OUTSTANDING!! RIP Aragones. Mad Magazine RULED

My thoughts exactly! Loved those Spy Vs. Spy cartoons!!

primevil110872 - totally saw that, too

So true 😂👍🏽

This is a copy of the famous plane called CONCORDE. Have you never seen it before?

Utter disaster if it got pranged. Beautiful kite, elegant flying, Great viewing.

The craft itself is wonderful but the piloting was great, too! The seemingly perfect landing was really fun to see.

Visionery1 the nose is not right and most of the front section to. It resembles but its not the same and i saw it right away, just looks strange. I can explain you why but its complicated only with words

simon w how when you can’t explain using just your words try using some crayon’s and paper...Not only will it help you but your mommy and daddy can hang the drawing on the refrigerator door.

Crowtein i could with paper but it wouldn’t help to explain since i can’t put a picture as a comment. But i can try to explain it with only words: the bottom part of the nose is not aligned with the rest of the fuselage. It doesn’t make a straight ligne. And on this model it does which is wrong. There is a small corner between the front of the windshield and the nose and the back of the windshield and the fuselage behind it which isn’t on this model which is wrong and the windshield is a lot to high and same for the small cockpit windows behind the windshield, those are a lot to high. And the Air France writing is not the same.

Like the original

I was curious to know what the fault was, as the wheel was intact during the landing roll out, and wasn't disjointed until taxiing. Then when he was walking it back, the wheel was back upright! Strange, no?

No kidding! Finished turn, quick drop down and was flaring before you knew it. I was impressed.

Strangely, it gets easier as the model gets closer to true scale.

great idea

What windows? This model doesnt really have any....

@@jrgenramdahl123 he means in general, as in any large scale RC. It would be really fun to watch if someone had cameras in the cockpit and/or passengers windows and give people a RC "passenger" experience.

Flipping great idea. I want the concession to rent out the virtual reality goggles to the audience.

And a camera on those people as they vomit from motion sickness.

No it doesn't! Nothing like it, this is just like any model jet. Great landing though

@@possel4747 Whatever. Its a great model, expertly flown.

It sounds like a vacuum cleaner on 440 volts

Not like any concord Ihave ever heard

he have also a wheel problem, like the real one

My guess: “OhGodohGodohGod” All the way til it landed.

@@jetaddicted Sitting here I was holding my breath on the landing!

if it has 4 turbines each one can cost over 5000 euros. airplane aside...

Allot

@@benoitm2810 building the plane isnt the hard part

@@benoitm2810 Germans are great at building all kinds of engineering - just look at their cars.

thats what the trained cat pilot is for duh

I guess this depends on the immense thrust of the engines and there fuel consumption. These models with four of these need huge tanks for an acceptable flight time.

So does the cost of my AMA insurance each year.

Ever heard of Canada's 'Avro Arrow?'

@@callmemonkh9020 Chalk and Cheese, dear boy, Chalk and Cheese.

That's because it is.

Wot shreddder said......⬆️

Lighten up guys. You know he means that it sounds like a full scale turbine aircraft, he's just not a hobbyist.

Robert Raudenbush don’t think it would have made New York😀, I think it’s good as you see what the model can do, and what a piece of engineering

You are an idiot.

@@NoName-hx4hm you mean like over the Atlantic 😂🤣😄

longer than my dad's cessna 150 for sure

Twice as long as my boat!

why are you fat shaming normal aircraft?

But-I wouldn't trust Gerbils-if you know what I mean.

...flight Insurance please, for those hamsters !

*astrólogo Olavo de Carvalho*

Perfect for Richard Hammond then.

Nah, the problem is that this only got enough fuel for about 9-10min....

I would never fly it for that reason alone! :D

Me too! Just one slip and Oh Nooooo

I was asked to fly my friends large scale RC plane, and you quickly figure out it is really a very stressful thing. It is difficult to judge the distances with the large planes and they tend to be very aerodynamically efficient and "don't want to land" as they glide very well. I like a plane that I can afford to stuff in the ground without tears.

Absolutely, big cojones required. 😳

Thats what she said.

First flight is the bitch, and sometimes the last.

I grew up living underneath the approach vectors for both the North and South runways of Heathrow Airport ... in fact, at night, with a cloudless sky, you could some times see them circle, at a distance, as Local ATC had them 'stacked', and 'staggered'. I think they only used the North runway, at night, for the remaining arrivals, to cut down the noise pollution, especially for those living on the airport's 'door step', as they would fly over houses at 300ft. However, photos taken that close to Heathrow are deceiving, as they make it look like they were coming in, hot, at barely house chimney level, let alone tree top level ... But I digress ... You always knew that a Concord/e of either BA, or AF, was coming into land, as no other aircraft at the time, nor since, had that same distinct noise, with both gears, and flaps, down ... Once you hear it, you'll always recognise it ... Although looking at photos of the cabin, it wasn't exactly spacious, inside, that it could go trans-Atlantic at, iirc, Mach 2, at 50,000ft, meant the travel time to reach the East Coast of America would be easily half, minimum, as compared to that of the subsonic airliners of the same period, including the 747. And as for the return trip, thanks to the jet streams flowing in the easterly direction, that meant it would have been even faster ... Hence, to me, she was, and remains, the Queen of the Sky ... [Edit: Since I don't have encyclopedic knowledge of her, does anyone know if she was used from LHR to/from C/YYZ ...?]

Chris H At least u could give us the name of the original poster of this stolen joke

Boss Tanaka All jokes are ‘stolen’ mate. How about aboriginal ‘dot art’ that was created by a white man in 1972? But I digress now and give you some freebies: A black man walks into a bar with a huge parrot on his shoulder. The barman says, ‘Where did you get that?’ The parrot says: ‘I got this one from Africa’ ‘There’s millions of them!’ What do you call an Amish guy with his hand up a horses arse? Mechanic.

My kids were asking the same thing.

not only dog but you can go with your dog with that 1200N power

Negative, sir, this is an HO scale Concorde, that would be "Hamsters Only." Suggest you send your clydesdale-equivalent canine via air freight.

ChrisB257 , next time you get on an airliner you might be surprised.

Fiery crash would be more satisfying.

@@flyingdog1498 i was hoping for a crash

only works on a Flat Earth

Nice words, Prof.

Same like with drones.

Yup, you're right. The faulty wheel was sideways, on the taxi back.

Well noticed. I could never get the wheels right myself when I made airfix models.

Jealousy raises it UGLY head.

Todd Breda lol they have a life and that’s probably why

Just a bit bigger, a one seater and heck yeah he could be flying high and fast.

Exactly -- so weird. The costs, time, and effort. Still, it's pretty bad-ass!

He could have made a seat and still flown it with a Transmitter lol.

Lol. Easier said than done.

Same as you do with smaller models

Its called pucker control

jimi sullivan 27 lit

Description says it carries 24L

Little bit yet, turbine exhaust speed is supersonic, so... if airframe can handle sonic barrier break?

It probably goes faster than concord in terms of scale.

Perhaps an onboard sound system with an mp3 track of sonic booms would be a nice addition.

@@keithscott1957 I totally agree. You really need to add the speakers and play sonic booms. Then have 1/3 scale FAA representatives meet it on the ramp when it lands!

No ARF there. Bob

Yeah. So what?

The plane also has a message on it, that it's a work in progress. Most people wouldn't get nearly this far -- it's close to a perfect model Concorde, as is.

@@mvpfocus Right. WORK IN PROGRESS is right. Did the F-22 and F-35 roll off the assembly lines perfect on the first try from drawing board to the Air Force, Navy and Marines? Perfection is a process, not an instantaneous event.

Reverse Thrusters it said but good question about brakes.