Quantum Computers Animated

  Рет қаралды 731,472

Piled Higher and Deeper (PHD Comics)

Piled Higher and Deeper (PHD Comics)

10 жыл бұрын

**Our new PODCAST: DanielAndJorge.com
**ORDER our new book: WeHaveNoIdea.com
Theoretical Physicists John Preskill and Spiros Michalakis describe how things are different in the Quantum World and how that can lead to powerful Quantum Computers.
Subscribe: kzfaq.info_c...
More at: phdcomics.com/tv
Animated by Jorge Cham: jorgecham.com
Featuring: John Preskill and Spiros Michalakis
Produced in Partnership with the Institute for Quantum Information and Matter (iqim.caltech.edu) at Caltech with funding provided by the National Science Foundation.
Animation Assistance: Meg Rosenburg
Transcription: Noel Dilworth
#FQXiVideoContest2014

Пікірлер: 543
@johnjackson4511
@johnjackson4511 9 жыл бұрын
And then you open the box and a dead cat falls out.
@anonblob1
@anonblob1 9 жыл бұрын
He's opened the box so of course he's going to know
@johnjackson4511
@johnjackson4511 9 жыл бұрын
But that's the whole point of the thought experiment. Once you open the box reality has to make a choice, is the cat alive or dead. The act of observing forces reality to make a choice rather than existing in that hazy , fuzzy in-between world that quantum mechanics likes to hide in, and quantum and particle physicists hate this. check out videos on the Two slit experiment. Let the experiment it do it's thing, and light will act like a wave. Observe which slit the photon travels through, and the photons will start acting like particles. Observation affects reality.
@profilename1987
@profilename1987 8 жыл бұрын
+John Jackson i think observation will never affect reality, and it never has. i think that assumption is absolutely absurd.
@johnnylabedzki
@johnnylabedzki 8 жыл бұрын
+hamster hubert the fact that a quantum computer breakthrough has been made that can calculate the prime numbers of 15 based on the math of quantum mechanics doesn't give a fuck whether you think it's absolutely absurd or not, because it happens regardless of your opinion, that's the beauty of science
@profilename1987
@profilename1987 8 жыл бұрын
Medstudent 187 theres so much wrong with what you just said.
@JoshuaCasper
@JoshuaCasper 10 жыл бұрын
I am extremely happy I found this channel. Thanks to everyone involved!!
@MarcSprecher
@MarcSprecher 10 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing this!
@jdferreira
@jdferreira 10 жыл бұрын
He DOES get excited! I would never be able to tell from the soothing sound of his voice!
@monicaxireland
@monicaxireland 9 жыл бұрын
I wish I had of had teachers that could have explained complicated concepts like this in simple terms. Thank you.
@paramethratnasakha3962
@paramethratnasakha3962 9 жыл бұрын
Quantum physic is not something you can just draw the illustrations on the board. It's mostly explained by mathematic.
@ChessdumyTV
@ChessdumyTV 9 жыл бұрын
Parameth Ratnasakha But mathematics can be explained by only illustrations on the board, and math rules, etc.
@paramethratnasakha3962
@paramethratnasakha3962 9 жыл бұрын
That's what I mean math only, no picture.
@ChessdumyTV
@ChessdumyTV 9 жыл бұрын
Parameth Ratnasakha What about like pictures of slope graphs and stuff though? :p
@michaelmcginn3298
@michaelmcginn3298 9 жыл бұрын
i say that hair style would be sexy there
@BingtheLizard
@BingtheLizard 8 жыл бұрын
I feel like I've observed a somewhat condescending attitude from those invested in quantum physics where classical physics is implicitly regarded as kid's stuff because it's inherently more simple and easy to understand. Even with our knowledge of classical physics today, it's still ridiculously difficult to develop and successfully launch a rocket without something going awry. Thermofluid analysis, mechanics, materials; it's a huge investment and slog to produce meaningful results to which we can benefit, and classical physics is worth every ounce of respect as well.
@marblejester
@marblejester 8 жыл бұрын
+BingtheLizard Plus the depiction of God being dumbfounded was potentially disrespectful to religion.
@pitthepig
@pitthepig 8 жыл бұрын
+marblejester if there's intrinsic uncertainty on the universe, then there can't be a omniscient God, because that means that even God can't predict the outcome of a quantum system. Religious people that can't digest the incompatibility of natural sciences from their beliefs should abstain to look at this videos.
@BingtheLizard
@BingtheLizard 8 жыл бұрын
pitthepig The finite being you've just defined and limited; one who can't comprehend or foreknow the outcome of a system of his own design; is not God. This is a common thing I see; that often people define a limited superior entity, and then say that entity can't exist or isn't worth their time; I don't blame them, but it's no shot in the nuts to those who do believe in a limitless entity.
@pitthepig
@pitthepig 8 жыл бұрын
BingtheLizard believing in a "limitless being" is a surrender of intelligence. Things are too complicated to understand? Ok, just imagine a limitless being, don't explain from where it comes or where it is, and problem solved! Fortunately, people that didn't rely on fairy tales to understand the universe took us out of the dark ages, in benefit of everybody, even of believers themselves.
@jonaslauschke1706
@jonaslauschke1706 8 жыл бұрын
+marblejester God is the result of people searching answers for who they are and why they are. Science couldn't give them the answers so they created some. That's the way human brains work. I do myself believe in life after death and im christ but at some point i know there is no magic (like jesus' deeds) in life.
@zer0c00l44
@zer0c00l44 7 жыл бұрын
so if you ask it a question and get an answer and it doesn't know how it came to that answer or has forgotten will you get a different answer to the same question every time you ask it or will it come to the same conclusion but work it out differently every time.
@MadnanTheArcher
@MadnanTheArcher 7 жыл бұрын
no the answer will be the same every time, but what the video was referring to is the fact that if you measure a particle you bring it out of its superposition into a determined state. Or in this case if you measure the wrong "door" you will change the state from what it was supposed to be to something new, which would screw with the final result
@OmegaA1000
@OmegaA1000 7 жыл бұрын
So say we are occasionally observing a set of particles entangled with random particles across the universe. If one starts behaving oddly as if it was in a determined state rather than superposition. Could we say that it's quantum'y entangled counterpart off in who knows where is being observed?
@teddybruscie
@teddybruscie 10 жыл бұрын
I now have a good general understanding of how much we don't know about quantum physics. And at the sametime not knowing anything about quantum physics myself. But I do know this paradox makes about as much sense as quantum physic itself. lol
@thepieking7976
@thepieking7976 10 жыл бұрын
brilliant explanation thanks for that and the hitch hikers guide to the galaxy reference
@muhammadbinzafar2216
@muhammadbinzafar2216 5 жыл бұрын
Great video! I watched it after 5 years it was posted.
@johu2
@johu2 10 жыл бұрын
Using quantum effects you can decide on what you actually wanted to calculate after you have done the calculation... kind of. And this is awesome. This enables you to do stuff you can not with classical 1 and 0.
@shivaprakash551
@shivaprakash551 6 жыл бұрын
Very nice and elegant illustration !!
@Thrax005
@Thrax005 10 жыл бұрын
TOP MARKS, best i've ever seen explaining quantum computing.
@forrestvalleyfarmer
@forrestvalleyfarmer 8 жыл бұрын
Just curious, how do we know WHEN we are supposed to get the result?
@novakevin
@novakevin 9 жыл бұрын
Can I download a transcript of this somewhere?
@DanielMunozdfmm
@DanielMunozdfmm 10 жыл бұрын
This is awesome. Congratulations and keep working...
@moomoodeadcow
@moomoodeadcow 7 жыл бұрын
How do you find enough storage space to store so much information?
@sinekonata
@sinekonata 10 жыл бұрын
Extremely good explanation, after 5 videos, I'm closer than ever to ever grasping the type of algorithms that would be useful to give to a quantum computer. PS : I always knew it was 42...
@sanzenkoan
@sanzenkoan 10 жыл бұрын
its 42 1/2
@itsiwhatitsi
@itsiwhatitsi 10 жыл бұрын
sanzen koan 21 "zero" and 21 "one"
@AkilJacob
@AkilJacob 8 жыл бұрын
So how would it process "classical" information? Also in terms if processing power, how much would a quantum computer have?
@cheri_inspired
@cheri_inspired 9 жыл бұрын
It would be enlightening to know why and/or how observing something on the Quantum level changes results, as in the double slit experiment.
@juanfrancisco4274
@juanfrancisco4274 8 жыл бұрын
In the 1:34 minutes ypu can see the Newton's silhouette under the "Classical" text, on binary code
@jayantbh
@jayantbh 8 жыл бұрын
+Juan Francisco Pastor Pastor Was looking for this comment.
@BruceThomson
@BruceThomson 9 жыл бұрын
Thanks, good video explanation of quantum computing. A start to my enquiry. Bruce Thomson in New Zealand.
@onebigmanful
@onebigmanful 10 жыл бұрын
Excellent! Very much enjoyed though way over my head.
@roberttuckerjr.9687
@roberttuckerjr.9687 8 жыл бұрын
I like this video. With the animation it made it easier to visualize how a quantum computer worked. I going to subscribe to this channel.
@imkow
@imkow 8 жыл бұрын
How do we know when the calculation is done in a quantum computer if we aren't allowed to look at the computing state?
@binaryalgorithm
@binaryalgorithm 8 жыл бұрын
I have always wondered if QM is truly random or comes from vacuum interactions in a deterministic way that we just cannot measure. It seems from experiments on collapse propagation rates that states become defined when interactions occur with other objects with a defined state; two things in superposition can entangle, but one thing in superposition interacting with something not in superposition will collapse to a compatible state. If you cool something enough and shield it from interactions it goes back into a superposition - is this because it no longer has a "relationship" to the environment, or in other words any state in the superposition is now "compatible" with the rest of reality?
@philipstuckey4922
@philipstuckey4922 9 жыл бұрын
So with classical information the amount of info you can store in "n" number of bits is 2^n right? How do you describe how much info you can store in "n" number of qbits?
@michael1372006
@michael1372006 9 жыл бұрын
Philip Stuckey I think in classical system the amount of information is n because there are n bits for each state, and each bit contains one information. But in quantum system, the amount of information is 2^n. This is because you need 2^n constants to fully describe the state(or wave function).
@Merthalophor
@Merthalophor 9 жыл бұрын
Michael Li No, because of what was in the video I posted before you (ahem). So you are saying n bits can have n different states? Just be silend please.
@michael1372006
@michael1372006 9 жыл бұрын
n bits have 2^n states but each state contains only n information not 2^n
@PrivateAccountXSG
@PrivateAccountXSG 9 жыл бұрын
So how does time play into observation? Does the fastest observer define the measurement for the entire room?
@alessandrobertulli425
@alessandrobertulli425 9 жыл бұрын
OK, the reference to The hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy just blow up my mind! :-D The idea of the unknowing processing of the computer..... Deep Thought would be proud of this! X-D
@Jumbod007
@Jumbod007 9 жыл бұрын
Simple, basic & way awesome … thank you … !
@MikeArroyoMAFITNESS
@MikeArroyoMAFITNESS 7 жыл бұрын
how are these quantium computers messing with are time line and the fabric of our reality? how does it pull information from other parrell universes?
@probablechoices
@probablechoices 10 жыл бұрын
This was neat, thanks :) not so heavy on the actual tech, but a great primer!
@TanvirKaykobad
@TanvirKaykobad 7 жыл бұрын
Can anyone give me an example problem that is well suited for a quantum computer? If the solution to a problem is not deterministic (or at least an approximation), how can we take it as a good solution?
@Dafastso
@Dafastso 5 жыл бұрын
thanks for animating my thoughts i should be having while this dude whisper talks in my ear. what i ended up doing was just turning up the volume and scrolling down so i couldnt see the moving video.
@pd6208
@pd6208 9 жыл бұрын
Nobody says how do you insert the question and how you measure the result !?
@JoshuaConci
@JoshuaConci 2 жыл бұрын
"I'd rather have questions that can't be answered, than answers that can't be questioned" -R. Feynman quantum computing sounds an awful lot like answers that can't be questioned.
@davidpunk1
@davidpunk1 10 жыл бұрын
I love this videos about quantum computing and quantum physics :D!
@subh1
@subh1 10 жыл бұрын
There are two ways you can determine the behavior of, say, water sloshing in a bucket when you move the bucket in a particular way - you either conduct an experiment & observe the water's behavior, or you run a simulation of it in a CFD software. In essence, what a quantum computer does is the former (it runs experiments on physical systems and reads the results). However, it also means that it can solve only problems that can be described as a sequence of water sloshings in buckets.
@veganath
@veganath 8 жыл бұрын
I'm missing something here how does something that has superposition (1 & 0) & that randomly when observed produces a 1 or 0 make for coherent data analysis?
@TheNaturalnuke
@TheNaturalnuke 8 жыл бұрын
+PocketDrummer You make it run a question, get what it says the answer is, then do the same question and solve it yourself. If it's right then it worked, if it's right 100% of the time then it isn't a fluke. As for why it works... if you find out please tell everyone?
@DarthVishes
@DarthVishes 7 жыл бұрын
I loved the reference to the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy 🌌
@AyanTheChosenOne
@AyanTheChosenOne 10 жыл бұрын
Can someone explain to me what the blue 0s and blue 1s meant? Because from my rudimentary understanding, a qubit can either be a 1, 0, or a superposition. But in this video, it can either be a 1, a 0, a blue 1, or a blue 0. I don't understand...
@onetruekeeper5055
@onetruekeeper5055 9 жыл бұрын
Is that how the implicate order "computes" and gives the results in the explicate order? However, one would have to have "faith" that the answer that is revealed is the correct one since it may take almost forever to validate it's accuracy using normal computing processes.
@Rasterbayne
@Rasterbayne 9 жыл бұрын
Love that, "it's a secret computation"
@MWCapone
@MWCapone 10 жыл бұрын
Wait, if you don't look at the computation or figure out how it worked or know how it worked, how the hell do you expect to manipulate it to do something you want it to do when the factor of randomness is still in effect? Wouldn't that be impossible?
@kabbalahcowboy7083
@kabbalahcowboy7083 10 жыл бұрын
The most important aspect of this video is that with the development of quantum computers, processors will be able to run thousands of times faster and store an order of magnitude more data than the largest supercomputers in existence today. Even a new book that discusses the implications of Rose's Law, D-Wave Systems, and quantum computers in general (that is, "On Computer Simulated Universes"). Someday there will be individual computers that will be able to basically mirror, store, manipulate, and mine all of the known present and past data that has ever existed on the Internet with relative ease.
@jmcenanly1
@jmcenanly1 6 жыл бұрын
What was the question @ 5:34 ?
@ncsr111
@ncsr111 9 жыл бұрын
Interesting how the animation portion portrayed the answer as the number 42. In Douglas Adams's The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy a race of hyper-intelligent pan-dimensional beings built a computer named Deep Thought to calculate the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything. When the answer was revealed to be 42, Deep Thought explained that the answer was incomprehensible because the beings didn't know what they were asking. It went on to predict that another computer, more powerful than itself would be made and designed by it to calculate the question for the answer.
@42_answer64
@42_answer64 8 жыл бұрын
Great Video!
@philtrem
@philtrem 10 жыл бұрын
Cool stuff!
@firdawsabdullahaydar3404
@firdawsabdullahaydar3404 5 ай бұрын
Thanks for explaining quantum computer
@teeKayNW
@teeKayNW 10 жыл бұрын
Brilliant. Thanks for explaining quantum computer in simple terms for EVERYONE to understand.
@athief
@athief 10 жыл бұрын
yep, I know this one !!! I actually watched it several times because this guy makes quantum physics again more wonderful ! :)
@Cineenvenordquist
@Cineenvenordquist 10 жыл бұрын
Qubits have 4 possible states, and are usually addressed via a schema having to do with reliability (from cases when qubits are in a dilution fridge so they don't just change states from the latent heat energy, or dependent on lasers with a middling coherence length/duration) traceability or scope. In practice qubits are always in superposition until you want a result; glossed by PHD TV here by a plain or blue 'read' interaction, hoping to intimate that a blue 1 means nothing about plain 1.
@semir2607
@semir2607 10 жыл бұрын
PHD TV, do you think quantum computing will be essential for interstellar travel?
@Cineenvenordquist
@Cineenvenordquist 10 жыл бұрын
Maybe PHD TV could have a little ruby for its video channels or inset in the show, for super-old (ca. 1965) lay explanations like this, or scope-of-field, or papers newer than 20 years old. Maybe just have a little word map showing the local neighborhood on Library Genesis or arXiv or suchandso.global.doe.gov topics.
@jezmaloan
@jezmaloan 6 жыл бұрын
One of them really sounded like Royce Bracket from the game Transistor
@rhlogic
@rhlogic 9 жыл бұрын
Finally a no nonsense, straight to the point explanation of what a quantum computer might be.
@yashwanthcb
@yashwanthcb 7 жыл бұрын
can it solve ackerman number with high values?
@pacinpm2
@pacinpm2 10 жыл бұрын
This guy has absolutly hypnotizing voice.
@hajames58
@hajames58 10 жыл бұрын
Yes Schrödinger's cat is an amazing conundrum to sit and think about it will leave u perplexed.
@itsiwhatitsi
@itsiwhatitsi 10 жыл бұрын
Intrinsic randomness ,entanglement and superposition of 0 and1: That's why quantum computer will have a consciousness and "he" can tell us how he feels but not how he "really" feels; and also the result of his computation but not how he made it
@rubikfan1
@rubikfan1 9 жыл бұрын
when a particle is in superpostion, and than opserved. so that is no longer in a superpostion. but than the observent goes away. is it in superpostion again?
@explosivechicken3836
@explosivechicken3836 9 жыл бұрын
Nope
@RyanBrackney1
@RyanBrackney1 10 жыл бұрын
Agreed. It didn't explain how computations would be done. Most of the video was a brief brief primer on quantum mechanics.
@johu2
@johu2 10 жыл бұрын
After reading out the state all of the superpositions are replaced with the values corresponding to final output.
@JB-1138
@JB-1138 7 жыл бұрын
Have these computers actually done anything? Figured out some brand new thing or some unsolved old problem? Cause it just sounds like a generator of randomness?
@peixista_sfc
@peixista_sfc 10 жыл бұрын
So factoring integers in O(log(n)^3) isn't magic enough for you?
@MrKorrazonCold
@MrKorrazonCold 8 жыл бұрын
Its just Two Spherical Sine Wavefronts multiplying inward +1=0 now -1 dividing outward at right angles from their sources.. . .And where the two positive and negative electromagnetic Spherical Sine Wavefronts meet, creates the particle effect.. . .
@VictorZen
@VictorZen 10 жыл бұрын
Love the subject and love the animation. But the people speaking sound like they would rather do anything than give voice overs.
@1j1e1s1s1i1c1a1
@1j1e1s1s1i1c1a1 10 жыл бұрын
intrinsic randomness vs probability associated with ignorance. hot damn.
@DrunkenUFOPilot
@DrunkenUFOPilot 7 жыл бұрын
This video is interesting, and education, but seems a bit short on explaining just what is quantum computation. It does a great job showing some of the characteristics of quantum systems as compared to classical. But it's not clear from this, beyond vague generalizations, how qubits and quantum phenomena can be harnessed to do useful computational work. How, at least in principle, would we add 5+7? Or solve a quadratic equation? Or find a fish in a photograph?
@Kenckaplus
@Kenckaplus 10 жыл бұрын
This is so exciting, studying computers never gets old. I'm glad I chose computer science as my field. Perhaps this is the future, and I'm into it. (;
@manolisteletos8274
@manolisteletos8274 10 жыл бұрын
Amazing
@smartguy9765
@smartguy9765 9 жыл бұрын
It's so mind bending it seems supernatural. Also, if it's so random, how can we use it in any meaningful way?
@jklein17
@jklein17 10 жыл бұрын
I would like to go to quantum school. I take a test and write the answers then the instructor checks my answers. Since the instructor can't know what the answer was when I took the test I should get a perfect score every time.
@Nuclearburrit0
@Nuclearburrit0 10 жыл бұрын
I don't think that's a school
@jklein17
@jklein17 10 жыл бұрын
I'm fairly certain it's not.
@DrXaOs
@DrXaOs 8 жыл бұрын
btw i have a question about quantum computers. Scientists cannot explain 'the ''observation effect'' and the super position because these traits are not happening on the macro world.So how can we create something when we cant explain how and why it works?
@gailwedgeworth9821
@gailwedgeworth9821 3 жыл бұрын
I always felt less because I did not know math and struggled to understand it, even basics, but I knew I was intelligent. For a long time as a kid, I thought my inability to grasp math meant I was not intelligent and doors were closed to me. I always wanted to understand physics, and so I am grateful for these videos which allows me to understand in layman's terms. This lets me think about physics on an intellectual level without feeling I can't learn anything about it because I am so math deficient. Thank you so much.
@cousteaulecommandant
@cousteaulecommandant 10 жыл бұрын
Came here from SMBC Comics expecting this to be a cartoon about the adventures of a quantum computer. Stayed because it was interesting and kinda well explained.
@cookielamaproduction
@cookielamaproduction 10 жыл бұрын
So I understand that the outcomes will be random, but how is this a good thing? Wouldn't it make it more difficult to program?
@avarg7
@avarg7 9 жыл бұрын
It would be so much harder to program. That's why we are taking ages to extrapolate quantum equations. We want to find a certain pattern in the quantum system, and as the quantum field of study is based on 'intrinsic randomness', we need to program these computers to BE intrinsically random. I think. Maybe. That's what I got out of the video. And the fact that these computers can run Minecraft at a great fps. :D
@Ragnathok
@Ragnathok 10 жыл бұрын
The D-Wave method isn't the same at all. The processor does have qubits and so uses quantum mechanics, but there is no control over the qubits individually. The machine solves the single problem of finding the fundamental state (lowest energy configuration) of a system by heating it and then letting it cool down, like the simulated annealing algorithm, except not simulated. Others researchers like the narrators try to start from few qubits to control them to be able to do more operations.
@danphillips8530
@danphillips8530 9 жыл бұрын
42, as in life the universe and everything or 42 factorial.
@explosivechicken3836
@explosivechicken3836 9 жыл бұрын
Can you elaborate
@aliciavilleda1846
@aliciavilleda1846 7 жыл бұрын
we live on one plece on one time and we can only see this particular in thad one please even if they are in multiple places in thad time
@Livingwater825
@Livingwater825 8 жыл бұрын
Then how are you supposed to do calculations or store data? The 01010001 that I stored yesterday night changed to a 0000000, depending on how I "opened the box". All the hype about quantum computers, talking about what they can and will be able to do, etc. without anyone talking about how they could possibly become practical, even for supercomputers.
@suparki12
@suparki12 7 жыл бұрын
You can predict what the outcome is, but you have to consider the fact that the measurement also affect the outcome.
@PeterAbt
@PeterAbt 7 жыл бұрын
agreed. I would love to see how quit calculations or algorithm's should actually work...
@iQ0VER200
@iQ0VER200 10 жыл бұрын
Perfect
@name7251
@name7251 9 жыл бұрын
5:28 Nice refrence.
@IBMua
@IBMua 8 жыл бұрын
If you want to get confused instead of seeing an explanation, see this. Sort of
@MO-hq4iz
@MO-hq4iz 6 жыл бұрын
They are taking about quantum physic not quantum computers.
@penelopewhite1509
@penelopewhite1509 5 жыл бұрын
I think Quantum phenomena does happen at the macro level,only slower and less often than the micro level.
@RCAvhstape
@RCAvhstape 9 жыл бұрын
I still don't understand how you make a computer with this stuff.
@paperothereartharmy
@paperothereartharmy 9 жыл бұрын
That's because quantum physics is the kind of thing you need to study for years to get a basic grasp of.
@profilename1987
@profilename1987 8 жыл бұрын
+survivorevil simple? get off your high fucking horse.
@profilename1987
@profilename1987 8 жыл бұрын
***** im sorry, what?
@profilename1987
@profilename1987 8 жыл бұрын
*****​ you little keyboard warrior bitch. Would me staying piss you off?
@KrutikFTW
@KrutikFTW 8 жыл бұрын
+survivorevil Neils Bohr once said "Anyone who is not shocked by the quantum theory does not understand it" you think it's simple but you are shocked by it, right?
@teamakesgames
@teamakesgames 8 жыл бұрын
42 xD Can't wait for them!
@johu2
@johu2 10 жыл бұрын
But it did cover aspects of quantum computing and this is grate as they are rarely covered in pop-science videos. You can not describe the internal how it works in one video as you need some math and there are several physical implementations. Try googleing Quantum computation with trapped ions, NV centres in diamonds, NMR, photons, quantum dots or superconducting qubits for details. Check out youtube channel of Veritasium for some videos of spin qubits.
@TheInfiniteWay
@TheInfiniteWay 10 жыл бұрын
nice it´s intrinsic inspiring
@tatejordan385
@tatejordan385 8 жыл бұрын
Bitcoin mining on a Quantum Computer
@_tyrannus
@_tyrannus 8 жыл бұрын
+Tate Jordan (“Hyplexium”) Boring, what about a Quantum-coin ?
@waywardhero1177
@waywardhero1177 6 жыл бұрын
Quantum- coin, you can be both in-debt or extremely wealthy at the same time, unless you check you balance.
@realRickSanchez
@realRickSanchez 10 жыл бұрын
Nice quantum explanation ...now we need a quantum computer to understand it.
@MegaANWAR786
@MegaANWAR786 8 жыл бұрын
i built a quantum computer and used it to email "happy birthday pal",......it sent the message 'eat my shorts' ahh.....dam that uncertainty principle!
@felixchen7998
@felixchen7998 7 жыл бұрын
Wow!it is interesting!
@andersv20
@andersv20 9 жыл бұрын
That's perhaps the most comfortable voice I've ever heard.
@this_mfr
@this_mfr 9 жыл бұрын
They should be called Schrodinger's Computers. The stages they are in with these computers are equivalent to the 1950's when a "bit" computer took up an entire room and only held a few bits of data. Imagine the world with the coming Internet of Everything along with Quantum Computers going mainstream in the next 30-50 years.
@TheSonyman101
@TheSonyman101 9 жыл бұрын
How the hell do I program it then if it could be 1 of 2 things just guess and check?
@alsu6886
@alsu6886 9 жыл бұрын
Nope, you program it for all possible combinations of zeros and ones at the same time. Check these quantum algorithms: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor's_algorithm en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover's_algorithm
@dpCynicalPrick
@dpCynicalPrick 9 жыл бұрын
If there's any "at home" scientists out there feel free to start a discussion :) due to the un-predictability of quantum mechanics, is it finally possible to bring to life the computers of the movie "I, Robot"? where we make software that encompasses the full potential of this randomness by teaching it to generate its own code to improve upon its self? Is the quantum computer a step in this direction or could it be (theoretically) achieved with traditional computers?
@alsu6886
@alsu6886 9 жыл бұрын
It could potentially be achieved with traditional computers, although now there is no understanding how to do it yet, just some very preliminary and basic attempts like deep learning: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_learning Interestingly if a useful quantum computer is ever built, it will make deep learning overwhelmingly more powerful: arxiv.org/abs/1412.3489
@auchucknorris
@auchucknorris 9 жыл бұрын
.. but we dont use atom super positions in WORKING quantum computers so the part about looking at it or not is not how we actually do it, we use super conductivity, not super poistion, were the current of electricty is flowing freely in all directions like its both a yes and a no going all paths, then raise the metal conductors out fo super conductivity to regular conductivity and make it pick a path once the current has to choose which direction to flow, leaving you with a very good guess path, then do that like 300 times a second to see the most probable answer
@Ragnathok
@Ragnathok 10 жыл бұрын
The exact way a quantum computer would work cannot be explained, simply because some major points have not been determined yet, such as which physical quantity would be used for the "0" and "1" (addition or not of a charged particle in a system, direction of a "spin", etc.) and near-perfect error correction protocols for large systems. As for the "intrinsic randomness", it differs from a lack of knowledge in the way the object interacts and evolves in time. Bell's inequalities describe it well.
@PaulKorir
@PaulKorir 10 жыл бұрын
This conversation consists of taking words we are familiar with and using them in ways that sound awesome and sophisticated and claiming that there is some sense behind them. The truth of the matter is that ALL the meaning is contained in the mathematical abstractions. I'm very sure this stuff is very, very simple to understand. It's just that the 'gatekeepers' don't want to break the spell just yet.
Quantum Computers, Explained With Quantum Physics
9:59
Quanta Magazine
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
The Map of Quantum Computing - Quantum Computing Explained
33:28
Domain of Science
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
Sigma Girl Education #sigma #viral #comedy
00:16
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 90 МЛН
Doing The Impossible
5:53
Piled Higher and Deeper (PHD Comics)
Рет қаралды 264 М.
Michio Kaku: Quantum computing is the next revolution
11:18
Big Think
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Quantum Computers Explained in a Way Anyone Can Understand
12:33
TheUnlockr
Рет қаралды 516 М.
A beginner's guide to quantum computing | Shohini Ghose
10:05
Quantum Computing with Light: The Breakthrough?
17:23
Sabine Hossenfelder
Рет қаралды 288 М.
How Physicists Created a Holographic Wormhole in a Quantum Computer
17:05
Quanta Magazine
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
Solving the secrets of gravity - with Claudia de Rham
1:01:17
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 37 М.
The Quantum Internet
15:20
PBS Space Time
Рет қаралды 584 М.
Decoded: How Does a Quantum Computer Work?
8:42
Scientific American
Рет қаралды 196 М.
Sigma Girl Education #sigma #viral #comedy
00:16
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 90 МЛН