Aww.

I remember Saints row 2 had a lot of destruction in the environment, and it was made by Volition and THQ. Is it possible it used the same engine as Red faction guerilla?

Maxemor The graphical engine is apparently the same. But the physics engine, not so much.

@@maxemore they did plan to make saints row 3 a fully destrucible environment, but it was too much effort i reckon

LIAR NO EMOO JI YOU EMO

More like 20 years ahead. It is 10 years later now and the industry still fails to implement destructible environments on a level similar to RFG

@@LostPhysx becouse making a ew differwnt engine cost money big companies want to use 1 engine for all the games they release

RedSjo its lazy though

@@redstar151 And not only that but most of modern games aren't even built on custom engines anymore, most use the same engines like unreal, unity, etc. So it's up to those engines' creators to implement physical destruction. But then on the other hand it may be not good for such all-purpose engines...

@@LostPhysx Disagree, Unreal 4 at least is flexible enough that anything that can be efficiently expressed on the modern hardware, should be possible to implement in Unreal - it does take some engine engineering expertise from the game developer, but then lots of games have their own core engine rework of the engine, like if you think of Remember Me running on UE3 and implementing a completely different material model, or Bioshock on UE2 and doing pretty much the same, and lots more games probably had less obvious rework done, which unfortunately the information is often scarce. UE3 had quite a bit of overhead and wasn't really suitable to express everything, but UE4 is much tighter. This doesn't mean throwing the whole engine away, the toolchain and editor, the asset pipeline, data streaming, memory management, behaviours/scripting and state control, API adapters and portability to various systems, are tedious parts of the engine and you can draw a lot of benefit from retaining them. Also please it's not even factually correct. You open up some extensive long list of game releases for a given year, say 2018 or 2019, and see which engine they were based on, and Unity only has relevance in the indie space, and a very small minority uses Unreal. The majority are in-house codebases. I think what has happened is that back in the day, you could print tiny screenshots on the back of the packaging and impress people with bullet points. Today first thing people will pull up is a Full HD or 4K video and they'll think "oh well this looks like shit" because destructibility is a massive compromise, as you cannot retain a culling structure to optimise the rendering. Most destructible game today? EDF series - looks too ugly for most people for sure, a super niche release. They say "looks like a PS2 game". :( Most games and most engines have thus converged to use very similar solutions, regardless of the specific engine.

I thought they had to send their level designers on a structural engineering course in order to keep them standing.

They said that they "had to become architects"

They didn't hire architects, they put their level designers through a crash course in drafting so they could learn how to use concepts like rebar inside the buildings to keep them stable. But close enough :P

@@TorQueMoD Makes sense.. level designers are artists, not structural engineers. In most games, they can just design a building based on aesthetics, and it'll always stand up without issues, even if it's not really structurally logical. But in RFG, as soon as the simulation starts, a building that isn't properly designed will creak and groan, and then collapse. I guess they needed someone to give them a quick crash course in the basics of architecture and structural engineering, so they could design structurally sound buildings :D

Flex at another level

Red Faction in 2001 was ahead of its time.

It's a staggering amount of extra work. There isn't just a button that says, "add nice destruction"

@@Nebulaoblivion But it is the little things that matter, and environment that breaks down makes it possible to create a game based around it, and forces everyone to change the same ol' tactics in FPS games for example.

Jo Mo it was like crysis, with their technology

What about battlefield? Bad company 2 was so full of house destruction an buildings, then, going forward they started to do more accurate destruction, which is good, but also overlooked a lot in big destruction, and that is a shame

While *gripping for balance* of course

UPS the game...... what a fantastical future age we live in......

It's raining monster energy and I need to mow my lawn

god i hate game companies they do nothing right

Too bad death stranding was a shit game

This is so sadly true lmfao

2009: wow i cant wait to see what future graphics will look like 2019: we have reflections that no one would even notice that kill performance.

2009: Building collapse at 60fps 2019: Game collapse at 0fps

I was a bit of a doomer 10 years ago and I thought I'd stick around just to see tech and games progress. They got me good!

@@norbertsoltesz1012 Inform more yourself on what ray tracing does.

i did this again few months ago,decided to play it again on ps4

i downloading from SteamUnlocked and i don't know if it will run because i need a graphics card

Me too lol

Bridge Jenga

Sniper hiding in building? Just hammer the building out from under them...good times :D Pity the lobbies were almost completely empty after just a couple years x.x

@@HaussPray its indeed a pity and a greater pity they had to make that sequel that made them bankrupt.

And then there was me running around with an ostrich.

I loved the multiplayer lol

I loved the multiplayer so much. I just really wish they added bots to to the multiplayer in case you couldn't find a lobby with nobody in it.

@ChiefBanana yea but that's a simulator

Oh boy this big Rocket tanks good memories

Blast Corps had bigger and slower vehicles being better.

rezaka116 Mechwarrior - “Am I a joke to you?”

@ChiefBanana In spintires the bigger trucks can be way faster than a small and "nimble" jeep so i would not call them slow.

I remember it well. "Don't shoot, I'm unarmed!" *stops and begins shooting again* You bitch... *takes C4* "Oh, ah, AAAAAAAAA!" *3 minutes running around* Boom.

Same tho. Red faction was amazing.

you missed the best part set them alight with the flam trower as they run around at the same time and then blow them up

Haha, man I miss that game. I remember when I would literally just sit there shooting glass and exploding walls, it was so fascinating to me.

@@torquetheprisoner Not really, I had access only to the demo when I was a child.

Giraffinator They had to remove the ground destruction if they wanted to do building destruction good because the PS3 couldn’t handle it.

@@jasontebbit6369 he was talking about red faction 2

Why didn't you destroy the whole building and pick up the object when it's on the ground?

@@bensdiaz Not as thrilling.

I remember taking the giant drills in red faction and drilling thru the ground until it ran out of fuel.

Probably because even if you have the engine already made, it requires a lot of extra man hours to design and model every building to behave properly, not to mention you'd need to have fully modeled interiors so it's not just a hollow shell. GTA V had a budget of something like a billion dollars as it is; imagine if that ballooned to two billion just so they could include one more feature.

@@stevethepocket GTA5 didn't have a billion, Halo Infinite had 500 million and that was stated to be the biggest game in terms of budget

AAA is lazy

At this point I'd say triple A games are more about graphics and less about cutting-edge technology, one might argue that graphics are cutting-edge but keep in mind racing games, they usually are impressive looking but use some techniques to make the game look better than it is.

I don't think it's gonna come from an AAA studio until it's super cheap. "Marketing influences game revenue three times more than high scores" - game industry live by this statement currently. So little is being spent on R&D whilst marketing budgets are skyrocketing. Games are copypasta for the most part

Just like the studio that's now 6 feet under

Ancient alien tech

*LAUGHS IN ROBLOX

Noita has pretty good destruction but it’s 2D

crs c Roblox is capable of great things regarding physics but ultimately janky and not performance friendly all the time

Well... Medieval engineers has some impressive destruction physics with entire buildings

@@flummizockt7322 Red faction is a full game with multiplayer. Not a single physics room game.

Remote minning the shit out of it

Nah, th most satisfying was destroying the Harrington Memorial Bridge, but not just destroying, but taking your time, carefully, precisely removing supports, leaving it with just enough to stand, and then finishing it off in one big motion, bringing every piece and section of it down in one big, beautiful collapse.

Teardown noises

I loved when you went through a building and the vehicle glitches and suddenly went 200 kph and was sent flying across the map

Well, think no more, teardown is a game that has a similar engin

So true

Or the thermobaric missile launcher

@Kristof Alexy You failed to mention they made Red Faction Armageddon, a game that steered away from the open world formula, and went for a linear campaign....when the whole point of Geurilla was being able to do whatever you wanted. So the game sold fuck all for money, and sent the studio careening into the abyss.

@Kristof Alexy But still, they could have sold the game engine so that there could have been more games supporting this kind of destruction

@Kristof Alexy It only went bankrupt after making a shitty game that didn't have very destructible environments: Red Faction Armageddon.

@@LordVader1094 but even Armageddon had impressive levels of destruction even in the campaign levels. Its been a few years but I think i remember it bring just as good as Guerilla.

@@Murr1can Arnageddon had a solid campaign, the only problem was that it wasn't open world. The main thing people were angry with Armageddon for was removing the competitive multiplayer and replacing it with a survival mode. No competitive multiplayer, no open world, makes for a really underwhelming game especially at a time when games like CoD were out doing amazing with their Nazi Zombies mode.

Next video: "ISIS offered me a sponsorship and I said yes"

I don't get it

@@TheTyphoon365 Red Factions's Destruction = YT will think it's a political video about a communist organization And we all know how YT treats channels that are political (regardless of affiliation) or really just informative in nature

@@ArcturusOTE ahhhhh yeah yeah

This

Aliens maybe

the skill of the developer matters infinitely more than the technology available.

@@ritenger87 Still if engine isn't completely capable it can sometimes limit what devs can do.

*OY VEY, CLOUD-POWERED DESTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY WITH 16X THE DETAIL AND RESOLUTION!*

@@aderemiporsche Honestly cloud techonology that when person moves trough it it creates you know, same effect you do when you pass trough smoke is pretty fucking cool in my book, if COD Ghost did anything at least its some of the graphical enhancments it has even if graphics itself and game are so so.

hmm maybe todays battlefield destruction for sure... But bad company 2 It's still good enough. I would say even better In some parts because destroying a house really felt like destroying a house, In this game It's looks like you are just destroying a bunch of cardboard houses. But of course RF still has more destruction, but bad company 2 feels better

The Frostbite engine has always been the emperor's new clothes. Good for trailers, bad for gameplay.

bruh there the same level.

@@v44n7 plz get your nostalgia glasses off kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j8Wkqb2Uls-on6M.html

Frostbite engine is trash. EA is just trying to cram it down everyones throat, but developers say its really hard to work with.

Lol it would crash, the buildings are too large and detailed.

@*GOD DOESN'T EXIST* Nobody likes you.

@*GOD DOESN'T EXIST* You're the one who made a 9/11 joke and is acting like a child.

@*GOD DOESN'T EXIST* you made a 9/11 joke and now yiur angry as fuck for some guy giving you shit when yiu literally insulted hundred of people's suffering smh

@@mandalorian8160 you got offended by a joke probably because sad shit jokes remind u of yourself

One of the biggest problems with fully destructible environments, if the structures don't regenerate then you're screwed.

@Ryan Yarnevich the problem is this is a game where the entire selling point is "you can destroy everything". it's like making a doom game but giving you a bad ending if you kill too many demons

Toys're US bargin price at less than US$2.5 pc cd-rom bought, no any bug but TRAP at the end on last final stage/level never can get out of there (even reinstall the whole game again same stuck in the same position without alter the f(x) in its win constant value page by changing the user authority as an administrator same as some so-called famous pc peripheral band's secretly alternation without pc owner permission operating behind so user cant install other device & drivers, play dirty 4 $$$ at back door even long b4 y2k on pc industry as well, nobody doesnt know that !), when jump inside to c anything can be surprised or another tunnel can go to nowhere hence just cant get out of that hole anymore & r.i.p. 4 sure, end game.

Imagine battlefront 3 with this destruction, the lightsaber combat of Jedi academy movie battles 2, the ship to planet combat. Best game ever made right there

Chips as in fries^

Probably doesn't want to show people the mini-nukes that thing fires...

That thing was insanely OP in multiplayer, especially in that mode when a team must protect structures like hangars and things 😂😂😂 and the "black hole" bomb 😂😂😂

@@KiyoKiyoshi277 ah singularity mines, good times lol.

@@nathandamaren2093 Yeah, was so funny seeing your friends spinning around and then exploding 😂

Cool to see that Philip is still checking comments on old videos

I think crysis and just cause series can keep up, but it's sad that there are so few modern games that have physics that were possible 20 years ago

Just cause 4 dies instantly.

@Yadu Govind put that in the bin.

@@xXqc_Zod47 I wouldn't expect a wwe fan to understand the charm of jc2

@Quarantined Goy YES, that game imo beats JC by a long shot

Crysis

Best comment. Those words could/should have come out of my mouth.

Crackdowngraded

siege is overrated

Because Siege is a shiny dumpster fire. Pretty, yes, but not something you wanna touch.

Crackdown 3 was good though.

Yep that sledgehammer was op af. I remember keeping that bridge up until near the end of the game cause it provided a great shortcut across a bigass canyon that required a 10 min drive otherwise. Eventually came back and nuked the sucker with the fully upgraded thermobaric rocket launcher.

Xbox should step up and make it an exclusive

@@Gl0ckb1te Umm, no...

David Valentin Uh, no thanks. They'll fuck it up. Look at their exclusive named "Crackdown 3" delayed a bunch of times and it just became Crackdowngrade 3 now

@@Jean.05 doesn't mean they'll fuck Red Faction up, it would be nice to have it on PS4 and make it have cross play for more chaos

@@daedricwarrior7546 i think it should be better if they release it independently like Metro series Devs.

Spaaace asshooooooole

just a quiet, backwater, facility. among the stars...

He was just mining his own business

@@steven.2602 Then one day I was minded my own business, mining my own ore And there he was SPACE ASSHOOOOOLLLLEEE!

In a truck, flyyiiing oooooff a bridge

second game was fine,as a game,it just went from open map to closed enviroments,had some cool guns too.Like the unicorn gun

Watch Unreal Engine Physics Chaos, they wanna update Fortnite with it lol xD

2020

i gonna play this game today. 2020 and its still a good game.

it does,played it few months ago

People now want graphics before physics, so devs follow what people ask for ... For example i was disappointed to see the new Star Wars game wasn't using Euphoria like The Force Unleashed, but pre rendered animations. Life is unfair.

Crysis 1 kind of has this sort of destruction in most of it's levels.

@@christianriddler5063 Crysis also barely had any buildings.

@@ChucksSEADnDEAD I played it a few days ago, there were plenty of buildings, especially in the first half of the game.

@@christianriddler5063 last time I played was probably back in 2009-2010 but the early game mostly had huts/sheds. When you got to see concrete buildings the destruction wasn't there.

Honestly the dated graphics and ambience are part of the charm.

Because not every game needs destruction for balancing reasons. It baffles me people don't understand it doesn't fit in every single game.

@@Sarnatuile they go out of their way to be more realistic yet explosions dont do shit to the terrain and structures ...

@@Sarnatuile it would be amazing if CoD maps could be changed throughout the round and you're a fool if you think otherwise. It would sure help cut down on campers if you blow a hole in the wall they're hiding behind

@@Sarnatuile it's a war game, it's single player could benift from a least a little realism.

Imagine playing Red Factions Guerrilla's multiplayer and purposely camping at the very top of a tower...... what a mad man!

@@Kimera92 Lol someone had to do it so the tale could be told!

building: please no

ooh.....i see what you did there,took me few seconds

It just works

@@zeon5061 except it actually works. Besides the ai of course

Fallout 76 map is actually really detailed, the problem with the game is that it lacks good rpg mechanics, which is what made fallout great. They tried to fix it with adding NPCs, but it still feels off. I still enjoyed the game though

Also Teardown after confrontation with RFG *weak doge speech kicks in*: somrry my bad, pleamse remove the thin line of solid so I could fall to the ground, thamks, wait... I'm not falling, the scale of demstruction was to big to hamdle such advamced opemration, I give up Guerrilla, you're better than me 😉

Bruhh... Red Faction: Guerrilla was released in 2009. Imagine in that day, the technology is so impressive. Rarely to find open world game with destructible physics.

That's scripted though, but the smaller buildings have pretty okay destruction

Eeeeh. brownie points for trying at least, but it still comes nowhere near close to this. levolution in BF4 isn't dynamic unlike this, and rainbow six only goes as far as being able to punch holes in walls, no physics-based destruction, no weight simulation, no interaction between two destructable objects for more chaos and destruction. no breaking off chunks of walls and have it be physics enabled, no need to actually get architects to design buildings for the game because your destruction engine is so realistic the original buildings you made for the game crumbled under its own weight instantly. ya see? same issue with the smaller scale BF4 destruction. the destructibility in those games comes nowhere near close to the dynamic destructable environment of red faction.

Where can I get the demo project?

Teardown is far from able to be called a game atm, especially a better game.

@@SABO_DB emphasis on *destruction* game I guess but yeah it's barely a game

R/woosh

@@SABO_DB maybe because it's it's not out yet

@@TwSkyll I mean I know what woosh is but I have no idea why you commented it here for the life of me

The multi was pretty good too bad it died completely

@@Journey_Awaits God I'd love to go back and play multiplayer. Levels would end up being completely flat by the end of the round. It was a ton of fun

First time I played it I was young, but the last time I played it through about a year ago it really hit me how fucked up it kinda was. You werent just attacking the government and military, you were bombing restaurants and massmurdering civilians in the name of red faction

Yeah I've played through the game many times, and I've never gotten the disappearing buildings or the rods sticking up out of the ground

Toys're US bargin price at less than US$2.5 pc cd-rom bought, no any bug but TRAP at the end on last final stage/level never can get out of there (even reinstall the whole game again same stuck in the same position without alter the f(x) in its win constant value page by changing the user authority as an administrator same as some so-called famous pc peripheral band's secretly alternation without pc owner permission operating behind so user cant install other device & drivers, play dirty 4 $$$ at back door even long b4 y2k on pc industry as well, nobody doesnt know that !), when jump inside to c anything can be surprised or another tunnel can go to nowhere hence just cant get out of that hole anymore & r.i.p. 4 sure, end game.