I agree.

So true

Hello Sir hope you are doing good

He’s got too many weapons to be a counter puncher, I doubt many coaches would describe him that way. He’s definitely doesn’t miss much!

He still lost the respect of tennis fans around the world when he backstabbed novak.

Not only is he back, he won it.

He was given the tournament

@@draoicht22 nothing is given in a sport Djokovic has not always won RG in the absence of Rafa si stop being a clown

@@draoicht22 🤡

@Ashutosh Vernekar didn't see him at the RG final when he did play. Besides, that's such a bot argument.

you should see his pressers at wimbledon 2022 and the later matches he is maturing

@@swarnabhdasgupta6572 si Kyrgios se tomara mas en serio el tenis seria uno delos 5 mejores en el rankings atp

illuminati confirmed :p :p :p

rigged

Much better match tho

Mark Petchy did flag it in commentary.

Thanks for spoiling the result, Einstein! Why not just input a couple of blank lines so that the score is not visible without expanding the comment?

2014 Wawrinka? No big 4 member. Realistically they are all usual opponents u need to play to win a slam, it's just that Federer/Djokovic wouldn't get taken to 5 by someone like Verdasco or Dimitrov.

@zakaria djouzi Yes and Nadal faced Wawrinka in the final. Nadal avoided Djokovic, he got a good draw. And no, Verdasco was not top 5, not at all. His highest rank was no7. He would've lost in straight sets to Federer had they played realistically. 2017 his draw was far easier than Federers ( Berdych, Nishikori,Wawrinka and Nadal). 2020 he did get a tough draw. But aside from that all the other draws are no harder than a usual draw.

@zakaria djouzi so, Wawrinka defeating Djokovic doesn't make him harder than Djokovic. That's like saying Federer FO 2009 was the tough because he beat the guy who beat the king of clay?? Djokovics draw was obviously worse, he faced Wawrinka 4th round and would have had to play a big 4 member is the final. Nadal matches up worse against Verdasco, he would've been beaten in straight sets by Fed. Fed has never lost to Verdasco, Nadal has numerous times to prove my point.He was not top 3 caliber, please, are you serious? Nadals draw is AO 2014 was standard, as was his AO 2009, his AO 2017 wasn't even that bad. Dimitrov, really????? That's the toughest opponent? A guy who was beaten in straight sets in round 4 of Wimbledon that year by Fed. Please, what are you talking about lol. You knows what was a tougher draw? Nadals AO 2012 draw, far tougher than any draw you've mentioned. 2017 Raonic sucked, he was injured all year. Berdych had a far better year. Get your facts straights. Raonic best result was Wimbledon, where he was destroyed by Federer??? And Federers Wimbledon 2017 draw was considered easy.

@zakaria djouzidude what u say makes no sense. I can't be arsed to argue with a guy that's saying that having to beat Wawrinka a Federer is a hard draw, yes it's hard but you should expect to always face 1 big 4 member to win a slam, maybe more. And then some solid top 10 players. What you're talking about is a normal draw

@zakaria djouzibruh have u seen the AO 2012 draw????? Berdych, Federer then Djokovic. That is a tough draw. Not Wawrinka and Federer, that's standard. Federer Wimbledon 2014, Wawrinka Raonic Djokovic standard Federer us open 2015 Wawrinka Djokovic, another standard draw. Federer Wimbledon 2015 Murray followed by Djokovic another standard draw. Federer Wimbledon 2012 Djokovic followed by Murray. These are all very common draws to win a slam. Not at all uncommon. Djokovic AO 2016, Nishikori, Federer Murray. Djokovic AO 2015, Wawrinka Murray..another normal draw. Like are u saying everyone of these slam draws are more difficult than usual......please just stop

FR

What has Kyrgios won? he's just a crazy player with some good serves lol

@@samuelpalacios6929 He has a freakish amount of talent to be greater than the top three, Greg is saying if he didnt have a sook about losing one point he would then be world number one.

@@vinton169 😂 sureeeee

​@@matthewwilliams3827i mean if you look at his match against rublev : 6:3, 6:0. Kyrgios is actually insanely good if he keeps his head in the game.

If he actually tried, he'd be a great player sure. There's no way he would own mens tennis. Talent means way more than looking cool and doing tweeners. To me he's not even half as talented as the big 3. They have the natural hand-eye coordination and flare along with more athletic talent. The social media era and the Australian media have blown this guy up into something he never was. Gael Monfils, Richard Gasquet, Nalbandian, Verdasco, Tsonga were all underachievers, all talented. But I've never seen a guy do so little for so long, ranked in the 50's or lower, come into the Australian Open and have the entire national media say "could he make a run this year", "this could be his year", "all eyes on Nick", and then tear the guy down when he doesn't get it done. If he was injury free, worked his ass off, and was all there mentally, he still couldn't touch the big 3 in their prime.

Bro they dont have the rights to cuz of ESPN thats y

Thanks for the video, I used to be 5.0, got hurt and am now 1/2 paralyzed I love watching whenever however

They can’t

William Martin that sucks!

So I’ve seen the AO reply to comments others have made about this. During the tournament, broadcasters such as Nine Network (Australia) and ESPN won the rights to publish highlights in their respective countries and areas. Afterwards, however, this changes and the AO can post any highlights or footage they like.

I think kyrgios has more mental stamina than several players in his level (top 40)

it is so interesting to se how he plays mentally...I think he has a lot to learn but in the other hand way stronger than any other player...he just need more self-esteem and less care about others...people who act like him has so little self-esteem... you could see that from the drop shot while he has strong enough shots to beat Nadal. 💪

It's always been Kyrgios vs Kyrgios when it comes to his attitude. His talent and skills could easily let him be within TOP10 years ago. But his mentality is constantly shutting him down. If there is any psychologist who can fix him, congrats in advance lol.

Michał nothing wrong with him, therefore no need to ‘fix him’ he just a young sports man who does very well actually 👌

Diana Vagasi why are we acting like he’s just bursted our moments ago from the junior league? He’s 25 by by which age these old guys he’s disrespecting so have won consecutive grand slams and titles all over the world. Also he, like other professional sportsmen, started decades ago in terms of training and discipline.

ラファスはスペインの英雄。彼は左手で激しくテニスをすることができます。

It’s like his volleys. With his volleys he doesn’t hit too many but when he does he almost always wins the point, because he only hits them when it actually benefits him and not just for the sake of it.

Me being a nick fan, really wanted him to win. But seeing his match against Karen dissapointed me. It shouldnt have taken him 5 sets to beat him. So i didnt have high hopes for him to win this match. Sry for later response :)

if kyrgios wud have won in 3 sets vs khachanov he probably wud have played at a much higher level against rafa

@@abhishekrajopadhye717 Nikki is a dunce for a tennis professional, his game would not have changed and would have lost likely the same way.

@@markuse3472 nick is in the wimbledon final now

​@@calvin9187 That Wimbledon was a farce from start to finish. Nick has done precisely nothing since, except insult past generations and claim he ever could have stood a better chance in a generation such as John McEnroe's. Nick had amazing talent, still has it, but his mentality turned him into a bum in comparison to what he could have been (no top 100 is truly a bum, that is s feet in and of itself), plain and simple.

I wonder how Tennis attracts such petty spectators

@@VCRider guessing you haven't seen the classless trash talk kyrgios is constantly spewing. Meanwhile Rafa is respectful even when the opponent is a jerk. seeing jerks lose is always nice :D

@@clevelandbrown5709 i like both players. If all real life villains were like nick there would be no problems on this planet.

dor ryoku yeah the quality was incredible, and nick played his heart out

Oblivion CST really? I think we are fine with long highlight, its actually better.

You see what i did there Personally I like longer highlights. This is just mocking this vid’s comment section.

Who said make them longer?

There is a big space between 2 minutes and 40 minutes

@@kirby4599: Who said make them shorter?

Yes, behind federer

the supernatural so you’re saying that nicks performance in this match is that of a terrible player? I’d like to see you do better

The only returner with good passes at the time was Agassi. Now, most of them are good at it. Also, courts are slower nowadays

True, rafa just has better fighting spirit in crucial moments

One great player

Josh Heinink we’ll need to give nick credit it wasn’t a walk over nice to see some of the young ones take Theese old legends on

mikes gt get fucked he’s fantastic

zakaria djouzi hes a fucking genius on court

Nadal is quite used to trick shots like that, Kyrgios is not the only one who knows how to feign a fake move, Fed/Novak does it often too ...

Syrgios

That kyrgios consistently would be top 5

@@Mongovi No

U will see today...

But its really a shock to know that a player of Kyrgios's quality has not even reached a single grand slam final or semi-final ... there are tons of players he can beat who has reached that stage, something is wrong ...it seems he's always coming up against one of the big guys early or he gets sloppy losing to players he usually beats ...

@@88feji he lacks discipline

una bestia nadal!!!

De acuerdo con casi todo, excepto que Djokovic sea un caballero. Lo es ahora, pero tiene un pasado algo similar al engreído del que hablas (hasta los canguros y los wombats tienen mejor gusto).

yes.

I think Kyrgios seriously have to see a psychologist, to improve his emotions and therefore his game. Great players like Nadal and Federer were very mature since their beginnings. You have to have both feet on the earth, otherwise you wont progress. In Laver Cup he argued with McEnroe, with the Judge, watching constantly the big court screen. In a nut shell: he needs to mature. Will he?

2 best australian players went full throttle at Nadal last summer Both times they got so close but he somehow outplayed them

“this will be your year” lol a year later: has gone from world number 23 to 115. like how? remember when he was world number 13 now 115 🤦‍♂️ Niko why

@@eljonowise243

I had the same feeling ah ah !!

I am guessing Nick was fatigued after playing 2 extremely long matches back to back (in his experience) and just did not get enough juice to be aggressive in his Nadal encounter. Unfortunate, since Nick is such a joy to watch

@@hippios thats a good theory too. I forgot about the previous two matches and how tough they were for nick.

ナダルはタイに行ったことがあります。 彼は苦いタイの若者にテニスを見せた。彼はこのショーから高い収入を得ています。

If he play like that he’ll destroy everyone

It is indeed effective, kyrgios won 3 matches against Nadal

Not anymore it's not

It works though, don’t need to criticise it. Nadal has an unusual technique, yet it works for him.

28:48 seems effective to me. The issue isn't the technique, its the player. Kyrgios's forehand technique is more than capable of outputting enough quality to beat nadal, but Kyrgios himself struggles to output that quality for an extended period of time. To be fair to him, he played a very long match against khachanov the match before and he was likely tired. We can see at 28:48 though, what happens when he really puts in that effort. His footwork was great and his preparation super early on every one of these shots. the results were world class. not everyone can approach every point with this kind of intensity though. this is what makes dominic thiem so good.

Really?? Nick has won 0 Grand Slam... so...

@@saturnoh3142 “that day” cant you read?

He beat him 3 times but ok

@@Tycho47: ..and lost to him 5 times, but ok.

@@notsohandytim5090 so what is your point???

what did he say?

@@coinrotator Nothing. Usual nadal fans that gets angry for nothing.

@@monsieurbreakdown4814 Lol, delusional,Kyrgios its a disrespectful prick sometimes, anyone knows that.

@@Man_3336 Funny how people are so used to the false world of tennis, acting and lying, that they call disrespectful prich someone that just being himself.

@@monsieurbreakdown4814 You are really sensitive. Go cry somewhere else.

Thiem era uno de los 4 mejores del mundo , lo que es una pena es lo que lea pasado ahora y el puesto que ocupa en el rankings espero que con el tiempo vuelva a ser el que era antes

Lmao good catch lol

Nick earned some of that respect back in this match tbh

@@BrandonSG13 he lost to his enemy in front of his home crowd. Nick was gutted...everyone else was satisfied.

During lockdown they reduced everything to 480p after the lift you can watch it

Martin Soukup this match was much better though

Particularly impressed with how Nadal repeatedly caught Nick by surprise with his serve ... usually its the other way around ... and Nadal definitely returned Nick's nuclear serves extremely well during this match !

Nadal won the French open when he was 19😂 I hope slow success didn’t refer to him

Alexander Kings tf is wrong with 720? fckin snob lmao

@@eugeneflash3578 You dumb f*ck, buy a name.

Alexander Kings WeirdChamp Wrap it up alexander WeirdChamp

You bitches complain about everything lmao

I feel like it's also the key to beating djoko on hardcourts, like how he did it in 2010 and 2013

@@user-pi9mw8mk7p Exactly

@@atptouracademy1121 his forehand shots now are a bit predictable and often land too short with high bounces, making it easy for players to attack

@@user-pi9mw8mk7p Yup, though I think it depends on the surface and conditions like on fast surfaces like the US Open he was hitting them quite low and hard.

Svebf