Propellertriebwagen Kruckenberg Schienenzeppelin (1930) Part 2.mpg

Рет қаралды 199,411

theoldman777

Күн бұрын

Part 2. High speed running.

Пікірлер: 45

@StarwarsSammler 4 жыл бұрын

Das Ding sieht aus wie aus einem Science Fiction Film. Wunderbares Stück Technik, und schon fast Hundert Jahre alt.....

@fepasarussa8642 2 жыл бұрын

The framework, specially the nose looks a lot like the shinkansen 0, i could say the Schienenzeppelin was the true first bullet train

@MrNobody0044 10 күн бұрын

Schön einmal ein Video von dem Zug zu sehen, weil in meinem Schrank ein Modell davon steht. Ursprünglich war es eine H0 Spurbreite ( Modelleisenbahn ) ist aber in meiner Kindheit einmal kaputt gegangen und wurde dann umgebaut zu einem Dreileiter. Danke für das Video sehr interessant anzusehen.

@Errr717 3 жыл бұрын

Way ahead of it's time. This is the original high speed rail. I'm guessing the tracks were not ready for the speeds it could travel.

@guaporeturns9472 Жыл бұрын

Lots of problems with that concept

@volkerdrieschner1264 6 жыл бұрын

Okay, das mit dem Antrieb hat längst überholt. Aber wenn ich jetzt nur dieses Design betrachte, dann ist das auch Heute, im Jahr 2018 eher Zukunft als wie Gegenwart! Und das fast 90 Jahre später!!

@DonovanDanteify 13 жыл бұрын

Thank you very much for uploading this!

@parisoinone5906 10 жыл бұрын

The appearance is similar to the first Shinkansen.

@rogerlollar4325 2 жыл бұрын

This has to be the first Streamliner ever

@meinAliasfuer2024 3 жыл бұрын

Großartig!

@jamesleopard8518 5 жыл бұрын

I never heard of Rail Zeppelins, since I liked trains as my childhood.

@applecounty 12 жыл бұрын

Okay, thank you for replying and keep looking for interesting films.

@BigKatz 12 жыл бұрын

They could have geared the engine to run a rear axle through the stations / yards, at slow speeds and throttle, then switched over to the propeller and high throttle. They also could have had some sort of fairing/cowling to cover the prop, as with a Murphy fan boat (swamp boat). Perhaps they ran out of money, or there was insufficient demand, or a lack of dedicated high-speed rail.

@JohnGeorgeBauerBuis Жыл бұрын

It was ultimately converted to a hydraulic drive connected to the wheels in 1932, and scrapped in 1939.

@badreality2 12 жыл бұрын

@kostyaz Couldn't they add train cars ("carriages") to the front of the engine? Also, how did the propeller train damage the train tracks?

@applecounty 12 жыл бұрын

There are shots of what appears to be a test track (straight) in the film, if I am correct where was this? Plus how much of the success of the SVT 877 is owed to the Schienenzeppelin?

@BigKatz 12 жыл бұрын

@MrWolfication That's what a switch engine's for, ya dope

@rogerb5615 6 жыл бұрын

Was Dr. Hugo Eckner involved with this design? The framework and streamlining remind me of the cabins on German dirigibles of the same era.

@paulhorn2665 5 жыл бұрын

Mr. Kruckenberg the inventer of the Railzepp, was a working collegue of Dr. Eckner.

@dextertreehorn 6 жыл бұрын

Background music is dark and creepy. Why?

@kostyaz 12 жыл бұрын

@badreality2 , because it can't take carriages with it, also it damages train tracks.

@Fischbroetchen1 14 жыл бұрын

Toll, aber hatte der Propeller nicht vorhin nur 2 Flügel und dann 4?

@uliuli1603 6 жыл бұрын

Ja meiner von Märklin hat 4

@siegmars.450 Жыл бұрын

ich las, dass beide Betriebsvarianten vorgesehen waren. Weil wohl noch nicht klar war, was besser ist.

@rudiaudio2379 19 күн бұрын

sicherlich hätten noch etwas mehr Passagiere Platz gehabt. Eigentlich ist der Wirkungsgrad von diesem Schienenzeppelin recht hoch gewesen. Laut Angaben hat er nur ca. 600 PS und brachte es auf 230 Km/h. Bei mehr Leuten vielleicht etwas weniger. Das Hauptproblem dürfte wohl der große Propeller im Bahnhof gewesen sein. Für ein Einzelfahrzeug auf nicht so belebten Strecken mit wenigen Mitfahrenden wäre es sicherlich ein sparsames Schienenfahrzeug gewesen.

@Starlight_66 2 жыл бұрын

Das man mit nur 2 Achsen so schnell fahren konnte...

@kostyaz 12 жыл бұрын

@badreality2 winds from this propeller damages tracks, i.e. stones flying away from the track.

@chaturongarchary9773 2 жыл бұрын

Sehr schon....

@RohrAtom 6 жыл бұрын

25. Sept. 1930 Erste Fahrt mit Gefell- fchaftern der G.V.T.

@lederbadehose 6 жыл бұрын

Erst Hirn einschalten dann sinnlos schreiben. Kauf Dir mal eine Hand voll Deutschkenntnisse. ſ also wie ein f ohne waagerechten Strich (Unicode Nr. 017F) ist die alte Schreibweise für ein ein langes s . Siehe auch : de.wikipedia.org/wiki/S de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langes_s

@badreality2 12 жыл бұрын

How come the propeller train idea wasn't commercially successful? They would have been the fastest trains for the time period.

@RACookPE1978 6 жыл бұрын

Too inefficient for the speed available on the tracks. See, "if" the tracks were "perfect" (no sway, no jerks, a smooth ride at long distance with constant speed on level (no intersections) tracks) THEN the speed could be maintained with a propeller drive. But the 1930-1932 tracks were rough and uneven and bumpy. So the ride was terrible when the ride was at high speed. Look at the people inside when the train is at speed. At low speed, when the the ride could be maintained at tolerable levels, the conventional trains using friction drive (and later using diesel trains even more!) the conventional drive was much, much more efficient. Today? Prop's are still less efficient than electric motor-to-rail drive on the "good" Spanish-French-Japanese-German dedicated high-speed rail lines. I enojoyed my rides on the high-speed trains between Madrid and Barcelona - but, if I wanted to go elsewhere = use a rental car or low-speed train.

@call9510 6 жыл бұрын

Also the BMW engine used in this prototype was soon required to provide Luftwaffe (Nazi Air Force) because imminent war. So not allowed to propulse trains, those could do be propulsed from any other engine system as usual.

@TheWuschelMUC 6 жыл бұрын

One more reason: the Schienenzeppelin could not go backwards.