I agree that the arguments here aren’t very in depth, but they’re not trying to be. All these atheists are acting like they were promised some six hour thesis about philosophy, theology and metaphysics from a learned scholar. In reality it’s just a meme that was probably more so intended to make his fellow Christians laugh than to piss off atheists. A meme that atheists have and do use all the time.

was an atheist my whole life. but this video, it changed nothing.

“Why can’t God destroy evil?” “He’ll do it eventually.” “Why can’t he do it now?” “Because he’ll destroy you.” “Why does he let bad things happen at all?” “We deserve it.” A masterpiece of how not to make an argument

"Why did god let evil exist at all?" "So he could be glorified in defeating it." Somehow you just made it worse.

Why do i get the impression this guy is a Redditor?

I've seen even atheists defend god better...

"Why do bad things happen?" "We deserve it" welp, I'm convinced

2:46 exodus 21:20-21 "Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property" Redeemed zoomer, please explain this verse to me

Bro lost an argument against his own straw men💀💀💀 Please note that the skulls are not symbolising laughter but are rather symbols about how this video sucks so much that it makes me wanna die

"I depicted myself as the epic based chad and the opposition as the seething wojak so all my points are true"

I'm a Catholic but sometimes *"I don't know"* is the only answer I can give. We don't have all the answers and to think so otherwise would be arrogance.

My grandpa died of cancer, he was the nicest man I've ever met Tell me that he died because he (or I) deserved it yet Pol Pot died peacefully at home in his sleep Edit: Thank you to all the Christians and athiests being kind, but it is genuinely crazy how many "devout" and "kind" Christians will publicly say that a man they never met deserved to die of cancer, just because he didn't believe in the same god as they did

im an atheist who was thinking about converting to religion, you reminded me why that would be a bad idea, thx dude :)

Every christian should watch this as an example of how not to defend your religious beliefs

I can't believe this guy actually tried to pull of the "jarvis, take their argument, depict them as a wojak and reply" strategy

I must thank Redeemed Zoomer for this video. Without it I wouldn't have had all the laughs watching the countless atheist response videos. This one video has been a gold mine for atheist creators and has provided me hours of entertainment. Thank you Redeemed Zoomer!

Here's a question: Why does god make things a sin? Not why is it a sin, but why did he choose that thing to be a sin?

How can anyone fail to debunk an argument even after strawmanning it?

"why did God let evil exist at all" "Because he's glorified in defeating it" He who poisoned the river should be praised upon cleansing it?

Frame one soyjak is a bold argumentative strategy not gonna lie.

"Well, to be fair, I never said they were GOOD answers"

You picked the most brain dead arguments to go against and you gave yourself the Chad Wojack. 11/10 great debate

as a christian i find your response to the problem of evil disturbing and flat out wrong factually speaking

Thank god im an atheist

"they can't agree so we can discard their opinions" what a wild statement

“Why can’t God destroy evil?” “He’ll do it eventually.” “Why can’t he do it now?” “Because he’ll destroy you.” “Why does he let bad things happen at all?” “We deserve it.” The 2 month old baby that got diagnosed with stage 6 cancer:

This is such a powerful video. It has truly brought communities together. Atheists, Christians, Muslims. We all unite, and in many comment threads I can see love, reassurance, and support for our fellow man. To keep hope, to love one another. And we all do this... in spite of what an absolute trash fire this video is. I assume you made this for school, or for a teacher, or for a community. I don't blame you. Get your grades, get your paycheck, do what you have to do and keep strong... but once you hit an old enough age to comfortably assume you can reasonably stand on your own two feet..? Set out upon the world. Learn as much as you can. Put ALL of your original considerations about how things SHOULD be behind, and learn like a child would in these new communities. Don't go WITH your fellowship, don't go WITH a missionary team, don't let them contextualize everything you see and learn into what you should believe. Just learn it for yourself. Breathe through it, and rip the band-aid off. I had to, once. You can do it.

I'll do you one better: "Stroke causes death" "but only 5.2% of people die because of stroke"

As a shameless atheist (or at least agnostic) scumbag who got this video in my recommended, here’s my live rebuttal to the first quarter of the arguments here, as I watch it: 1. This is true, but it’s not a rebuttal against atheism (that God doesn’t exist), it’s a rebuttal against anti-theism (that belief in God is a net negative on society). I don’t think religion is necessarily evil, I just don’t think it’s logically justified. 2. See number 1: I want counterarguments to atheism, not anti-theism. 3. You just completely ignored the point of the argument here, and that a lot of people AREN’T atheist because of birth: they were raised religious, but realized there was no justification for their beliefs when they became an adult. Meanwhile, by far the most common reason for belief in Christianity is because one’s friends and family are Christian: it’s a tradition, not a logically-reasoned belief. 4. Atheists can’t know whether a specific worldview is true, but they can reason it out through logical reasoning and a cause-and-effect approach to morality. Meanwhile, there’s no logical reason why someone would believe in one religion over the other: like I said, it’s a tradition, nothing more. 5. That’s not an explanation, it’s just an excuse: “Well of course you can’t prove that an angry old man created the world, the 2000 year old book I got this information from specifically said no one can prove his existence!” By that logic, you might as well believe in the Tooth Fairy. 6. Do you have any source for the possession claims, other than a book filled with anecdotal evidence from someone who has every reason to lie about this? And the evidence of NDEs being real experiences is, to put it lightly, highly inconsistent: some people seem to accurately remember small details, others don’t even come close. 7. What about the literal factual inconsistencies in the Bible, like how it describes Goliath dying in two completely different ways (a contradiction so egregious that most translations retcon the second death into being Goliath’s brother)? 8. I would take any claims of early Christian knowledge with a massive grain of salt: there is very little evidence that people like St. Ignatius ever actually met the apostles, let alone were able to attest to the Gospels actually being written by them. As it stands, by far the most reliable interpretation of the Gospels is that they were written a few decades to a century after the events they claim to describe, and likely based on at least a couple earlier manuscripts (hence the large amount of near-identical passages). 9. Just because there’s a lot of debate over how the Gospels altered the story of the historical Jesus, that doesn’t mean that the Gospels are a completely factual account of events that actually happened (an idea that’s highly unlikely, to say the least). 10. That’s not proof that Jesus was actually God, it’s just proof that the Gospels wrote Jesus as if he was the son of God. You might as well say that Mark Zuckerberg founded Facebook due to being rejected by his girlfriend, when the only evidence of that is how Aaron Sorkin wrote it in The Social Network. I’m gonna stop here: my mobile KZfaq comment box can’t handle the wall of text I’m writing here, and I honestly don’t have the energy to write any more. Suffice it to say, if these are the brilliant arguments you’re starting off your hypothetical anti-atheist debate with, you need to find better arguments.

I was looking for actually good arguments to challenge my atheism, and after watching this video, I found none. The amazingly massive amount of logical fallcies and wordplay in this video is absolutely breathtaking.

The funny thing about the "can God contradict itself" is that plenty of atheistic scholars reject that argument as well, as they properly understand the definition of omnipotence. Another good response to the military conquest argument is the amount of times Christianity has spread to a new country or culture by just one missionary who was later killed, but the people converted anyway.

For anyone who's wondering, as of March 14, 2024, the like to dislike is: 31K to....53K !

I watched "Logical fallacies explained" right before this video. Thanks for the exercise.

Saying that God let evil exist because he's glorified in defeating it is like starting your own war and then stopping it and being hailed as a hero, even though you directly caused all the suffering, so really you've just created evil.

“This wasn’t serious. It was just for the memes!” - lazyboned Zoomer.

List of the fallacies(35) I found in this video. If I missed one or got one incorrect, feel free to drop a reply! 0:01 - Ad Hominem 0:19 - Red Herring 0:28 - Tu Quoque, Hasty Generalization 0:36 - Red Herring 1:02, 1:21, 1:22 - Appeal to Authority Also 1:22 - Ad Hominem 1:46 - The argument itself is an Assertion fallacy - the reply is Ad Hominem and Hasty Generalization 1:59 - Argument - Assertion, Reply - Circular, Assertion 2:49 - Special Pleading 3:10 - Red Herring, Special Pleading, Hasty Generalization 3:27 - Special Pleading 3:37 - Hasty Generalization 4:08 - Strawman? (It uses an argument by said Atheist that misconstrues the meaning of "Atheism" but idk) 4:27 - Appeal to Personal Incredulity 4:43 - Red Herring, Hasty Generalization 5:02 - Circular, Non-Sequitur, Begging the Question 5:27 - Appeal to Future 5:31 - False Dilemma 6:24 - Appeal to Consequences 6:33 - Non-Sequitur 6:37 - Begging the Question 6:48 - Red Herring 7:13 - Argumentum ad Lapidum 8:02 - Red Herring 8:13 - Argumentum ad Lapidum 8:23 - Red Herring Not posting this to be an ass, but firstly as practice for me to listen more carefully for illogical arguments, and hopefully as a reminder to others! I would be interested to see maybe a video this length on 2 or 3 topics, and then take the time to explain them in more depth.

saying triumph over evil is better than no evil is like saying dropping your mug and gluing it back together is better than just not breaking your mug

This is gaining a lot of traction. Unfortunately for zoomer i dont think its the kind he was hoping for.

Notice how almost all his answers are questions💀

-Why god allowed evil -To glorify himself in banishing it! *** -Mommy! I chopped puppy's legs of, so i can feed him and treat his wounds! -Oh, you such a glorious saviour, pumpkin!

Why did god let evil exist in the first place? -Because he's glorified in defeating it. Thats pride, the main sin

Crazy how he mocks the voice of people who sound exactly like him

This is the greatest argument for atheism I've ever seen

"Secular scholars don't agree on which quotes are fake so we can discard their opinions. It's totally okay that there's 5000 Christian denominations though because they agree on the essentials." Lmao.

"it's over atheist, I've depicted you as a soyjak and myself as a Chad"

As a Christian, I feel this piece falls a little short on the explanation side of things. While I (inner circle, regular Bible reader) can understand the meaning and context to most of the answers to each argument, I don't think the majority of "answers" really answered anything. It often just posited an opposing point, without sufficient supporting evidence. The answers with quotes from Church fathers and Bible quotes were the best responses. Every answer to each of these questions should tie back to those things in some way.

I was an Atheist all of my life , but this video proved me correct now I am even more Atheist

Alex O'Connor's response video is excellent

The reddit mod Atheist voice he used when asking the atheism questions was completely unnecessary, he already sounds like that 🤣

This seems made for people who already agree with you and I get the feeling many of them would have cringed through this video regardless.

If the Secular scholars not agreeing on which Psalms are made up makes THEIR opinions invalid, then Christians not agreeing on how to worship God properly makes THEM invalid. I don't believe Christianity is invalid, but I do not believe in God, I never will, and I do not want your opinions shoved in my face.

So, I’m Norwegian, and I just wanted to add; Norway would not be a country if it wasn’t for us getting christened, and specifically turned into catholics. The Christians in Norway today are more often than not Protestant, but even tho Norway as a country is counted as a very atheistic country, there is not a single larger/medium city in Norway that doesn’t have at least one church. I believe Oslo has about 10 different churches at least, from all sorts of different denominations. So all in all, for a country that is known for being very atheistic, Norway is very christian.

"Because he's glorified in defeating it" does not seem like a greater good than not letting evil exist in the first place.

Oh dear, most of these are answering weak arguments with weaker arguments

"Why do bad things happen?" "We deserve it" Okay tell that to the little girl that got raped did she deserve it?, the family's mother who was murdered? Do they deserve to live their life without their mother? How about the INNOCENT victims of all the serial killers in human history? Did they deserve to die?

it's been so long since i found myself falling down the christian vs. atheist debate youtube rabbit hole, but now i remember why i climbed out in the first place - videos like this one that are just overflowing with contradictions, strawman arguments, logical fallacies, etc. etc.. so thanks for reminding me that i don't actually want to be here. 👍

I had to stop watching immediately with the claim "Hitler is an Atheist." "It's true that Hitler's public statements opposing atheism should not be given too much weight, since they obviously served Hitler's political purposes to tar political opponents. However, in his private monologues, he likewise rejected atheism, providing further evidence that this was indeed his personal conviction. Perhaps even more significantly, he had complete faith that Providence had chosen him to lead the German people to greatness. It's clear through his personal monologues that he rejected Atheism, but while confessing faith in an omnipotent being of some sort, however, Hitler denied we could know anything about it. Source: Hitler's Religion by Richard Weikart (History Professor at California State University)

I love how he felt the need to lie about Hitler being atheist. If you have to edit the Wikipedia article, you know you’re in the wrong. Hitler was a critic of atheism💀

Bro doesn't understand how he contradicted himself without sources as well as making stuff up about the bible that was never actually mentioned. Maybe read the bible again and see if anything you said is actually there or try to justify your claims after rereading it.

as an atheist i guarantee i can make a better debate for why god is real. especially when it comes to this: “Why can’t God destroy evil?” because who is to say what is evil and what isn't? dying, suffering or anything else we percieve as negative might be for the greater good, maybe we are not capable of understanding beyond ''this feels good, this feels bad'' and so on. Nothing is good or bad, shit i realise that while im trying to defend gods existant im kinda going against it since god created hell for bad people and heaven for good people, well i guess its impossible to defend something made up by the church to make extra money and manipulate people n gain political power “Why does he let bad things happen at all?” we as humans are not capable of seeing beyond our own suffering, or others suffering, only god is able to see the bigger picture, in the end we cannot feel good in absence of suffering.

The whole video has the energy of "It's too late atheist, I have drawn you as the virgin and me as the chad!"

"Why did god let evil exist at all?" "Because he's glorified in defeating it" When I heard this I remembered the dialogue of Senator Armstrong in Metal Gear Rising- "I'm using war as a business to get elected"

how come the bible says that the earth is flat when it clearly isn't

@Redeemed Zoomer Hey, I'm an atheist but still enjoy your videos, and I have a question - having watched a lot of your videos, there is one thing that I cant quite wrap my head around: When you counter a lot of these arguments for atheism it often ends up at a point where you go "yeah okay okay so science can explain a lot, but god is outside of the entire universe so science and god dont contradict each other". I get that argument, but at that point all we are really arguing about is the question "Is there a divine entity of any kind at all", and you argue "yes there probably is because etc etc". And that is great, I find those arguments interesting, but like, thats not what i came here for. I came here for "okay why is christianity, specifically, right". If we agree that a divine entity exists, then its again the 4000 and 3999 gods question, to which basically all religions (christianity included) say "yeah okay uhhhh... we think *we* are right

I find it interesting how in this video, in response to the "Evolution disproves God" argument, you say that there have been religious thinkers in the past who have concluded that the Genesis story is not literal, but in a more recent video about heresies, you say that anyone claiming that the bible is not literal follows "liberalism" which is a heresy. So in order to answer the athiest argument, you had to use a heretical one. Again, very interesting.

I love how this video has been fucking skewered by atheists on KZfaq

Honestly I think a better way to answer the “religion causes wars/evil” question is not to say non religious wars/evil happen more often, but that no matter your religious belief we are all intrinsically evil, and that religious people are not exempt.

This left me with more questions than answers, good work

"Why does God do this that or the other thing?" is not something an atheist is asking. More like a theist who isn't religious curious about a Christian's opinion on the subject.

bro just defended atheism

It's videos like these where I truly miss the thumbs down visibility.

What makes jesus any more real than any other god or religion that existed both before and after his supposed existence?

Ibn al-Haytham was an early proponent of the concept that a hypothesis must be supported by experiments based on confirmable procedures or mathematical reasoning-an early pioneer in the scientific method five centuries before Renaissance scientists, he is sometimes described as the world's "first true scientist."

Someone graduated from the Ben Shapiro school of sophistry

So 40 of the worst arguments answer with weak counter arguments, nice

This guy is the definition of saying hes good because he labeled himself as a chad and everyone else as a soyjack.

thank you for fighting for what is and against the world while the myopic and naive try to fight against you. thank you for your work and let's keep moving. we fight for all goodness that is our Lord Yahusha Hamashiach Jesus Christ.when we fight for Jesus, we fight for everyone. i love you brother. let's do this because we have forever to look back. we don't know where He will take us but He will take us through it

The worst part about it is he didn't even answer the entire roulette

Love the attention to detail in the video title! It implicitly acknowledges that while it dors contains "answers", they aren't necessarily good, accurate, or convincing.

This guy failed at debunking the weakest atheist arguments

You shot yourself in the foot with this one man

I think, my favorite part about this video are the questions you don't "answer" because of how ridiculous the argument is. I fully support totally ignoring bad ideas, they are merely strawmen and should be torched and ignored. Calling them reddit scholars was a nice touch.

"Because he'd have to destroy you" is absolutely not a counter argument to "Why can't God destroy evil now?" If God can destroy evil but doesn't because I'm alive he has my full permission to send me to hell on the spot, that's just a basic trolley problem.

It’s something we glaze over a lot without thinking about it, but it really gets me thinking about it. I am special enough to be cared about by an eternal creator among all the stars and animals and people and galaxies. It’s such a beautiful love story “Consider the ravens: They do not sow or reap, they have no storeroom or barn; yet God feeds them. And how much more valuable you are than birds!” ‭‭Luke‬ ‭12‬:‭24‬

How can someone be so confident and so wrong at the same time

I love how like half of these are internally self contradictory 😂

wish i could show this video to my students. it'd be the perfect introduction to logical fallacies.

Hahahaha you got so COMPLETELY owned by Alex O'Conner response-video!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Maybe you are aware of this by now, but just in case. This video along with your “all arguments to explain God” has basically served as a rough outline and pathway down dozens of hours of research. I was struggling feeling like my studying was arbitrary and all over the place, but using these videos as a framework for my study has been immensely helpful. Thank you for this.

This is a new level of brain rot 💀💀💀

The argument isn't "Your geographical location influenced your belief, therefore your belief is false." The reason someone holds a belief has nothing to do with whether or not it is true. The argument is "If a god exists and reveals themself to all people, we would not expect geographical location to be the primary indicator for religious affiliation. Location _is_ the primary indicator for religious affiliation. Therefore such a god does not exist."

Alright. *Cracks knuckles. 0:08 Although religion isn't the primary cause of all conflict it is the only type of conflict that cannot be resolved using logic and reasoning. For example if you invade a place on the grounds "god told me this was correct", there is no way of verifying that claim or coming to an agreement about what is morally and ethically correct. Therefore i would argue a war of religion has the potential to be the most deadly and pointless. Furthermore, this is not an argument that says anything about the existence of god in the first place. 0:27 Atheism is not a belief. It's a lack of belief. However, i can correctly say god doesn't exist as opposed to “i don't know if god exist” for the same reasons i can say giraffes can't fly and not “i don't know if giraffes can fly.” a lack of provable scientific grounding. A belief is taught a lack of belief is not. Therefore your culture upbringing has far more to do with you being an atheist then a theist. 0:37 you didn't even answer the question so i won't either. 0:50 You have now admitted there are no ways to prove the existence of god. Human beings cannot observe what is beyond the natural world, if there is “beyond the natural world”. If you think there is, you must substantiate that claim otherwise it has the same weight as literally infinite amounts of others. 1:02 That is not evidence, that is lack of understanding and deriving a definite conclusion. Aka, Argument from ignorance. It could be that the brain retains information in a way that is much deeper then we currently understand. It could be that language is stored genetically and they have “unlocked” the ability to speak using a placebo. Now, is this a good explanation- absolutely not. But does hold equal if not more weight then “its magic” which is what you are suggesting. Yes. 1:16 “You think the bible has contradictions, well it doesn't because the people who study the book who find contradictions have already declared they are metaphors.” When science finds contradictions this is what happens “hmm, that's weird, clearly one of these answers is wrong”. See the difference? 4:23 Ok well i simply claim that the singularity is the uncaused cause. I have one less step than you do. Occam's razor. The rest of the statement is also just a claim “it makes a lot more sense for it to be personal rather then impersonal force” I can't disprove this statement in the same way you can't prove it however the fact everything operates on the same fundamental laws in a bottom-up way shows complex structures can be composed of simple ones. Therefore my random impersonal force is more plausible than “magic”. There is no secret sauce we can see. 4:43 No atheist who actually has a decent grounding in logic and empiricism would say that. Science is just prediction and observation. No scientist ever needed religion to come to a provable true fact about our world. They are scientists who happened to be religious, not scientists because they are religious. 7:25 Holy dude😭 it is logical to assume my food is not poisoned because 99.99% of all food ever consumed by humans has not been poisoned. It is logical my wife loves me because my wife is my wife, wife's generally love there husbands. It would be faith if i walked into the "poison food pizzeria" and just said to myself "i think ill walk out of here just fine"💀 Not worth watching the rest lol.

I love religion. It brings people together and makes happiness (usually). Even if one doesn't believe in it, what reason is there to destroy or disprove what makes people happy?

Im an atheist and i agree that some atheist arguements are not very good, but for some of these I wish to counter your arguements, please keep in mind that I wish to only create peaceful debate. 0:49 this is not a sufficient counter agruement to me, just because something is not disprovable does not mean that it may be likely to be true, I could say that a different god controls the universe and argue for its existance simply by saying you can't prove its not real. 1:02 while these occourances may seem strange, it could be that they were exposed to certain information e.g. languages from films or holidays, which they could then make sence of from some event. They may also recall information from such events, even if they entirely forgotten it. 4:23 If you use the arguement that god was uncaused, why could i not then use that same arguement to say that existance was uncaused? 5:36 I would like some elaboration, but if this is because of Adam and Eve, why should we be punished for what they did? And also why does God sometimes not punish those who have done wrong, but sometimes punish those who have not done wrong? 5:46 This is stating that the idea of good has to come from a god, but evolution could explain how morals are naturally formed, because peoples need to help others leads to more surviving humans, causing our race to survive. 6:25 this says that a triumph over evil is greater than a lack of evil, but personally I believe this to be false, to this day there is so much unnecessary pain that leads to many innocents suffering or dieing. I personally belive that a world without evil would be a better than a world with evil which you need to defeat. 7:25 All these analogies are not the same as faith in God, in all of these examples we have reasons to believe these things, e.g. food would not be harmful because if it were there would be legal trouble for that company and it would harm business, or we can believe that your wife loves you due to previous interactions. 8:23 If there is so much disagreement on the bible, why doesn't god clarify? Wouldn't a all knowing god know that we would misinterpret it and clarify? I am open to discussion and I will be respectful. Also I made sure not to comment on arguements that either I didn't understand, didn't have enough knowledge on, or arguements from atheists that even I think are weak.

0:12 No one says that 0:24 That is just wrong. Hitler and Mao were religious. Hitler was a Pantheist. Mao spoke against religion in the form of the religious leaders using the faithful, not against god or belief itself. He saved many religious sanctuaries during the revolution, which would've otherwise been destroyed by the mob. 0:33 You completely fail your strawman. I can be/become an atheist anywhere - You can only become a christian where the word of christianity is spread. 0:40 1. Humanism is a religion 2. You don't need faith for a world view - Those are two different things. I don't need faith in anything to be a nihilist. 0:50 Yes, science only deals with stuff that exists... Your point? Science never 'disproves' anything as the burden of proof comes with the claim. Saying god doesn't exist isn't the claim that needs evidence. 1:15 I ain't paying 30€ for that book. 1:25 Okay let's list a couple, maybe you can explain them: How long does gods anger last for? Forever (Jer 17:4) or not forever (Micah 7:18) Were humans created before (Gen 2:18-19) or after (Gen 1:25-27) animals? How much did David pay? 50 (2 Sam 24:24) or 600 (1 Chr 21:25) shekels? 1:39 Another point that no sane human ever brought up as an argument 1:45 Now you just argued against the gospels? Okay? 2:07 Now he did claim that he was god (John 10:30) 2:40 What about James tho? Paul didn't really have anything to do with anything in the beginning. 2:50 As the bible isn't taking a clear stance you can make arguments for both side, but tbh even if the bible allows slavery... It has nothing to do with the argument itself. 3:10 same as before 3:35 Does that make him good? Because he gives and takes life? Idk, it also feels like it's failing the point. 4:00 Yes, people are more likely to become atheists with a higher standard of living. This happens everywhere, not only in christian societies. Also - Those countries aren't atheistic, they just aren't deeply christian and haven't been for hundreds of years. The rise of fall of those nations had nothing to do with their religiousness. 4:20 Well it is a good gotcha if someone is unprepared - But it's not an argument in any form, yes. 4:30 Please explain why. Why is a godly creator more likely than a random event. Mind you, before the big bang there was no such thing as time, so why is something happening in an infinite amount of time less likely than a creator just existing. 4:40 Not sure what morons says this, god is based on faith and science can't disprove faith. That is by definition not possible. Yes, the curiousity about god and nature lead to science. Yes, almost all centers of learning where held by theologians and the church. Doesn't proof anything tho, as it has nothing to do with the argument. 5:15 Why is there a why? Also -> If we don't know something then a lot of people will tell you that it's proof of god. It's always the point we fail to understand (yet) which is used as proof that some greater being (god) must(!) be behind it. 5:27 God is the creator of evil (Is 45:7) I cba to do all of them so from now on I'll just do those I feel like - If anyone takes issue tell me which one specifically to address. 6:08 Funny little thought experiment - But you can do that with science aswell and it's just as funny. It neither proves nor disproves anything. 6:27 Because he created it (Is 45:7) 6:37 Well back in the day you got people in line with fear. A bit more bs that I cba to react to 7:20 Yes, parts (like holidays) were taken from other religions. It helps people ease into it as they already know more about it. It wasn't a 1:1 copy of another religion tho. 7:30 Yes, you're completely right. Who are the idiots claiming that faith is the opposite of logic? It's on two different levels. 7:50 How old is the world? How does it work with such a small amount of time and why did it slow down so extremely? Also how big was Noahs Ark? 8:12 It took over a small part of the empire. One of which was Constantine who made it rather popular in the elite circles of the empire and Theodosius I. who crushed the pagan west and basically forced it to convert after the 394 battle of the frigidus. But yes, Christianity also had a major spread without war. 8:20 I will be honest - I've never heard anyone say this. That just doens't make any sense at all. 8:25 This is also a mood point, the amount of denominations neither proves nor disproves anything. 8:32 Yes, a guy named Jesus existed. Since we are there already... What about his brother? Anyone heard something from James recently? The church seems to have just gone with Paul the Roman after instead of James who was supposed to be the heir of the christian movement. 8:50 Well yes, that is what faith is about. Again anyone seriously trying to use this as an argument is a clown.

I was atheist before... and I'm still atheist

Stupid answers with stupid claims

See, true Atheists will never be douchebags to ask questions like these. I'm Orthodox and have many Atheist friends, there's always so much respect between the two different viewpoints and the desire to learn more about them. People asking questions like these are just losers with nothing going on in their life who wanna make other people bitter, reddit atheists and discord mods.

>strawman every argument >still somehow fail to rebut the strawman Ladies and gentlemen, the peak of Christian intellect. This is like the greentext where the dude lost an argument against an imaginary person in his head and even stuttered.

well... thats a load of bullshit if ive ever seen 1