can you please screenshot the actual numbers? it would be interesting to see

​​@@totallyturtles480And do you have any more examples?

And what are the best and worst Christian cartoons in your opinion?

On the validity of "New Apostolic" being heresy, this seems to me more of a Cessationism vs Continuationism debate. Ephesians 5, five-fold ministry: along with evangelists and teachers and pastors, God gave us apostles and prophets and no where does the Bible say that God would take them away. Paul urges us to earnestly desire the gift of prophecy (1 Corinthians 14). Jesus warns vehemently against false prophets in the days following Him (Matthew 5, Matthew 24) and, as Paul so poetically describes it, "super apostles" (2 Corinthians 11:5) were a problem even in his day. Super apostles being people who claim to be apostles, possibly on the grounds of signs and wonders but are really operating through demonic entities, judging by the fact that Paul calls out the Corinthians for receiving a different spirit than the Holy Spirit. So the Bible does not say apostles are finished on earth, but it does say that there are false apostles running about and we should be aware of that. Not familiar with Montanism, but the idea of God giving dreams and visions (like He said He would do) that do NOT contradict the Bible is not heretical. Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever, so as Jesus and the Holy Spirit are described in the Bible is how we have Jesus and the Holy Spirit today. John 17:3 (the definition of eternal life) could be described as Montanism under your brief definition, so I caution against that. I would personally argue that Cessationism is a borderline-heresy and point Cessationists to the Apostle Thomas and warn them that Christ reserves certain blessings to those who believe without seeing. That might be why Cessationists haven't seen a healing yet or had a dream or a vision. Did you know that the Apostle Thomas didn't believe until he felt the wound of in the side of his Savior from the spear, and that the spear is how Thomas was martyred. So Christ redeemed that moment of unbelief! Praise God. Ask, seek, knock. Pray ceaselessly, fast for new wine. God will clarify any uncertainty. John 1:5 🙌

Really? that would be a strange one, the only channel i ve actually seen it on. The timing on the dislikes suggests its actual dislike bomb. Maybe try to contact extension creator?

Solid argument

(CCC) #239 states, in reference to the Father: "God transcends the human distinction between the sexes. He is neither man nor woman: he is God."

​​@@balghar493 ah yes, my favourite sex, God

@@balghar493 I don't know what "CCC 239" means. But God _is_ male. Not a man, but male. Jesus was/is a man, and he is the image of the Father.

⁠@@octaviusmorlock Ironically, I think confusing Christs human and godly natures is itself a heresy you just committed Christ being male does not at all signify god as being male, just as Christ being human does not mean god is human and mortal and this distinction you have of “not a man, but male” makes no sense With any logic whatsoever, it is clear to say a divine being outside of time and space would not be male or female

I'm Lutheran and we have several Catholics on my wife's side and they're like you are. There's some friendly banter but more than anything we're all glad we can call each other Christians

Amen

Convert to orthodoxy

They reject the biblically evident filioque because they wanted to be crybabies about not being invited to the council. Become Catholic. You know the crusaders that fought to preserve Christianity and fought your fight? They were Catholic. ​@@Xav-ce1re

you do realize jesus message was for his Jewish followers and not to gentiles? In fact Matthew 10:5, Jesus instructs his disciples not to preach to Gentiles or in Samaritan cities. in fact this relates to the goal of the movement at the time. Judea was conquered by the Roman empire, which led to many new religious movements and Schools thought. one of these groups was the belief of a Messiah figure to not only unite all of Judea but to kick out the foreign invaders. now I know you guys are going to bring up "make disciples of other nations". that was after the crucifixion, which is odd when he specifically ordered his disciples not to do that. it's weird you guys are debating each other over "false Christianity" when you hijacked another groups religion and reshaped it to make seem like it was meant for gentiles.

Completely agree

Yeah, totally.

Yeah my Christian brotha/sista

as a catholic, there's obviously one better than the other the whole reason why denominations argue constantly is because they want to reach the best conclusion possible the only thing that's wrong is when arguments devolve into fallacious squabbling

It’s not about who is better or worse, is about who is right or wrong. If you believe that truth exist, than whatever is not true is false, and if you have evidence to claim that something is true, you’ll argue with people who think the opposite, this is how society evolves, things are discovered, and knowledge is made. Nothing divides people as much as the truth.

yup, it's a problem in Protestant Churches in the west too

I've also noticed that Oneness Pentecostalism tends to be popular with Protestant Hispanic populations, but that's just my experience. The one I talked to last week was a modalist, and he claimed the Trinity was """invented""" by the Catholic Church.

​@@redeemedzoomer6053I hate to be that guy, but Latin America is in the west

@@josephb.4640THATS awful.

@@ruso- Fr-

That's interesting about the Word of Faith, I figured their doctrine would have been based on the whole: "If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you."

@@HaggisOfDeath That, too, about having faith, however instead of it being about having faith in God and reaffirming that through your words and actions, its just new-age crap in a fancy Christian label.

I agree, and I think Pentecostalism is especially subject to getting highjacked due to its emphasis on the gifts of the spirit at the expense of the fruit of the spirit. Even the 5 fold ministry and seven mountains mandate can have a more charitable reading of “maybe there’s something to the bishphoric structure of the church (most NAR apostles are basically acting as overseers of their “networks”, which is the role of bishops in all but name and subject to the same abuses)” and “the church should be salt and light in our countries’ institutions and stop the spread of secularism”. It’s people taking it way too far and seeking to have control due to their offices instead of rendering control to god and actually being shepherds where things go wrong.

you do realize jesus message was for his Jewish followers and not to gentiles? In fact Matthew 10:5, Jesus instructs his disciples not to preach to Gentiles or in Samaritan cities. in fact this relates to the goal of the movement at the time. Judea was conquered by the Roman empire, which led to many new religious movements and Schools thought. one of these groups was the belief of a Messiah figure to not only unite all of Judea but to kick out the foreign invaders. now I know you guys are going to bring up "make disciples of other nations". that was after the crucifixion, which is odd when he specifically ordered his disciples not to do that. it's weird you guys are debating each other over "false Christianity" when you hijacked another groups religion and reshaped it to make seem like it was meant for gentiles.

I bet this dude ​@happymate8943 does not even read about Jesus healing the daughter of a gentile in Mark 7 25-30

"But flee youthful lusts, and pursue righteousness, faith, love, peace with those who call on the Lord out of a pure heart.” 2 Timothy 2:22 :)

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on us sinners

real.

Pray to the Lord when you have it. "Intrusive thoughts" may be genuine demonic attacks on you. Put on the armor of God, his word is your sword.

I have found success in 1: fasting (not just from food, but electronic devices in general) 2: scheduling each day, including the free time, 3: reading the Bible a lot daily, and 4: taking thoughts captive (saying "no" to certain ideas and then thinking about others things, especially godly things instead). "Set your minds on things that are above, not on things that are on earth." - Colossians 3:2 ESV I'll pray for you!

1st) welcome home! 2nd) How was your experience?

i'm glad for you where are you from? (country no need to doxx yourself xd)

@@Icantchooseaname136 it was very positive everyone wanted to talk to me and they gave me a bible :)

@@markstein2845 xd I’m from the United Kingdom

@@Icantchooseaname136 it was really positive everyone wanted to talk to me and they gave me a bible :)

yipee i'm glad ur better :-D

good for you ^^

Hallelujah! If you ever feel discouraged again, read the accounts of the crucifixion or the Parable of the Prodigal Son to see how much God loves you. Watch the Passion of the Christ as well if you want a visual image. I know what it's like to feel like God looks at us with contempt, but nothing could be further from the truth...the whole Bible is a story of God redeeming humanity, with the climax being the life, death, and resurrection of Christ! Embrace your new identity as a beloved son or daughter of God!

You people who believe God is love because of an ancient story book written and assembled by humans need to wake up. Explain how a christian maie i know has prostate cancer snd i, for example, the same age and a person who totally believes God is clearly an evil monster does not have any cancer? Such bullshit, I'm waiting. Random evil by God for his own evil entertainment for himself. God created satan BEFORE humans, if there is a satan and either enjoys evil or is too Fing weak to do anything to stop him. You can't explain why a chrisian male is not loved. And of course AFTER he was diagnosed with the cancer people prayed and of course that is having zero effect. If it wasn't sad it would be funny. God allows numerous children to stave or suffer around the world. God is clearly evil. Read Exodus 4:11 in your book.

I’m glad to hear that brotha. I actually go through something similar still; and that is the feeling of guilt whenever I sin. I feel horrible because I know it’s wrong and I feel like God is mad at me. But something specific I remind myself of whenever I feel this way is Hebrews 12:6 “because the Lord disciplines the one he loves.” So whenever I feel guilty, I actually turn and thank the Holy Spirit, because he has disciplined me in that way, which also brings me closer to Him. TL;DR, there will still be some rough days brotha, but just remember that God will always love you and that your guilt actually brings you closer to Him.

What you’re describing isn’t even law of attraction though. Law of attraction necessitates the universe or god reacting to the desires or statements one puts out into the universe to reward the person. You’re just saying that if you put in work you are more likely to reach a goal. That’s just natural cause and effect, not esoteric universe manipulation.

you do realize jesus message was for his Jewish followers and not to gentiles? In fact Matthew 10:5, Jesus instructs his disciples not to preach to Gentiles or in Samaritan cities. in fact this relates to the goal of the movement at the time. Judea was conquered by the Roman empire, which led to many new religious movements and Schools thought. one of these groups was the belief of a Messiah figure to not only unite all of Judea but to kick out the foreign invaders. now I know you guys are going to bring up "make disciples of other nations". that was after the crucifixion, which is odd when he specifically ordered his disciples not to do that. it's weird you guys are debating each other over "false Christianity" when you hijacked another groups religion and reshaped it to make seem like it was meant for gentiles.

I used to be part of that cult for many years and let me tell you how you described it is seriously not it. Some of them would even say *not* to work because you wouldn't be being grateful to "the universe". They had a list that went something like this to get 'results' -never look for results -drink your body weight in water -listen to these things called subliminals that seriously mess with your brain -be grateful even if you find some random coincidental thing -EVERYTHING IS A SIGN -you get to demand when and where the 'universe' gives you stuff (which does not line up with the never work theory) -don't obsess over results -but also think about it constantly -did i mention you have to drink water? yea bro water has spiritual energy and you need to replenish your spiritual energy cuz this stuff is tiring (read this as if high to get the real effect of what these guys are preaching) -if you don't get results you didn't believe enough I am so grateful Jesus saved me from that mindset and doctrine. It is really terrible for mental health. Whatever you think the law of attraction is, that is not it. I've got insider knowledge and all of these people have lost more than a few marbles. What you are saying is true, that you need to work, but the whole premise of the law of attraction is murdering that middle man. They don't misunderstand the definition of the law of attraction, that is the definition, and they have definitely lost it if they believe in that definition. Luckily I found it again, but only through the grace of our Lord.

@@happymate8943 Yes, and? He ordered His disciples later to preach to Gentiles because they would not believe at first without proof of the resurrection. The Israelites would believe because it was what they had already been taught. They were sent out the second time with substantial evidence to convince those not brought up in Judaism. In Acts 1:8 and Matthew 28:19 they are told to go out to all nations, including Samaria, which you mentioned specifically. Revelation 7:9-10 "After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. And they cried out in a loud voice: “Salvation belongs to our God, who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb.”" From every tribe, people and language. Jesus came to save everyone who believes. And, a classic, John 3:16. "For God so loved the world", not God so loved the Jews. We did not reshape it, you did. This is why that view is considered heresy.

@@happymate8943The Old testament references the salvation of the Gentiles multiple times

You should watch Gavin Ortlund

you do realize jesus message was for his Jewish followers and not to gentiles? In fact Matthew 10:5, Jesus instructs his disciples not to preach to Gentiles or in Samaritan cities. in fact this relates to the goal of the movement at the time. Judea was conquered by the Roman empire, which led to many new religious movements and Schools thought. one of these groups was the belief of a Messiah figure to not only unite all of Judea but to kick out the foreign invaders. now I know you guys are going to bring up "make disciples of other nations". that was after the crucifixion, which is odd when he specifically ordered his disciples not to do that. it's weird you guys are debating each other over "false Christianity" when you hijacked another groups religion and reshaped it to make seem like it was meant for gentiles.

@@happymate8943he literally said to preach to gentiles after the resurrection What more do you need to know

@@LaserKatze That person is commenting that same thing under each comment. Just ignore them.

@@happymate8943 I don't undrestand what are you talk about? 1. Matthew 28:20 clearly says that Gospel be preached to all people and all nationd 2.I think you don't undrestand what the New Covenant is, the New Covenant was made between the God and creation(us) throught blood spilled on the Cross and Jesus' ressurection from death. 3.Cornilius, the Roman captain, was first gentiles to be baptized and accept Christianity, him and all his home became Christians. 4. No one hijacked anyone, it's quiet normal for people to not agree on some issues, don't you think? Orthodox and Protestants have a lot of things to dissagree on, but we have something common - we believe in God triune in Personalities of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. 5.Even prophecies in the Old Testament are saying that, due the apostasy of the Israel, God will make the New Covenant with other nations, who are ready to hear and understand Him. 6.Due the apostasy I mentioned, the Church is the New Israel, the Kingdom of God on the Earth with Jesus Christ as the King. God bless you brother.

Cheers from a manichaean, however heresy status does not invalidate theology if there is a scholarly truth to it

you do realize jesus message was for his Jewish followers and not to gentiles? In fact Matthew 10:5, Jesus instructs his disciples not to preach to Gentiles or in Samaritan cities. in fact this relates to the goal of the movement at the time. Judea was conquered by the Roman empire, which led to many new religious movements and Schools thought. one of these groups was the belief of a Messiah figure to not only unite all of Judea but to kick out the foreign invaders. now I know you guys are going to bring up "make disciples of other nations". that was after the crucifixion, which is odd when he specifically ordered his disciples not to do that. it's weird you guys are debating each other over "false Christianity" when you hijacked another groups religion and reshaped it to make seem like it was meant for gentiles.

​@@happymate8943What about Matthew 28:19?

​@@happymate8943How exactly are we reshaping anyone's religion?

​@@aleksajankovic3461It is apparently a bot

You can actually be baptized even by an out and out unbeliever as long as they use water and baptize in the name of father son and holy spirit

I was "baptized" by a Jehovah's witness, so I actually did need a proper baptism afterwards

I think RedeemedZoomer unintentionally misrepresented Donatism a little bit (not entirely). Donatus taught that clergy had to be above reproach and sacraments conferred by clergy outside a state of grace were invalid. During the Diocletian persecution, a lot of clergy apostatized out of fear. When the persecution subisided, the clergy sought reinstatement and Donatus denied it and any sacraments performed after their attempted return were deemed invalid. Augustine fought against Donatism saying the grace of God would not be denied to the returning clergy and they should be welcomed back in communion. With regard to the validity of baptism by a false believer, if you were baptized into a Christian Church that affirms the Trinity, its a valid baptism even if the baptizer didn't personally believe in his heart. In the case of sects like Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses or Oneness-types, they deny the Trinity. Their baptisms are invalid because even though they may use the trinitarian formula, their understanding of what those words actually mean are at odds with orthodox Christianity.

were you baptized in the name of the father, son and holy spirit?

Were you baptised by immersion in water by your choice to express your faith in Jesus christ, believing that he has saved you from your sin? Then your all good if not then you weren't baptised inthe first place.

​@The_christian_workerThey are all in the Nicene Creed. Plus I also consider Oriental Orthodox people and the Church of the East people are also christian

@@ilbrasciolarochearrostelac8762if you asked Paul what are the basics of Christianity his answer i don’t feel would be particularly similar to the concepts elucidated in the Nicene Creed

​​@The_christian_worker - there's only one God, the Creator, and he loves us. - knowing we're sinners, He decided to die on the cross so that His sacrifice would grant us forgiveness. - After His death, Jesus rose from the deads, beating death, after that He ascended and has been alive ever since. I can't summarize all the basics in just one comment, but this is what I usually answer when someone asks me what I believe in as Christian

@The_christian_worker i'm afraid i don't quite get what you're trynna tell me (there's a bit of a language barrier on my end since i'm not english) I wrote what I usually answer when asked about my Faith, and I know it can't be a sufficient explanation of Christianity but i'm pretty sure even if something is missing what i've included is right. I guess it's true that Paul thaught it, but what's the problem? He doesn't contradict nor diverge from the teaching of Jesus, in fact he's considered one of the most important preachers. His letterw was so important they were included in the bible. I don't get what Pauline Christianity means: didn't he spread what Jesus thaught?

@The_christian_worker probably our disagreement comes from those divisions you've talked about. May I ask if you follow a certain denomination? I, as a catholic, have huge admiration for whats Saints have done and Paul is one of the most inspiring. I'm still very young and don't know the Bible so well: would you help me learning where exactly Jesus talked about Gahenna? If I have ever heard those, I probably think He was talking about hell. The reason i believe hell is a thing is beacuse of free will: God lets us the choice tho have Faith in Him or not, so if one decides that's not what they want to do they can just choose not be with God, which means, by definition, hell.

W.

you do realize jesus message was for his Jewish followers and not to gentiles? In fact Matthew 10:5, Jesus instructs his disciples not to preach to Gentiles or in Samaritan cities. in fact this relates to the goal of the movement at the time. Judea was conquered by the Roman empire, which led to many new religious movements and Schools thought. one of these groups was the belief of a Messiah figure to not only unite all of Judea but to kick out the foreign invaders. now I know you guys are going to bring up "make disciples of other nations". that was after the crucifixion, which is odd when he specifically ordered his disciples not to do that. it's weird you guys are debating each other over "false Christianity" when you hijacked another groups religion and reshaped it to make seem like it was meant for gentiles.

@@happymate8943bot.

Fellow Orthox here. RZ mis-defined heresy. Heresy is defined by favoring private interpretation over tradition. The Protestant 'definition' of heresy is engineered to favor their understanding of ecclesiology, itseld heretical; and it's also basically influenced by the history of Catholic witch-hunts.

@@loganstrait7503what are catholic witch hunts?

How can you see the dislikes?

Negative comment.

@@choombilly The Return Dislikes extension. RZ has since claimed that that extension is inaccurate and that most of his videos have fine like/dislike ratios, but I'm skeptical--I've seen one of his vids get plenty of criticism before.

@@UnpatternedGarbagethe extension is very inaccurate

@@Tonistarr I haven't seen anything that would suggest it's _that_ inaccurate. And even with what I have seen, it seems to usually be inaccurate in the opposite direction of what RZ claims--ie, _more_ dislikes than are shown.

It actually warms my heart that you feel that way. I never had anything against athiests since faith and spirituality is a personal thing. But it is great that you find this interesting!

Absolutely share this perspective as an atheist

Same tbh This is very interesting to learn about

I hope you keep watching the christians videos, I suggest you to watch Cross examinated, Frank Turek presentations and short question and answers from atheists

I was an athiest for years. The constant shortcomings of Christians in my life kept me that way. It wasn't until I took a look at what specifically Christ tells them to be vs. what they decided to be that I started to believe.

I think Hyper-Calvinism (The idea that God does not love everyone and that he actively predestines some to Hell) could be considered a heresy, but historically it has been very little affirmed and most of those who defended it were, in fact, a small group of radical Baptists. The Reformed position is that God loves everyone and that predestination to hell is passive on God's part (he simply chose not to give saving grace to the non-elect, but is not responsible for their sins). Regarding limited atonement, if you properly study what is taught, you will see that there is a lot of diversity on this subject (I recommend the video on Predestination by RZ), we believe that the extent of Christ's sacrifice is sufficient to redeem everyone, but it is only effective for the Elect, because only they will come to believe in God. Thomas Aquinas wrote about the issue of God's love and salvation of only the Elect in Summa Theologiae Part 1, Chapter 23, Article 3: "Objection 1. It seems that God reprobates no man. For nobody reprobates what he loves. But God loves every man, according to (Wisdom 11:25): "Thou lovest all things that are, and Thou hatest none of the things Thou hast made." Therefore God reprobates no man. Reply to Objection 1. God loves all men and all creatures, inasmuch as He wishes them all some good; but He does not wish every good to them all. So far, therefore, as He does not wish this particular good-namely, eternal life-He is said to hate or reprobated them".

​@pedroguimaraes6094 I am also raised as Calvinist, but predestination is iffy. God cannot create certain man to destine that person to hell. And thats not necessarily what predestination means. God destined us all to be in relationship with Him (all men are invited to eternal life) but not everybody lives with this gift.

Hardcore robotism

​@@pedroguimaraes6094old testament on steroids

hypercalvinism (or calvinism taken to its natural conclusion) makes God the author of sin and makes him into the islamic God essentially, so I'd say it's a heresy as it mischaracterizes God's character

That is not actually what the word translates to. You could say it means "to pick and choose" but that is a bit erroneous translation. Heresy comes from the greek word haíresis which best translates to "thing chosen" or "To choose" and predates Christianity where it was used to refer to someone who chose a path of philosophy or a school of thought to follow. When Christianity co-opted the term it came to refer to anyone who "chose" an interpretation that did not align with the mainstream view of Christianity.

Herecy is defined as an obstinate, post baptismal denial of Church dogma. So yeah, if you obstinantly deny a dogma by pick and choosing what you like, it is herecy

protestants

​@@myronmason8170You have failed to undermine ProfessorPicke's comment.

@@dixieslav1274 I was offering clarification.

you do realize jesus message was for his Jewish followers and not to gentiles? In fact Matthew 10:5, Jesus instructs his disciples not to preach to Gentiles or in Samaritan cities. in fact this relates to the goal of the movement at the time. Judea was conquered by the Roman empire, which led to many new religious movements and Schools thought. one of these groups was the belief of a Messiah figure to not only unite all of Judea but to kick out the foreign invaders. now I know you guys are going to bring up "make disciples of other nations". that was after the crucifixion, which is odd when he specifically ordered his disciples not to do that. it's weird you guys are debating each other over "false Christianity" when you hijacked another groups religion and reshaped it to make seem like it was meant for gentiles.

@@happymate8943 Mhm seems like it

@@happymate8943maybe because the gentiles would have killed them for claiming there was only one god because most everyone else was pantheistic. In the Roman Empire you could only practice certain religions, and Christianity was not one of them. Judaism got a pass because it was ancient, but those who didn’t worship Roman gods or some of the other acceptable religions were literally prosecuted for atheism. Did you consider that they wouldn’t have been receptive to “repent and worship the only true God”? Or maybe it was something else. But I don’t know why you wouldn’t just look it up *why* instead of coming to the conclusion that God was wrong.

Part 3

Nah probably the 13th

Actually 21th century

@@markstein2845 seems to be 15th or 16th century

What was herecy in the 15th century is also herecy now and will be in the 40th century

I will add the 18th century just for fun.

Cope. Watch Pope Francis on 60 Minutes

I could believe that the political divide could be more exaggerated now, but liberation theology has been around for some time

Right-wing Conservatives like the Republican Party in the United States do the same thing in the USA.

@@streetscissors3457 I watched and what was left-wing on his speech ? The women even tried to make a emotion appeal saying: To a small girl who is catholic will she ever be able to become a deacon (not even a priest) in the Church ? And the Pope said: No ! Literally, he didn’t explain, he didn’t mention St John Paul II, or the Bible verses, he just said …NO! The Pope is based. He also corrected the reporter when she said the church allowed blessing gay couples, and he said the church allows blessing gay individuals who are in couple, individually, not their union which is AGAINST WHAT THE LORD ESTABLISHED, He said just like that.

I, as a Zoroastrian communist, actually have a soft spot for Liberation Theology. Just because Jesus never condemned slavery doesn't mean it isn't wrong. All the same, just because Jesus never taught socialism explicitly doesn't mean that christianity can't be interpreted that way. As such, I would argue that Jesus's teachings DO have socialist implications, and, would point out that christianity has a rich history of socialism. Many christians argue that "communism doesn't work", yet you have succeded at it yourselves. Look up the Taborites. One of human history's first communist movements was Christian, and it was a success.

He misrepresented NAR. NAR believers do not believe in new Apostles, they believe that there have always been apostles (the lowercase letter is imperative to understand) who exist within church government. It's just an organizational way to say that pastors shouldn't hold absolute power over a congregation.

Unrelated, but I like your Zelda videos, Bread Pirate. 👍

Fancy seeing you here, I didn’t knew you were Christian.

you do realize jesus message was for his Jewish followers and not to gentiles? In fact Matthew 10:5, Jesus instructs his disciples not to preach to Gentiles or in Samaritan cities. in fact this relates to the goal of the movement at the time. Judea was conquered by the Roman empire, which led to many new religious movements and Schools thought. one of these groups was the belief of a Messiah figure to not only unite all of Judea but to kick out the foreign invaders. now I know you guys are going to bring up "make disciples of other nations". that was after the crucifixion, which is odd when he specifically ordered his disciples not to do that. it's weird you guys are debating each other over "false Christianity" when you hijacked another groups religion and reshaped it to make seem like it was meant for gentiles.

​@calebneff5777 the church says otherwise

If the Church approaves

@@markstein2845 so, A. Lol

​@@markstein2845 then that church is not of God, of course the Lord will guide the True Church!

Real

You’re not even religious YET, don’t worry your time will come, keep watching the videos and keep looking for answers and you will find it

you do realize jesus message was for his Jewish followers and not to gentiles? In fact Matthew 10:5, Jesus instructs his disciples not to preach to Gentiles or in Samaritan cities. in fact this relates to the goal of the movement at the time. Judea was conquered by the Roman empire, which led to many new religious movements and Schools thought. one of these groups was the belief of a Messiah figure to not only unite all of Judea but to kick out the foreign invaders. now I know you guys are going to bring up "make disciples of other nations". that was after the crucifixion, which is odd when he specifically ordered his disciples not to do that. it's weird you guys are debating each other over "false Christianity" when you hijacked another groups religion and reshaped it to make seem like it was meant for gentiles.

Anglican is a good middle ground between Catholic and Protestant. I believe they're called Episcopalan in the US.

​@@ivettezepedamedelgay marriage, gay clergy, crazymatics, hard pass

@@happymate8943 I ain’t reading all that Christ is king forever and ever amen!!

@@happymate8943 you’ve been replying to all comments comment this. You need to ask yourself, do I know Jesus better than the apostles and his early followers who died to preach the gospel for all nations ? Cause you’re implying as you do.

Those and NAR are MLM (multi level marketing). It's all a pyramid scheme of churches and why all that are involved heavily promote eachother while having the lackeys at the bottom selling their deceit. I call it the church Amway built.

Honestly, its the same with all of us. There's always more we can learn from the Bible, and I imagine almost everyone has held beliefs that they ended up changing, and still hold beliefs today which, assuming they continue to study the Scriptures, they will end up changing too. In many cases I do not think it is too important, for instance I do not think it matters all that much if the communion wine is literally turning into the blood of Christ or if it is just metaphorical, but it is important that we get the fundamentals right, and accept Jesus as our Risen Lord and Saviour. It is a wise man who realises they need to learn more and seek guidance from God and His Scriptures in that task. I shall pray for you. Please pray for me too. God bless you.

@@HaggisOfDeath Amen. May God bless you my brother 🙏🏿❤️

The Christian knows where he is because he knows where he isn't. By subtracting where he is from where he isn't, or where he isn't from where he is (whichever is greater), he obtains a difference, or deviation. The divine guidance drives the Christian from the position where he is to a position where he isn't, and arriving at a position where he wasn't, he now is. Consequently, the position where he is, is now the position where he wasn't, and it follows that the position where he was, is now the position where he isn't. Because the faith has modified some of the information the Christian has obtained, he is not sure just where he is. However, he is sure where he isn't, within reason, and he knows where he was. He now subtracts where he should be from where he wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where he shouldn't be, and where he was, he is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

It's heretical

you do realize jesus message was for his Jewish followers and not to gentiles? In fact Matthew 10:5, Jesus instructs his disciples not to preach to Gentiles or in Samaritan cities. in fact this relates to the goal of the movement at the time. Judea was conquered by the Roman empire, which led to many new religious movements and Schools thought. one of these groups was the belief of a Messiah figure to not only unite all of Judea but to kick out the foreign invaders. now I know you guys are going to bring up "make disciples of other nations". that was after the crucifixion, which is odd when he specifically ordered his disciples not to do that. it's weird you guys are debating each other over "false Christianity" when you hijacked another groups religion and reshaped it to make seem like it was meant for gentiles.

@@happymate8943that’s a heresy, the gospel is for everyone

@@Tyebaidjjd Kinda weird to call it hearsay, especially when there's pagan elements in the religion.

@@happymate8943 what pagan God do you worship?

@@Tyebaidjjd what are you even talking about?

Me too

It's really a plague on our churches

I hate the false gospel posited by Rome

@@darthbanana7 dont even worry about that, just stay prayed up and everything will be okay

@@darthbanana7 where did you get your Bible

He just said what the bible is saying.

@@FootBallClipsEditz he said the parts he liked of what the bible is saying

@@andyghkfilm2287 sorry but you’re insinuating that believing in any of those stuff is biblical, please tell me what you believe and why you think is bliblical, and what are your defense agains the most common arguments against it

@@markstein2845 “please argue my point for me” no lmao

​@@markstein2845It is Gids will to heal us, we still have prophets, and God is a provider.

This church used to believe one MUST be sealed, baptized not just by water but also by the spirit, and this could only be done by an Apostle performing this ceremony. Essentially placing a man between others and their salvation. Today, they believe that God can ALSO dispense the holy spirit at will, but Apostles performing this rite is still totally cool too. They're basically in the process of backing away from the core tenant of its existence, the primacy and hard requirement of apostles existing today for the salvation of the bride of Christ. Who knows what they'll believe next decade!

The Israel stuff is based on something called Dispensationalism which among many other things claims that Genesis 12:1-3 is saying we need to bless Abraham (and all his descendants) if we want to be blessed, and that if we curse Abraham (or any of his descendants), we will be cursed. The passage is actually just talking about Abraham, but this is the Scripture they use to justify helping the jews above everyone else. The problem for them is that even if it did apply to the descendants of Abraham, which it doesn't; the descendants of Abraham would include the Arabs (of Ishmael), and almost certainly some or many of the nations of the Germanics, Slavs, Mongols and Turks, and everyone they mixed with. Which is essentially every single nation on the planet. Even if people try to deny the links between the lost tribes and the Germanics, Slavs, Mongols and Turks; there is no getting away from Ishmael and the Arabs, and if you have to bless both the Arabs and Jews, well, that doesn't allow the Dispensationalists to uniquely support the jews in their conflicts against the Arabs. So the whole thing is essentially nonsense, and that is before we even look at the fact that many modern day 'jews' have no links to the ancient Hebrews or the people of Judea, and if anything often originate from Khazaria, which is a Turkic tribe and so might also have some of the blood of Abraham via the lost tribes, just like the Germanics, Slavs, Mongols and other Turks; but that would then make them no more special. For some reason none of them realise that a modern day 'jew' is not the same as a jew from the Old Testament, or a member of the tribe of Judah, or an Israelite, or even a Hebrew. There are a bunch of other reasons why they are clearly wrong based on the Scriptures as well, the most obvious being that the Christians become heirs to the promise of Abraham as specified in Galatians 3:16-29. Apologies for the long and rambling reply, but I've been looking into this stuff recently and figured I should share my findings. God bless you brother.

Yes, people don't realize how heretical that is.

@@HaggisOfDeathdo you have any resources you could point me to about modern Jews not being the same as the old Hebrews? I have heard this a lot but never investigated it. It would make a lot of sense to me

@@B1RKSYnot a resource, but a common argument goes that Judaism conceptually existed in anticipation of the Messiah, which is Jesus. As most Orthodox Jews of today deny Christ’s divinity, they therefore have missed the whole point of their faith.

Us manichaeans are not bound by the old testament so our forefathers did not need to worry

I was shocked when he appeared in the video

Is someone who killed 29 million people evil? If you say yes, then you are calling God evil. If you say no, then you're a psychopath.

Ethiopians orthodox is more judiac except you don't have to be Jewish

The Israel-hamas conflict

I haven't really seen it popping up among Christians, but I have seen it popping up among some atheists trying to do a gotcha by talking about the shellfish ban.

This!!

​@@sladetuner8661yup!!

Calvinism doesn’t teach that

Are you suggesting someone can lose their salvation?

​@@redeemedzoomer6053Is it not a necessary implication of Calvin saying you're either predestined to heaven or to hell? After all, you cannot change that, therefore salvation can neither be gained or lost. Calvin said it's set in stone by God.

I think that's a misunderstanding but if you don't believe that once saved that God has the power to keep you than your salvation isn't really secure and somehow depends on you and that to me is a heresy. I wonder about this question in my earlier years and I have come to the profound belief that once God says that person is mine. That's it, nothing and no one will deter or separate that person from his power and love. As Paul writes in Romans can anything separate from the look of Christ. My thoughts on the passage for a long time well what about me. Can I separate myself from the love of Christ. The answer is no. Why, it's not because I am somehow better or incapable of doing sin or drifting away from God. Far from it but God will work all things to bring me back. He knows how to discipline me and get my attention that there is something that I seriously need to repent of and will act in such a way to keep me to the day of salvation. Does that mean I should act in such a way to be frivolous upon my salvation. By no means, I should remember instead how much God was willing to pay for me. Those who are truly saved know this. Only a person who wasn't saved and thought they were would act so recklessly.

@@pgpython It's not about the power, but the will. As Adam and Eve demonstrated, God isn't going to stop us from throwing it all away. However, he will forgive a repentant sinner seventy-seven times seven times. As another example, King David, who was described as a man after God's own heart, earned God's ire after he committed adultery with Bathsheba, well after he was crowned king. Solomon, too, was initially blessed by God, but then he turned away to his many wives' pagan religions. From Jesus, the parable of the lost sheep presupposes that God already owned the one that went astray, and ventured out to reclaim it.

i'm beginning to feel same, i am word of faith, and NAR and i thought this channel was awesome.. but now i see he is just another heresy hunter

the very premise of the channel is that he's a "redeemed" zoomer, he's a young person who prefers traditional values over the new ones, that obviously means that he's also going to adopt the more barbaric and gatekeepy ones aswell hence the hefty use of the word "liberal" as a means of criticism, at least he's pretty informative about the ones he doesn't get emotional about emotional is a strong word, but you get it

So is Communism.

Dat dispensationalism.

I agree, protestants love israel with no good reason. PS: But I do agree with permanent zionism, that since Jews obtained their land in 1949 when its neighboors Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and Jordan aknowledged they lost the war they started against Israel and accepted Israel independence. And Israel is the rightful owner of the land but the only legitimacy that all countries are based on. And that Palestinians have no claim on Jerusalem, and I that they should ask Israel to propose one more time the 2 states solution that Israel has proposed already for more than 50 years and Palestinians brainwashed by other muslim countries who couldn’t care less for palestinians live and don’t even accept them as refugees make them reject. If they are lucky Israel will offer again to give them all the land Israel built infrastructure on, and Palestinians will have a better infrastructure than most of his neighbor countries like Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, etc. All built with Israel’s money.

I ❤🐄 or smth

how is this judgemental lmao

I'm not sure

Sedevacantism would count as schism. It's technically not a heresy. Donatism involves sacraments just not happening. It involved doubting whether you were actually baptized or whether the Eucharist was actually consecrated at all

@@alonsoACR @alonsoACR Yeah, but Sedes always say that all sacraments are invalid because the current Catholic faith is led by a false Pope

As a Catholic who respects NO and advocates for TLM, I would say that some Sedevacantist priests are acting like Donatists and that some clergy who are part of Catholic church and attacking other priests for having invalid ordination may be under suspicion of being Donatists. Avoid priests that are teaching heresy, convict them and if they do not listen, leave.

I just read on the internet that one priest had been baptizing laity wrongly for many years. Diocese spokesperson Katie Burke told NPR over email that Arango is believed to have used the incorrect word since the beginning of his priesthood in 1995. "I do not have an exact number of people affected, but I believe they number in the thousands," she added. Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted said in a statement that the error was first reported to him and confirmed after an investigation by diocesan officials in consultation with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome. He noted that the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith affirmed in 2020 that baptisms conferred with the phrase "We baptize you" are not valid. "What this means for you is, if your baptism was invalid and you've received other sacraments, you may need to repeat some or all of those sacraments after you are validly baptized as well," the diocese said.

you do realize jesus message was for his Jewish followers and not to gentiles? In fact Matthew 10:5, Jesus instructs his disciples not to preach to Gentiles or in Samaritan cities. in fact this relates to the goal of the movement at the time. Judea was conquered by the Roman empire, which led to many new religious movements and Schools thought. one of these groups was the belief of a Messiah figure to not only unite all of Judea but to kick out the foreign invaders. now I know you guys are going to bring up "make disciples of other nations". that was after the crucifixion, which is odd when he specifically ordered his disciples not to do that. it's weird you guys are debating each other over "false Christianity" when you hijacked another groups religion and reshaped it to make seem like it was meant for gentiles.

I would argue that cessationism is heterodox, not heresy. I think that cessationism is wrong (just read the end of Mark), but not all cessationists are heretics. I have met many cessationists who legitimately believe in the Gospel.

Cessationism does not compromise God or the message of the Gospel. By nature its only talking about the spiritual gifts (or lack thereof) of believers, not the ability of God to do miracles, which he still does. Cessationists and continuationists can congregate together in harmony brother.

​@@rileymckinzieIt's contrary to the scriptures though. The day of pentacost was demonstrative of the Spirit being upon the followers of Christ ushering in the words Jesus said that He would leave them with the Holy Ghost, who provides by the nature of God spiritual gifts and guidance.

@@rileymckinzie healing is in the gospel. And the gospel should be demonstrated with power

I'm a continuationist and I disagree. I don't think cessationism rises to the level of heresy. Error? Sure, but I don't think its something vital enough that Christians should break fellowship over it.

The tithe is an absolute ripoff used to construct ornate temples. As a manichaean, I applaud your realization

you do realize jesus message was for his Jewish followers and not to gentiles? In fact Matthew 10:5, Jesus instructs his disciples not to preach to Gentiles or in Samaritan cities. in fact this relates to the goal of the movement at the time. Judea was conquered by the Roman empire, which led to many new religious movements and Schools thought. one of these groups was the belief of a Messiah figure to not only unite all of Judea but to kick out the foreign invaders. now I know you guys are going to bring up "make disciples of other nations". that was after the crucifixion, which is odd when he specifically ordered his disciples not to do that. it's weird you guys are debating each other over "false Christianity" when you hijacked another groups religion and reshaped it to make seem like it was meant for gentiles.

Then why did Jesus reveal himself as Messiah to Samaritian women. Israel was to be light to all nations.

@@hanihudini98 you know Samaritans are? They're a religious group originated from Hebrews and Israelites. In ancient history there was intense dislike between the two over ideas of worship practice. The Hebrews wanted the Samaritans to come back to their faith.

@@happymate8943 samaritians adopted some form of Judaism mixed with their old pagan beleifs, you must first READ Bible and then start commenting otherwise it is stupid because uou dont know what is and isnt.

Isn't what Joel Osteen preaches mostly "send me money"?

@@fluffysheap find me one clip of Joel asking anyone for money?

@@happyfeetlives5878 I just googled “Joel Osteen asking for money” and got a KZfaq link where he claims giving him money is like giving money to the poor and needy And like… one of the frequently asked questions on his site is “how can I send you money”, lol. The last four numbers in the phone number you can call to donate are “JOEL”

These are NOT minor things💀💀💀😭🙏

@@EconAFD yeah but it is not something that is incompatible with the Christian faith and Zoomer is bringing us more together rahowing what is (heresy) “imcompatible with Christian doctrine and faith” and what is not.

​@@EconAFDOP is talking about Christians accusing others heretics for stuff like communion practices

@@EconAFD They're talking about trying to re-define God to suit themselves, not saying things like "Oh you weren't baptized by immersion, so it didn't really count"

Exactly. I can understand calling a JW or Mormon a heteric because they change the foundation of Christianity but calling a Protestant, Catholic, Roman Orthodox or Oriental Orthodox a heteric is just a waste of time as most of their practices are just different and they don't reject the essentials of Christianity

Parts of it are heretical, yes. It still is today. But now, we try not to call individual protestants heretics, as they grew up like that, so they dont have the full knowledge and consent to commit herecy. Reformers like Luther or Calvin are heretics tho

Oh geez 3h

It wouldn't be redeemed zoomer without the straw men

He didn’t explained but Unitarians deny the trinity, and some of the Unitarian Universalis goes even more further to say that Jesus lied when he said he was The way, cause actually there are infinite ways. As long as you’re happy, this is a way to heaven.

Was waiting for a WH40k ref. Also, HERESY = BLAM!

Good

@@andyghkfilm2287 no

That's not good. Religion causes a lot of trouble throughout the world.