i saw that and thought it was one of them telephone poles

Hes just so EXTRA

My first reaction was, "ya gotta be kidding me..." but then when you look at many of the mid-to-later pterosaurs, they really seem to have been vying for attention!

Thunderclap looked so wrong

Well it did have a use It was most likely used for finding a mate

the name is so cool, sound like some dwarvern skyrim thing

@@internetduck1520 Yeah, you're right.

*Favorite*

I love Quetzalcoatlus and hatzegopteryx.

OH YES AZDARCHID THE BEST !

Thank you very much!😁

I can totally agree

Damn didnt expect to see you here mr. Carnivores man

I agree

I also love hatzegopteryx beacuse i live in where it used to live, Romania

agreed

Yes

You are a great person

Yes but imagine if they survived

@@imranullah1319 They live on in our hearts❤

DrChick Engie Who knows? Once birds and bats go extinct. Maybe a group of gliding lizards might take to the skies again.🤷‍♂️

@@KhanMann66 gliding lizards would probably evolve into microraptors.

You forgot birds even existed

@@greminboye yea but they aren't the same thing

@@i_omqxxjakexx1670 Microraptors and pterosaurs are two different types

Nope! Felt the same way!

Doesn’t even look like a pterosaur to me.

@@KhanMann66 yeah, it looks like the porgs from Star Wars

Eah dude so cute. In my encyclopedia it was a real monster!

Wonder how they would've tasted if given the chance. I mean the porgs...well the anurognathus also, I do wish that Chewie did get a chance to eat his meal.

thank you!

I love Peteinosaurus

some of them are so cute, and others are menacing looking

Honestly I agree but I doubt a marine pterosaur would have such a coloring. Cool concept though

@@yuujinner5801 i dont see why not. Pterosaurs are quite extra, it makes sense that they had vibrant colors

@@leonardogrande6144 it makes sense, but not in the context of marine animals. No other marine seabird has had a radical coloring like that. Aboreal pterosaurs could have crazy coloring, but not marine, since having a weird coloring can let their prey know that they are coming, which is disadvantageous compared to the normal countershading that they possess. If some truly did had that color, it must be no more than a mutation, since I see no benefit to the creature.

@@yuujinner5801 countershading is very prominent, yes, and nature follows certain patterns when they work in general, but not that simple and limitated. See.. sharks, orcas, seagulls, they all have countershading, but in very differnt ways and some way more subtle than others. But why the two white spots of orcas over they eyes for instance then? That shoun't be there if the rules were as restrained as you say. Then we also have totally white dolphins.. which also should not be a thing if they wanted to camouflage. Also, let's keep in mind that pterosaurs don't have any living descendants, we know very little of their behaviour to assume that much. being unnoticed does't seem to be their way of doing things. And they wouldn't be the only sea animals in that. While most fish also tend to camouflage, we also have others on the opposite side, presenting all kind of colors, almost asking to get eaten, but there they are. Also some sea birds do have vibrant colors .. I woun't dare to assume pterosaurs could not be colorful for many reasons

@@leonardogrande6144 what seabirds have vibrant colors? I do not know of any. Also, since their anatomy is so similar to albatrosses, we can assume that they have had a similar lifestyle as well.

I give you the hint it's easy hint is I love the largest flying petrosaur. If you say Quetzalcoatlus and hatzegopteryx then you're correct.

Good job.

Quetzalcoatlus is the largest flying petrosaur.

@@skyandsparkleanddiscoandve1992 Arambourgiana

@@skyandsparkleanddiscoandve1992 It's Hatzegopteryx. Mario was wrong!

Arambourgiama is the tallest and has probably the longest wingspan while hatzegopteryx is easily the most robust and heavy and therefore bigger.

Hatzegopteryx: *_Buenos dias_*

Arambourgianian*

Some maintain that Quetzalcoatlus and similard might have been flightless...

@@MarioLanzas. but why they think that they was flightless ? Because of weight or something else?

Proto-pterosaurs are literally wingless.

There is the SoS 2428 specimen it belongs to an Unnamed Pterosaur and because of it's short wings and large abdomen it's thought to be flightless.

@@yagzkran9812 Let me know when someone other than David Peters comes to that conclusion. His methods are considered highly flawed by other paleontologists.

😮

😂

The kicks

Y

2

It was the hatzegopteryx

Go theopods

Please 😢

With music on the second channel in the video where there were models of dinosaurs from 2016s

@@altstepan2451 sure! There are many videos of theropod yet to come

Old and new theopods

Nosso t rex é o irritator

​@@limaceara835oxalaia: 👁👄👁

Metira

Sério n tô zuando

etnemataxE

True

O que não é bom é o contrabando de fósseis que os estrangeiros criminosos fazem

Ummm 1:34

@@TheRandomWolf I think he means in real life

Actually Q. northropi’s wingspan is similar to Arambourgiania, Hatzegopteryx and Cryodrakon.

@@bkjeong4302 Maybe.....possible.

@@bkjeong4302 the wingspan is u certain for all of those. They are just estimations

Gotcha

Gracias! claro que te entiendo jaja soy de españa

ce começa com mario e depois chama o cara de marcio? EU SEI Q TU É BR

@ Erro de corretor.😆

Good to have you back!

It looks more like a spoonbill

I don´t know much about that game. maybe one day

@@MarioLanzas. ok

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa wtfuck

It use to be catching a fish or something Probably

Because it’s actually a filter feeder like whales and Flamingos.

@@KhanMann66 indeed

Not really! Typandactylus crest would be even larger, with a slightly different shape, longer at the back. Nobody said tapejara didn't have a large crest too

@@MarioLanzas. that's right, i forgot to analyze this

I am...... Shit

@@altstepan2451 ok

There were no humans. that's mostly why. animals today don´t have enough land available, they are also hunted. they barely have the chance to keep existing

Prehistoric mammals were also large so it's not the asteroid. The Earth's oxygen levels have also been different throughout history, allowing growth. But over the millions of years of their existence, in many ways size was necessary in the evolutionary arms race of predator vs prey. And yes, humans played a factor, but animals were shrinking before humans as well, as a result of food supply changes and an overall lack of need to be huge.

But we don't actually know for certain why they got so large. We just have more theories as to why the super large creatures didn't endure

@@TheBertoSan No one knows for certain what occurred millions of years ago but we can make educated guesses (that's what scientists do). And our guesses can be pretty educated if we use the laws of Physics to calculate. As such, there are 2 things that don't add up concerning dinosaurs and today's earth gravity: 1) Some flying dinosaurs (Pterodactyl) were the size of today's Giraffe - too large and heavy to break earth's gravity. That is about the size of a Cessna 152, which requires 110 hp to fly. 2) The Brontosaurus's neck is too long for blood to be able to reach its head. To do so requires a heart the size of its chest, which its bone structure doesn't indicate so. And even if it's heart is that big, the sheer blood pressure produced would burst its veins (i.e. it would have a stroke). Because of that, some scientists had suggested Brontosaurus have 2 hearts - one in its chest and the other smaller one half way up its neck. But there is no bone structure evidence for such an organ there. The best explanation is that earth's gravity was less back then. And the reason why it's less was because earth was a little smaller back then. Millions of years of asteroid and meteor bombardment added to its mass, hence increased its gravity.

@@TheBertoSan If size was necessary in the evolutionary arms race then why didn't it affect the Size of whales, maco sharks, and other large sea creatures? Answer: because water buoyancy negated strong gravity. So, that is a clue that gravity has something to do with size of land animals.

Thank you! It's just a matter of practice. With the proper time you would learn

Absolutely!

@@MarioLanzas. thanks for your