Lochner v. New York Case Brief Summary

No video

Lochner v. New York Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Рет қаралды 59,896

Күн бұрын

Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► www.quimbee.co...
Lochner v. New York | 198 U.S. 45 (1905)
In the late 1800s, as the labor movement took hold in the United States, many states passed legislation to protect workers. One such law passed in New York in 1897 and known as the Bakeshop Act, capped the number of hours bakers were permitted to work on a daily and weekly basis. The State of New York indicted bakery owner Joseph Lochner twice under the Bakeshop Act for permitting an employee to exceed the maximum allowable 60-hour workweek.
Lochner was convicted and fined by the Oneida County Court. Lochner’s conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, and New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals. Lochner appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here www.quimbee.co...
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► www.quimbee.co...
Have Questions about this Case?
Submit your questions and get answers from real attorney here: www.quimbee.co...
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:
Subscribe to our KZfaq Channel ► www.youtube.co...
Quimbee Case Brief App ► www.quimbee.co...
Facebook ► / quimbeedotcom
Twitter ► / quimbeedotcom
casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries

Пікірлер: 18

@kenbutler7560 2 жыл бұрын

Came here because some guys screen name in Halo was Lochner V New York. Clever way to teach people something new.

@teaenjoyer1676 2 жыл бұрын

on my way to work 80 hours in a bakery 😈😈😈

@catherinefusini5237 5 жыл бұрын

hey, you're awesome, thank you for making studying for constitutional law more tolerable.

@seekinghavoc5329 4 жыл бұрын

I just changed my major, pivoting into that same direction. Would you mind if I messaged you more about it? I still have a nascent understanding of what to expect. Thank you if you could!

@TheShadowHawkz 4 жыл бұрын

Forest Vanacey I am willing to talk as well if you like.

@JohnSmith-xq6cv Жыл бұрын

This is property law

@artisth0785 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for doing these! They help me save SO much time and help me understand the facts of each case much better than I would on my own!

@Padi314 3 жыл бұрын

wait so they were using strict scrutiny for EVERY alleged substantive due process violation during the entirety of the lochner era?!?!

@antisatorirecords Жыл бұрын

Strict scrutiny wasn't really a concept back then, that comes from all the Jurisprudence from Caroline products

@wayanlantela8175 3 жыл бұрын

Am I the only one that noticed Justice Peckham looks like Albert Einstien?

@no-bozos 3 жыл бұрын

Whoever created this video should have specified which decision was overturned by the "West Coast Hotel vs. Parish" decision. That decision was about minimum wage law and had nothing to do with the employee work hour restrictions from the "Lochner vs. New York" decision. This is why so many people are so confused about constitutional law. So many people trying to educate on the subject never seem to clarify context. They make these videos for the casual viewer and never get call out for mistakes.

@DarkMustard1337 5 жыл бұрын

Can;t have freedom to contract in a world where you can't tell a business what to do...the default available work and pay will get worse and worse

@xyplexer1419 4 жыл бұрын

hmm interesting

@xyplexer1419 4 жыл бұрын

im a smart picklre

@isabellageib8472 7 жыл бұрын

helpful😀

@Alec-Al Жыл бұрын

The justices were dumb back then, many were former slave owners or from families that owned slaves. These justices saw no reason why a bakers couldn't work themselves to the bone for slave wages at 80 hours per week at 5 days per week or 16 hour days? That insane! These were idiots justices. Although, I can understand it a bakery wanted its bakers to work two 8 hour shifts during the holiday seasons like Thanksgiving or Christmas, that's reasonable as long as the employee was pay extra wages for all these hours behind hot ovens.