Sweet

Thank you. I appreciate the encouragement!

Generally speaking, thin client builds won't have a lot of storage. That is the main foreseeable issue. The low end graphics card will be limiting on what you can do on the PC itself but it's CPU should be sufficient to function as a NAS and I would assume the NIC is decent if it has to remote into another system for its primarily functions. Have you had any luck with thin clients in the past?

@@adventuresinnostalgia That’s true, they won’t have removable racks for expandable storage but they still can be upgraded to higher capacities since most already contain a boot drive. The laptop featured in the video was rather low-spec, so rather than go into the realm of unfamiliarity with a lightweight Linux distro, it makes sense to get the most out of what it’s capable of with a “Thin PC” build of Windows since realistically speaking that’s what the hardware is comparable to: a Thin Client. I don’t personally have such a setup, but considering how many I’ve seen use shared folders in VMs for essentially the same purpose I wonder how that’d translate to actual hardware considering the alternative use case would be essentially a netbook in a growing digital age of tablet computers.

I have not had time to properly look into this. I do have it on my to-do-list though!

@@adventuresinnostalgia 👍👍👍

It would be faster than regular Windows 7, but I don't recommend it because it's geared towards pos systems and uses write filtering

@@adventuresinnostalgia Ok thanks. I also want to ask you - Do you have plans to make another Windows 7 ISO after the last BypassESU updates have been issued?

It's personal preference. I just like Edge better

Firefox is not lightweight. It uses about half the resources the Chrome Dome does.

I used the exe