Me too!

Glad I could help

Well; I didn't think the print quality was too bad. Bible's are notoriously struggling with that because of the pure volume of text trying to be squeezed into a single volume.

No, sorry. But I am sure they can be purchased on Amazon or Abebooks.com

Hello bro are you from India?

@@Orthoindian Yes bro, I'm from India. Nice to hear from a brother of mine from home.

@@nikhilrao7151 where in India?

@@Orthoindian Right now living in the States... could we connect via email?

The Prologue of Ohrid by St. Nikolai and The Six volume Synaxarion by Hieromonk Makarios of Simonos Petra

Thank you for the correction.

Yup. "You and your" used to be the formal pronouns, but as the English speaking world became more formal during the 19-20th centuries, "thee" and "thou" were slowly fazed out.

Get the Lexham. Brenton is good but it’s older; also it reorganizes the prophets to match the Hebrew Text. Like Jeremiah in the Septuagint is in a different order than the Masoretic text; and Brenton rearranges the LXX. We don’t know why the order is different between the texts; but it’s better to just leave the LXX the way it is. The order of the books is not inspired; you can see similar differences in the Psalter as well. All of the content is there, but it’s just in a different order. All new translations of the Septuagint are going to use the Brenton in the translation process anyways.

I believe you're referring to the Peshita. The Peshita is a Syriac translation of the Bible. It is the official text of many of the so-called Oriental Orthodox Churches, as well as their Roman Catholic Equivalents. It is surely an important part of Christian history, and I do not think that it is a problem for a person to read it or a translation of it. However; I am not aware of an Orthodox Christian Church that uses it, as the Antiochian Orthodox Church uses an Arabic Bible known as the Roman Orthodox Version. In the Middle East, Christians, all Christians, are called Roman.

Hey brother, firstly, consider joining the discord. We’re more than happy to have conversations with you, over text or voice chat about all of your questions. I’m willing to bet this won’t be your only question. ;) discord.gg/AaDahsGU Now; I have a King James Bible with Apocrypha which is good, the World English Bible with Apocrypha is good, the Annotated Revised Standard Version includes these books, there is the English Standard Version with Apocrypha, and there is the Orthodox Study Bible. Right, so Protestants have access to these books in most translations that they use. Even the New Living Translation and the Message have Catholic Editions which include these books. These books are I-IV Maccabees, Tobit, Judith, long Esther, long Daniel, Psalm 151, The Prayer of Manasseh, Wisdom of Solomon, Wisdom of Sirach, Baruch, the Epistle of Jeremiah, III Esdras, and IV Esdras. That’s the full list of books that the Protestants don’t typically refer to or know.

@ArchangelsMedia thanks! I did notice the 1611 kjv and the Catholic ones are a few short though at like 77 books. And that young Orthodox kid lol forget his name, but he kept mentioning your Bibles have 81 books.

@@danperez3970 For whatever reason, there are minor differences in canon across traditions. Slavs have II Esdras but not fourth Maccabees, Greeks have IV Books of Maccabees but not II Esdras, Roman Catholics only have two books of Maccabees. We also combine books sometimes, which is not uncommon among the Jews, as the “lesser prophets” are gathered together in one book called “the book of the twelve.” If you want access to all of the material used throughout the world, then the RSV Annotated edition is good. Otherwise, the Orthodox Study Bible is good, though it lacks IV Maccabees and II Esdras. Really though, we way we look at canon isn’t the same. There are three categories of books, not just two. In the West it’s all about “books in the Bible” and “books not in the Bible.” To the Orthodox, it’s “Books read in the Church, Books read in the home, and Books not to be read.” If a bishop has a book in the second category read in the Church, it doesn’t really matter, because we *all* recognize it as good and bearing witness to the Faith.

@@danperez3970 Also, Thomas Nelson just released a very affordable King James Version with apocrypha. :)

@ArchangelsMedia I appreciate your earnestness and kind help, God Bles you brother. May Christ keep you, I will look into this subject for sure!

Illinois.

Some use the RSV. I didn’t claim that the DRV was used in the Church.

Did I leave out the OSB? I’ll have to watch the video again; it’s been a long time.

There's not much to discuss about the OSB. It uses the Septuagint and the NKJV for NT. So in his estimation, the DR would be better.

@@grimstuff1 No, not necessarily. It was probably just taken for granted.

@@ArchangelsBookClub The OSB isn’t a true LXX translation. Look up verses that differ in the LXX and MT in the OSB for yourself to see. It’s the NKJV OT updated in some places to conform a bit more to the major LXX readings.

@@littlefishbigmountain That is true.