Also they never ate meat.

They never ate meats but rascals who don't know Ramayan according to Shastra talk rubbish just to get excuse to eat meat and slaved by his greedy uncontrolled mind.... Their just graping untrue knowledge from Shorts, TikTok etc....Shri Ram or Krishna is father of whole creative how can he eat his own children....

Ramakrishna was sahajiya ,he considered himself Bhagavan ,preached to people he was Krsna..ths is why theyre not bonafide .

There is Krishna in everyone... Please don't call anyone a rascal...

Can you give the reference

Prabhupad. Morning Walk - July 10, 1976, New York

Same Prabhu pada also was a woman hunter used to be take seva from women and stayed with women in the same ashram

@@durgashakti7316 You fool, do you even know what woman hunter means? Let me spell it out for you ......... One with illicit s*xual intercourse and lusty exchanges with women other than his wives is a woman hunter. Those women you are talking about in the context of Srila Prabhupada were His disciples, so obviously, they would look forward to taking instructions from and serving Srila Prabhupada (their guru) by serving Him prasadam, typing the texts given by Him, painting spiritual pictures under His instructions, worshipping deities and so on like any of the male disciples of Srila Prabhupada would do. The relationship between a Guru and a disciple is like father and son/daughter. But the thing with Ramakrishna was that he engaged in illicit s*x before his marriage to SUCH an extent that he became impotent ( can you even imagine what level of illicit interaction he must have performed to turn impotent? ). So after marriage, he could not engage in "legal" interaction, i.e. interaction with his wife due to being impotent, so he made an excuse of being renunciate. Wow!! Do you see the difference now?

No , that's called Grihast Aashram and later he took Sanyas..

Read Śāstra, no one decides its according to Kṛṣṇas design of time.

@@ISKM108 #1.which Shastras say this is for Kaliyuga and this not #2. Vaishnavas and Brahmanas are different? which Shastra says this?

Stupid arguments. 1. Majority of Bengal was eating meat but couldn't fight against mughals, and other islamic invasion. Half of bengal is gone as Bangladesh. Even today's west bengal is almost gone case. Same is with Kashmir, Kashmiri pandits were eating meat but were kicked out of their home. 2. Today's kshatriya are not equal to bhim or pandav nor they have to go and fight , so in 21st century it there is no reason for kshatriya to eat meat. Doesn't matter what pandavs did, Pandav were pious soul. Moreover, we are not supposed to follow them. 4. Eating meat is sinful, you are not allowed to snatch a baby animal from its mother. It doesn't want to go away from its family be it chicken, goat or pig. You can't kill someone for your taste buds. Additionally, the halal way of Killing animal is very cruel where they are cut slowly while they are crying and are in pain. 5. It's not about Iskcon, it's simply sympathy towards poor animals. No logic can justify eating flash or blood of poor animals who don't want to live miserable ,filthy life in cages and ghettos and only to end up in slaughterhouse. Meat is simple tamsik, previously it was offered to devi that's different thing. But nowadays that's not the case, so it's simple tamsik and can no way help one progress in spirituality. No pious popular sants, gurus of India ate meat. Be it tulsidas ji or any other saints. 6. Illogical point : animal doesn't get hurt with your thoughts or speech, they simple don't want to get killed and separated from their family. Be it street dog, cow, goat or a bird.

@@BhavikBarai You arguments are not only stupid but more like a dumb speaking. In reply to 1. According to you, not even after eating meat (fish, the bengali tomato) the Bengalis have no courage, then Bengalis are not kshatriyas but lazies loafer. You mentioned the looters called mughals as an evidence without a territorial geographic and perspective of why those things happened and failed to mention other grand battles fought by Bengalis like the Gangaridai warriors. Bengal has a 20,000 year history for you to dare to pick and choose what is convenient for your arguments. Eating meat does not make one a kshatriya but meat is in the mode of passion and can be an incentive for courage that could be utilized under the proper leadership of a kshatriya. During the British occupation the period I was referring were many proponents of the Indian freedom struggle hailed from Bengal, including Chittaranjan Das, Surendranath Banerjea, Prafulla Chaki, Jatindranath Mukherjee, Khudiram Bose, Surya Sen, Binoy Basu, Badal Gupta, Dinesh Gupta, Matangini Hajra, Sarojini Naidu, Aurobindo Ghosh, Rashbehari Bose, Shyamaprasad Mukherjee and many more. Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, the face of Indian armed freedom struggle, was fostered in Bengal like many other Indian freedom fighters. The walls of the Cellular Jail in Andaman stand witness to the sacrifice of Bengali youths, as the highest number of jailed revolutionaries came from Bengal. Intellectually promoted by Raja Ram Mohan Roy, the 'Father of modern India', Pandit Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar, Swami Vivekananda, Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose, Satyendra Nath Bose, Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay and Rabindranath Tagore propelled the movement forward and made Bengal the face of progress and culture in India. That thing that bengal today is gone, is another topic and outside the period of Vivekananda Swami. Your point 2. "Today's kshatriya are not equal to bhim or pandav nor they have to go and fight , so in 21st century it there is no reason for kshatriya to eat meat." More dumb than hat no one can be. The qualities of a kshatriya "Prowess, splendor (greatness), firmness, dexterity, not running away in battle, magnanimity, lordship (commanding and ruling power)-these are the functions of the Kshatriyas born of their nature." and everybody knows that Kshatriyas may and commonly do eat meat (though never beef), and many also take alcoholic drinks; both of these characteristics set them apart from the Brahmans. FYI kshatriyas get defeated by others kshatriyas with more determination to win. Your points 4 and 6 to silly to answer.

I completely support you . We hindus know the most beautiful thing about hindus is being diverse but staunch believers will always try to enforce their will and thought process. We have many path of seeking our gods period.

@@rohitburagohain9499 Yes, in the Puranas ALL are the Supreme to teach us not to go around criticizing and to respect different types of god realization.

Narak me Jane ke bad Yam Raj ko ye Gyan Dena murkh

Because he is following a foolish organisation which dares not speak the truth. Was Sankara math banned for criticising Vivekananda? They stood by their statements

You have no idea what's going on behind scene.. CM and PM offices were involved One small temple in Mayapur burned to ashes Devotees were under attack physically Please be little mature before you start making judgments

​@@srikrishnasankirtanam4302💯

​@@srikrishnasankirtanam4302😮 shocked. May lord protect our devotees

​@@srikrishnasankirtanam4302 Which temple😳 Ye kab hua, kaha hua...Kya news me b aya ye???

Killing animals for the satisfaction of the tongue and the belly is the greatest jealousy of another's life. First fix this basic jealousy.

@@ayiruskan8016😂😂😂

Jesus didn’t instruct people to eat meat.

@@ISKM108 Mark 7:18-19 - Jesus asked, “Are you thus without understanding also? Do you not perceive that whatever enters a man from outside cannot defile him, because it does not enter his heart but his stomach, and is eliminated, thus purifying all foods?”

@@ElloEveryone don't misinterpret, this is not saying that you can kill and eat meat. Here the subjcet is food, not meat. We don't concider meat as food. Allso the situation of jesus times, place and audinece was differend, they didn't make slaughter house business, only if there is need to avoid death by taking meat it is differend. Not that you grown animals and kill them just for taste and satisfaction of tongue and to grow body bigger, thus increasing material propensities.

@@ElloEveryone ŚB 11.5.11 Translation In this material world the conditioned soul is always inclined to sex, meat-eating and intoxication. Therefore religious scriptures never actually encourage such activities. Although the scriptural injunctions provide for sex through sacred marriage, for meat-eating through sacrificial offerings and for intoxication through the acceptance of ritual cups of wine, such ceremonies are meant for the ultimate purpose of renunciation Rules for meat sacrifice: CC Madhya 24.250, Purport: This is another good instruction to animal-killers. There are always animal-killers and animal-eaters in human society because less civilized people are accustomed to eating meat. In the Vedic civilization, meat-eaters are advised to kill an animal for the goddess Kālī or a similar demigod. This is in order not to give the animal unnecessary pain, as slaughterhouses do. In the bali-dāna sacrifice to a demigod, it is recommended to cut the throat of an animal with one slice. This should be done on a dark-moon night, and the painful noises expressed by the animal at the time of being slaughtered are not to be heard by anyone. There are also many other restrictions. Slaughter is allowed only once a month, and the killer of the animal has to suffer similar pains in his next life. At the present moment, so-called civilized men do not sacrifice animals to a deity in a religious or ritualistic way. They openly kill animals daily by the thousands for no purpose other than the satisfaction of the tongue. Because of this the entire world is suffering in so many ways. Politicians are unnecessarily declaring war, and according to the stringent laws of material nature, massacres are taking place between nations.

@@ElloEveryone Jesus never tought meat as food for a civilized follower of His. He never gave order to eat meat or to kill animals. Please stop talking nonsense on behalf of others... Final warning

Not according to Vedic authority: aśvamedhaṁ gavālambhaṁ sannyāsaṁ pala-paitṛkam devareṇa sutotpattiṁ kalau pañca vivarjayet "In this age of Kali, five acts are forbidden: the offering of a horse in sacrifice, the offering of a cow in sacrifice, the acceptance of the order of sannyāsa, the offering of oblations of flesh to the forefathers, and a man's begetting children in his brother's wife." (CC Adi 17.164) Just stop this nonsense killing, learn to cook something proper. You won't die or become hungry...

@@ISKM108 true.

ISKCON did wrong when they banned Amongh Lila Prabhu. Why are you defeating Vivekananda? Why not Krishna? If Vivekananda says what Krishna says, that's alright, but if he speaks against Krishna and His instructions, we are not going to tolerate that. Are you going to follow Krishna or Vivekananda? We must speak out and defend Krishna's authority. You watch the video, it's for your own good.

Bcoz their belief are taking away lives of others, they should not apply thier believes on animals,, animals deserve life... animal killing is wrong.. I m also a devotee of maa kaali but I m a vegan... maa kaali did not kill any single animal in her whole life...

For you kind information vaishnava s ar3 more in numbers go and google 😂😂

@@jayantchaudhary3584 ya thats true, baisnabs are more in numbers but fact is most of them are not sakahari.

@@ISKM108 I didn't follow your comments before. It's strange and ridiculous that you are comparing Krishna and Vivekananda. Are you in your sane mind to distinguish between bhakt and Vagwan. When did Vivekananda said against Krishna? Vivekananda was awakening whole sleeping Jati. And it was for the sake of Dharma.

By your foolish comment, you are asserting yourself as more learned the Srila Prabhupada and Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Swami, so now, why don't you establish 64 Gaudiya Maths or hundreds of temples, worldwide? Why don't you memorize literal hundreds of scriptures and quote them even at an advanced age? Why can't you chant 1 billion names of the lord while living in a straw hut? Why are you only talking about minor things instead of looking at the whole picture? Who told you Srila Prabhupada had lust? Is marriage just lust? Lust means having illicit connection with woman, marriage is a way to regulate and stop lust. Srila Prabhupada was so detached he could leave everything and take vanaprastha. Can you do that? Can you sever family bonds for a higher cause? Srila Prabhupada was a Nitya-siddha Maha bhagavatam, one of the most greatest devotees, and it is very clear in his personality. Please don't spread your foolishness, try to actually learn about the person you are speaking of, instead of foolishly trying to find faults in them. Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati was Nitya-siddha as well, he could see his guru's spiritual form in his picture and so he took sannyasa from him. Can you even take on brahmacharya for life like Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati did? Please don't talk nonsense.

@@shivranj , well said. Please provide Vedic justifications. Similarly as you said I should learn about that person, similarly ask ur so called rascals swamis to learn about Hinduism and the other saints. Hinduism is not so narrow minded and driven by text book only as u people claim.

@@souravbhattacharya1549 First of all , Hinduism is a foreign term, can you show me the tern Hindu in any scripture?

@@souravbhattacharya1549 Who is a rascal swami? If you're talking about the present ISKCON ones then okay sure, but don't blaspheme the pure devotees like Srila Prabhupada, it's dangerous, an offence at the lotus feet of a pure devotees is unforgivable.

Hinduism has many yoga systems, but the entire point of yoga is to connect with god, and there are many but the ultimate goal is to go back to Krsna. The entire basis of this religious system is the books, so don't think of blaspheming our 'textbooks'

Watch the video completely.No meat at the slaughter house is allowed. Such kind of killing sends you to suffer in hell for millions of years. Only in certain circumstances meat offered in a sacrifice is allowed but who is doing such procedures these days? Also they had the ability to give those animal sacrificed a higher life is that happening now? Also such sacrifices are not allowed in Kali Yuga. So don't say Kastriya are allowed and you can also consume now both are not the same meat at all. All meat eaters of this day and time definitely have to suffer hellish punishment for consuming meat from cruel slaughter houses

​​@@ayiruskan8016how they have the ability to give higher lives to sacrificed animals, is there proof ? Isn't it a flowery language. And you know non-vegetarian people are killing animals at least which they can see and vegetarian people are killing a whole lot of animals which cannot be seen.

You comment makes no sense because you haven't even watched the video, therefore there's no point to talk to you.

Nothing is above vedas...vedas strongly condemn meat eating...without consecreated without mantras.... Ur pandits have made u fool

@@subhodip3064 tantriks take meat and alcohol and many have become great sidhhas. Vivekananda used to call this problem "kitchen politics"...that is getting stuck about what to eat and actual progress becomes zero ! Where as there are people who ate non veg and also did sadhana....and because of actual progress the wish to eat meat simply faded away, no need to argue and fight and make "reply videos". Just because of this forcing....we feel like eating more mutton and chicken near your face !! Please let us all mind our own business ...is it really that tough.

@@avishekmukhopadhyay6086 Tantriks take meat from slaughter houses where billions of innocent animals are slaughtered daily? No they have to do the rituals once a month only on Amavasya and take and even then there is sin involved and they have to pay for such sins. Are you consuming meat according to these regulations? If no then definitely you can't hide behind the tantric and Shakta shield because you will definitely have to suffer untold miseries these animals are facing in slaughter houses. You are asking us to mind our business so why cant you let the poor animals to mind their business? Why double standards? If you are a real man take the life of the chicken or mutton yourself daily instead of buying from the super market and then come and talk. If you got the guts for that then you talk about meat eating, no scripture will ever support Slaughter house meat and you will be punished by Kali for such cruelty.

@@avishekmukhopadhyay6086 first read properly what i have written..meat eating is allowed only after concreated with mantras ... Buying from market and eating every week is not allowed..such persons will surely go to hell... Vivekananda knows more than ved vyas??? After death where have they gone what do u know? Attaining siddhi is not the highest goal of life...even ramkrishna mocked people attaining sidhis... What do u think u will harm the universe everyday..and it will keep quiet? Vivekananda and ramkrishna both are not avatars...they are not mentioned in scriptures... It was preducted in bhagwatam...brahmins will behave like sudras and sudras like brahmins in kaliyuga...thats what exactly is happening.... Some foolish brahmins just gave u the ticket to hell

Because you're stonehearted without having any mercy for other living entities. You should chant Hare Krishna first.

Not just that prabhu Hare Krishna chanting too can't melt the stone heart of such karmi.

Material world is this upside down Banyan tree, not sanatan dharma. I think you have mixed the concepts😅

So much knowledge he had and failed to understand a simple thing that by eating meat you cannot reach God. That's ridiculous.

I agree @chanyandey3208 you are misguided follow the shastras