www.realcrusadeshistory.com Facebook: / 220051141405247 Twitter: / crusadeshistory Thumbnail image by Sasha Sacuruva A discussion of the life and career of King Baldwin I of Jerusalem (1060, 1100-1118).
Пікірлер: 113
@natedorney70327 жыл бұрын
"I will not wear a golden crown in the city where Christ wore a crown of thorns" ~Godfrey Of Bouillon
@spckrft5 жыл бұрын
Thats a f**kin relief Godfrey because you're not a real king lol
@Master...deBater4 жыл бұрын
@@spckrft: Hmmm...he was a descendant of Charlemagne...and ruled a Kingdom...pretty much makes him a king if he had wanted it!!!
@3John-Bishop4 жыл бұрын
Good career move.
@arturkvieira4 жыл бұрын
Well said
@teebee73742 жыл бұрын
Salute Sir, That deeply touches my heart! 🙏🏽🔥
@RealCrusadesHistory10 жыл бұрын
A discussion of the career of King Baldwin I of Jerusalem, a truly magnificent and brilliant Crusader ruler.
@ladykostoula91908 жыл бұрын
+Real Crusades History nice video and great facts just one mistake Edessa was a greek city, it was founded by Alexander the Great who brought settlers from Greece it was populated by Armenians many centuries later.Since you mentioned the siege of Antioch you could also mention the Holy Lance "madness" with the Peter Bartholomew (Pierre Barthélemy) visions and how it lifted the crusaders morale !!!
@RealCrusadesHistory8 жыл бұрын
+Lady Kostoula Glad you enjoyed the video, but I was not wrong about Edessa. There are several cities of Edessa, and the one that Baldwin took control of in 1198 was in fact in Mesopotamia. Indeed, it was a largely Greek-speaking city populated by Armenians, so you were right there.
@johanstrydom29198 жыл бұрын
Didn't Baldwin have governor Soros killed after he married his daughter and became the air to Edessa??
@Richard-fv3xc7 жыл бұрын
Hopefully, this comment will be seen as a helpful effort, rather than a criticism. Seminaries were not in existence until after the Council of Trent. Before that, one studied at the University, and lived in the Bishop's home. RQ
@GIBTECStudios6 жыл бұрын
Hello Mr. J Stephen, I just want to ask what are the best books or sources for learning more about the leaders of the first Crusade, Internet sources are heavily limited to basic facts (like: so and so was at this battle in this year) and fail usually to "get in the dirt" of these men's lives and motivations. Its okay to brag if this channel is the best source (because so far it is) but what are your recommendations?
@BenjaminLion6 жыл бұрын
I’m in a small campingsite in Bouillon, by a river called the Semois. Surrounded by the forest that was once home to Godfrey and Baldwin. Watching these videos, I can only imagine the impressive history of my forefathers. Tomorrow I will visit the castle of Bouillon. Thank you for the outstanding effort you put into your video’s. Peace be with you brothers
@treaty924 жыл бұрын
Awesome
@bmo508210 жыл бұрын
Thanks for all of these videos. They are a refreshing take on the crusades.
@tauceti83414 жыл бұрын
I love these longer ones man. Your cadence is perfect for me. Often I get so overwhelmed with tid bits. This allows me to think about what your saying, and connecting the overall dynamics, with your guidance. From the description sounds like he was quite the looker it's no surprise then his sin was that of the flesh.. Haha my man, geeeet it! I like 25:40
@RealCrusadesHistory4 жыл бұрын
Glad you found it useful. Thanks for the feedback!
@Osvath9710 жыл бұрын
It was not rare for a Nobleman to be educated during that period. The concept of everyone being uneducated during that time is mostly a Renaissance myth. Of course, people were not as educated as they were during Antiquity, the Reinaissance and the Modern Age, but during the times of the Crusades it was still considered to be a disgrace for a Nobleman if he was not educated enough to at the very least be able to read and write Latin.
@RealCrusadesHistory10 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I kind of mentioned that in the video. What I meant was he had a heavily literary education normally reserved for the clergy. Your typical knight at that time would have had a more basic education involving some Latin, but Baldwin got the full-on priestly education since he was originally intended for the priesthood. All his life he had an exhaustive knowledge of Latin literature and church law.
@Osvath9710 жыл бұрын
Real Crusades History Ah, yes I see. My comment was more intended for confused viewers rather than as an argument against what you said in the video. You are doing an excellent work with these videos!
@RealCrusadesHistory10 жыл бұрын
Osvath97 Yeah, and you're definitely right, that is a common misconception, that the Western nobility were not educated. That's why when I said it, I tried to kind of clarify that he got a heavier literary education than was common at that time. And thanks very much, glad you like the videos!
@Osvath9710 жыл бұрын
Real Crusades History I would personally love to see more videos on we the Hungarians struggle against the Ottoman invasion of Europe!
@SauroniastyPL10 жыл бұрын
heh actually friend the levele of 'high education' is during antiquity is also a myth created much centuries later, level of education and scientific develompent during medieval period was much higher than in antiquity actually even concept of scholarship that we use today is medieval concept (elementary medium high and highest/college) just like universiteis are, greets
@unnamedindividual713510 жыл бұрын
those paintings are awesome.
@alfabravo8010 жыл бұрын
I have a new respect for Baldwin I, which I have to admit till now, had been reserved for his brother Geoffrey. A great lesson, thanks.
@21nickik10 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your videos, I really like them. One thing that I would wish is that you show more maps, I dont always have the location of all citys and invasion routes in my head.
@wepzuk607310 жыл бұрын
A big fan of your work Real Crusades History.
@BoyCary9 жыл бұрын
Very good I really enjoyed it. I love history!
@michaelcote581910 жыл бұрын
Awesome job once more good sir.
@sirbutthurt29378 жыл бұрын
This definitely changed my mind of Baldwin. He seems like a pretty ood guy, considering the middle ages.
@Bomstep9 жыл бұрын
Im reading Thomas Madden's "Concise History of the Crusades", and i have the Holy Lance on my amazon wish list. Its getting hard to remember who controlled what territories when (and during which crusade), and who was related to who. Do you know if an infographic exists that outlines these?
@williamcrawford76215 жыл бұрын
You didn't mention how Baldwin obtained Edessa. He allowed its leader to be assassinated and the man who introduced the two to be tortured to death. I cannot take these cruel methods to be the acts of a genuinely pious knight.
@RealCrusadesHistory5 жыл бұрын
You're misrepresenting what happened. It's more complicated than that, and involved an already present civil conflict among various Armenian factions. I go over it in this video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rbSah7x01J_Hm6M.html
@user-fl5mq9kp7g4 ай бұрын
@@RealCrusadesHistory The pious crusader man: He is a person who kills Christians, rapes nuns, and says that he is a believer and will enter Paradise
@hairyjohnson2597 Жыл бұрын
I think Godfrey had different intentions than Baldwin. Godfrey seemed true to what the one mission of taking Jerusalem. Baldwin, was a pious man, but seemed to have a thirst for not just conquest, but ruling large portions of land. Regardless of that, I like Baldwin as well. The younger of two other great men, destined to have a bit more from inheritance etc. He made himself much more than what he was destined to be, that is always a fascinating thing.
@thecrusaderhistorian98202 жыл бұрын
wow. You are right. He is a great man
@daleandrade81403 жыл бұрын
Do you have some of your sources for this video. I'm a medieval history buff and am always looking for good book recommendations.
@kingslegion16 жыл бұрын
I notice you discarded how (if it is actually true, the episode is confusing) Baldwin took Edessa.. however .. putting that aside (for it truly does not matter) Baldwin was amazing. to say the least. and I too see him as an inspiration to anyone of just doing what is right. (and making the means to do so)
@hurleyOC10 жыл бұрын
I asked you question no too long ago about Israel and Palestine in which who does the land belong to and you told me you already made a video about this subject but I couldnt find it on your playlist can you give the link or whatever. Second thing have you read God's Battalions: The Case for the Crusades by Rodney Stark? I saw your suggestions on crusader books so I was curious
@RedSarGaming5 жыл бұрын
What are the sources for the video?
@antran446511 ай бұрын
I came here for the history analysis. Thank you.
@MacMeelo3 жыл бұрын
Do you guys have any recommendations on Any good crusade books?
@sunnyboy45534 жыл бұрын
Did he leave any heirs? Was he married? What was his wife's name and what were some of her characteristics/background. Would have liked to hear more about his personal life.
@RexOlafusVidulusMagnus3 жыл бұрын
So quite simillar to King Mieszko II of Poland, he was also well educated for the 11th century (knowing latin & greek both as well as being able to write & obviously read)
@TheWhampoaClique7 жыл бұрын
Nice
@spencershears64977 жыл бұрын
I am a snobby, boring person within my generation,. Unforgiven and unashamed. As proof? Well, videos like yours intrigue me in the wee hous of the day. Keep it up little brother. BYTW, I authored a biography of Varius Avitus Bassianus, cousin of Caracalla and later, emperor of Rome 318-222. I am not in much demand at cocktail parties as you can imagine. Smile. Smile.
@arturkvieira3 жыл бұрын
How can such a young man be so accomplished ?
@KenDelloSandro75654 жыл бұрын
He was tolerant of all the different Christian Rites ( Rite of St Basil in Constantinople, Maronite Rite in Syria/Antioch, the Melkite Rite in Jerusalem as well as the Roman Rite. Closer to Egypt they went , they would encounter the Coptic Rite ,etc.).
@lucillebonds21962 жыл бұрын
These are part of the Catholic Kingdom who acknowledge the Holy Father as their head except the orthodox who later cut ties (schism) to the Holy Father.
@killahpriest95286 жыл бұрын
the only "israel" i support... deus vult
@staxstirner5 жыл бұрын
Why this one lol. All of the jews would be in diaspora
@stevenpaddybwoy4 жыл бұрын
They still are mostly. Wish they would all go away
@damienpace73504 жыл бұрын
Someone doesn't like Jews. Ohhh "based"
@damienpace73504 жыл бұрын
Dumb people are subversive too. That's you right?
@Thor-Orion8 ай бұрын
14:03 reinforcing the flank with security and supplies is hardly a purely selfish action. It’s the solid military strategy.
@Thor-Orion8 ай бұрын
Why do you think Bohemond stays in Antioch? To secure the rear. You have two of the finest generals isolating the borders and supplying the armies from the fertile regions.
@RealCrusadesHistory8 ай бұрын
hey Thor, thanks so much for going through and watching all of my videos, I really appreciate that my friend! Hope you enjoy them all!
@Thor-Orion8 ай бұрын
@@RealCrusadesHistory you do great work here. Glad to have found your channel.
@RealCrusadesHistory8 ай бұрын
I greatly appreciate that, thanks for stopping by. Hope you stick around for a long time!
@catherineserembe134710 жыл бұрын
I dont think he was such a great person, though he was smart, considering what he did to Tancred in Cilicia. He threatened tancred to give him the city of Adana, which Tancred won on his own in siege. He also does not let Tancreds reinforcements into Adana to stay over night and Tancreds reinforcements are slaughtered because of this terrible act. How can you say Baldwin's achievement eclipsed Godfreys? Godfrey (one of the nine worthies of christendom) was the most prominient leaders of the crusade, baldwin just rode in his coat tales most of the way. Baldwin wasnt even aloud voice in the council of princes along the way because he held no land. He did do a good job setting up the kingdom, your right but this is after Godfrey conquered it. Very good stuff though im looking forward to Baldwin II, Fulk, Baldwin III, and Almaric. Can you do one each on the seperate counties , Antioch, Tripoli, Edessa. Thanks
@RealCrusadesHistory10 жыл бұрын
I'm as much of a fan of Godfrey as anyone. But I think his legend is a lot bigger than what the evidence actually shows us of his life. Of course he died early on, so we don't know much of what kind of a king he would have been. Godfrey's position in the First Crusade army was greatly bolstered by his brother Baldwin's conquest of Edessa, which was one of the most brilliant and outstanding acts of the First Crusade. Baldwin was able to provide the besieging army at Antioch with an abundant supply of horses and funds, which greatly boosted Godfrey's prestige. Once Baldwin took the crown of Jerusalem, he quickly transformed a fragile statelet into a major regional power. His organization of the regime was brilliant, his use of the local people, the clergy, and the army absolutely outstanding. He expanded the territory of the Kingdom immensely. History shows him to cut a far bigger figure than his brother Godfrey in the actual work of founding and building the Kingdom of Jerusalem. He was truly a great king.
@ThomasWBaldwin8 жыл бұрын
+Catherine Serembe bite me....
@williambradfordbaldwin43868 жыл бұрын
Trying to learn what I can about the name of Baldwin and if I'm related by blood.My name is William Bradford Baldwin
@SmallFries016 жыл бұрын
I'm also a Baldwin, unlikely. Also Baldwin is the English version. Count of Flanders/Boulogne would likely have spoken French if not Flemish. The French version of this would have been Baudouin or Beaudouin which annoys me because I know some douchy Beaudouins.
@claudemaassen29635 жыл бұрын
Baldwin was his first name, not his family name. I don't see a connection.
@kensebego1994 жыл бұрын
Baldwin was a first name, they were members of House Anjou.
@alwantamalus37094 жыл бұрын
You're related to Baudoin like all the Williams are related to Guillaume.
@lardoyle19797 жыл бұрын
can you do one of these on behemond 1v of Antioch
@RealCrusadesHistory7 жыл бұрын
Already have.
@ThomasWBaldwin9 жыл бұрын
hello
@bobbyyalda1557 жыл бұрын
I think it was the Assyrians who invited him since they would have been specifically living on this land the plains of Nineveh
@user-fl5mq9kp7g4 ай бұрын
Have you read the history of who the Assyrians were? They were exterminated more than a thousand years ago
@williambradfordbaldwin43867 жыл бұрын
How can I find out if I am related by blood to Baldwin I? I am William Bradford Baldwin
@claudemaassen29635 жыл бұрын
You are not related. Baldwin was his first name, not his family name. You first should look into your family's origin. You probably stem from England . Baldwin as a family name, originates from Normandy. It means Bold friend or Bold protector. It became a relatively frequent name in England after the Norman conquest in 1066.
@tinaborich43134 жыл бұрын
actually yes it was his first nam3but after the battle of Hastings in 1066 William the conqueror bestowed baldwin with the right to use his first name as his surname thus the line of baldwin came about i have done extensive research on this subject because i have traced my maiden name to this family.
@davidorbach54067 жыл бұрын
The first King of the Belgians, Léopold I, built a very big Statue of Godfroid de Bouillon in Brussels. The royal Dynasty in Belgium consider they are all descendants of Godfroid de Bouillon. Baudouin I, II, II, IV . The French took the power after them and it was a catastrophe, they killed Saladin's sister and all the caravans. They were defeated by Saladin and had to leave the the Holy Land
@nasalimbu30784 жыл бұрын
John of arc
@dixonj419 жыл бұрын
So this guy is what Ridley Scott was using as a template for HIS version of Baldwin the IVth the Leper
@RealCrusadesHistory9 жыл бұрын
No, Baldwin IV the Leper is a real individual. He was King of Jerusalem from 1174-1185. This video is about Baldwin I of Jerusalem, who was King from 1100-1118.
@dixonj419 жыл бұрын
Real Crusades History I know that. My point was that in the film The Leper Baldwin's personality was that of Baldwin I.
@RealCrusadesHistory9 жыл бұрын
TheAssholeAtheist No, not really. In fact the Baldwin IV in Kingdom of Heaven was nothing like any actual Crusader in history.
@dixonj419 жыл бұрын
Real Crusades History I get it... I was saying that his character traits were like the first Baldwin. Scott made him more of a likable character by changing his personality. Hope this cleared up what I meant
@holthedin36972 жыл бұрын
Hey it's the same thing
@Icewolf19927 ай бұрын
I think I'm kinda happy I'm a descendant of him
@VeryCoolJeep6 жыл бұрын
He died in Veliko Tarnovo
@RealCrusadesHistory6 жыл бұрын
No he didn't. This isn't Baldwin of Constantinople, this is Baldwin of Jerusalem. There are more than one Baldwin out there.
@Amanda-cd6dm Жыл бұрын
I thought King David was the founder of the kingdom of Jerusalem
@holthedin36972 жыл бұрын
vu
@hammerbit19 жыл бұрын
Baudouin's relation to you: Direct ancestor (20 generations)'s 1st cousin 8 times removed's husband You William Harvey Berry your father Harvey Harris Berry his father Ada Isa Mustard his mother Evanna Harvey her mother Amos Franklin Harvey her father William Harvey his father Jane Walter his mother Jane Brinton her mother William Brinton her father William Brinton his father Thomas Brinton III his father Thomas Brinton II his father Thomas Brinton I his father John Brinton III his father Mary Stonor his mother Joan de la Pole her mother William de la Pole her father Katherine de Stafford, Countess of Suffolk his mother Hugh de Stafford, Earl her father Sir Ralph de Stafford, 1st Earl of Stafford his father Edmund de Stafford his father Nicholas de Stafford, Sir his father Robert de Stafford his father Hervey de Stafford II his father Millicent de Stafford his mother Robert de Stafford her father Robert de Stafford II his father Nicholas de Stafford his father Robert de Toeni de Toeni his father Raoul I'd'Espagne de Tonei deTosny II his brother Godechilde I'd'Espagne de Tonei deTosny his daughter Baudouin Boulogne I her husband