Oh boy! That had to suck?!

Ye

What we’re you listening through?

I felt that too but I think it's because the video itself was made with the 7RYMS

Shh he's trying to get a freebie off DJi

I was listening with earbuds, and the dji’s sounded warmer to my ears, and a little cleaner. The others sounded a little thin imo… I have no dog in the fight, I don’t own anything from either company just fyi.

Well said. Double entendre. 😀

This can be especially true when your subject(s) is walking. From above, footsteps can be very loud, but from below, they often sound more balanced and natural.

Another method if your close is the chest, it makes the sound deeper and much more seriouse.

@@Jamiewelmanwhat? Pls elaborate

@@nobad6843 when you take the sound close to the chest, you'll have more low frequencies, and if you take it colser to the nose, you'll get more high frquencies. So if you have more low frequencies from the chest, you'll have a voice more serious, profound. (sorry if my english isn't good)

​@nobad6843 the sound of your voice is more than just your vocal cords vibrating, it's all the other fleshy parts of your respiratory system resonating, as well as the space in those cavities, and what frequencies travel through those various mediums better, the chest tends to create more bass in the voice, so if you're focusing a mic towards that area, you'll get that low frequency more. If you want a good example, when you plug your ears, you'll notice that when you talk tour voice sounds lower to your own ears, that's because the higher frequencies aren't being captured from outside your ears, and you're only getting the low frequencies that are vibrating through the tissue and bone of your head.

Please invest in one with removable batteries. The built-in ones are short-lived and ruin a perfectly otherwise great product. (pro tip: you can get high-end rechargeable AAs/AAAs from Panasonic)

Don't go for those wireless he mentioned! As if someone can't afford pro level wireless (i.e. a receiver such as the Wisycom MCR54 / Lectrosonics DSR4 / Sony DWR-S03D / Sound Devices A20-RX / Shure ADX5D / etc plus the appropriate matching receivers) then going instead with the fourth generation Sony UWP-D is no brainer decision! (although, I'd recommend 2x UWP-D21 over 1x UWP-D27) This choice is so easy it isn't even close, as the 2nd best choice comes a long long way behind Sony. Sony gives you: True diversity receiver (no other prosumer UHF wireless has this) Has a digital compander (avoiding the issues that say for instance the Sennheisers have with their analogue compander, giving you better quality audio from the Sonys. Essentially, the Sony wireless transmission behave more comparably to how Lectrosonics Digital Hybrids do, using the same mix of digital + analogue for transmission) A slot receiver (again, no other prosumer wireless does this! Although, sadly not unislot, you'd need to get the Sony DWR-S03D instead. Hopefully Sony will bring out a UWP-D receiver one day in the future with unislot compatibility) An option of using the smart shoe on Sony cameras to feed it audio directly, skipping doing another D/A conversion, along with numerous other benefits such as being able to add more audio channels than otherwise or being able to go cableless with the receiver or not needing to do battery changes either for the receiver (these are all features entirely unique to the Sony wireless) Sony UTX-P40 Wireless Plug-On Transmitter supplies phantom power. (the Sennheiser EW100 G4 plug-on transmitter does not) Headphone output (but yet again, the standard Sennheiser G4 doesn't have this) An option for a dual receiver (again, the Sennheiser G4 doesn't have this) An option for getting it in the 941 to 960 MHz frequency range (again, the Sennheiser G4 doesn't have this, Usually only pro wireless offers products in this frequency range) Backwards compatible with all past UWP products. Just a few of these reasons would be enough to make a strongly compelling case to buy the Sony UWP-D21! (especially as Sony is priced similar to or cheaper than the Sennheiser competition) But add them all up together? Sony blows away all the competition. There are literally hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of options for lav mics for the Sony wireless just merely listed on the one B&H website alone: www.bhphotovideo.com/c/products/mini-microphones/ci/3779?filters=fct_compatible-with_744%3Asony%2Cfct_connector-type_745%3A3.5mm-mini-plug|3.5mm-mini-plug-locking There are zillions of accessories for the Sony UWP-D system, such as these (would you like for instance a battery pack for your Sony transmitter so that you can run it for over 24 hours? You can do that!!): www.hlaudio.de/sony-pro-audio/wireless-zubehoer/ Unfortunately when people hear "Sony" they think of "cameras", not audio. What most people don't realize is that Sony's name itself comes from the latin word for audio: "sonus"! Sony originally started out as purely an audio company, and has been making wireless since the 1950's.

I thought the same thing. Also I don’t know who you are but damn your profile pic got me questioning things about my sexuality

@@TheTripWhip mayb we shud meet up

@@HarmonyLeighThomas I’m down

@@HarmonyLeighThomas 😘

2 weeks later he's almost doubled!

Heh, and don't rush when you do - I've had the "check" step be the cause of having to shoot a scene over (didn't have the gear to dub the video - long time ago on VHS)

Wow thank you Nahom!! This and your comment made my day :)

Aww that’s so kind

Hi sean I need you. How much do you charge? Im doing a short film pro

his cat reacted to dead cat too

Hahaha

Of course, thanks for watching!