thanks for sharing, fascinating!

I wonder how Tesla did it without oscillation scope

@@robertjames9273 they had basic scopes in de first half of the 1900's but, indeed I wonder how he did it in the early days.

Shouldn t the voltage on the coil be zero at TDC due to lenz law? Magnet aproaching positive pulse, magnet leaving negative pulse.

@@pierremorrow4627 Nope, thats because back emf is very hugh frequency because the sudden change of the popularity of the signal from no flux to thr hard slope of the flux is like the steepness of an AC signal, measured in frequency. The charachter of this pulse is measured in voltage because of this, and because its a high potential energy wave of electromagnetic force. The shorter the pulse width of the arc, thr closer you get to zero voltage switching like on a zvs driver for power converstion. Another example of DC spikes relating to voltage is on DC - DC flyback converters.

thanks, I will!

@@MasterIvo Can you explain whad do you mean exactly by "parallel resonant coil"?

@@jarosawjaskuowski3179 series resonant: coil and capacitor are in series, parallel resonant, coil and capcitor are connected in parallel (not always prefered)

If you like this you should check out the old scientists channel too, you may find his experiments interesting

Master Ivo Well done! I like the cheap, and easy to make, speaker wire coils

thanks, I am developing a new circuit, based on a half bridge. this will creates a positive and negative impulse, on both maximums of the series resonant coil. stay tuned

​@@MasterIvo Good new!!

I had to deprogram my mind from all the garbage and lies that was put in. Once I started to think in field dynamics it al started making sense. Logic is a great guide. intuition is even better

@@MasterIvo Hello from France. A question wich has nothing to do with this comment: did you go to the Tesla Museum in Belgrade?

@@alexandretsilefski2308 no never been there.

The governments (globally) don't want the children to learn at school about free energy because they want everybody to pay for electricity and there is a lot of money involved there...

Bankers, Big oil.... u know, the scum of the earth. Its funny but also kinda sucks, when people used to give me crap about conspiracy theories, I'd just hit them with "... oh yeah? how much did u learn about Tesla in K12? College even?" ........[crickets]..... "who?" Ya thats not suspect at all... the guy that invented our entire tech future... super glad that more people know who he is, but that comeback was a gem!

Thanks, worked hard for it.

Thanks!

many EEs & the late great Electric Inventor Giant's (among others) have noted many times that using the actual WEIGHT of a coil/inductor/etc., is much more useful in calculating precise measurements of its values & behavior. Walter Russell spoke of (in his "Optical Dynamo Generator) making sure that the coils in each separate section of the Generator (dual coils, 5 on each side, with gap in center, around iron[perhaps ferrite too?] cores) had to have the exact same length {in his notes he also says that using different wire gauges for the thinner & wider innermost coils, it would be more appropriate to match by weight, not turns or length}, in other words of the same weight.... yet each consecutive coil,, starting at either end and moving towards center, would get "shorter" or flatter/thinner than the previous, AND needed to be of a certain geometry/diameter & thickness, as the geometry WITH the consistent weights of each coil, with their differring sizes and geometries, is part of the REASON why it works as a Dynamo/Generator. There are pics of many of his original drawings, as well as a few blueprints and schematics, and a COUPLE pics of the remaining pieces that were left & still reside in the University of Science & Philosophy Museum (basically the Walter Russell Foundation) of the coil forms. He has copious notes written all over his drawings, and it really requires reading them all, and keeping them in mind when trying to do a rebuild (either simulated or on the bench), as there is no ONE patent or paper or schematic that gives ALL the necessary details. And his notes have proven to be extremely pertinent to those who have sought to recreate it in person. And from those that have, theyve said that the EQUAL weight of each coil, regardless of # of turns, as long as the width/diameter & thickness dimensions are adhered to, is a CRUCIAL aspect of getting it to work as intended. He and his wife Lao Russell used this device to help power, heat, and light their mansion home at Swannanoa, VA, & he (as brilliant as they were, in the 1st half of the 20th century, many Genius Inventors ahead of their time, were also a bit naive when it came to the motives and desires of others, both ppl at large, & corps & governments) wound up, just like many of his other discoveries, wanted to help the world and give these things, discoveries, and knowledge to Humanity as a whole, and wound up having RAYTHEON cart off the larger working device, with naught but a few (probably prototyped pieces, spoken of above) pieces left to be found years later. The actual complete working device never seen again. Schauberger, Tesla, Dollard, Heaviside, Keely....... this pattern sounding familiar to anyone?? I jest, but its true, and sad. So THANK YOU, Ivo, and others, that continue to investigate and report and open source their work, experiments, results, schematics, and device specs to the rest of the world. We obviously know what happens when someone tries to patent something thats just a LITTLE TOO GOOD, and could spell the death knell for the energy Corps(es) of the world. Much love & light everyone 🙏😎👍💚 Be well & stay safe!

Thank you very much Fabrizio!

Thanks man, keep up the good work!!

Thanks :D

thanks!

Thank you for the appreciation, worked hard for this

Yes the extra coil has my attention right now.

Yes! and working on a 3000v version with series Sic mosfets. making L2 and L3 as the plates of one capacitor

Much appreciated

videos are in production

Stephane fyfe , you are Absolutely Correct. Truly Brilliant Mind With a Celerity Unmistakable!

Indeed very important to investigate further, and now we can together

Third test is a resonant transformer, coupled and induced by the dielectric field.

L3 also lights the lamp without being grounded. the ground is only needed to show a proper signal on the scope.

@@MasterIvo I consider his approach awesome as he is coupling his L-1 & L-2 with his L-3 Pancake coil with dielectric field… What to me is fascinating is that the coils perform a type of diode function retarding the back EMF spike of the reintegration of convergent / divergent blending… This minimizes the normally destructive / disruptive forces facilitating effective harnessing the loss of inertia… I like his strait forward approach of replication of the spark gap function with frequency… This approach helps our minds more clearly understand the three ~ five dimensional movements of what I term as the oscillating movement of the zero point gap exchange between space and counter space. Congratulations Master Ivo on your discovery with this fantastic work… This is a great demonstration of capturing the amplification of Back EMF and harnessing it to do useful work… I sincerely appreciate you sharing this sir, Thank you!

@@MasterIvo Very interesting. I have done lots of research/experiments with electro-magnetic but never used pancake coils. I think this experiment is validating a suspected principle that I have predicted would happen. Your experiment is showing that by providing a kick to the resonance by hitting /injecting an opposite then breaking that just before switching direction at the peak point. The BEMF hits just before peak, breaking at peak, then its effect is boosting the resonance. That point is what I am referring to. I have been taught conventional theory and have long ago suspected that theory is not the real truth of what is going on in electric circuits, Yet those teachings continue to be a curse to my ability to understand new concepts even when I know electricity is/must-be, way more than I was taught. Ken Wheeler has really opened my understanding on magnet and is counter-part the dielectric.

Thanks for sharing @@donmcilroy6362 I too have had to clean my mind from the educational poison. For me everything relates to fieds. Ken was the one that kick started my passion for research. To get rid of the "electron" particle lie, you can think of the electron, as the termination point of a dielectric field upon a conductor.

Super! Are you going to replicate?

@@MasterIvo I am most certainly considering it.

I did, and continu to do so

yes we can!

Thanks, are you cgoing to replicate and test your idea?

@@MasterIvo Yes, perhaps next month. :)

looking forward to your results ​ Plamen Pankov!

thanks Andy

great, start with the switching module, I advice to make 2 for 2 mosfets (I will release a new half bridge circuit soon)

thanks! good to hear you are inspired. Rigol has a cheap but decent scope don't know the nr but something like 1054. google it (around 300usd). maybe you can find a second hand one, those old 80"s scopes also do the trick and they are cheap(less then100 usd)

It's not pulling energy from a vacuum it's pulling free electrons out of the air

@@terrylloyd9824 that doesn't exists. He is forming a Zero Vector, forming a Zero Vector reveals the Scalar Wave reaction from the virtual particle field aka Vacuum, aether , etc

@@frehleyukito free electrons dont exist?

@@borisjohnson1944 No

Its pulling energy from the electricity grid, not the vacuum

thanks!

My pleasure!

thanks brother

@@MasterIvo Just getting part now, so soon will try to replicate . Class right now Topic RLC circuit and resonance . I hope I'll get full understand soon. Thanks

resonance is the continuous transformation of one energy form into the other. magnetic field energy into dielectric field energy and vice versa. resistance is loss into heat (a very high frequency) which dampens the transformation. The impulse is key. it is a resonant half wave that has an impedance effect

l1 l2 are 450pF and 0.21mH If I remember correct. the big L3 data is given in the video. But you need to tune it any way. use 1nF capacitors in combination with 10nF caps (all in parallel) tot tune the coils. wima fkp1 or mkp10 600Vdc. those caps can reach much higher voltages, and stay cool. pretty amazing

And? good stuff! what makes you think iron (or ferrite?) interacts with radiant energy?

Iron’s atomic geometry or arrangement of protons are qualitatively aligned so that their susceptibility to a dielectric or magnetic field is high. It is this critical magnetic arrangement that gives it the highest potential to be manipulated. Matter is coherent energy in dynamic stability. It, the proton, is a self-sustaining pressure mediation mechanism that is much like a valve that allows finite amounts of energy, electrostatic, back into the Ether. It is our Universes simplest and smallest energy vortex. And it has poles which are incorrectly called the North and South poles. The poles are actually dielectric lines of force that converge to a null point at the center of the proton. Newton’s inverse square law proves this. Every Proton in the universe is attracted to each other’s null point regardless of distance. (This attraction is actually Gravity. Who knew! The mainstream science has overlooked this simple fact but then again we are discussing Tesla’s Radiant Energy discovery.) All Matter seeks equilibrium, Unity, and to do this they are inherently attracted each other’s gate into the Ether, vortex or counter-sink. Dielectric fields are purely attractive while magnetic is purely repulsive. Iron’s unique geometry allows its magnetically aligned protons to have greater affinity to dielectric fields. The pure radiant dielectric energy should also be most attracted to this element than any other. And silver least of all. I highly suspect that a neodymium magnet would also be affected more so than iron. Chasing Dragons

@@redfishervictoria Interesting, I will test with MnZn ferrite, which is more suitable for these frequencies (it contains iron)

thanks! still learning

@@MasterIvo Yes cool, the rabbit hole of research often seems never ending I know, but your doing good.

@@aerotro I'm now working with current impulses, which give interesting results

@@MasterIvo I think we often overlook the two types of field the magnetic field and the electric radiant field the latter which are often more known as r.f. it's easy to forget but I posted a video on a book that deals with the two types. My guess is the impulses stimulate the electric field more than the magnetic field maybe.

@@aerotro yes, and its the displacement current of the changing dielectric field, which is what Tesla called Radiant. there are 2 types of impulses. one going back and forth, while the other only goes back or forth. into or out of the conductor. It reminds me of a halfbridge drive

Yes current can appear to flow backwards from negative to positive

@@MasterIvo Is that displacement current or conventional current?

@@braaitongs still conventional

Tnx! :)

I Am!

It is a possibility, but it would change both capacitance and inductance, and the copper weight. Easiest is simply adjust the capacity of the series or parallel capacitor. (multiple caps in parallel can be added up)

Great to hear you are replicating Mark S please keep me informed. If you have questions, please ask.

@@MasterIvo I placed a metal plate around L3 to verify that is was not EM coupling...it seems you are correct on electric field coupling...

Hi@@MS-ef1gy good to hear back from you. "a metal plate around L3" that sounds like a faraday cage, am I right? This would confirm it is longitudinal, and not transverse, due to the impulses. I hope you made the impovement, of placing the resonance on the inside rim of L2 on the V+ side (c1), while the impulse enters via the outside rim of L2 (c2). this gives a voltage difference over the whole coil.

@@MasterIvo Yes...a faraday cage.

@@MS-ef1gy Thats is great! And you know it. Thanks for sharing!

It should be clear from the video. But the bottom line is, the input is higher than the output. But The way its working is rather unique. Magnetic induction cant do that. Dielectric induction can. I think the parallel capacitor on L3 is not the right way to proceed with this circuit. It should be working like a "extra coil" as Tesla called it. I'm Still working on it!

thanks! I already use both currents. the resonant sine is from regular power, the impulse is radiant, and travels the other direction into the same resonant coil (L2). this amplifies the current and voltage, and sets up a longitudinal tension field, felt by L3 (dielectric induction is longitudinal).

I think there is and additional reason the voltage doubles that I am going to test within a couple months. Luv the discovery. I tried faraday set up with just magnets. Really bugs me that you can do this with electricity but not magnets I think because the magnets are always a bit unbalanced there is always a bulge but not with electricity 🤔I believe it has to do with how they are made and gyroscopic wobble. Because when a gyroscope slows down it wobbles but when it accelerates it spins true aside from balance.

I'll post how I tested faraday set up just with magnets for the very few who are curious😂🤣🙄🤷‍♂️

I get this question often. I havený tested, but its really not a proper way to compare, as inductance and capacitance of the coils would differ both. Tesla in his patent 512340 states, he only put the flat coil as an example, but al sort of variations can be used. It is about the increased capacitance/voltage differnce between the windings. I think both coils would do the trick. but the way I wind them, the windings have equeal length and I prefer it like that.

yes, tuning for a single impulse is needed

l1 and l2 together draw more power

@@MasterIvo Thanks !

yes. thicker is better. it has lower resistance, thats good. You will need to tune the coils anyway. I now use 2.5mm2

Thanks, the exciter works when the impulses on the primary of the stepup transformer, makes the secondary resonant (sine wave). It needs to be tuned to the right frequency.

yes I believe arduino due (its faster) can be used, to drive a gate driver IC that drives the gate of the mosfet.

@@MasterIvo.. Thanks for the response.. Will be asking more.. Later.. 😊.. Thank you very much

a current probe. a pintek 655, if I remember correctly.

delends on the DC offset. if the impulse is - 500V, the dc offset is also 500V, then 630V caps are needed

yes it is doimg something out of the norm. normally resonant coils do not produce power. but this does. It is due to the impulses (radiant). Applications, are the chair I made,for health bemefits. but that was more of a side effect for me. But this could be explored deeper. I have advanced this circuit, into a radiant half-bridge circuit. Still looking into the possibilities of this. It is able to produce a electric energy feedback loop (recycling)

@@MasterIvo Thanks for the reply and explanation, that's awesome, did you or are you going to post about the chair? And thanks for sharing this with the world, we need more people like you. I wish I could understand this myself, so I guess I am gonna study electronics a bit.

@@neodos the chair is not my main research direction, I just noticed it did this. You can find a lot more info on my channel. Keep in mind regular "electron" based electronics is limited. I advice you to learn and think in fields (dielectric and magnetic fields), like Steinmetz explained.

dont forget, the bifilar coil charges the capacity between its 2 windings to a much higher voltage, which thus can store more energy, which in turn lowers the resonant frequency of the coil.

@@MasterIvo In that case a higher frequency input power should result in even more storage capacity as inductors behave more like capacitors as frequency increases. Would be interesting to have a variable frequency input. Thanks for sharing you work.

yes just tune it into resonance.

Thanks, yes: rigol ds1054z its 4 channel. there is also a cheaper 2 channel. but I would recommend 4

@@MasterIvo Thank you so much. How important is the Bandwidth? I saw a new one from rigol DS1202Z-E with 200 MHz. And also, is it recommended to have a build in signal generator like DS1104Z-S PLUS?

signal gen is not worth it. bandwidth: 70MHz and higher is fine

thanks, impedance is like ac resistance. it is frequency dependent resistance, caused by capacitors and or inductors. its explained in this video kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jZiGqqR9nJOcXaM.html Its not easy to understand without understanding the capacitor and inductor first. in the video are links to those also. Hope this helps

tried many things :)

I have once intended to build a joule thief with a PNP transistor. So it makes negative impulses. But I never got to it

@@MasterIvo Yes, perhaps it wouldn't deal with high voltage very well but you could always start with very low voltage or replace the PNP with a MOS. I did some experiments about a year ago and got some bizarre results. At one point I produced over 3500 volts and fried the transistor. I just never worked out how that was possible to see such a spike from this system! It made me think at one point it was drawing "negative energy" somehow! I know a lot of people have covered joule thief's but I would love your take on them and some measurements!

@@zaneaussie how did you know it was 3500V?

@@MasterIvo I had the system hooked up to two separate digital auto ranging voltmeters. One to measure input milli amps and the other for system voltage. Much like your setup. Sometimes the voltages would swing wildly even sometimes reversing and showing negative. At the time I thought perhaps it was some sort of surface static charge developed by the transistor!

Fascinating!

This one! but use a SiC mosfet for higher voltages, and a isolated gate driver IC. I use this mosfet: 2m0160120d it can handle 1200V and has 160mohm I drive the gate with this IC 1edi60i12af if you buy enough for 2 circuits you will be prepared :)

now use the capacity of the coil for (dielectric) induction.

@@MasterIvo I don't know much on that side of induction, but a fun thing is called an "electret" the dielectric analog of a permanent magnet. Melt a non-conductive like wax, resin, or plastic and while melted run about 25+kv through it to align the molecules with the flow. Then while still in the alignment allow it to cool and freeze in the alignment. Was used to make stronger static electric generators back in the day. Something I'm looking foreword to playing with when I find the time.

@@paulksycki not much is known about that side of induction that's why I research it. It's behavior is fascinating

the bemf impulse flows to ground. if it sees ground it will flow there. the switching module, has no (earth-) ground so it should not cause damage there. The Bemf is a discharge of the magnetic field energy of L1, It should not be able to discharge in the switching module, as it is fully isolated, and only related to the source of the mosfet. Isolation of this module is key. That is why I power the signal generator from the battery. as the battery voltage floats on top of the source. Hope this helps

@@MasterIvo I think i already fixed the bemf problem of my circuit.. I am now producing around 300v peak to peak in L2/C2.. But very little amount of current (0.005A).. 🤔 My input power is 0.9A, 9v.. I did not made DC offset yet.. Still waiting for MUR1660ct diodes.. Thank you very much Master Ivo.. 😊