Razavi Basic Circuits Lec 10: Thevenin's Theorem

Рет қаралды 9,107

Behzad Razavi (Long Kong)

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 17

@saabisabiha9648 10 ай бұрын

breaks my heart to see him getting old.

@user-hj8pc8eg3e 2 жыл бұрын

48:34 There is a mistake that R3 is included in Section A. R_T should be R1+R2.

@MrCiprian2179 2 жыл бұрын

You are right.R3 is not included in sactio A.

@selimyener2103 2 жыл бұрын

@@MrCiprian2179 It is the place where I am not sure if section A is include or not, but I think that section A should not include R3 and Rth should equal to R1+R2.

@moslemasgari7388 2 жыл бұрын

@@MrCiprian2179 Exactly. The professor seems to be tired at the end of the class. This is a minor mistake due to this. his teaching is wonderful.

@rahulsinghthakur672 2 жыл бұрын

I cant express my happiness to see him teaching circuit theory also.....i was waiting from too long for his videos

@hemantj675 Жыл бұрын

Pure beauty as always.

@milindgoel405 Жыл бұрын

48:30 There is a mistake here in Rt Calculation - R3 should not be considered in calculation .

@OpticalMaterials-jm8no Жыл бұрын

There is a mistake in RT calculation. R3 is included by mistake.

@MrCiprian2179 2 жыл бұрын

Great teacher and lectures.I only have a question:when you written a kvl for saction A,you atributed a negative sign to R1,cos the current was going from low pot. ti high,but you gave a pozitive sign for the R2 voltage,witch is also going from low to high potential.Whay is that?Thank you!

@user-hj8pc8eg3e 2 жыл бұрын

It depends on what you determine to be V1. If you set positive side on the bottom of R1, negative side on the top, the final result is identical but sign is inverted.

@azizmizrobov4058 10 ай бұрын

There is a mistake in calculation of Rt. You included R3 in section one as well

@friendman2001 8 ай бұрын

To me i seems that thevenins theorem is not that usefull since most circuits you deal with in industry is connected by more than two wires. Maybe I'm wrong in my thinking.