Thank you, I was always annoyed by ken wheeler and eric dollards cryptic descriptions. Once you "master" it, you can explain in thousand and one ways. What you expressed is one of my goals. thanks for the recognition.

I agree completely! He is an effective communicator and with good will too. A rare find.

thanks Micheal. you clearly are no 100% disabled (although I do believe the "system" has labeled you this way). I know of the experiment you talk about (falling opposing magnets). I am already implementing this. I have full confidence I will succeed. It's only a matter of TIME. ;D

@@MasterIvo It's Michael. Thanks. I could not afford the expensive equipment to measure time precisely enough to develop any formula, all I had was a TMU watch (Therbligs) and had to use an acoustic sensor. But there was definitely a repeatable and statistically significant difference in time between the two. But I am convinced its not just a gravitational effect, but a time effect as well.

Sounds good :)

Sounds yto me lioke the crap the Company did back into the 70's! They called it remote viewing, and it is based on resonance theory (of brain waves).

Check out "Voice of God" technology or weapon.

..off topic a little but humanity would do well to copy..Here is a little secret of nature.....communication from the subatomic thru to the galactic in both scale and time is achieved via longitudinal embedding ...how?..via muliiples of phi (1.618) ref the work of Dan Winter😃

indeed, and Dan Winter is very clear about implosion

Thanks, Indeed it would

Hey, off-topic, but your namesake used Tesla tech to develop electrical systems that created useful electrical power from simple sources without consuming anything. If you haven't seen his work, you might check out "The Don Smith Magnetic Resonance Energy Crafting Systematic Index" by Richard Friedrich. Richard compiled and published his work since Don's attempts to bring them to the public were unsuccessful commercially.

@@mundymorningreport3137 I've been looking into this also - Thanks for the lead - FYI - Robert Murray Smith has been an excellent resource also - I had sent him a bit of my WV Hemp and Bamboo a couple years ago - I hope to get into my own Hemp Graphene R&D one of these days - $$$$$$

There is a borderlands science video from the 80's where Eric dollard lights a bulb with longitudinal energy and it has pressure waves they were able to demonstrate on camera

@@DavyOneness Found the video. Its called Tesla's Longitudinal Electricity.

Yes I am aware of the influence of the dielectric field on the inertia of the aether.

Interesting!

thanks :)

:)

Thanks! much to share. I hope soon. H bridge build is almost finished. look up "master ivo" on Instagram

thanks

Correct, basically recycling of electric energy, by re using the energy that was stored in the magnetic field, that is put back to use.

@@MasterIvo I'll bet you are the guy who could design such a circuit to do just that!

thanks!

And a happy new solar year to you on this winter solstice.

thanks :D

please share!

@@MasterIvo You just take the energy from the medium. Today its easyer because theres electric everywere to be kept. batterie never dies for years depends on the recipe. One always charge the others. Old principle. very light weel whit brushess could maintain a static state accunulator... You save the weight of the fly weel even in carbon is to expensive. antenna could play a role in the negative and positive state.

thanks, yes the dc aspect needs to be met. but the impulse voltage can exceed the cap rating, as it is current less

Yes, I read them

@@MasterIvo Is there a possibility to you try to replicate it?

No, I let Don Smith behind me years ago (no clear information there, censored out) . I rather make my own devices, so I can understand them fully, and explain them. Making good progress so far.

yes, already working in it.

depends on the used circumstances. I now use current impulses of 40ns up to 1000V, using parallel Mosfets

thanks. the bemf, as inductive spike, holds the total energy of the magnetic field that produced it. But it is manifested in less time, due to its longitudinal nature. Why does it take so much time to build up a magnetic field, while the discharge if this field (inductive spike) is so much faster? because the magnetic field is spacial and transverse, while the back emf is counter spacial and Longitudinal. It is a longitudinal dielectric field event. That is why it is so quick. All this energy in such a quick time. indeed you need to know how to use it. and I showed how. the impulse into the series resonant bifilar pancake coil, amplifies its energy. The impulse is a very strong current, as changing voltage represents current. but not a transverse current as the magnetic field current. but a longitudinal current. aka Radiant energy

Master Ivo has misspoken in his description of how the bifilar coil works (initially) in 7:20 he emphasizes the effect of adding capacitance (the bifilar coil stores the initial energy in the capacitance as well as the inductance. Opening the circuit of a bifilar coil forces the capacitance to transfer all the dielectric energy stored along the entire length of the winding into the inductor. This makes a massive, and limited impulse, or a perfect radiant profile electrical discharge, not like a typical inductor's magnetic field collapse, which is what Lindemann must have been referring to (that is prolonged and self-limiting in its rate of release. When you look at the circuit performance of capacitors vs inductors, you see the capacitor always activates ahead of the inductor and faster than the inductor It is this accelerated movement of energy that amplifies the power in a way that Tesla cherished it. (consider it the electrical equivalent of the Oberth effect, amplified kinetic energy transfer, basic rocket science, SOP for NASA) When one considers the other effects that Tesla discovered from his radiant beams of energy, they may be sourced by the characteristics of the ionizing atoms caught in his spark gap. Think of electrons jumping between orbitals... conceivably a dielectric difference separates the orbitals, and making the transfer releases the magnetic energy in a very high-speed pop (an EMP). This might lead us to think smaller is better, the larger bifilar coil will have a relatively long cascade along the winding, shading the EMP with an RF profile. The goal is to resonate the impulse, not the RF. If the transmission distance is limited for Ivo's build? Building a large number of smaller coils would be a closer approximation to the individual atoms ionizing in Tesla's spark gap. But, Ivo is definitely on the right track to replicating Tesla's work without an ionizing event. (similar to a marx generator, using simultaneously fired mini-bifilar-coils) There are other parallels that affirm this model. Amazon has an ebook: "The Book of GEET: Part 1, basic science" by Paul Pantone. Pantone generates uniform ionizing events with a slight vacuum and fuel mixture, producing the magical events that Tesla had, but not recognizing it as radiant energy; he never fully reaped the potential from his non-electrical, electric generating device (ten thousand KVA from a 1/4 hp engine without a generator). And Denny Klein patented an HHO electrolyzer that produces diamagnetic water gas from ionized water, which naturally releases similar radiant energy (enough to fission matter, studied by multiple plasma physicist) when the diamagnetic molecules condense into liquid water.

@@MasterIvo My guess as to the difference in timing for inductor charge-up vs. discharge goes back to your own analysis. resistance and capacitance and the rate of change in the field, based on a total excursion of the field differentials. Discharge is low capacitance and high resistance, also from full capacitance charge to zero. Charge up is a slow climb to low target voltage with low resistance, also traveling through capacitance charge up first which is an exponentially long curve that never maxes out.

me too.

No I avoid sparkgaps.

..I'm reminded of (something like) how electricity & magnetism can appear as each other from different relativistic inertial frames... #hmm2

Great research & explanation videos btw! 😎👍✔️ #excellent

If I may... If you picture a magnetic field as an invisible oval surrounding a magnet, and two magnets approaching each other in a N/S configuration, it is the two fields which combine into ONE field which causes the two magnets to slam together eliminating the space between them. Likewise, approaching each other in a N/North config the two OPPOSING fields cannot combine into one, so they repulse each other, preventing them from combining into one field. Space conserves just as energy conserves. Take 13 ball magnets (12 around one) and they all form as perfect a sphere as can be had, and that volume is the LEAST amount of space time that they can exist withing, and that's WHY our universe is 3D from our own point of observation. Space is created and eliminated by energy fields, and so too is Time. It all fits together only ONE Way (pun intended). The math becomes simple too. Once you SEE the truth it is easy to be entreated, it's just hard to see it because we have all been programmed wrongly.

R Stelzer thanks for sharing your observations.

thanks Micheal, keep sharing! I hope you have a youtube channel Which I can subscribe ti, to hear morenof your truth. Your logic is rock solid.

@@MasterIvo I don't know how to do youtube, but I would love to do something to add value for those who love the truth. Some things are just too difficult for me to do without some help. My brain is injured, and who understands all that? I don't.

He is about to reveal the real source of energy. We are swimming in it but have not yet seen it clearly...

@@rstelzer2928 Hi are you lvor?.

no he is not me (ivo). The magnetic field energy, whennthe circuit of the opposing fields coilbis opened, rushes out of the coil, as a longitudinal AEther pressure field, rolling like a ring toroid Aetherfield over the conducting wire out of the coil into the lowest path of impedance. If this is a series resonant coil (low impedance equal to wire resistance only) And the (total tesla bifilar) coil ( acting as a capacitor plate) , that has a dc offset to another (tesla bifilar capacitor plate) coil, that dielectric field between the "plates" (coils) gets to see the instant voltage (tension) drop, which is currentless (no transverse motion of aether volume, maybe only longitudinal Aether volume motion, a volume of Aether=inerta) This in fact is a form of dielectric induction, when combined with magnetic induction creates electric power aka electricity

@@bobvincent5921 Ha Ha! No, friend. He is much more capable than me. I just like his spirit and seeking truth, in any form it comes to us, so I wanted to contribute something of value. My background is manufacturing in Electric products since 1977; first as an Engineer, then up to and including VP General Manager. Then my past injuries caught up with me, and my brain doesn't work like it should anymore.

yes, It does. I use a series resonant bifilar coil, and impulse it on top of the sine wave. the impulses are detected further away. I'll try to show it in my next video

Master Ivo, I'd appreciate it! I'm a ham radio guy, and though I have no idea what frequency these pulses are at, if the frequency is anything below 7 mhz, you should theoretically be able to detect it from thousands of miles away. Though you may need a much longer (resonant) coil to make that possible. Even listening to standard side band HF radio that propagates around the world at just a 100+ watts, sometimes far less, the scope on the radio transceiver is constantly interrupted by lightning strikes around the planet, and other dielectric energy releases. Dollard was big on the idea that longitudinal RF was capable of propagating many thousands of times further and faster than standard RF, due to how hard it is to attenuate something that is not being driven by force, but rather, being driven by the LOSS of that force. Love your channel.

being driven by the loss of force. beautiful. like the sudden collapse of a DC capacitor

It seems the impulse is changing yhe dielectric field strength of the bifilar coil very rapidly. It sets the whole polarised Aether around the coil into a longitudinal motion.

@@MasterIvo if you've never seen Skycollection videos on KZfaq I recommend checking him out. He makes some of the nicest bifilar and trifiler pancake coils out there using them to drive some cool pulse motors.

yes we know each other. Always fun to watch his devices. pulsing won't get us into the longitudinal domain. Impulsing does.

new video on dielectric induction producing ground currents: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/och4d6uaprfWoqc.html

yes more surface area = more capacitance

you can find my email on the about page (use pc)

no never

I have a link to a proper cheap signal generator, on the description of the radiant power video of april 2019, around 20 dollar, runs on 5V (its the one I use)

better not try to convince him, you can't open others eyes. Just open your own. scope just shows interpretation, sine wave. Experiment is more clear. Nature shows longitudinal waves, in sound and water (tsunami). Best is to show him dual resonance, whereby the frequency splits, and the second higher mode (not a harmonic) becomes 180 degrees out of phase. aks him how that is possible.

@@MasterIvoThank you. Longitudinal may not be accurately descriptive, but if it can travel through semi and non -conductive materials, then I can use it.

Not necessarily in the case of dielectric impulse. Electricity is a combination of both magnetism and dielectricity. Volts=longitudinal dielectric, and Amps=transverse magnetic. Alternating current is a combination of the two, as well as direct current. I think I may understand what you mean, but I think you may be looking at the waveforms on Ivo's oscilloscope in the wrong context. The voltage may be represented the same way the current is, but the actual geometric properties and attributes of the dielectric and magnetic fields (although the two are incomensurably indivisible, and are literally the yin and yang of the universe itself on the subatomic scale) are polar opposites. Dielectricity is inertia and acceleration by the very nature of the fields geometry, and magnetism is force and motion as per the nature of ITS geometry. If you want literally THEE most in depth information in current existence about this, I highly recommend the KZfaq channel Theoria Apophasis. The guys name is Ken Wheeler but that's his channel. Ivo mentions him along with Eric Dollard in his description if I'm not mistaken. If not then their DEFINITELY mentioned in one of these vids descriptions of Ivo's.

@@bringer-of-change thanks! i follow ken as well. Actually I was thinking it’d be great for everybody if Ivo and Ken joined forces. Sadly Stanley Meyer is gone, but those three would be the complete spectrum of theory (Ken) - generic practice (Ivo) - energy applications (Stan 💀). Ken is quite hard to follow in the critical parts, just before he finishes with “it’s so simple!” LOL. Also bumped into Konstantin Meyl, and his unified theory “Objectivity” (on potential vortex) bought all his books. Still trying to grasp all these concepts and make them compatible with each other. Ivo has a video (second earliest I think) where he tunes a coil with an antenna feeding the mosfet, that was epic and would solve the natural frequency scanning circuits without any need for software.

@@bringer-of-change BTW I’m a bit behind. My background is in software engineering so I’m set for a steep learning curve and little free time. But eager to do some experimentation. Buying stuff for a lab at max speed.

yes, I use series resonance to reduce the coils impedance (wire resistance), then i introduce the impulse, so the whole dielectric field of the bifilar coil gets a sudden voltage change, creating a longitudinal (shock) wave. Tesla used high voltage, I don't. I use 1000V which is low.

1 yes 2 the pwm igbt module is very versatile. I can plug an external pulse generator in, and see what I'm doing. plus, I can supply power from a battery, which negative pole I ground on the Source (for high side switching). Voltage is always relative. Dual. put a fan on the heatsink. When tuning loads of amps can flow through the mosfet

Thank you, when you say dual what are you referring to as In dual pwm ocxi's one to modulate the other? Also do you mean to ground the negative of the battery on the source of power for system?

dual, as in no positive voltage, without a relative negative voltage. source: the negative of thd battery of the gate drive circuit (pwm ocxi) is grounded on the source of the mosfet. the 3 pins of a mosfet are called "gate", "drain" and "Source"

Thank you so much. I am just learning the workings of all of this so lots of questions will come up, I appreciate your informative answers 😇 🙏. For the impulse generation coil is the phi ratio the best coil geometry for impulse generation?

@@ben12335 No Phi ratio isnt the best (doesnt matter) best for impulse is high inductance, low capacitance and low resistance. I have a video about impulse generation

interesting Idea

The Russian "woodpecker".

Could be a telicamunications boom

@@dianathompson7597 It's called "SUBSPACE" and it was part of Star Trek for decades. It's not only possible, it's already here.

@@rstelzer2928 anywhere in the public sector?

You'd have to chain it down so it didn't zoom off

I tried a half bridge (alternating high and low) but it didn't work. also tried low. now I only use high side switching

+ and - indicate DIRECTION of flow from polarity of time. We are all time travelers, but only in one direction; forward. That is BECAUSE of the polarity of time in this universe. Time is continually created just as space is. Magnetism and fields are at the genesis of every "moment". MASS is related to the SPIN induced by the toroidal nature of magnetism, and the spin of it IS energy giving inertia to everything.

Voltage is Intensity, a.k.a High Tension. Current, is more like a Quantity.

@@drgonzo7806 Voltage is POTENTIAL, Current is the FLOW rate. POTENTIAL does not indicate any flow, just the POTENTIAL for flow. For example a bowling ball at the top of a 100 foot high slide has more POTENTIAL (energy) than the same size/weight ball at the top of a 50 foot slide, but neither necessarily has any flow; just potential ENERGY. CURRENT is a measure in coulombs of electron flow, (1,000,000 x 1,000,000 per second OF FLOW per second past a certain point; for one AMPERE of CURRENT). Or in the water pipe analogy; VOLTAGE is like the pressure behind a closed water-hose; while current is how much water flows through the hose when opened.

@@drgonzo7806 Voltage = tension; tension of the polarised Aether, expressed as the dielectric field (made of faraday tubes). the lines of force, are faraday tubes, that pull the conductors, where they terminate on (plus and minus) together (casimir force).

true, I did several measurements on different distances.

The captive electrostatic field is more affected by distance than the magnetic field is.

I have a video (how to build a bifilar tesla coil) if you connect the 2 windings in the center (or outside) it opposes

This arrangement changes how the coils are being optimized from Tesla's patent. ( connect one inner to the other outer to match Tesla and maximize the dielectric content of the initial discharge source, holding the capacitance stable for the duration of the impulse; although small, this may slightly increase the width of the impulse over a single coil. You would have to test, but i doubt it would decrease the peak significantly, it is intended to increase the peak) Connecting the two inner or two outer leads will give you the bucking configuration, the collapsing impulse now is sourced across both coils as before, but compliments rather than matches each other. This is expected to increase the capacitance of the flux-capacitor as the differential voltage with the opposing current flows will vary along the coil length which will draw the discharge into storage where the impulses of oppoosed polarity cross past each other slowing the release out the inductor to the rest of the circuit. The effect will be dependent on the timing of the impulse traveling through both wires, which will vary depending on where in the coil the pulses are as the mutual inductance will alter the pulse speed through the coil at different locations. The benefit of a balanced charge along the coil is lost, which may lead to punch-through of the capacitor in the coil. It may also give an odd flutter of impulses similar to a dripping faucet that reflects a randomness generated by the changing dynamic impedence. This effect is typically benign in AC systems with slower frequencies or ferromagnetic amplifiers that have limited frequency response capability which may be why it is so popular in those designs. For this work, it introduces a randomness that lim ki ts the control of ev ax luating pulse width effects, something Tesla clsimed made the effects change from replicating chemical, buological or nuclear reactions. Ivo just says they would prove interesting. I agree, these possibilities do seem interesting. Impulse electricity may have potential for new applications that AC and DC have not approached or found practical. Especially in plasma and astro-physics.

go ahead

You aren't going to need anything but the fastest pulse you can squeeze off. Paul Babcock if you want a 2ns switch. 1% duty cycles

indeed, I made a video (Ascension Seat) which shows a chair with these properties.

Master Ivo, see Ken Wheeler's experiments on seed growth after exposure to south pole magnetism, and north pole magnetism. Very fascinating stuff.

A good day to you Myke ;D

@@MasterIvo I looked for the link it's not in the April video, LMK

@@mykedoes4099 I think this is the signal generator he's talking about. www.aliexpress.com/item/32659833249.html

20MHz sparks. I've seen some Russians do it years back. Can't remember the name(it was on youtube) . the spark turned into a beautiful flame.

@@MasterIvo thank you so much for responding. i have downloaded most of ur videos specially about the bifilar coils. im worse then a noob in electronics but im very passionate to learn electrical science. nd i find ur research to be a treasure for those who understand. sir plz can u just tell me this one last thing, through which instrument/components i could be able to acconplish this 20Mhz sparks ??? plz guide

box 379 You need to use high voltage switching diodes in a circuit with the appropriate rectifier and transistors. Why do you need 20 mhz spark gap? Why not a continuous output? For example, if the fields don't have time to completely collapse, then it would make no difference...?

graphene might be an option, but not necessarily

​@@MasterIvo have you seen Keshe Foundation on Nano-coating to get better conductivity?

@@opeixepeixoto9453 no haven't seen it

the same capacitance as the inductance is? those are like volts and amps, they're not the same, and don't have the same scale.

as a sine wave has a positive and negative maximum in one wave period, why not, push back in the other direction

@@MasterIvo it doesn't tell me if you had several pulses next to each other your amperage would increase

by the way you do a great job

@@pierrecotnoir5186 the Impulses are without current, but help to build up current (amps) but not un the same space. I'm not sure what would happen, this requires a experimental setup.

@@pierrecotnoir5186 Thanks!

Holy hell, that's scary to think about. ;P

yes except this uses impulses (resonant half waves) instead of pulses

@@MasterIvo where can I get the schematic? Thank you !

@@EthericZone see my april 2019 Radiant Power video, for the circuit (it's the same I used for the "ascention seat" which gives health benefits) also read: teslaresearch.jimdofree.com/lectures-of-nikola-tesla/high-frequency-oscillators-for-electro-therapeutic-and-other-purposes-the-electrical-engineer-november-17-1898/

@@MasterIvo awesome thanks for the link will check out that Radiant energy video , do you have a video on PEMF device ? My PEMF device is working until I plug in the 16awg wire then the Mosfet 740 burns out , a physicist told me that my PEMF device needs 1000ft of 24awg magnet wire and will work properly, curious to see how a PEMF device with your Bifilar coil performs . Thanks again !

yes to low inductance gives high currents = heat in mosfet. Never worked with Pemf myself, just impulses and resonance.

I'd like to see that!

equal copper mass per winding, equal turn diameter, equal turns.

I think it will have a similar effect, although the dielectric field is in a different direction (perpendicular to the pancake plane) than Tesla's version (radial). Pondering further on that concept, you could make multiple Tesla bifilars and connect them in parallel but alternate which of the two windings in each coil is the higher or lower voltage. Then stack the coils on top of eachother and you get dielectric energy storage radially and axially at the same time. If powered by 100V, then a cross section of the coil stack would look like a checkerboard with 50V difference between each square. Should increase capacitance for a given total copper mass without increasing inductance or resistance.

it is part of understanding Nikola Tesla's work. We only know magnetic induction, but Tesla worked with dielectric induction, based on these impulses. both induction methods are needed simultaneously.

Reading the research of Gerry Vassilatos, one learns that Tesla discovered that with a capacitive powered voltage spike, jumping a gap prior to the closing of a switch from a high voltage source to a neutral network, he would see an amplification of electricity. This amplification, by the distance the sparks jumped out of the receiving circuits, was much greater than the amount of power behind the voltage differential supplied by the capacitors. (A spark that jumped a few centimeters at the switch would produce an arc of feet out of the receiving conductors, killing people who should have been safe distances from the wires.) Only Tesla saw this as an opportunity to discover how nature creates electricity. This led Tesla to discover that electricity could be disassociated into charge and something else; which he decided was Ether. The Charge was relatively slow-moving compared to the Ether; the Ether was also able to amplify and re-constitute the electricity when it slowed down. Tesla also discovered that the Ether was able to power devices and substances directly, without electricity or wasted energy in resistance and heat. It all depended on the frequency and vibration rate of the impulses that Tesla conditioned with his complex spark gap mechanisms, as to what the Ether impulses he could separate out, changing what they would do... the substances they would affect and the energetic response the substances would manifest. He found he could replicate any physical reaction in the various substances with his beams of pulsed Ether-energy. This took remote control to a new level, from transferring energy to actually doing chemical and nuclear reactions remotely. Tesla also discovered that Ether beams, that did not have charge, could be transmitted wirelessly without loss or delay. The limitations of transmitting electrical power in wires that had resistance and also losses to the environment became obsolete.... as well as the physical limitations of power distribution that made it easy to control and monetize power distribution. This would have led to the devaluation of wealth in the world as we know it... so, his discovery became public enemy #1. Right now, the idea is just a distraction... not of practical use. But if the power grid fails, it could save humanity. Master Ivo is looking at impulses produced by opened coils, not closing capacitors. The quality of the electricity that each event dominates with, a charge differential driven electricity, vs. a magnetism driven electricity is different. He is using a similar concept, but producing a completely different effect than what Tesla researched. Master Ivo's is original research and is especially important in clarifying the relationship of Ether to electricity. There is much more to this than one can see in the description. Party on dudes... be good to one another. Peace, B.

@@mundymorningreport3137 And then, along came the Michel/Morley experiment which disproved the existence of ether. It just wasn't the same as Tesla's ether as they had misunderstood Tesla's meaning. And then all of science ignored Tesla until now when dark matter/energy is confusing the hell out of them!

@@jimporter7418 they falsified the concept of a static ether.

When you can eliminate the "back emf" from a circuit you can produce over-unity simply and continuously. This is the pathway to doing just THAT.

I have enough inductance, I need more capacitance. I'm going to add a titanium dioxide mixed with epoxy to increase it. This is for a high voltage capacitor made of 2 pancake coils (which act as plates)

eddy oklobdzija It is similar to how a suction cup is easier removed by moving it laterally until the outer ‘edge’ of the cup is no longer meaningfully engaged with the opposing surface and the system dynamics the force is created from, no longer exist in a manner which sustains itself.... Copy? Things is, magnetic ‘poles’ are not a singular ‘system’ there is more than just a ‘N or S’ component to a ‘pole’ eg, Each pole (on a cylindrical magnetic.) has twin regions of maximum Gaussian Flux which are in fact the result of differing system dynamics. The bar magnet and iron filing demonstration we were all shown as representative of the magnetic field is woefully inadequate at representing the dynamics of a magnetic field. It also completely neglected the null point, dielectric plane torsional characteristics of the magnetic field, the twin ‘hemisphere’ aspect of the field and how this is in conjunction with all of the above. Does not even clarify the twin fields at each pole which are dynamically linked but exist under seperate Base line principles. The ‘serrated’ aspect of the force (the sensation u experienced when applying a shear force to a N/S magnetic configuration) also applies to the polar axis longitudinally. You can observe this as a volume of ferrofluid moving ‘along’ the polar axis ‘field lines.’ It will transition from its ‘pooled’ mass at rest and as it is subjected to the field of a ‘magnetic pole’ its motion will exhibit a reciprocating and equidistant ‘globular’ nature. This is nothing more than the magnetic fields dynamics creating an interference pattern like structure with itself, which could be conceptualised as a standing wave if this helps but it is important to remember that this is technically inaccurate/incorrect and only fits as a conceptual representation when the field is isolated from external influence. (Within the fields spatial-magnitude-parameters, which are the critical threshold for the dynamics of the field to exist in a natural state of static equilibrium...) Once the magnetic field is influenced by its environment (for a given scale of perspective.) Then this conceptual understanding quickly breaks down when the field experiences an external influence and the notion of the ‘serrated’ sensation needs to be addressed from more of a interference type perspective. Twin opposing vortices (over simplistic but that is the very basic jist.) occupying the same spatial volume is a good conceptual instrument. If u consider the twin vortices as being phobic of the others constituent ‘matter’ and the opposing components of these vortices as being forced to intertwine their respective (practically identical, but opposing.) components together in the most efficient manner possible than you arrive at something similar to what is happening. The multitude of ‘cones’ protruding from a mass of ferro fluid when subjected to the field of a magnetic pole is another good conceptual tool. These ‘domains’ of maximum ferromagnetic influence are contradictory to the assumed nature of a magnetic field as the bar magnetic/iron filing demonstration, shown to100’s of millions of young students, would have you subconsciously believe/understand, which would simply be concentric rings protruding from the ferro fluid. But as I said earlier, this pattern of force concentration and viodance exists on multiple axis of the field and create an entire array of this ‘serration’ in the magnetic fields force.

because that is much harder to do. Discharging a coil into a COIL-CAPACITOR is much easier and better to control and research.

@@MasterIvo no its easy you need 2 spark gaps,first one from flyback has a fine purple high frequency spark which feeds into your caps and another spark gap,which produces a noisy fat white spark frequency controlled by gap distance, very easy I use 6 1000vlt . ..01creamic caps in oil bath in glass jar in series, best coil so far is rodin coil wound on 12 in white polystyrene ring tested on charging a car battery,14.8 vlt charge with .6amp 12vlt imput in 12 hrs,yet a rodin coil has a pitterful magnet field at that power setting ,on scope with old style one not digital there is a white dot on end of emf spike on screen

thats like saying the cheese weight and the air pressure needs to be the same. they have different dimensions! the coils magnetic field (inductance) is created in the dimension of space. while the capacitors dielectric field (capacitance ) is created in the dimension of Time! So how can they be the same? Appels and pears, space and time.

So true, I always thought of it as a giant capacitor as well. Ground, air, then moisture/conductor.

that is something I would also like to know and understand

If I may; electricity IS the dielectric (magnetic field) at a 90 degree phase angle as the current travels downstream from the source. Electricity (what we call it) is real two forces combined into one, and one component of it travels outside the wire at that 90 degree phase angle. This is why two wires beside each other, with two opposing or agreeing directions of current will either repel each other or attract each other as the current flows; and THAT reflects the amount of magnetism (Di-electricity) in both circuits. Longitudinal electricity operates sub-space, (no wave forms) that is: outside of time and space, which is what causes instant action at a distance. Our friend is putting it all together for us! He will find the secret to MASS which is not a magic pixie particle! Ha hah hah!

I'm trying to answer your first question. The magnetic force increases and decreases as the difference between two magnets increases and decreases. So when the opposite poles of two magnets are pulled apart the distance between them increases and it becomes easy to do, but when the two poles of same polarity of magnets are pushed in the direction of each other, the distance between them decreases and so the acting force increases too, so it becomes hard to keep them together. (Sorry for my bad english).

@@SSIKR "but when the two poles of same polarity of magnets are pushed in the direction of each other, the distance between them increases and so the acting force increases too," the distance between them INCREASES? No. I think you misspoke.

@@SSIKR I think you meant to say "as the distance decreases the repulsion increases. That's because energy dissipates as area expands, and increases as area diminishes. That's whay the formula for either is a Pi R^2 relationship; a circle. (area not direct line distance) Correct? Just as Fission is easier than Fusion, in fact; Fission is the trigger for fusion.

@@rstelzer2928 my bad, I mistyped.