Lol, I was doubting my morals because I was also cheering. 😅

Me 2 bro because we love dany verymuch

same lmaooo

@@bhanuOG also hate cersei

With u all the way.....people be saying....oh the dragon queen has gone mad ...hell no she got pissed off

So much bad writing in this season, one of the greatest characters of television ruined in the end

Same

right and these are the people that cheered ned starks death

@@princess4pint you know that the Targaryens killed Ned's family, right?

Yeah and they killed Missandei... So... They deserved it.....

​@@nicolasmanning1393no merecía morir gente inocente

The people agree. The problem is all the people she killed that didn’t have to be. They cuda just had her go for the queen. Terrible and lazy writing. So sad

That seems to be soo verdad, thanks for sharing, it seems the fiction of got. Neverevertheless Beautiful Drogons supremely king Of the Dragons thru it all and loved if there wete no fierce bold mighty drogon, theyd all be dead to the ground pretty much throughout mostly all got Amzing how drogon burnt the throne into a thousand fierce fires to melt away the show the throne ❤️🔥🔥💥💥🔥🔥🔥❤️

Yeah so the obvious and totally sane thing to do is commit genocide of countless innocent civilians

Indeed, without Jorah and Missandei and Tyrion betraying her or Jon being Jon so she doesn’t have anything left, just fire, because she’s a dragon.

So if your culture is different from hers you deseved death? No wonder Varys tried to kill her.

Nonsense, she went from freeing slaves to murdering hundreds of thousands of people

You don’t go from saving the world from zombie apocalypse to mass genocide in a span of two episodes its retarded writing

Truth and it’s perfectly reasonable, horrible but reasonable, it is not a madness.

@@omairsheikh3982 i think that at that point Dany just wanted Cersei to see the consequences of her actions by letting her rage take over and Drogon burn the whole city down, like the two of them were connected in grieve and just acted by anger. Was it right? Absolutely not, but it was well portrayed. The two of them stopped at the ring of the bells, but you can tell the moment Dany decided to show Cersei what she could do as a reaction to her trigger

S8 EP5 specifically: She is Super Hitler! The Hitler that FLLLIIIIIEEESSS!!

Not only that she literally saves the world from a Zombie apocalypse two episodes prior. So going from that to committing Genocide is stupid writing.

She locked away the dragons that didn’t do any harm though.

@@mijanhoque1740no it is not because she has always been genocidal.

@@jjh2456 No she hasn’t it’s terrible writing you doughnut 😂🤦🏻‍♂️. If she was genocidal then should have just left White Walkers kill everything and not help at all

Ikr like why he cant even have kids, it was all a plot for the starks ngl , dan and dave made the buggest fuck up in tv history to the point that the author george hated them, and thats why he chose to write the prequels himself

True. Actually, I would have gladly accepted Dany being Mad and see her atleast rule as a mad queen to see her character officially change gears.

Yeah, it was definitely rushed, and given how much money they'd already put into the series as a whole, rushing it was unnecessary. Dani's character arc was always going to end up this way. If you pay attention from start to end, you can see her evolving in that direction, little by little, and Targaryen inbreeding made madness more of an eventuality than a possible family trait. Anybody hoping for a Disney ending in the GOT world was deluding themselves. The entire story is one brutal tragedy after another, with brief interludes of heroism from the "good guys." I think the ending could have definitely been better written, but I'm not at all surprised about where it ended up. To be honest, before I finished the final episode, I thought sure the final scene would show Dani sitting on the iron throne with her dragon behind her, John beside her, and the Unsullied and Dothraki at her feet, in some Conan-like pull-back shot showing the Mad Queen presiding over the burning, twisted rubble of what used to be the red keep. Ready to rule the world by blood and fire. But, again, John's decision to end her wasn't a huge surprise. Bran as king? I don't think I'd have gone there. King's/Queen's advisor maybe, given his "sight," but not king himself. Just didn't make sense, and made the rest of it all seem kind of lame. I think most people are disappointed because they wanted to see Dani or John on the throne, or both, with Cersei hanging from the dragon's jaws, Jamie in a cell somewhere, Tyrion happily drinking and whoring in a brothel, and all the world rejoicing at the wondrous turn of events. But, again, that would not have been GOT.

Yep dude. You said all correct 😭the ending is screwed

Lol I just somewhat typed this then seen your comment! Definitely!

Yessss and that's exactly what she after everyone turned there backs on her jon couldn't keep a secret to himself she lost the ones who were loyal to her it's funny how people get mad at her actions but were happy when cersei blew everyone up including innocent people not just people her own damn people I say they all had it coming js

Right, she kept her promise.

Better last word for Missandei would’ve been “Yoink!” and she placed a death-grip on Cersei’s arm and threw herself off the city walls. “What- AaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!” **squish** “…..right, so… what happens now?”

@@FreemanicParacusia 🤣

but now people already forgot about the pain Cersei brought to Dany, hiding behind the so called 'innocent people', all over the sadden, this war will come to end by a damn BELL. If you are innocent, what are you doing in the middle of war grounds? there you go girl, burn them all, I was with you when you were in pain, m still with you even now.

Good comparison. Danaerys is Anakin in many ways. People don’t wanna admit it but Anakin was always more appealing than Obi Wan or anyone else in the force.

Nah bro, this is bad writing, i understand your ficked reason, but season 1-7 she especially says "i will not rule ashes", so sad, a greater character broken by writers with shit in their heads.

@@alexandrealencarm8844 Even Anakin fought for the good for awhile

@@alexandrealencarm8844no it made a lot of sense. You have to remember that her best friend died before this and so did her dragon .. if you watch the show you would know that her mercy has limits even Tyrion said it. I wasn’t shocked at all with her response ofcourse it doesn’t make it right nor am I justifying it but from psychological standpoint yeah this is a pretty accurate reaction from all trauma leading up to this. At the very end of the series she became unrecognizable to the rest of the characters and that was the whole point. Bran becoming king was pretty forced though I believe that is pretty bad writing

The Targaryen madness inside her is unleashed

which of characters fantastic? i hope not Cersei)

they did what they were supposed to do, the execution was the issue.

@@orianamedhestchanel3894 they are all fantastic characters, very few of them good. And even the good are killers.

dany was also exaclty like this haha. she took the most violent and selfish action in every turn unless stopped by her advisors, who were all either dead or she felt betrayed by.

@@cadem.1017 Exactly this, I don't see why people expected anything else, she has always been a ball of revenge

Don't fall for the writer's lack of skill. They could have done MUCH better than this. Fuck them.

After too

​@nicolassantos3362 Nah, bad writing. Not even a decent villain 😂 little Joffrey is way better than this shit

​@@nicolassantos3362ew no

Nothing excuses this kind of action, She deserves the worst death

I actually scroll down the comment section to find a cmt like this lol

she didnt go insane over 3 episodes though.....if you pay attention, she gets more and more brutal and tyrannical every season

@@IGetWetInHD She was never tyrannical enough to kill innocent people. Everyone who she killed in previous seasons had wronged her in some way. The truth is, we needed another 2 seasons of her becoming even more tyrannical for this Mad Queen bs to work

@@IGetWetInHD yes but never in a sadistic way

@@IGetWetInHD the same way every single character in got did? Cersei killing people left and right, Tyrion killing his father and paramour, Tywin ending two houses, Robb killing his own men but oh no all of those are justified but Daenerys killing slavers isn't. What a load of garbage

@@alebelen4255 She wanted to listen to the witch woman scream in agony while burning to death in season 1, all because the witch woman killed a brutal rapist who enslaves innocents (Drogo), and killed her unborn child, who was destined to be an even bigger villain than Drogo. You can definitely argue that killing an unborn child is itself evil, but Dany's response was definitely sadistic. Same as locking people in a vault to die a slow, horrific death from asphyxiation.

agree completely. She was a young girl who saw so much tragedy. And her finally saw her BEST friend murdered in front of her. Remember how she walked off on that scene? She was never the same after that. And she did not grow up in King's Landing, I dont think she was as fond of keeping it as those who lived in westeros either. So she took out her rage on the one thing everyone wanted.

It was not always there. She hammers on and on about not being the queen of the ashes, and then when she eventually does go mad there's no trigger that makes sense. The bells? how are they triggering her. The season was rushed and the writers completely forgot how to develop characters

@@HMSBreadnought yup. After “the blood of my ennemies, not the blood of innocents” “I will not be queen of Ashes. We will NOT attack King’s Landing.” “I am not my father” « I Want To Make My Kingdom Beautiful, To Fill It With Fat Men And Pretty Maids And Laughing Children. I Want My People To Smile When They See Me Ride By, The Way Viserys Said they smiled for my father” - they go and serve us this sh!t. The wound is not healed.

@@HMSBreadnought Yes it was.. People see what they want to see, Dany was not a good person, she had a good cause, definitely, but terrible values She says she's not going to be queen of the ashes, until she's actually gets to that bridge. Humans do it all the time: I wont get drunk, gets drunk. I wont get mad, gets mad. Id never let my kid do that, lets their kid do that. I wont get addicted, gets addicted. Her advisors knew it was a slippery slope to tyranny and she ignored them anyway, she was saying what she and the others wanted to believe, but when push came to shove, she handles it exactly the same way as she always had, by killing people. So yes, this is how Dany is meant to be, if you wanted a Mary Sue, youve still got Aria, the worst written character of seasons 6, 7 and 8.

@@cloudnyne4663 You're telling me that Dany, who spent 5 or 6 seasons freeing slaves across an entire continent, who locked up her dragons after a single innocent life was lost, who made all of her unsullied freemen, who decided to negotiate with Cersei in order to save humanity first; always had the signs of being a tyrant? This wad bad writing and made worse by the fact that it had no trigger other than the bells. And on top of that afterwards they give her Hitler imagery, which we had never seen before from her.

She said the latter as her group with baby drsgons were starving in the heat and would die if they didnt enter Qarth, so that aint foreshadowing for burning a city of innocent people when her whole thing is standing up for the little man

The issue is the way it was executed, not necessarily the decision to do it. It COULD have worked, but you need time and development to take such a beloved character and change them in such a way that something like this is believable. The change here is literally a few episodes (at most) and that's it.

She wasn't like this from the start. There was nothing to indicate this. The writers were lost without the final book and they needed a strong climax that will crown the show at its climax. If ONLY they took a bit more time to make her slowly descend into madness and darkness, she would've been the best villain ever written.

There are so many things that happened in the show that did not happen in the books. Daenerys locked her own dragons up because one child was murdered, yet this same person is the one who would burn a whole city to the ground, including children? She is reflective of her actions throughout the books, compared to someone like Cersei who doesn't care about anyone. She could have attacked Kingslanding ages ago but she stays for the people, if she was power-hungry why would she do that when she could just take her army and three dragons and just attack? In the books when Daenerys goes to Qarth, she's welcomed in, whereas in the show she gives a whole speech about "burning cities to the ground", which doesn't even happen in the books. She doesn't burn or feed men to her dragons - doesn't happen in the books. She is a mother to her people, and she goes out to protect them, she states "Why do the gods make kings and queens, if not to protect the ones who can't protect themselves?" She fights against slavery and kills Slavers (which is a great thing, nobody misses them) and fought for their freedom (though that freedom can be questioned). She has her brother Viserys killed, but he was an abuser even if you read through those chapters she's so sympathetic towards him, she tries her best to accommodate her abuser and he tries to kill her baby and that was the final straw; but throughout the books, she still is haunted by his death. The only thing that was a grey area was when she crucified the masters because they crucified children, but she thinks it was justice for what they did because among those crucified were those who were innocent and against slavery; but afterwards she regrets it when she smells their bowels and blood. Daenerys states, "I want to make my kingdom beautiful, to fill it with fat men and pretty maids and laughing children. I want my people to smile when they see me ride by, the way Viserys said they smiled for my father." I don't think Daenerys in the books is going to systematically massacre and commit genocide after they surrender to her. There will definitely be collateral damage but not in the way the show depicted it. George R R Martin is setting up Cersei to be the mad queen, it's so blatant in the books, don't think he needs Daenerys to be another mad queen - I could be wrong but it just doesn't follow her narrative arc in my opinion.

@@princeamir9235 I dont think Daenerys is meant to be the Mad Queen. I think she's meant to be the fallen hero from the books. Yes, she has good intentions, even in the show I believe she died thinking what she did was the right thing. I don't think Daenerys is evil or Martin wrote her that way, but I think he also purposely wrote Daenerys chapters only from her POV so we can't really judge her actions from outside. I think when she will arrive to Westeros her view of right and wrong will differ a lot with other main characters.I think what happened in the show was a breaking point, she was not in her best state of mind, I don't think she did it of intentional malice but more of a violent breakdown. The thing she's just too powerful and her actions can be too destructive. Still, this is just speculation since the books aren't out and they probably won't be out in a long time.

Tell me you don't get the point of the story without telling me you don't know the point of the story

and that's why because of the way this happened in the show, she needed to be killed. Sad it was jon but it needed to happen. Imagine having a queen that at the moment she's mad or hurting she decides to burn entire towns and innocent people instead of going specifically for the people who did something to her. Like imagine someone in the north insults her and she says "let's burn the north" like damn

@@koki84ji7 you must beware of people who refuse to do any self reflection.

No, regardless of what cersei did, this was wrong on all accounts. Daenerys became worse than Cersei when she did this😂😂😂

Yeah, that was the narrative season 8. But when you go back to the first 6-7 seasons when Dany was for the people, and didn’t kill innocents on a massive scale but rather corrupt elites, it’s hard not to question why she wouldn’t just fly up and kill Cersei, or at least just burn down the red keep. She became pretty ruthless early on but destroying an entire city felt out of character imo

It makes sense narratively, but with the way her character has been portrayed thus far, it needed time before it could happen. As it stand, at the point in the story from which it happens, it makes absolutely no sense.

@@sleepy3151 Didn't kill innocent people 🤣

@@sgang195 Can you identify a moment before season 8 where she killed innocents on a massive scale?

Literally no build up to this. Danny has been through so fucking much, and never has been swayed to do something like this. All in the span of one episode she decides to go full crazy? Lol

You and me both. I would've done the same. After all those years of trying to build a name for myself and helping nations, then....losing two of my "kids", seein' my best friend killed, muhfkaz conspiring behind my back, knowing that no one would ever REALLY support me as ruler of the Seven Kingdoms when it was all said and done.....fk it....burn this bitch to the fkn GROUND.

dunno which show you're talking about but game of thrones' quality dropped heavily during season 5, and by 6 it was a bad show. it got worse but it was not near perfect before season 8. seasons 1-4 you could make an argument for

@@henhicktaimon youre entitled to your own opinion. I enjoyed all of them. except season 8 lol

@@henhicktaimon I agree with you, quality dropped incredibly. The only thing that kept me watching was to see Daenerys get the crown she worked for, but they decided to kill all her loved ones and allies and make her go mad and then betrayed by a "north man" who is and will always be true to his world. They made her go full Hitler by the end.

Which character arcs were 'thrown away'?

@@SerbAtheist um, John Snow? Denaereys, and Jamie's.

I will never understand this view....she had mad queen tendencies from season 1

@@that.ll_do_pig you are exactly right. All these "fans" were just pissed cuz it's not what they wanted. If they actually watched the series as a whole and not fawned over Dany they would have seen in coming.

@@mikeymartinez8677 👏🏻👏🏻Fffff-ingggg thank you! I hate how ppl ignore her decent into madness. I knew this was coming the moment she told jon to kneel.

When they butchered the dorne plotline in season 5, I pretty much checked out and took the show as an epic fanfic.

@@des_18 the last seasons were just a sad fanfiction of the books

what doesnt make sense? You not understanding it doesnt mean it doesnt make sense lol

Character arc? Look back to the earlier seasons. Those dragons were used to intimidate and execute people.

@@annbowen9656 right?! She never had any qualms about using the dragons to kill others. Even in one of the earlier seasons she told Tyrion that she was going to burn down cities with her dragons.

@@sonofmoss Yep

@@annbowen9656 No one on the show has qualms about murdering people lol. Daenerys should somehow be different because she has dragons?

@@miguelmahecha88 ask Harren the Black what Aegon did when he conquered Westeros

History is written by the Victors besides aegon never attacked at city of innocents after they have surrendered.

Nope

She always said that she would burn as many cities as necessary. It was said and done

No it made no sense. She has liberated too many people to start burning thousands of innocents. Thats not her way.

Except all of the times she said she was not there to be queen of the ashes. Or all the times she said she would not hurt the innocent. Locking her dragons away for accidentally killing a child. She remained in Essos for the sole purpose of freeing people from slavery. Conquering city after city- without unleashing fire and death onto its inhabitants. She set aside her own desire for the iron throne- to help the people of Yunkai, and Mereen, and the rest of freehold so that they wouldn’t slip back into chains. She was reminded over and over the atrocities her father committed, and every time she condemned his actions- assuring her advisors that she was not her father. Aside from Jon, Daenerys was one of the only characters that actually considered how her actions might affect the lives of innocent people. So much so, that they called her their Mother. She set aside her desire for the throne to save Westeros and the North from the Night King- sacrificing most of her armies and a dragon in the process. What other characters sacrificed more than Daenerys? Yes, she had the potential for darkness- as did every other main character! Arya’s entire mission in life was to become a skilled assassin and avenge her enemies through murder. Sansa almost killed her own sister because she was a threat to her position. Jon murdered a fellow brother of the nights watch so he could infiltrate the wildlings. Tyrion used wildfire to burn thousands of men, he also threatened to poison everyone in kings landing, and strangled the woman he loved because she betrayed him. Bran was arguably the worst of them all because he knew what would happen and did nothing to prevent it- so that in the end-he could sit the iron throne. Brienne, the Hound, Jamie, Bronn, all of them have murdered people, for one reason or another. Do we consider those moments of darkness for them as proof they were destined for evil? No, because that’s not character development.

@@jonathanl9229 Commendable essay. Everyone kills. Some out of necessity, some out of duty, personal revenge, etc. I think Daenerys posessed a unique combination of vengeful bitterness and entitlement. While she was kind to the innocent, she treated her enemies with excessive cruelty to her deep satisfaction, and always on the scale of conquest. "I'm not my father" was a sort of mantra, always spoken with threatening command, but half her actions showed that half of her WAS her father. She had to consciously veer herself towards kindness and reason many times. "I won't be queen of the ashes" were Tyrion's words, which she repeated as a new mantra, to keep, as he once said, her worst impulses in check. Whenever Daenerys set aside her own mission to assist others, she would experience loss and pain in return. Maybe when she finally got what she was after and heard those bells, the realization hit her that none of it was worth it. Countless friends and two dragons lost, all for this strange foreign city in front of her. These people think they were worth her sacrifices? Damn them all to hell.

Nah bro, this was not established in the beginning, you are trying to put something in your narrative, just read the books, or whatches the show again, is not that hard

Understand her anger but killing a whole city was just dumb

it was.......she's been slowly going mad since drogo died.....

@@IGetWetInHD stop justifying this mess ppl

@@ShayaN9776 we're not it's how it is told in the books and how the show adapted it. People seem to remember only the good in her but she had ambition + stubbornness + violence + entitlement. From season 3 to 8 she always choose violence first before being advised otherwise by the different good people that surround her, she gets more and more brutal and tyrannical every season

@@ShayaN9776 So it is a certainty that this would happen, but the show made it dumb because there's no transition whatsoever. In the books she's still at the events of season 5 and she already shows signs of madness

@@MeraHarch we're not talking about the books, we're talking about the show. Plus the books aren't even finished. None of what she did in the earlier seasons leading up to it has convinced me that she was destined to become the mad queen. And don't say "you weren't paying attention."

you would have done the same but she did everything in her power to free slaves, and bring justice to the world, she has good morals so this didnt make any sense for her character, maybe for you but not for her character.

We hate her for the whole burning hundreds of thousands of innocents thing…

Exactly, whenever bad things to happen to me, I LOVE burning down entire cities and brutally murdering women and children. But then everyone comes at me and says it’s bad, they just don’t understand 🙄

@@conniptions1533 these are the same people that begged for Ned Starks head. They deserve what they got.

@@theonewhoismany8072 True

Like father, like Daughter #Danymyqueen

Mata a Cersei y listo, no quemes gente inocente

Acting like other GoT characters haven't been through hardships too lmao and they didn't go mad💀 This scene destroy her character development

@@adinab478 everyone went crazy in their own way, the characters are individual. Would you like the mother of dragons to be less ferocious? Then why does she need fiery children?)

🎀I agree. 🎀

@@adinab478 🎀She had nothing. Not even Jon wanted her in the end. When you have nothing what have you got left to lose?🎀

@@autumnhomer9786 I wouldn't say Jon didn't want her, he still loved her but was weirded out by the aunt situation (he should've been there for her tho), but it's still completely out of character for her to burn women and children when they surrendered. She could've just gone for the Red Keep and get her revenge there.

Eu amei a decisão dela, essa cidade só tem mentirosos que tiraram tudo dela, foi + que merecido ela quebrou a roda matando todos esses lixos.

Yeah did you watch the same show she crucified people for a reason you saw those kids right and at the end she lost everything for nothing it wasn’t worthy anymore all the things she gave for nothing

"Danny crucified people" As punishment for those same people (Slave masters btw) doing that very same thing to slave children. Judging by her quote of "i will answer injustice with justice", it doesn't look to be vengeance. "She burned people alive" They were almost always her enemies or she had logical rationale to do so. Besides, Stannis did the same and we often talk about how much of a fair man he is. "The only thing that held her back was her advisors" Apart from that time in S5 when Daario advised her to kill all the masters to stop the Sons of the Harpy and she instead decided to adopt a diplomatic approach of marrying Hizdahr. "She was increasingly detached...," Mostly based on Propaganda spread by Cersei and valid distrust from Northerners for what happened to Ned's brother and father when they went south to meet the her father. But i mean, she was conquering their lands. She should have known they'd fear her. Besides, winning the throne via conquest would still be valid anyway. Personally, i think everything you mentioned can be explained. What i can't find an explanation for is why she would purposefully burn innocent people when Cersei, her true enemy and the only one with power able to rival her's, is within reach.

@@LFC_Fan23 I blame HBO for not having more time to show the decent into madness, but in short the line Danny says to John about ruling through Love or Fear is what explains her decision to roast King's Landing. When John refuses her, she says "Fear then". She was always prone to be impulsive and had just burned Varrus alive for the crime of knowing who the true successor should be AND was dealing with a lot of trauma from Mesande and Jora dying. She was not at baseline or stable when she made that choice. I truly understand people's confusion or anger at this plot twist, but since when did GOT do things that the people wanted? If they did Rob and Ned never would've died in the first place and John Snow would be king.

@@jameshurley9551 it’s not madness idiot. It’s anger and the need for revenge.

@@aranielleb7718 George RR Martin said the show just needed more episodes to show Danny's decent into madness. Go take it up with him. Have a nice day and maybe don't lead with insults. It reflects poorly on you as an individual.

Bruh! You didn't even watch gOT🤣

Yes

@@kaylak169 no

Yesssssss exactly

I didnt need the flashbacks. Way back in season 1, Drogo talked about raping and pillaging Westeros, and Dani smiled. Based on that, and a bunch of other stuff Dani said and did over the years, Dani's burning of Kings Landing, was a tragic but not a big surprise. If she had been merciful, that would have been surprising to me.

It's strange, we can't see her after the bells rang. There was rumors that Emilia didn't know all this, she thought she was killing just Lannisters armies.

@@paolarosichetti899 wow 😯 really?

@@SJB2000 they was just rumors... But I believe that it's true

ya, i dont get it either. Id say even earlier though. Like each season she gets more and more brutal and tyrannical

Exactly, when she torched the Tarly's, I immediately said "villian arc." Too bad cuz Dany torching King's landing almost felt like a victory for Cersei somehow

@@IGetWetInHD it’s still incredibly rushed though. Her character is almost unrecognizable in seasons 7-8 as her arc begins to speed run to a conclusion. She was always going to go mad and I knew that, and it’ll be amazing in the books, but D&D handled it terribly. Her character arc in s8 is not believable at all, as well as most other characters in season 8

To be fair, they are just foot soldiers following their commanders lead

7 seasons of daenery’s character build up thrown to the trash in 1 episode . people will be salty of course

@@LFC_Fan23 to be fair Jon Snow didn't follow. They did what they wanted to do. It shows that and nothing less.

Ehhh surrendered Lanisters but I get your point

thats what I think, like the arc to mad queen wouldnt have been that bad if they wouldve actually built up to it.

They did show it from the beginning. All the signs were there but people ignored the madness because they thought she was doing it for good.

@@oliviasturgeon7256 Except when she freed slaves? Even gave the unsullied a choice to leave.

Did she just free the slaves? = Heroic Or did she also kill, crucify and feed nobles to her dragons? = Fucking lunatic

She locked her handmaid and and Xaro up in a vault to go mad an starf to death.

Destruíram a personagem. Que ódio! Não tem lógica nenhuma.

Exactly. I mean people were actually disappointed but forgot that's what game of thrones did every season, they killed the favorite characters.

No, she was good through out most of the series, it was shown over and over that she really did care about innocent people and did not want to be like her father. You can't just change who the character really was just to suit the ending.

@@haselbasil2488 she was crucifying people in one of the earlier seasons. Like when you saw her do that, that’s when you should’ve gotten a clue she ain’t all there. People like you would’ve fallen for all the despots like in Germany, Italy, and Spain in the decade before WWII.

Thank you. I'm glad some people out there weren't so enamored by her charisma and epic speeches that they blinded themselves to all the cruel and self-serving things she did through the entire series. People complain that she 'suddenly' turned bad at the end, but she was showing glimpses of it all the way back in Season 1. But rather than acknowledge it, they're all bitter about their 'slay Queen' not being the hero Goddess they'd been duped into worshipping. They thought they were watching a hero's journey, and threw a tantrum when they realized they were tricked into rooting for a villain during their origin story.

@@TheMonkeyShowOnline the problem was the origen story- absolutely. First season she seemed innocent until she let her clearly mentally ill brother get murdered by her raping/killing husband. I got over her real fast.

@Frankie Byrbe Yeeeah gotta agree with you here. Even if they did wanna go the "mad" route, they rushed the hell out of it to the point where it makes no sense. The writers get no forgiveness for this.

yes you are cuz... is not well justified , i mean yeah she has passed so many things during the whole series but she was able to learn from those experiences and even ... she mentioned " i im not here to be queen of the ashes " that is the point when we all get that dany is not going to repeat madking acts .... well fuck that

But they didnt. They just wrote it horribly. But danys madness was obvious from season 2 and her vision in the tower of the dead.

@@des_18 if you call The house of Undying *the tower of the dead* you didn't understand a 💩

@@des_18 Yes, they wrote it horribly because they rushed it. That's called screwing the show.

@@ventusbruma1039 exactly there’s a reason this show is now regarded as one of the biggest ending let downs in ages

Nah. It was Dany that killed all those people.

Same, obviously it's awful, but completely understandable why she behaved the way she did.

Exactly. I don’t get why people are giving Cersei the green card for everything she did but the moment Dany does it, it’s a problem.

unapologetically same lmao, as truly awful as s8 was with its decisions this is one of the very very few good parts lmao

@@kiandronootto Cersei was always evil, it's not excused but its understandable because of her character arc. Dany though, she's always been for the people, she's always wanted the innocent to back her but then she massacres an entire city full of innocent people? Doesn't make sense.

While it might have been predictable, that's not a great comparison. We knew Anakin was going to turn because we'd all seen the original series 20 years before the prequels. We had a foregone conclusion with Anakin. There were only theories about Dany. Not all fan theories bore fruit in the series (Tyrion being Aerys' bastard, making the third head of the dragon, is an example).

@@serrephim well this theory bore fruit. Don’t like it cry about it.

Né.