I didn't hear any Republican on the Panel "Deny" climate change. In fact, several pointed out that the Climate has been changing for at least 3 billion years. The TRUTH is that, to the extent the Climate is changing, there is nothing humans can do that would make any meaningful difference.

You know it’s wrong when they won’t debate the science but question the scientist political opinion,consensus science is not science at all

The greatest benefit of Broadband is that we can listen and learn from Real Scientists and not get our information from Political Scientists. In NZ our press is owned by the government and they control the local level of misinformation. Thank you Dr John Christy.

Finally get to hear some common sense spoken I'm 66 it was hotter when i was a kid

So the House Natural Resources Committee posts this to …. Prove they are stupid?, not the “deniers”.

The social cost of reduction of CO2 will be astronomical and has not been assessed.

OK. Ignoring all the pollution generated from “renewable” energy sources, can anyone explain why Texas is one of the largest producers of renewable resources at the cost of hundreds of thousands of acres of windmills and yet it only supplies 10% of TX energy. I would love to see tax returns of Democrat politicians and see where their funding comes from.

I live by Sydney harbour Australia water level has not risen at all over the last century

I loved the comment that, if anything, carbon emitters should be subsidized rather than taxed. Way to argue to 100!

This is the problem with all of this stuff. Something that needs to be thoroughly vetted out, is met by derision and scorn rather than honest debate. Really nice job.

Happy to see this finally going finally being addressed.

You make it sound like denying a lie is a bad thing. Not a single model has even gotten remotely close to actual observed data. Not one. End of story. Saying otherwise is not "Science" If you disagree with that, by definition, you are the denier.

Here we are after 7 years and the climate seems to be doing fine.

Alas finally seeing a few brave politicians challenging the orthodoxy. The only thing they’re denying is a climate apocalypse. We have 30 yrs of Climate Policy meetings and posturing. The result: CO2 has increased, the biggest emitters China and India continue to build new coal plants at a rate of one per wk with no end in sight. They’re not worried and with good reason... all the climate models have proven to be grossly overblown, the earth has greened up noticeably over 20 yrs, sea level change is consistent with the past 400 yrs, polar bears are doing well, none of the previous catastrophic predictions have come to bear, hurricane and extreme weather are unchanged. All the science contradicts the dire predictions.

What's with this "denier" thing? I thought this was a scientific issue, not a religious one

It's funny how this video was meant to turn us against Republican "climate deniers" when all it did was show us how intelligent they are.

The Toyota Prius is profitable, at least in the United States, because of federal tax credits of as much as $7500 per car.

changes aren't permanent, but Change is.

November 20, 2022: This nonsense has been going on for too long now why we continue to discuss it is beyond me.

The fact is, that not one climate model has been even close to being accurate, and it is always TERRIBLY wrong and always only in one direction. Are they really that inept? Or is just possible there is a hidden agenda?? The fact is, climate always changes, so yes there is climate change. “It was warmer during the Roman Period, a fact that is acknowledged by the IPCC…. It got cooler during the Dark Ages. It then got warmer during the Medieval Period. And then it became much colder until about 1800,” The fact is, during the warming period prior to 1998 (there has been scant warming since)... *the polar ice caps of mars were melting!* A logical assumption would be that it was due to variations in the sun's intensity... it also warmed us. It is highly likely that mars has too many SUV's. It's a fact, from about 1950 to 1970 we were also certain that we were headed into an ice age! There was a political agenda with this also. It is a fact is even though, it is agreed that CO2, can cause a "slight amount" of warming... an examination of world climates shows that in general, temperatures, rise first... Co2 levels followed. Not Co2 rises and temperatures follow. Al Gore and his propaganda machine, simply lie. The fact is, there is no 97% consensus that climate change is due mostly, or even largely due to man... only a lie that is repeated so often, by so many that those who are too lazy to examine the evidence, simply listen, believe and follow like the pied piper. *Unfortunately, that's about 50% of the world* A FEW MORE FACTS... I don't want dirty water. I don't want dirty air. I don't want the sea to rise. I don't want my children and grandchildren to live in a climate decimated future. If the actual science indicated that my cars would cause that... I'd burn mine... and maybe even yours too! But the science does not say that. Only those who don't know better and those who a political or financial interest in propounding this lie. I also don't want the future of our country to have their economic hands tied behind their back with restrictive, oppressive, economy, job destroying laws that accomplish nothing other than to destroy our place as a world leader of personal and economic freedom!

At 4:20 john Fleming hits the nail squarely on the head! and we can see facts have gone iut the window and conservatism needs to return!! I not only fought the liberals in Washington, I also fought the leadership of my own party when they were all too willing to compromise on our conservative principles," Fleming said in his statement of candidacy.[41

Sea level rise is measured in millimeters per year and has slowed in the past two decades. How can anyone say they're suffering from the rise of sea level??

it's painful watching our esteemed governing officials attempt to sound intelligent

Thing is people need to keep warm, we're changing one fuel for the other. Go somewhere where coconuts are used to cook and you'll see how fast renewables can create pollution.

Surprised KZfaq hasn’t banned this. Dare sensibility comes into the climate alarmists argument.

Global cooling, then Acid rain, Manhattan under water, Great Barrier Reef now completely recovered from natural dormant period, Polar bears populations all are multiplying. I do hope we at least get some warming but the average global temperature remains a flat line, not a political model. And the hole in the ozone healed itself. Maldives still not below the sea.

Only fools would belive that restoring CO2 to the atmosphere it came from would jeopardize beneficial circumstances for life on earth. Life had 420 ppm before, it had 2000 ppm before and 7000 ppm aswell. It did not have 180 ppm before, which was the case after the last ice age. 150 ppm threatens life, 2000 ppm obviously does not. CO2s absorption potential gets saturated so that the marginal effect gets smaller and smaller like painting a house. It doesn’t get another color after the 4rt layer of paint. Climate alarmism is a replacement religion used by many to their advantage in an echo chamber. The Emperor is naked, nobody dears to get out of line. It gets slightly warmer but the oceans also get warmer if I pee in the water. The magnitude is not alarming. What is alarming is the medicine. It is worse than the disease. Energy poverty will case starvation for many, especially poor. Doubling CO2 will increase the average temp on earth from 15C to about 16C or 17C and that will have a lot of benificial effects. Changes will be over centuries. Fear should be of the cold, it killes more than heat, even in India.

There is a-patent to run cars on WATER. The guy was killed But we should bring that 😳

Marianas Islands Mr representative, it is not that the seas are rising there it is that the land is subsiding there

Great presentation. We must hold our government accountable so I see. Thank scientists. We rely on you.

Let’s got brandon

That sounds pretty reasonable to me. As we are now, I think that not only the solutions brought up by the "greens" in regards to the crisis they identified are too armful compared to their track record on predictions so far (how long ago were island nations like Fiji and the Maldives supposed to be drowned by sea level rise? most coastal cities? 20 or 30 years ago). An now, we are at the verge of food catastrophes in many parts of the world that were dependant on Russian and Ukrainian food/energy, millions of people will starve, and the weather has nothing to do with it, only human madness.

Carbon is not pollution .

Climate is defined as the running 30 year average of weather.

They blame SUVs yet the first SUV didn’t come out until the 1930s😂

Where are the scientists?

Been listening for almost 5 minutes and all I hear is agreement that climate changes. No denial so far.

What exactly does "climate denial" or "climate denier" mean? I don't think that there is single person that thinks that the earth never has gone through, and is *currently* not going through, climate change.

*I love climate change. I'm a scientist studying it. I have been traveling to exotic places for 30 years now measuring temperatures.* *The Grant money is great! I got a 5 million dollar house in the Hampton's. I can tell you climate change is here to stay!*

Climate is a dynamic system. When the head of the U.N. Climate group stated that they had not expected the sun to have such a large impact on the weather, I lost all faith in their claims. We learned in 3rd grade that climate was driven by solar cycles. The U.N. Is not smarter than a third grader.

Climate alarmism is very Big business. Greenpeace has a budget of 350 million. Alarmism is essential to keep the money flowing and yet the polar bears and great barrier reef are doing great.

Why not just put, this is what we need to get people to back the sustainable goals of the UN. And that it's not science that made those goals but business and government. It seems more like a way to get everyone to participate in the global economy. You can't make a dollar of someone that doesn't have one. It's all about profit of others work. That's why costs have to go up.

weather is cyclical they proved that

2014 was the hottest year on record. Okay how far back does the records go? The records only go back about 150 years. So one of these years has to be the hottest one of these years has to be the coldest what's your point doctor

The fact that CO2 can slow transmission of heat from the surface of the earth to outer space is not in dispute. The issue is whether this effect can be catastrophic or not. Since CO2 makes up just 0.04% of the atmosphere, we have to ask how such a miniscule proportion of the atmosphere can have an effect that is even measurable much less catastrophic. The IPCC reports do not explain that. See what Michael Crichton said about this.

All the models predictions have not happened

There’s no clarity on the problem they are trying to solve. What is actually happening that they need to put right?

Carbon is not a pollution, and there are benefits for plants and people. Carbon is bood.

unrecyclable wind is also killing large birds hmm

Can somone tell me exactly what is denied? I tried to find out what the CO2 climate sensitivity is, no one can tell. I fear it is completly unknown.

Listening to this objectively and realizing the identity politics involved it looks pretty clear that, A. The republican speakers are not "climate change deniers" and B. The democrats are relying on consensus rather than fact based science.

5:50 Wait until you see what happens in 2020 in your field of medicine. You will be disgusted sir. Keep up the fight young man. 10:40 Sir, we are not saying that the seas are not rising, what we are saying is, "mankind is not the source of the pricing of the sea". Let that filter a little bit

Has any one ever look at the rising seas because of all the amount of concrete

Its not denial - just an alternative viewpoint

“The health effects of carbon pollution”?!?! What a joke?

It rises very little

I'm Sorry, the link at the end of the deskription is not available.

The most respected scientists have the option that a higher CO2 level is required. We are entering a period where the temperatures will reducing due to sun radiation reductions. The official, NASA MARSHALL, temperature rate of increase is 1.1C/century now and reducing.

a true debate needs to take place on the adverse negative effects of geoengineering on our environment as well as a hard debate on genetitically modified foods and the people like gates who push this agenda. and its effects. no mention of this here.

I saw those ice chunks a few years ago.

Leave it to the experts. I hear a lot of gibberish out of all these people. They don’t like that they’re being proven wrong. But they really don’t know anything in these studies. They have no experience whatsoever. Who lets them talk?

I love the irony of the titles. And what is 'climate denial'? This is the most ridiculous title of all. Those that are denying climate change is a problem are proving to be correct.

Laugh out loud truth and signs make a concession. I like this guy and he’s right

reducing carbon is unnecessary as well as impossible. CO2 is not a polluant. Let me put it in my words, sharing 30 years of observation in the real world and dedication to common sense: TIME and PROPORTIONS are the two key factors, which deliberately seem marked out, this time and in any kind of organised and imposed fanatical belief, aka agenda. In general, same as in real life, there is no urgency and it's ok as it is. There are two major aspects of existence, which we absolutely need to consider simultaneously. Big mistake, if we don't. 1. Nature (and its climate) is simple. 2. Trying to understand Nature ( its climate and weather) is phenomenonly complex, climate is following a chaotic pattern. Reliable predictions are impossible. My conclusion: Science is wrong by taking things apart, instead of looking at Nature in the long run and as a whole. Nature is in a constant state of change with the aim to keep the system balanced. It's capacity to "do" that is unlimited. Time doesn't matter. It's been doing it for billions of years. Eternally. Humanity and science are wrong in thinking, that we could "do it" , god or bad. Our influence on this system is ZERO, NADA, NIENTE. Not now, not as a consequence for the future. Having said that, doesn't mean we shouldn't care about nature and the environment. Of course we have to, but first understand basics, then respect time and proportions. There is no causality, CO2 does not have the alledged effect, it's the other way round. In a natural cycle, it's warmer and therefore we measure higher CO2 ppm counts in the atmosphere. Inevitably, a cooler period will follow, consequently CO2 ppm counts will go lower. Then maybe science would rightly conclude: CO2 is a tracer, not a polluant. Temperatures vary slightly, so is CO2 ... this is a correlation, scientifically mistaken as causality. Get back to work.

I am very disappointed that these “new technologies” have Not delivered My Flying Carpet yet........!? 🙄🤦🏻

What are the actual numbers for the costs of Alaskan sea level change?

A natural phonomena ... it happens! There is nothing people can do to change or control the climate...

Oil companies have been the largest Funda of both sides of the debate from the start because they benefit the most

I am a Climate Denier and proud of it! The United States developed all of these energy systems and now we are supposed to give it up and allow China to reap the benefits of our technologies? What World changing technological breakthrough was given to us by China? Did they invent the steam engine, electric motor, phone, radio, television, plane, or computer? The car maybe???? Nope. Not the car either. Why in the hell should we FREE, and thus creative people take the back seat to China or any other Country who is clearly benefiting from our technologies? This is all a complete shame! This is nothing less than an attack on America by people who are clearly ungrateful for the advancements they enjoy specifically because of America and its Free People.

So, for all of their talk we are still fighting climate change ghosts.

Water vapor is estimated at 5000 ppm. CO2 is about 240 ppm. All greenhouse gases other than water vapor are less than 300 ppm. Draw your own conclusions.

Have They calculated how much greenhouse gases get submitted each time a human being farts?

Hard to believe less than 45,000 views in 7 years for this video Must be some explanation as to why this is so.

All the SNOW AND RAIN this week is from global warming they tell us. Pinocchios!

I think that they said that the climate change is not proven to be man made

Almost everyone commenting here got this seven year old video recommended within the last week. Why do you think that is?

In the tropics, CO2 is the limiting factor for photosynthesis. So there’s always that.

Why is it no one going to jail

Just an observation: the sea level in Alaska has been rising since the Bearing Land Bridge existed.

Pity that the Reps couldn't predict that within 10yrs of this hearing, #Obombing would, as a retired public servant, pay $11.75million for a Beachfront 27 acre Mansion Compound in Martha's Vineyard. He's not very worried about rising sea-levels now, is he?

Here's the problem. The Democrats use the facts that support their view and the Republicans use the facts that support their views.

Republicans stay focused on Facts and Objectivity.

why is my phone volume turned down when they dont want me to hear what the ißues about

45k views and only 547 likes. may we assume they got ratioed. who wants the dislikes hidden ?

He's right on!

Yes,but when you build citys they affect temps in local areas.

Rising sea levels in Alaska but the Maldives are still there, please.

I have a sense that the young ladies in background are literally captives.

They were also throwing virgins in volcano

good. And none of the climate alarmist clames have come true.

There is no rising seas land masses sink and some rise

Well, the 20th century research papers of the oil companies tell a different story, but that is not important. Just make money and who cares....

Is not climate denial, it’s fact.

Finally, men talking some sense.

Climate Change Truthers revealing "man made climate emergency" scam :) Brilliant!

Hahaha to accurately state that climate has changed for billions of years is to deny climate change. What kind of liberal logic is this?

I find the denier labels interesting. Clearly an underlying purpose for those who put this video out.

At 4:21 this video flashes a little Chiron stating that what is being said is faults and gives a URL link. It is not false and therefore this video is providing misinformation by saying it is

if YOU do not recognize that the evidence of the last 7 years mak4es these people look like fools you are a lost soul

What the hole that is talking about renewables is not being real about is the toxic chemicals and upstream and downstream costs of the so called renewables. Wind turbines do not just use the wind. they use magnets made with toxic chemicals for about 15 years of working life. Before this the toxic chemicals for the new magnets have to mined from the earth, often done by poor underpaid people in dangerous jobs. And where are these turbines coming from? Are they coming from the USA or are they being manufactured in China using Australian coal? How much energy actually goes into making the things, compared to what you get from them? And how are they being disposed of after they come to the end of their useful life? I understand that many of them are ending up in landfill or just left in places to let those toxic chemicals leach out. The same is true for many of the batteries we have - made in China using coal energy and containing toxic elements and then there is no adequate recycling for many of them. The renewables should really be taxed more than the fossil fuels because of all these extra toxic substances they have in addition to all the CO2 produced in China etc to make them in the first place.