If you watch videos before and after the murder accusation, you see very different versions of Amanda. In the before, you see a goofy, bubbly, open hearted young woman. After, you see a heart defensive, cynical, distrusting, and much more closed type person. She went through a living nightmare, and it obviously took it's toll on her psyche and changed her a lot. Yet, there are glimpses of the old Amanda when she's with her family.

Better keep away from Rudy Guede..... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nLmEl6tk3Nmoenk.html

@annie C your spine is no forensic evidence. See here what a real investigation looks like.... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nLmEl6tk3Nmoenk.html

Rudy is out soon... you can room with him... both of you can make lies together.

@@SuelFadel You'd sleep with a dirty person? Meredith resented her lack of hygiene, even to the point of not flushing.

Well said!

Well to be fair most of the have extremely low intelligence. Anyone who thinks a person is guilty without evidence is scary sad dumb. They completely ignore the facts and go only for she acted different. Scary as hell really. These people could be jurors one day. I am not the smartest cat, but I am smart enough to realize just how out there some people are. It is half the population in the states.

I agree!

www.repubblica.it/2008/04/sezioni/cronaca/perugia-uccisa7/genitori-sollecito/genitori-sollecito.html

You ought to look at what a PR Firm has done to YOUR brain Dummy

Lies, lies and minimization of the seriousness-almost ridiculous-he's a major perpetrator. He is is so dense.

Minimization again ha ha just a construcion-Sollecito hairs found on bra clasp and all over murder room?

He must have changed his story about that night approximately 10 times-bizarre!! For us in the UK, we always felt Amanda & Raffaele Sollecito were guilty. Meredith was good at karate, it needed extreme force to overpower her that night

@@tonywelsh3709 Seems like you didn’t do your own research and just believed whatever the Italian media told you. Yikes on a bike.

The total lack of evidence got them off, they shouldn't have been charged in the first place.

+Quintus Beckmesser Will you change your mind if he,appeals and gets a different ruling?

What does that prove? That they want to save money? That they don't want to admit they were wrong? IT is about the money nothing else.

He recently stated that he lied. That she had been there and he pricked her.

Prosecution seems to chat away with Knox about this horrendous murder-Are the Italians mad? Never chat chat with Knox. Knox twisted her way around Magnini and he didn't cross examine. Knox got off cos of Donald Trump?

The prosecutor's messed up the forensics and kept all the evidence in the same place. It was contaminated. I recommend you watch the Netflix documentary about it which goes into a lot of detail.

@@daphne4983 and thats a lie he made up when they found out that merediths dna was on the knife. she never was in his appartment.

@@flipsidetruly1669 this is bullshit. You should read the Massei report

Look up the word factoid. You just posted one. Amanda told one story. The story she told while being illegally interrogated (Italy ordered to pay her 18k by the ECHR for that interrogation) was coerced and she was arrested and spent 4 years in jail right after so not a self helpful story. She did not mention Raffaele in her coerced story but he was arrested also and spent 4 years in jail also. Patrick Lumumba was arrested, said the police abused him and kicked him and called him names, but then as they kept his bar closed he changed is tune. You have a tabloid understanding of this case. Respond if you want to get schooled.

Rebecca Howell 😨😨😨 omg!

Rebecca she only bought lingerie to parade naked??

www.repubblica.it/2008/04/sezioni/cronaca/perugia-uccisa7/genitori-sollecito/genitori-sollecito.html

Amanda had no clothes (sic), that's why she maliciously accused an innocent man of murder.

He must have changed his story about that night approximately 10 times-bizarre!! How did Amanda know how Meredith had died when the police didn't know because the body hadn't been examined? For us in the UK, we always felt Amanda & Raffaele Sollecito were guilty. Meredith was good at karate, it needed extreme force to overpower her that night. The email Amanda sent to friends & family 2 days after the murder was clearly her giving a cover story & start the lie.

Simple explanation accepted: Knox and Solleceto bloody footprints captured correctly in the Luminal together with hair evidence and double DNA evidence with Knox/Kercher blood everywhere, Sollecito knife cutting off bra and bra clasp full of Sollecito hairs and duvet and handbag full of Knox and Sollecito hair, Sollecito bloody footprint on bath mat-no wonder two competent Italian Courts convicted Knox and Sollecito.

He must have changed his story about that night approximately 10 times-bizarre!! For us in the UK, we always felt Amanda & Raffaele Sollecito were guilty. Meredith was good at karate, it needed extreme force to overpower her that night

Area 20: Sollecito’s statements and lies Posted by The Wiki Team 20-01 Two days after the discovery of the murder, Sollecito claimed to a journalist that he and Knox had been the first to discover Ms. Kercher’s body and that there was blood everywhere, even though he could not have seen the room interior. (Follain) 20-02 Sollecito also claimed he and Knox attended a party that night, apparently confusing that night with the prior night of Halloween. (Follain) 20-03 Sollecito claimed to Zaroli and Romanelli that Ms. Kercher’s body had been covered in Vaseline. (Follain, Zaroli 2009) 20-04 During his November 5th questioning by the police, Sollecito claimed he had made up a “bunch of lies” during previous questionings and claimed uncertainty whether Knox was with him the whole night of November 1st. 20-05 In a letter to his father dated 11/7/07, Sollecito also laid down a story about the night before the murder and the events leading up to the discovery of the murder. His account was similar to Knox’s, but different in some details to Knox’s, and in any case was belied by cell phone records, computer records and witness statements. 20-06 Sollecito claimed he surfed the internet and may have watched a film and then received the goodnight text message from his father. But his computer showed no activity after 21:10 and he did not receive the text message until 6:00 the following morning. 20-07 Sollecito did not mention that his computer was used to play music for half hour at 5:30 the following morning. 20-08 Sollecito failed to mention the 4 minute long phone call with his father at 9:24 that morning, claiming he was sleeping at that time. 20-09 Sollecito failed to mention Knox’s phone call to Romanelli, done at his apartment, prior to their going to the cottage. 20-10 Sollecito claimed they brought the mop that Knox had brought over earlier that morning, back to the cottage, and that apparently, Knox put the mop bucket in another room (rather than at the entrance.) Apparently there was much interest in this mop. 20-11 Sollecito claimed he found Romanelli’s bedroom door wide open, while Knox claimed it was still closed until she opened it. 20-12 Sollecito claimed he restrained Knox from climbing from the terrace to access Ms. Kercher’s bedroom window. 20-13 Sollecito claimed that only then did Knox call Romanelli and try Ms. Kercher’s phones, whereas these calls had taken place nearly 30 minutes earlier. 20-14 Sollecito claimed Knox was panicked about the lack of feces in the toilet she had seen earlier, and apparently he did not see them either, though they are clearly visible in the crime scene photos. 20-15 Sollecito claimed he attempted to break Ms. Kercher’s door down, then he called his sister, but he failed to mention calling his father for a minute prior to calling his sister. 20-16 Sollecito claimed on November 11, 2007 that Knox went with an Argentinean guy to laundry mat on the morning of November 2nd to clean up things. 20-17 Sollecito then claimed Knox continued to lie. 20-18 At the first preliminary hearing, Sollecito stated he never again wanted to see Knox. 20-19 Sollecito expressed concern that Guede might say ‘strange things’ about him just days after Guede’s arrest. 20-20 Sollecito gave spontaneous court testimony that he pricked Ms. Kercher’s while cooking at his apartment, even though Ms. Kercher had never been to his apartment. He ultimately retracted this statement on Twitter. 20-21 Sollecito later claimed he was at his computer the night of November 1st, sending emails. Proof of this claimed activity has never been found or presented. Posted on 11/06/14 at 05:30 PM by The Wiki Team

The clasp has been contaminated with his dna because the police touched it without changing their gloved. The piece of Rafaele's dna on the clasp was too tiny to mean he did touch it.

Camille Charton. Not true. Sollecito's dna was found on the bra clasp. The defence has been that this could have been contaminated. However, according to David Balding, who is a world recognized expert dna statician, for someone else to have contaminated the bra strap with exactly the same dna profile as Sollecito, is extremely unlikely. There is also the bloody footprint revealed by luminol, which matches Sollecito's footprint. If you were in the same position as the Kercher family, would you accept Sollecito's innocence?

susangavaghan you are 100% Right. The two are Narcissistic psychopaths. God sees what they did. If they don’t get right on earth they’ll be going straight to Hell.

@@susangavaghan well said..so true..his DNA was on her bra clasp then he says he pricked her with a knife but Meredith was Never at his apartment...Raffaele is a pathological liar..

First of a premise note: the Bruno/Marasca verdict is contradictory. It is illogical to the point of being grotesque. We may see the long trail of inconsistencies later on. Now we shall note as a premise that its inconsistency is glaring on macroscopic points What I can do is note those things are that stated clearly as proven facts - and we shall distinguish between those findings pointed out as certain in the ruling, and what instead is considered not proven or not in the ruling. One proven thing, called “incontrovertible” by the ruling, is that Meredith was physically killed by more than one person, while someone was holding her tight. It says that this is not because of the previous Guede verdict, but because there “multiple evidences” of this that emerged also in the Knox-Sollecito trials. On pp. 25-26 explains that it would be impossible for a single person to commit the murder, because of the mechanical action needed. So it is absolutely proven that Meredith was NOT raped and killed by Rudy Guede, but instead she was raped and killed by multiple perpetrators. Think about this and absorb this information. Then, also: It calls the purported burglary a “staging” and points out that even thinking about a burglary would be illogical because of the peculiar dynamics of the murder; it also says Amanda Knox washed her hands of Meredith’s blood, and calls this an “eloquent proof”. (you may concede that Amanda Knox with Meredith’s blood on her hands is a particularly disturbing image to find in a verdict). On the other hand, the ruling does NOT say something like "Amanda Knox was not involved in the killing". And does not utter the word “impossible” at all. Quite the contrary: instead, the verdict recalls para 530.2, concludes that it is only not proven beyond a standard of reasonable doubt that Knox took “active part to the killing action”. (implication: but she might well have) Note: let’s repeat this, it does not say "she didn’t", neither calls this option “impossible”, even remotely. Quite on the contrary, it points out (p.49) that there are in fact only two options: either she took an active part to the killing, or she only tried to cancel the evidence subsequently in order to cover up a murderer. The ruling does not present a third option. There is no "innocent" option presented. Obviously, one might notice, the Supreme Court assessment that the proof of an “active participation” is “resisted” by the lack of DNA findings in the murder room, is clearly contradictory with the finding at pp.25-26 that the participation of multiple perpetrators is “incontrovertible”. Besides the detail that the Supreme Court cannot assess evidence and does not have access to evidence, this is just one of the glaring contradictions in the verdict. Another contradiction is with the trial papers: the assumption that a lack of DNA finding of a female subject (with no detectable Y-chromosome) in a context where the traces from another female profile is very abundant would be significant, is an assumption that contradicts the findings of the preliminary hearing (testimony of Stefanoni of Oct. 2008). Stefanoni did explain in fact that if small traces DNA of another female were present, they would not be detectable on Meredith’s body nor on items where the presence of her DNA is massive (because of statistical effects due to the amplification process). Another few notes: The ruling does not say that Amanda’s presence in the cottage was “acclaimed” in the trial. The ruling says that her presence is a PROVEN FACT in the trial (albeit the English doctored translation published by the pro-Knox camp alters and falsifies the content in many passages). It calls her presence “certain” also in one other passage, it points out clearly that it is talking about the moment when Meredith was killed, that Knox even heard her scream, that she was aware of details of the murder before the police knew them, and that she knew Lumumba was innocent because she was there.

He must have changed his story about that night approximately 10 times-bizarre!! For us in the UK, we always felt Amanda & Raffaele Sollecito were guilty. Meredith was good at karate, it needed extreme force to overpower her that night

Really karate? I didn't know

Meredith was NOT 'good at karate': she had a beginner's orange belt which is useless for self-defense.

marmackk But it has been proven that she was not killed with THIS knife so who cares !

He lied he's not innocent just trying to play innocent in front of the cameras..

He will, when they'll quarrel about money.

psychopaths always relapse, it's just a matter of time

Lock him up!

um, meredith's dna was never found on the knife, and it was not the correct length for the knife used in the killing. The murder weapon was a smaller knife, they can tell because the hilt of it repeatedly hit Meredith in the neck. Also, the killer placed the bloody knife on the bed, revealing the outline of a smaller knife.

***** It was found on the knife , this is one of the reasons why they was found guilty in the first case. The dna was so small though that it could only be tested once which is what the defence argued on the appeal which got them off. From what iv read now though the Italian courts are saying it should of never been thrown out hence the return to Guilty. Sollecito also admitted that Merediths DNA was on the knife and lied about it " The fact there is Meredith's DNA on the kitchen knife is because once when we were all cooking together I accidentally pricked her hand. I apologised immediately and she said it was not a problem." Some people argue this was him speculating but the detail about the apology doesnt sound like speculation and he repeated it twice

that wasn't the same knife, that was when he was cooking at their house, the knife evidence was thrown out by the appeals court and rightly so. Again, the huge kitchen knife was way too big to be the one used, they have a bloody imprint of the knife! Do you realize they didn't even test all the knives at Sollecito's house? They picked one "on instinct" they said, then made it work. But there is no use arguing w/ a true believer.

Im not a true believer ***** i think there are arguments for both sides which is what makes the case so interesting. I just think when people say there is no evidence against them they are crazy. When Sollecito made up the lie about Meredith Kercher pricking her finger he was defonatly talking about the knife in his kitchen by the way, Iv never heard your version before?

*****, you live in a dream! The knife was compatible with the mortal wound and with the trace on the bed. And a small knife was the second weapon of the murder...there were different signs of cutting on the cadaver. Even Sollecito admitted that the dna was on the big knife (as writes Jimmy Shelter in his comments)...and Knox, in an interception in prison, said to her mother that she was "very worried for a knife in Raffaele's apartment". Meredith's dna was categorically on the blade, as an enormous number of forensic experts affirms. Simply there was a small quantity. Conti-Vecchiotti's report, by now, has no trial value. And even the contamination on the bra clasp isn't demonstrated, but just presumed. Amanda admitted in 5 occasions to be on the crime scene during the homicide! If you read only pro-Knox websites you can't know the true facts.

What a bunch of ignorant nonsense. Clearly you got your info from the tabloids.

Sollecito is a liar and a psychopath who has no conscience whatsoever and all he does is lie, lie and lie again. All personal evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt he was in the murder room at the time of the commission of the murder together with Knox.

No, your delusional point implies the media et al already knew she was dead before the door was kicked in. LOL

You make a great point.. also, whatever you think of their personalities, they were nailed by the forensics & their repeated lies

@@markbrennannow3630 The forensics were terrible, and poorly analyzed actually, and didn’t even support the prosecutors claims at all

Mill Wright: 1. 2 bloodied footprints were revealed by luminol - one matching Knox's and one matching Sollecito's. 2. There were 5 bloodstains with Meredith's and Knox's dna mixed together - the only explanation being that they were bleeding together. 3. Sollecito's dna was found on Merediths bra clasp. 4. It has been forensically proven that Guede could not have acted alone. 5. There was no dna at the crime scene other than Merediths, Guede's, Sollecitos and Knoxs. 6. Knox tried to blame a completely innocent man. Does that spell innocence to you? If you were in the Kercher family's position would you believe Knox and Sollecito to be innocent?

susangavaghan Can you explain us how Amanda could have bleed without any wound ???

@@CamilleChaton it was exfoliation DNA of epithelial cells. She rubbed her hands to wash the blood away

Please not to call innocent people guilty. He is very honest, sincere and decent guy, just based on the interview one can easily detect.

Knox, Sollecito, Guede and Lumumba: All innocent. I have studied this case in and out, the prosecution are wrong

gameloverchic21 you are a good joker

sara paparazzi No it doesn't. You might want to do some research on police tactics during interrogations and false confesstions, and keep in.mind that at the time Knox was a 20 yr old foreigner being interrogated in a language she didn't understand very well with mo attorney present. Then ask yourself did they really not record interrogations in a murder investigation or do they simply not want to release them?

Nancy Parker would be interesting for all these people that don't understand false confession would do if they were put in similar situations. They would probably admit (or the police would say you did b/c he was not recorded) to all sorts of murders. some people will just never get it.

Even if that were true (which it isn't), changing your tale is still better than chasing your tail, i.e. what "guilters" do.

Steve Morse Dna does fly. The bra was contaminated with Rafaele's dna because the police didn't change their gloves to touch stuff in the flat.

Quintus Beckmesser The people who WERE in charge of collecting samples of evidences DID confess they didn't change gloves.

@@CamilleChaton First of a premise note: the Bruno/Marasca verdict is contradictory. It is illogical to the point of being grotesque. We may see the long trail of inconsistencies later on. Now we shall note as a premise that its inconsistency is glaring on macroscopic points What I can do is note those things are that stated clearly as proven facts - and we shall distinguish between those findings pointed out as certain in the ruling, and what instead is considered not proven or not in the ruling. One proven thing, called “incontrovertible” by the ruling, is that Meredith was physically killed by more than one person, while someone was holding her tight. It says that this is not because of the previous Guede verdict, but because there “multiple evidences” of this that emerged also in the Knox-Sollecito trials. On pp. 25-26 explains that it would be impossible for a single person to commit the murder, because of the mechanical action needed. So it is absolutely proven that Meredith was NOT raped and killed by Rudy Guede, but instead she was raped and killed by multiple perpetrators. Think about this and absorb this information. Then, also: It calls the purported burglary a “staging” and points out that even thinking about a burglary would be illogical because of the peculiar dynamics of the murder; it also says Amanda Knox washed her hands of Meredith’s blood, and calls this an “eloquent proof”. (you may concede that Amanda Knox with Meredith’s blood on her hands is a particularly disturbing image to find in a verdict). On the other hand, the ruling does NOT say something like "Amanda Knox was not involved in the killing". And does not utter the word “impossible” at all. Quite the contrary: instead, the verdict recalls para 530.2, concludes that it is only not proven beyond a standard of reasonable doubt that Knox took “active part to the killing action”. (implication: but she might well have) Note: let’s repeat this, it does not say "she didn’t", neither calls this option “impossible”, even remotely. Quite on the contrary, it points out (p.49) that there are in fact only two options: either she took an active part to the killing, or she only tried to cancel the evidence subsequently in order to cover up a murderer. The ruling does not present a third option. There is no "innocent" option presented. Obviously, one might notice, the Supreme Court assessment that the proof of an “active participation” is “resisted” by the lack of DNA findings in the murder room, is clearly contradictory with the finding at pp.25-26 that the participation of multiple perpetrators is “incontrovertible”. Besides the detail that the Supreme Court cannot assess evidence and does not have access to evidence, this is just one of the glaring contradictions in the verdict. Another contradiction is with the trial papers: the assumption that a lack of DNA finding of a female subject (with no detectable Y-chromosome) in a context where the traces from another female profile is very abundant would be significant, is an assumption that contradicts the findings of the preliminary hearing (testimony of Stefanoni of Oct. 2008). Stefanoni did explain in fact that if small traces DNA of another female were present, they would not be detectable on Meredith’s body nor on items where the presence of her DNA is massive (because of statistical effects due to the amplification process). Another few notes: The ruling does not say that Amanda’s presence in the cottage was “acclaimed” in the trial. The ruling says that her presence is a PROVEN FACT in the trial (albeit the English doctored translation published by the pro-Knox camp alters and falsifies the content in many passages). It calls her presence “certain” also in one other passage, it points out clearly that it is talking about the moment when Meredith was killed, that Knox even heard her scream, that she was aware of details of the murder before the police knew them, and that she knew Lumumba was innocent because she was there.

@@CamilleChaton the amount of contact trace dna l was high enough for the original source to be quite substantial. What could that source of contact trace dna have been?

True and its not only Sollecito DNA on bra but his light chestnut hair too all over clasp. Rudy Guede puts Sollecito in the murder room.

He must have changed his story about that night approximately 10 times-bizarre!! For us in the UK, we always felt Amanda & Raffaele Sollecito were guilty. Meredith was good at karate, it needed extreme force to overpower her that night

Yeah that is what the evidence showed also.

@@imateapot51 www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-498853/The-wild-raunchy-past-Foxy-Knoxy.html

Oh Stfu

He's on Anderson Cooper, one of the biggest shows on US network television in front of a studio audience, speaking in his 2nd language. If I was on talking about a book I wrote I'd be nervous.

He is literally speaking in a language that he’s not comfortable speaking him. You expect him to be confident?

He must have changed his story about that night approximately 10 times-bizarre!! For us in the UK, we always felt Amanda & Raffaele Sollecito were guilty. Meredith was good at karate, it needed extreme force to overpower her that night

patriotsrus don't you know anything? they found Amanda's DNA traces mixed with Meredith's blood, and most of all, Amanda accused an innocent man of the murder and change her version about that night several times, that's why she was accused of lying, and the police though she was involved with the murder...read the file before talking nonsense. Anyway now she is free and this story probably brought so much money that she can really call herself lucky.

patriotsrus yes even anthony ray hinton is proud and thank god that he is an american, bullshiters

+patriotsrus For a long time Americans who do not speak Italian could only hear the murderers version of events. Knox's father, even enlisted a PR company Marriott & Goggerty to peddle the murderers lies in the American media. None of the media outlets were allowed to ask proving questions, all were geared up to sell the murderers books who have made them millionaires and they continue to profit from book/movie deals, interviews and speaking engagements. Sollecito has just released his 2nd book whilst Knox was charging $100 per seat and 2,500 per table to listen to Knox on the 3rd of December 2015.They didn't only got away with murder but are now handsomely cashing in on this murder enjoying every minute of it. They are happy with what they did. Look at Knox's interviews, watch her smile with all the gory bits. A truly sick couple.

Not everyone has "normal" facial expressions, and that does not make the guilty. There are so many more sociopaths that murder and rape that could pull the wool over your eyes so easily it's a joke. The most prominent serial killers get away with it because people like you going " DUUURRR His face looks like h'es telling the truth DUURRR" XD

yes!!! i'm very glad too!!:-))))

He must have changed his story about that night approximately 10 times-bizarre!! For us in the UK, we always felt Amanda & Raffaele Sollecito were guilty. Meredith was good at karate, it needed extreme force to overpower her that night

Shall we dispense with cops and the judicial system then?

HE has never thrown her under the bus, innocent people don't have too, he still says that he and everyone around him support Amandas innocence as much as his. This is only about separating the cases so they aren't joined at the hip.

Ignorant statement

patriotsrus not you Nancy. That was meant for Mary oconnell

How about the detective that cannot follow simple crime-scene procedures goes to jail? How about the actual killer Rudy Guede pay for what he has done? NO? Gonna be an ignorant media-sponge? Ah thought so :(

All of the forensic evidence was tainted, the investigators did an awful job cross contaminating stuff

Knox lied about her alibi and lied about Lumumba and she has failed to pay the 40,000Euros she was ordered by the Court to pay to compensate Lumumba for his losses. And now Knox is begging the American public for more donations.

Geo T Lol I can see it.

Except Fox is a decent guy who hasn't killed anyone.

Sollecito would manufacture any old construction to get him out of responsibility. What about Sollecito's designer knife collection-was he happy about sex predator 7 day wonder Knox using a Sollecito designer knife for the attack.

@@dianamincher6479 he was into knives very much and porn..there you go

Quintus Beckmesser Erm where should I start? How about his illegally wiretapping phones? His pathetic and twisted attempts to turn the suicide of Dr. Narducci’s and this case into some kind of orgy, satanic cult thing? ..Not to mention what he did to Mario Spezi? Any prosecuter who has a twisted mind and soul as he clearly has shown, who goes to the extremes he does for personal gain is corrupt morally in every sense of the word! So sue me!

Quintus Beckmesser you just called me a dumbass (which I doubt you'd say to my face) so why continue with this conversation when you clearly prefer to insult me and have no intention to change my mind on him with facts .. Toodle Oooo

Drugs chance everything. Don't forget this

@@yvonneh.9537 I have no clue what this was even about 4 years on.. I'll have to rewatch to see why I got into this debate 😂

@@yvonneh.9537 Ahh it was the Amanda Knox case.. I still believe they're innocent..

I They were not real friends she said

Actually i heard her interrogation by the police and interpreter where she said that she was confused because she has been questioned for 14 ,the prosecutor said not not 14 ,,immediately she changed her claim and said 6 hours ,,

***** The only shred of DNA found from those two was that Raff had a fingerprint on Meredith's bra strap; and Guede left a bloody fingerprint on it. The investigators determined that wasn't enough evidence to convict Raff when the case was reopened. ""Rudy admitted he was with Meredith at the cottage and in the murder room; Rudy in the presence of his two attorneys admitted having his hands at Meredith’s neck as she died; Rudy said Meredith let him inside the cottage about 8:30 pm [30 minutes earlier than Meredith’s arrival home at 9:01 pm] Rudy’s DNA was found inside Meredith’s vagina; [There is also a semen stain on the pillow case] Rudy’s DNA was found on Meredith’s jacket and bra; Rudy’s DNA along with Meredith’s blood was found on Meredith’s purse; Rudy’s palm print in Meredith’s blood was found on the pillow case underneath her body; Rudy’s shoe prints, set in Meredith’s blood, were found in the murder room and hallway; Rudy admitted being in Meredith’s bathroom where a bloody footprint was left on the bathmat [He also said he had wet trousers when he left the cottage] Rudy’s excrement was found in the toilet and his DNA on the toilet paper; Rudy had cuts on his right hand that were still visible when he was arrested two weeks later; Rudy admitted being in Filomena’s bedroom; [Where the break-in window was] Rudy fled the country two days after the murder; Rudy said Meredith screamed around 9:20 pm; [Meredith’s empty duodenum suggests she died by 9:30 pm. At that time Raffaele and Amanda started a Naruto cartoon at 9:26 pm at Raffaele’s place] Rudy had a history of burglary with a knife and stealing credit cards and phones; [Meredith’s phones and credit cards were stolen] Rudy told a fanciful story about being at the cottage on a date with Meredith when someone else killed her while he was in the bathroom; [This is a known criminal excuse called the bushy haired stranger excuse] Rudy was seen by witnesses dancing at a nightclub after murdering Meredith. "" ""According to Guede's own account, he arranged with Meredith to meet her at her house and arrived about 8:30; he became intimate with her (consensually) but they did not have sex; Meredith discovered her rent money was missing and blamed Knox; Guede, having eaten a suspect kebab earlier, had to use the bathroom; while in there with his iPod headphones on, he heard the doorbell ring then heard Meredith scream; he rushed out of the bathroom without flushing the toilet; he confronted a knife-wielding Italian man who had stabbed Meredith in the neck; the man fled, saying "Black man found, black man guilty"; Guede had tried to staunch the blood from Meredith's neck with towels, but had given up, gone home visited a friend and then gone out to a disco.[12] At different times, Guede gave different versions of this story: for instance, the time and place where Guede supposedly made the arrangement with Meredith to meet her. In December 2007, Guede claimed that he met her at a Halloween party given by Spanish students. By March 2008, it was well known that Meredith had spent her entire Halloween in the company of friends, first in the Merlin pub before they later moved on to Domus disco. In March Rudy changed the location of his meeting with her from the Spanish party to Domus, which by chance Rudy had also attended following the party. However, neither Meredith’s friends who were continuously in her company nor those who accompanied Rudy to the Domus witnessed any meeting between the two.[12] By March 2008, Guede's account had also added the detail that Amanda Knox was the person who had rung the doorbell, and who Guede also saw leaving the house after the murder."" "Rudy Guede’s Statements And Stories Skype Chat[7] jack says: (7:10:21PM) Listen, you have to tell me jack says: (7:10:25PM) who was there. Rudy Hermann says: (7:10:25PM) Do you understand where I am? jack says: (7:10:32PM) No. Tell me what city. jack says: (7:10:53PM) That way I can send you some money. Rudy Hermann says: (7:11:19PM) I was in the bathroom when it happened. I tried to stop it but I couldn’t do anything. Amanda had nothing to do with it. jack says: (7:11:19PM) You have to tell me who was there. Rudy Hermann says: (7:11:31PM) Because I fought with a male. Rudy Hermann says: (7:11:36PM) And she wasn’t there. jack says: (7:11:39PM) And who was there? Rudy Hermann says: (7:11:57PM) I don’t know. I didn’t see his face. Skype Call[8] Guede: In the newspaper they’re writing that I was drunk and slept on the toilet. That’s crap. In that house we were smoking joints, we smoked and so did those girls, everyone did. After that I said to the guys, who are men of their word, “Listen, guys, I’m tired, I can’t walk now, can I sleep over here?” So I slept on their sofa. I was only ever at their place twice. After that, after that I met Amanda, but I didn’t talk to her any more, I just saw her one other time, at that pub, at Lumumba’s pub, whatever his name is. Beneditti: Right, Lumumba. Guede: Just one other time, and we talked in that pub, but after that I didn’t see her any more, I mean I’d see her often in the street, but it was nothing more than a “hello.” The time of death from his Skype call: Beneditti: But if I understand, I mean like where was this…I mean, what time do you think this happened, I don’t know… Guede: Around nine, nine twenty or so, because in the meantime we had gotten to talking and all. Beneditti: I see. Guede: I think nine‐twenty, nine‐thirty, around then, and then, when I heard the scream, let me tell you she screamed so loud that you could hear it even in the street, Giacomo, she screamed really loud. When I came out, it was in semi‐darkness, I came out and I saw him." Yet he later said he heard Amanda arguing with Meredith and then leaving from out the window. That man suddenly no longer existed when he was questioned again in 2008.

***** The only websites I can find that have that listed as evidence are websites that are old as hell or still insist that Knox and Raff did it despite how much evidence is against Guede. And how would you know they didn't cook together? They pretty much lived with each other for the week they were together and the knife that Knox had used had flour on it, along with both their finger prints on it. And no. One finger print on the bra wasn't enough against the bloody finger prints left by Guede. Amanda and Raff did discover her, so who the fuck knows what they did when they were waiting for authorities.

***** Because Guede *was literally there at the scene when it happened.* He had done numerous break-ins like the one at Meredith's multiple times before and was also charged with assault with a knife in his past. "What Volturno really said is he received a tip-off from an informant saying that a girl had been injured with scissors at Raffaele’s old school. The “informant” (if one even existed) didn’t mention Raffaele’s name or that he was responsible, just that something had happened at the school. Volturno went to investigate and found no evidence of it. His investigation did discover Raffaele’s “discipline problems” were playing with his pen and he once threw a paper ball at a class mate." "Maori: Investigations at Giovinazzo….. You spoke earlier to the Prosecutor about investigative leads in connection with the injury caused by Sollecito at school and so you went there to investigate. Did you seize the class records? Volturno: No, we photocopied them and took some notes on some of the class records. Maori: And what notes were there about Sollecito, were there serious things? Volturno: No, there were no serious notes, they were about Sollecito which we photocopied because we felt it best to do so. Maori: For example “Sollecito plays with his pen despite having been told off about it?” Volturno: That was one such note Maori: So a person that is accused of murder, you… Massei: Excuse me, let’s avoid interpretations. Let’s keep to the facts! Maori: Another note “Sollecito throws paper ball at class mates”? Volturno: That was another note. Maori: These are the notes that you have… Volturno: These are notes that in any case I permitted to take, verify, I photocopied them and I recorded them. Maori: You didn’t find a note that Sollecito had hurt… Volturno: No, because… Maori: Let me finish. Massei: Let’s always wait until the question has been completed. Maori: You didn’t find a note that Sollecito had hurt a class mate? Volturno: No because as I already said earlier the school records of Molfetta Senior high school, liceo Einstein, via Togliatti, were sent for pulping because every 5 years they do this and we didn’t find any trace of those records where perhaps there was this note that we were looking for, but we weren’t fortunate. Massei: On what basis did you go looking for this? Volturno: There was an investigative lead that there had been an incident during Sollecito’s time at school where a girl had been injured by some scissors and we searched for a note of this kind, however the records had been pulped and we didn’t find it. Maori: What do you mean by “lead”? Massei: What did you know about it? That a girl had been injured with scissors? Volturno: Exactly, during Sollecito’s time at the school, and we went to see if the class records of the middle and high school to see if there were any notes that referred to this incident, however unfortunately the records had been sent for pulping. Massei: So it could have been anyone in the class to have caused this incident, not necessarily… Volturno: No, no, we went to find out if there was any record of this incident. Massei: And who had caused it? Volturno: Exactly Massei: The theory was that it could have been Raffaele Sollecito. Volturno: And we went to verify, however the records had been pulped and so it wasn’t possible to find out. Massei: You weren’t able to find the truth about the incident nor the one to cause it? Volturno: Of course. Maori: Just to clarify given that your curiosity about this President is also ours…This investigative lead what was it? Somebody had told you “A girl in Sollecito’s class had been hurt by scissors”? Volturno: We received news of this incident and we went to verify it. Maori: But what do you mean by “we received news”? Was it an informant? Volturno: An informant. Maori: And this informant, how did … Volturno: I’m not obliged to reveal information about informants. Maori: The name of the informant no, this is true, however you are obliged to tell us how this information was received, by telephone, by a person who came to the Questura and informed that a girl or boy had been injured, this you can tell us. Volturno: In person, a meeting in the street with a person that knew of certain things and this incident was reported to us and we went to verify it. Maori: And you verified that Sollecito threw balls made of paper! Volturno: We didn’t verify anything because the records didn’t exist any more. Maori: And he disturbed a lesson! Massei: No excuse me. Let’s keep to the questions, please." As for violent rape porn, even women watch that. Rape fantasy is a very real and very common fetish for a lot of people; unless he was actually watching rape videos, and if that were the case, he would have been imprisoned for doing it. Does it raise a red flag? I can see why it would, but that fetish is almost as common as a foot fetish.

***** "Prosecutors argued that Knox had washed Meredith's blood off her hands." They argued over it. There is no point where it was solid fact. It was in a bathroom, where both of their DNA was riddled. The only other area in the house with DNA from Knox was on a glass in the kitchen.

I agree... Furthermore, the other guy who is in jail right now "fled" the country a day after she was murdered!

Anna Isabela totally agree

www.bridgebase.com/forums/topic/67258-is-amanda-knox-guilty/

He must have changed his story about that night approximately 10 times-bizarre!! For us in the UK, we always felt Amanda & Raffaele Sollecito were guilty. Meredith was good at karate, it needed extreme force to overpower her that night

MASSEI ha scritto ( copia _ incolla ) 423 pagine di nulla ... Il suo movente è ridicolo , la " prova " del DNA è platealmente FALSA come dimostrato