symptoms seem to get less with age is that autistic people learn to mask their traits in order to avoid rejection by society. You probably know people with autism and have no idea. As a society we need to stop the stigmatization of autism and other neurodivergent conditions and accept people for who they are.

You did bro. It's hard I know. It sucks.

@@iadhdki9535 You CANNOT 'reverse autism', no matter what you do, be it dieting or 'heavy metal detox', because it's GENETIC in nature, that is 'caused by variation in the genes of our body', and thus mostly hereditary, so you cannot do anything about it, only adapt to the way your brain is wired. And I say it as an autistic adult myself. Please, for the love of common sense and all actual science and medicine based on approved research, get your facts straight, do your own research and stop torturing kids with pseudoscience.

@@iadhdki9535 I’m not sure if the diet of a child effects their brain structure.

Maybe the ones who need to see it won't, but these videos give solid arguments to people who may be dealing with a loved one who's buying into antivax conspiracies.

I'm spreading this video , I got some friends that need to here it....

The reason for that is because of how conspiracy theories work. By definition a conspiracy theory cannot be falsified. Therefore, it is impossible to prove a conspiracy theory wrong. You can provide evidence to suggest their outcome is very unlikely, but you really cannot prove them, out right wrong. The same actually applies to a scientific theory. Scientific theories forbid certain elements or aspects. As a result, when scientists conduct research, they aren't trying to support their theory. Let me give you a prime example of what I mean from the one and only James Randy. Imagine that you believe in Santa Claus and we are having a discussion about his existence. You ask me to prove that he doesn't exist. I take you up on that and fly to the North Pole. I look high and low, however, he isn't there. No lapland, no elves, no rain deer and no Santa. I record my observations and come to the conclusion that he is not real. I come back and present you with the evidence supporting the idea that he doesn't exist. Your response is, "well Santa is magic, he simply turned himself and Lapland invisible upon your arrival." That doesn't mean that's what actually happened. But, I can't prove that he didn't just turn invisible. In other words, conspiracies are based on confirmation bias. An individual who believes in a conspiracy theory wants it to be true. They will twist and bend evidence to suit their narrative. If you try to prove a scientific theory by looking for proof of your theory, you run the risk of doing the same. That's why criminal investigations are based purely on the evidence. In reality, criminal investigators will not make up stories based on evidence they will just look at evidence from a surface level. This is because, they run the risk of bending the narrative if they don't. Conspiracy nuts that see this video will make their own explanations for why their view is correct and adhere to confirmation bias.

I think occasionally a person who is slipping into the conspiracy theory might find this and have their minds changed. That's all you can hope for. If you're lucky they will go on to help change other people's minds. I can't see any negatives to trying to educate people about these issues. I think it justifies the work PDE put in to create it and is performing a public service by providing accurate information as a counterpoint to the deluge of ignorance on social media.

@@enhaxed7839 Definitely. To be honest, if I see people spreading misinformation about vaccines, I just send them a link to this.

Same

@@thejarjosh Thats just your personal experience, it does not extrapolate to anyone (hell, its not even that normal). For contrast, i know someone who didnt want to use masks and had the chance to get vaccinated by covid but didnt bc "vaccines bad". A week or so he got covid, and died painfully without the chance to calm his pain other than putting him to sleep. LOL its all about the anti-vax / anti-mask propaganda.

@@thejarjosh a antimask cop died of covid like last week dude ....... im sure more have there just to dumb to admit there mistake before getting ill

@@thejarjosh I didnt intend for what i said to be true. Just a representation thats the contrary to what you say. You said that you know someone who does not use mask nor vaccinate, and its the healthiest person you've ever met. I told you i know someone who does not use mask nor vaccinate, yet he died in agony bc of not taking the corresponding measures. Both are personal experiences (mine being an hypothetical one), saying the opposite but arguing the same way "i know this guy that does x and hes x". Yet, you say that yours is true bc yes and mine is not bc its a lie and because big pharma. This does not make sense. Stop for a moment and think about it. Think of what you'd answer me, and put it the other way but throw the same non-fundamented arguments. Why would either one be true or not? what does determine it? What you have there is a big big bias dude.

@@thejarjosh Whatever, it does not make sense to keep on talking. Have a great day.

I think vaccine hesitancy is a good thing. Vaccine paranoia is a problem however. Vaccines like any medicine aren’t inherently side effect free and the chief principle of both medicine is benefit vs harm. For instance, we’re not getting vaccinated for cholera bc the benefit is too little compared to the potential harm. It’s not just good but necessary to view things through the lens of benefit-harm weighing. I think it’s a misconception that skepticism is a bad or unscientific thing, it’s a fundamental in performing science on the contrary. Only ideas that can hold their own past skepticism survive which is also why vaccines have survived. The problems arise when people behave irrationally through paranoia and hysteria, not when people are skeptical.

@@ExternusArmy I don't think anyone is saying all skepticism and all hesitance are negative. They where hesitant to get a vaccine that was and is proven safe and effective. Hence, vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine paranoia is a different animal altogether, like you said. But largely irrelevant to what I was stating above.

@@ExternusArmy and to be clear, we where both skeptical of the vaccine, until evidence suggested it was safe and effective. The science won me over but my s/o just needed a little extra push, which is why I praised this video.

@@darthteck Is this the same guy as before or did you forget to switch accounts?

@@ExternusArmy I think your take on skepticism is off by a fair margin. I agree almost completely otherwise. There is a difference between skepticism and mistrust. And a lot of what is considered skepticism is actually distrust. (I think there is a better word, will update is I remember it later). They can look a lot like each other.

SHOW ME AN AUTISTIC PERSON THAT IS UNVACCINATED

​@@Brian-gx7yx If this nonsense is true, why are so many vaccinated folks NOT autistic?

@@Brian-gx7yx I think you are a bot

@@johannsanchocuevas7854 Why do you think I am a BOT

@@johannsanchocuevas7854 Why do you think I am a BOT

​@Paul Stockton Facebook? Pfff... I just have Donald Trump's twitter feed injected in my arm

@@jericho6231 Wouldn't this channel fit the bill that you're describing?

😂😂😂

@@jericho6231 not sure if your response was supposed to be ironic, sarcastic or something in between, but Dave puts forward a much more compelling argument backed up with easily researched facts than the meme photo your friend Gary with 1 ex wife, 2 kids who call another man “dad” and a glittering career as a “lifestyle blogger/truth seeker” posted onto his Facebook page.

but but vaccines cells contain dead babies

@@deletedchannel9945 lol

@@deletedchannel9945 like what?

@@deletedchannel9945 how about you list those mistakes? Vaccines dont cause autism, they are completley fine, masks are effective, end of story

@@deletedchannel9945 any examples? Or just hot air

@@RealAlphaMango It's not worth it man, you can't convince people like this guy of anything that is supported by copious amounts of valid scientific literature.

Yes

Yes and there is so much nonsense on the internet and social networks

You must be as braindead as he is or as sold out. This nonsense about the covid jabs is borderline criminal.

@@andromedaaldebaran1378 No evidence to support that it's nonsense? Typical covidiot 🤣🤣🤣.

Yay reddit we did it

I think it will depend on the pathogen, I'm not really aware of what would make one approach more desirable than another but I'm sure it varies, it's a good question!

Yeah, you should probably look for someone who works in the field of immunology.

The coronaviruses simply don't work for vaccinations using the same methods as other vaccines, learned by trial and error what works. So they had to find another way. Maybe comparable to what weight loss/control methods work for a person. It varies.

mRNA is a new vaccine technology that has transformed the management of infectious disease. There’s no way that the older methods can compete with the molecular precision and timelines of getting a vaccine into arms. Vaccines for influenza have been produced in fertilized chicken eggs in the past, and it’s a primitive and costly way to go. It takes billions of eggs, for one which must be set aside months prior to influenza season. Once the virus is inoculated in the eggs, all the eggs have to be harvested for virus, and all egg protein and contaminants must be purified away, and the virus inactivated. Despite this, egg proteins have sometimes been present at levels high enough to cause immune reaction in patients. mRNA is here to stay and will replace not only conventional vaccine platforms for infectious disease, but also allows for vaccines against cancer and other conditions.

@@ProfessorDaveExplains have you seen the increase in myocarditis and excess deaths, if so would you be willing to talk about it?

Eggs contain carbon and sulfur. Therefore, they came from Leopold's rubber plantations. Eggs need to be canceled. Get woke, go nutrient broke, lol.

I laughed xD

LMAOOOO

@@jasonc0065 weird how most woke people actually follow the science at least in comparison to their opposition

@@excalibur2772 I don't the science of injecting RNA into your body. It's mutilation.

heh heh. yep.

She's a little confused, but she got the spirit

@@Sovayer I've got the spirits too. Come on over. Let's get drunk out of our minds and jam out to Green Day.

time to sell "sugar"

Mom, did you know sugar is coal?

Cult of personality

No but my fart frequency is its so organic you can smell it

@@sunsetsleeper 5 ghz fartwith

My stash of plutonium-238 is organic so it must be healthy

@@patricksarama4963 FBI wants to know your location.

I just bought it and sent a copy to a friend.

Indeed, a good recent example is Thunderf00t's video on SpaceX. In an attempt to try to show that "SpaceX isn't all that great", he examines the NASA paper "The Recent Large Reduction in Space Launch Cost" from 2018 which compares the cost to launch the now retired Space Shuttle versus a modern Falcon 9. In the video, everything points towards SpaceX being cheaper than the Shuttle and in the end, it is a meandering video with a lot of speculation which doesn't really prove any particular point. Yet the takeaway for some of his viewers is "wow... I never knew SpaceX was so bad!" because they are pre-disposed to thinking Thunderf00t is a reliable, unbiased source. I think this recent video has proven that otherwise.

The anti-vaccine nonsense is not skepticism. Skeptical thinking involves looking at the data and forming a rational conclusion. These folks are conspiracy theorists, which is a different animal altogether.

These people don't practice skepticism. Paranoia and skepticism are not the same thing. Paranoia involves cherry-picking information that conforms to their existing cognitive bias (in order to feel like they've broken through the fog, cracked some kind of code and figured out who the shadowy figures are... when in reality they'res still deep within a fog of ignorance.)

@@OzearEimaj lol he just posted a reply video especially for you.

@@atom6_ I wouldn't like to throw myself in with the diehard fans, but seems he's done the same thing again and ignored everything that contradicts him?

@@stephen3654 no, not at all. That’s all I’ve needed so far. So far so good. Are you anti vax ?

Well maybe listen to presidential candidate Kennedy who says the vaccine against Covid did not work and is not safe. They are more dangerous than getting Covid.

How's your heart doing? Cancer flare up yet?

@@Oussama-sabouh me too

Good video, I also like professor Delores Cahill s videos, and many other doctors and scientists that have different, understanding and views. And with non ionising technology I find the scientists and researchers, that know and have experience in that field ✌️. And the ukcolumn.org team to learn about propaganda 😁

@@TheHayleydavison If you like this video then there's no way you can also like anything Cahill has to say. She sits squarely alongside Kaufman and Wakefield and her opinions stand against all that Dave covers in this video.

@@frankwilson3265 I like to listen to other views and perspectives and see how they convince others or see their facts and references and then I investigate further their facts and references. It's all quite interesting 🙏 there isn't just one or two professors and scientists in one country with one view. There are hundreds of professors, scientists,in many countries,with many different research papers, many different research institutions. To teach is not to show one side of the coin, it's to offer a coin to the student to look at both sides of the coin 😉 or to particularly have some kind of naming names slagging match is just personal and egotistical,not educational 🙏

@@TheHayleydavison I agree with that, but not where the debates around the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic are concerned. Sometimes the scientific community is split down the middle on something. Then I am more than happy to listen to both sides of the argument. Sometimes the scientific community are split over several different views, with each fairly well represented and usually with common ground shared among them. Then I'm very interested in all of those views and look to see where each has merit. But neither of those things are the case with the current "debate". What we have is 99%+ of the scientific community being of one opinion and a fringe factor with opposing views. The likes of Boschee, Cahill, Sunetra Gupta, Coleman etc. When these people come on the radar of COVID-Deniers, lockdown protestors etc, they are instantly elevated within the movement and presented as the "side" of the argument. If on the other hand a scientist's view forms part of consensus view, the vast, vast majority are simply unheard of because what they have to say is unremarkable and therefore there is no-one pointing to them excitedly saying "Listen to what this person has to say". This does not form a debate where views are represented in the ratios in which they are held. All it does is create false equivalence.

It's part of my next debunk.

@@ProfessorDaveExplains yayayayayayaayayyayyayayayayay

@Robbierobot574 also a lot of weird shit about the “hebrew race that runs the world”, not ok at all

@@ProfessorDaveExplains well anhk my frequency and send me to Atlantis! Looking forward to that one

@@ProfessorDaveExplains Hopefully it comes soon.

A lot of people who distrust science in some ways don't distrust it because of some 'alternative fact' but because of how it makes them feel: in control. Perhaps if you restructured what you were saying around helping your son feel in control, it might help you reach some common ground?

@@efulmer8675 Yes, that's probably what I'll need to do. It's a balancing act while arguing with circular logic that's very hard.

Your son is smarter than you.

There needs to be. The only ones I see specifically about him either take his side or none, in spite of the blatant evidence against him. This man should have been jailed years ago.

@@berniethekiwidragon4382 I wonder how much of a hero someone would be if they could think up a way to get his sorry ass back to the UK... By whatever means necessary. I personally can't think of any methods to achieve that, but there must be some out there. Maybe someone could just ask him to go back... 🤣🤣🤣

@@berniethekiwidragon4382 Old comment, I know, but you might be interested in hbomberguy's "vaccines - a measured response" video essay. It went into great detail about Wakefield's fraudulent paper, his actions regarding the children in the study, and the conflicts of financial interest that were likely the driving force behind the paper. Also, hbomb is pretty engaging :)

I mean, if you don’t Trust him you can just look up this stuff for yourself lmaoo but I’ll save you the time: everything he said in this video was factuaö

@@jonathansilvestri7648 youre not as clever as you think you are if you dont realise the above is a joke mimicking what anti vaxxers say You think a guy like Dave would have barely passed biology? LOL

@@tiaan7032 i mean im not very familiar with dave haha maybe he didn't do to great in highschool biology but found a love for science later in life? idk. It just didn't sound like a joke is all LMAO

Agreed. I guess watching Dave figuratively kick the living sh*t out of flat earthers IS more entertaining, which would explain why those have 1,200,000 plus views.

Because he is wrong about the covid gene therapy injection.

most people don't care about catching covid

@@alien4ever221fair

I too agree that vaccine makers should never have been granted blanket immunity against lawsuits (by President Reagan in 1986). Though we vaccinated our daughter in late 90's (with no injuries), my views changed in 2015 when my healthy 7mo old dog died within hours of her 7-in-1 jab. I now dread all needles. I would rather take risk in getting the actual infection/disease naturally and allow our immune system to fight it off organically. My three remaining dogs haven't been to a vet in 8yrs. I pay attention to what I feed them (no processed crap). I am of the firm belief that man will never really be able to fully understand the immune system (because our bodies behave in highly complex ways once we breach the closed-loop system to study the process). I am not anti-science; but I am definitely anti-$cience, funded solely by profiteering mobs of Wall Street. I hope to one day start trusting science without fearing it. At the moment, I am s#it scared of all synthetic drugs and invasive procedures. If I get seriously injured in an accident, I may not have any other choice.

Can we discuss the reason why vaccine manufacturers are indemnified by western governments against law suits from individuals who suffer adverse reactions? Can we discuss why the vaccine manufacturers opted to not supply vaccines (protecting against this indescribably dangerous disease) to developing countries who's own governments would not provide an indemnity?

@@mfctrv2139 It’s certainly true that the vaccine and medicine industry is still an industry, and the big companies will still do anything they can to make money. But that doesn’t take away from how important vaccines are today, since if you didn’t have them you would probably die of a disease you can’t pronounce the name of.

@@mfctrv2139 Magically, developing countries didn't really get hit with covid somehow.

It was left out on purpose. It's all about promoting the narrative over an honest and objective look at things that is as neutral as possible.

This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a KZfaq topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. He's not a good person. Read more 1 2 Show more replies Anthony Conigliaro 1 year ago As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you? 2.3K 169 Philip Michel 1 second ago This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a KZfaq topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?! Does anyone here know what that means? Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence? Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...? He's not a good person

Yeah, aluminum is a neurotoxin and has the ability to cross the blood brain barrier. Considering aluminum is used in many vaccines as the “adjuvant” and the purpose of a adjuvant being a compound that stays in the body for a long time which the antigen binds with so you have a consistent immune response for a long term. Of course, they have done studies to ascertain the toxicity of the dosage of aluminum right? The only study that has been done and cited only tested the toxicity of INGESTED aluminum in adults. They never tested injection toxicity and never did any toxicity tests with children or infants at all. If you seriously try to equate effects of ingestion and injection then you have left the bounds of a scientific conversation.

Doctor are you really a Doctor?

@@nothanksbro69 Yes, I am. Why?

@@docmike8601 Hi Doctor

You send you victims to this idiot I hope they get a better teacher next time

@@georgemoore7461 George you didn’t graduate school. Shut up.

If water was suddenly flammable it wouldnt take 5 minutes for someone to light the oceans on fire lol

Not at the start! But I sure am glad it turned out this way!

Must be easy not watching a single second of a video and just baselessly accusing people of plagiarism so that you can avoid challenging the lies you’ve chosen to believe.

@@deletedchannel9945 lmao, you clearly have not watched or have not understood anything said in this video. "Misinformed", you don't know how stupid that sounds coming from you.

@@deletedchannel9945 facebook posts and youtube vids > science

@@ProfessorDaveExplains you just deleted deleted channel’s argument

I hope so, I've always connected more with neurodiverse people😂

Severe ADHD over here I think people are afraid of having a low functioning ASD child Asperger’s is high functioning

It was also great how we found a literal cure for rabies.

Bruhmoment moms on Facebook be like: everything on Facebook is true, except the things that I think are fake

If you ask a vaxx pusher they will tell you to get the vaxx. If you ask me i will say no vaxx. Its your right to do either. Natural herd immunity has been know way before vaxxes. Big pharma stole the term herd immunity and attached it to their product aka vaxxes.

I know. I done studies on it, and found that it’s even in our water!

@@ejstudios6916 wait really. This is madness. Were We're screwed

For those who don’t get it... Dihydrogen monoxide IS water

It’s even in the oceans too. The poor sea creatures!

It's also ridiculous they put sodium and chlorine in food, one spontaneously catches on fire the other toxic

Don't forget bananas. If you eat 10k of them in an hour, you'll die of radiation poisoning! :D

same thing for people that say fluoride is toxic. you'll die from just the water long before fluoride ever has a negative effect.

That's assuming the Coronavirus even exists, but you do you.

@@henryford2950 ⬆️⬆️malaka

@@henryford2950 better take a look in the mirror to see if you exist, pinhead

@@gerdsfargen6687 Nice try.

This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a KZfaq topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. He's not a good person. Read more 1 2 Show more replies Anthony Conigliaro 1 year ago As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you? 2.3K 169 Philip Michel 1 second ago This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a KZfaq topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?! Does anyone here know what that means? Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence? Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...? He's not a good person

We need look no further than American public schools to find stupid and dangerous people with guns

A good analogy I saw was that normally, vaccine production is like trying to drive across a busy city in the height of the rush hour. Covid vaccines are like the local council banning all other traffic and you being given a police escort through the city. In a sports car.

There are three more companies about to get the green light to produce so hopefully things will be very different by the summer. Fingers crossed!

It is hardly suprising that vaccine production is taking some time to ramp up and that there are some initial teething problems. Actually it is impressive just how efficient the whole process has been. Likely there will be adequate vaccines for everyone, in western countries by spring. The rest of the world will have to wait a bit longer, but governments are stepping up to plate for that too.

CH you like in a town of 15k people? Damn that's a ghost town.

@@nothanksbro69 maybe, but for us in Switzerland thats not small, but also not big... The hole country haves only 8Million people so...

Dont hide him, it was Andrew Wakefield. Or to use his official medical title, Andrew Wakefield. He wasn't even an anti vaxxer, he just wanted people to use his measles vaccine instead of the MMR one.

I have severe ADHD and there’s strong evidence it’s existed in my ancestral maternal bloodline When people tell me it’s how I eat or medication or whatever nonsense I just ignore them

In some people, a little bit of education gives them all the confidence they need to believe in what they want. When you have no education, you are probably aware of it, and would therfore be more likely to listen to someone who is educated.

Stem cells are thought to be essentially immortal because they continually renew themselves. Just google your question and you'll get a lot of good/more in depth answers

This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a KZfaq topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. He's not a good person. Read more 1 2 Show more replies Anthony Conigliaro 1 year ago As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you? 2.3K 169 Philip Michel 1 second ago This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a KZfaq topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?! Does anyone here know what that means? Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence? Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...? He's not a good person

There will be an entire nutrition series at some point!

Unprocessed plant based is best. Just make sure you hit all of your caloric needs and essential nutrient scores. A simple step in the right direction would be to switch out dairy milk with an unsweetened plant based. Experiment. See which ones you like.

@@joeylafrond2472 i ate whole-food plant-based for 2.5 years, following dr Greger's daily dozen. at first i felt good but by the end of it i developed severe burning sensations to the head and neck, as well as tinnitus. i did supplement with b12, as Greger recommends. The symptoms i mentioned gradually went away as i reintroduced animal products into my diet.

@@HakuCell Check out Mikaela Peterson's Lion Diet debate at Oxford from a few weeks ago. In a nutshell she sums up how an all meat diet cured her of all the ailments that haunted her throughout her life, as she had many autoimmune and mental health disorders. She claims they tested it on a larger population and apparently there was huge benefits, like people with type 2 diabetes getting off their insulin. Meat is the only form of sustenance that you can survive on solely, is another claim. I personally don't know much about it. If nothing else it's fascinating, and personally I want to try it and see if there's an impact on my ADHD focusing issues, depression, and anxiety. Besto luck.

I also suggest eating no more than 2000 calories a day to stay healthy. Although if your health is seriously in a bad shape go to 1500 to 1000 calories

it's the same mentality, so no surprise it seems familiar.

@Robbierobot574 I've also seen talk of "green energy is to blame!" despite all forms of power being affected...

"Researchers at the Wellcome Sanger Institute and EMBL's European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) have identified over 140,000 viral species living in the human gut, more than half of which have never been seen before. The paper, published today (18 February 2021) in Cell, contains an analysis of over 28,000 gut microbiome samples collected in different parts of the world. The number and diversity of the viruses the researchers found was surprisingly high, and the data opens up new research avenues for understanding how viruses living in the gut affect human health." www.google.com/amp/s/www.technologynetworks.com/immunology/news/amp/140000-virus-species-found-in-the-human-gut-345766 Sorry to say, but Dave is just as clueless as his KZfaq audience

@@thor4164 What does this have to do with what Dave said? Did you read the article you linked?

@@keisi1574 The article you've linked does indeed prove that microorganisms are essential to our existence. No one here is disputing that though. The difference is that there are still certain bacteria and viruses that are infectious and dangerous, not the kind you want as part of a healthy gut microbiome. Those are what are important to immunize against.

Your final comment is poetic. May I quote you?

@@carolbilyeu6418 You sure can.

Pilot studies happen all the time, so a low N count is not unusual. But they don't hold much weight either. Pretty much all they can do is say 'hey, there might be something here. Can we do a bigger study to see if it holds up?' Turns out it didn't hold up when those bigger studies happened, and Wakefield himself was given the green light to do a bigger study with funding and a big patient pool to draw from, but never did it despite insistence from colleagues.

@@Ravaxr do you know if Wakefield had the opportunity before the other large one? Or perhaps, would it be most likely he'd have the opportunity? I'm ignorant of the processes but I'm wondering if given the benefit of the doubt it's possible he just made a mistake or if it's beyond a reasonable doubt that he was dishonest.

@@drunkrtard Wakefield worked for Royal Free hospital, and soon after the paper was published and resulting media frenzy, they got a new director, Mark Pepys. Pepys was skeptical of the study, but agreed to keep Wakefield on, and provide funding and a patient pool to have a larger study, around 150 participants. This should be every scientists' dream: Funding, access to tools and personnel, and a nice big pool of patients that you have the green light to study. Except Wakefield didn't do it. Brian Deer, investigative journalist, later figured out exactly how the data was manipulated in the pilot study, and with so many eyes on him now, and such a large patient pool, Wakefield could no longer do that, and knew the study would show the pilot was unfounded, and the media frenzy based on a lie. One of the kids in the pilot was the brother of another patient, and didn't even have autism to begin with, yet was claimed to have such clear symptoms that their own parent noticed within 24 hours of the vaccine. I mean if you're just making it up at that point why not.

@@Ravaxr thank you for all the detailed information.

If you get the covid, you’ll still have to be vaccinated later. Since the immune system doesn’t keep the antibodies’ « blueprints » against covid forever

This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a KZfaq topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. He's not a good person. Read more 1 2 Show more replies Anthony Conigliaro 1 year ago As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you? 2.3K 169 Philip Michel 1 second ago This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a KZfaq topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?! Does anyone here know what that means? Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence? Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...? He's not a good person

Tell her I'm not saying anything that isn't well understood by the scientific community. Also if she thinks Malone "invented mRNA", she's bonkers, and needs to learn basic biochemistry. She also needs to stop trusting unhinged iconoclasts. People are liars. Malone is one of them.

Even being charitable, to say Malone invented mRNA vaccines is akin to saying Ben Franklin invented the lightbulb.

@@Ravaxr But does Malone understand mRNA vaccines better than say, a KZfaq Professer?

@@joshualawson7604 It's more important to ask if he is being honest about it.

My advice is stop pushing your vaxx religion on to your friend.

is it as bad as death? Then don't worry.

Is there any good reason to think there will be long term effects?

They deny the dangers of COVID-19 ("It only attacks the elders and people with preexisting conditions!"). The vaccine will be made of just _parts_ of COVID (eg RNA of COVID), since according to them COVID-19 isn't dangerous, neither is the vaccine.

The long term effects of what? The mRNA vaccine? The mRNA degrades and is eliminated by the body after a few days. We can check for this. Everything else in the vaccine has been used in other vaccines for decades. The only long term effects we don't know about are how long it will be effective for combating Covid-19, and the vanishingly small chance that the vaccine will provoke an immune response to non-covid organisms that use a similar spike protein. This would only be a problem if the non-covid organisms were beneficial to humans, but this is why they have clinical trials. To weed out such issues. Since the immune response only takes at most a couple weeks to completely destroy an organism in the body, any major effects from accidentally killing beneficial bacteria would have been discovered by phase 3 trials at the latest. I just got the moderna shot, and the only thing negative effect so far has been a sore arm for a couple days. I've heard some people develop a low grade fever and other flu like symptoms. These are intentional. They are the vaccine provoking an immune response.

Ask them to name one vaccine that we administer today that has ever caused widespread, long term effects. Imma give you a hint, there aren’t any. However the long term effects from covid-19 are very real and have been proven to exist

As a wise man once said, "you cant win an argument against an idiot as they will deag you down to their level and beat you with experience."

absolute chad

@@lydiabentley3413 Well, I had the polio vaccine many years ago and *do not* suffer from or with multiple sclerosis and this is much later in life!

@@lydiabentley3413 Let me make this clear: There is *no* link between vaccinations and ms. This is a quote from the Multiple Sclerosis Trust . "Numerous studies have investigated a possible link between having a vaccination and later developing multiple sclerosis or another autoimmune disease. In 2018, researchers collected all the published data together on HPV (human papillomavirus vaccine) and Hepatitis B vaccine and found no association between these vaccines and MS or other autoimmune disease. Other researchers have looked at the vaccines for influenza, MMR (Measles, mumps and rubella), polio, typhoid fever and the BCG vaccine for tuberculosis. None of these vaccines resulted in an increased risk of developing MS. The BCG vaccine may delay progression from CIS to full MS. The diphtheria and tetanus vaccinations may be associated with a decreased risk of MS." (mstrust.org.uk/a-z/vaccination-and-immunisation)

@@lauracusumano9473 From the first line of the wikipedia article: A vaccine is a biological preparation that provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease. Whatever you think a vaccine is supposed to do doesn't matter. You are not an immunologist or an epidemiologist. If you think that vaccines are some sort of scam you need to present evidence.

@@lydiabentley3413 Oh yes, Dr Buttar, a conspiracy mythologist, anti-vaccine proponent, and osteopath. Mine are *not* beliefs. Please have a vaccination and wear a mask. It will save a life, your life or someone you love.

@@lauracusumano9473 I am right. Can you refute it? How about Merriam Webster? www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attenuated The fact is that you have a preconception that doesn't fit reality. I am sorry but reality isn't going to change just because you don't understand it.

@@goos6005 Facebook collects data, google eveen more... everything with amazon... also... well yeah

The more the better. If my memory serves me right my statistics class way back in my college days showed the bare minimum of 31 in a sample size was needed. But this minimum gave the lowest level of confidence of results. Meaning the ability to be wrong was high. With Covid-19 the testing was conducted on 10's of thousands of people, which provided a very high level of confidence of reults.

@@surfk9836 So you need thousands of subjects? Why?

@@jeremiahkennon4990 as he said, the more the better. The more times you try something and find it that it works, the more confident you can be. It's best to bring uncertainty to a negligible level.

@@jax5734 Oh. Thanks for telling me.

I’m not sure. If you are unsure if you are allergic then consult a allergy’s doctor

@@nutsyear I already got it around a week ago, the 2nd dose.

I thought if I looked for long enough, I'd find a good comment.

@@deletedchannel9945 please cite your sources, or, let me guess, it's just something you read on facebook? Jackass.

@@deletedchannel9945 nope, there's a reason your account doesn't exist anymore. I'll give you a hint, it's not because you were in the right.

@@deletedchannel9945 "all the science proved it" lol what a moron.

Settle down, Neo. You must conserve your body's finite energy.

@@deletedchannel9945 what doctor gives a child more then 50 vaccines at one appointment? That’s the only way you could be poisoned by vaccines. And that’s the minimum amount.

asyntomatic people exist

Yeah...... covid is sometimes known to be asymptomatic

Are u suggesting it’s fake 😭

@@cheesepizza1775 I really hope your joking

but but but vAcCiNeS aRe DaNgErOuS tHeY cAuSe AuTiSm

nO tHeYrE nOt, i SaW tHiS tOtAlLy LeGiT aRtIclE oN oAnN aNd iNfOwArS sAyInG tHeY wErEn'T

It is safe. Keep up on your shots.

@@joeylafrond2472 and if we took 5 doses instead if booster dose. Is it cause liver damage. Actually i saw a death from rabies in my village and m in dipressn. I want take 5 shots instead of 3. Bt m very scared. 10 years ago, 1.5 years ago i took full corse of anti rBies

@@RamanDeep-gz9jd It won't cause liver damage. Even if it did, liver damage is manageable and even reversible. Rabies is neither.

@@joeylafrond2472 any case which they took 5 shots instead of boosters hv any serious kidney or liver pb.bcz m taking only i thought my pet dog bite by rabid dog and his saliva on my opn wound m very scared nd decide to take it . Have u any idea

@@RamanDeep-gz9jd Not that I am aware of.

Zoonotic origin is still extremely likely, though accidental lab leak can’t be ignored as a possibility.

Try searching for peer reviewed studies.

It's a wonder they don't include charcoal, the "lead" in pencils, or diamonds, in their diets. It's carbon, after all. All of our food consists of molecules made with carbon. 🙃

@@berniethekiwidragon4382 Indeed! Also, I wonder why they keep consuming salt in one way or another. They are, after all, expert chemists, and they should know sodium is highly reactive, and chlorine is extremely toxic 🤔

Yeah.

I usually just say "I stubbed my toe! It must have been the vaccine!"

It’s like the same logic as horse shoes make you lucky or wearing “lucky underwear”. Oh I didn’t miss the bus, it was my lucky underwear! Oh I got a passing grade, that was my lucky underwear.

@@TheSilentWalkerz yeah but if someone is healthy then takes the vaccine and gets myocarditis that is much more suspicious than wearing underwear 🙄

@@prplt Why? Why are you inclined to assume that (1) the two events are connected, and (2) no other factor is relevant? This smells like bias to me.

Dude smallpox has been eradicated

@@dhruvjain5439 I guess I should’ve indicated when it first came out then.

@@ronjones2266 oh well then I guess that the person COULD get it, I don't know the rarity of that, but it would come once the memory happen cell forgets the virus and how to counter it.

Check Simulated Sun from my featured channels list!