@Jaegar19Ultima I remember when 3RE was announced it was made to seem that Nemesis didn't have much scripted events and could come into any safe room to get your ass which made it much scarier- I was so disappointed when I found out that wasn't true

Its the femenist narrative that they have to include in their games these days, all female characters must be badass, take no shit, foul mouthed and constantly saying the F word, never sense any fear nor threat by the male antagonist (nemesis). a cliche which we see being used constantly regarding female characters these days.

The Mayo is strong with this one.

@Jaegar19Ultima Making Brad a brave lad was the worst for me. The whole RE1/RE3 lore was how he was a coward and a pussy, the way he is represented on RE3R is like he never abandoned the S.T.A.R.S back at the mansion because he got spooked.

@Jaegar19Ultima Thats not what I said tho. I'm talking about his personality change from coward to brave out of nowhere. But then again, every character personality turned upside down in this game for some reason that still eludes me.

Yup. The game released in 1999, which was only a repurposed spin-off, had more substantial content than this 2020 release. I am still not over how you got to see more than half the city in the fucking demo. Hell, watching Boundary Break proves way more was planned, but got cut out for who knows what dumbass reason. Then there are the characters. Jill becoming a generic action movie chick doesn't need any more explanation, but others do. Brad getting infected by a random zombie and not killed by anenesis was fucking dumb. Nicolai not making even a token attempt to hide that he was a backstabbing asshole. God, Nicolai was even more of a one-dimensional than Chief Irons in RE2make. And naturally, there is Nemesis barely being a credible threat. God, what a disappointment.

its stil funny how the speed run of the remake is actualy about 5 min longer then the speedrun of the original implying that the original has an actualy shorter playtime. i agree that it would have been better if they didnt cut content but am happy with what we got.

Never played but didn't the original have also less hardware put into it

Yeah I had worries about this remake as soon as I heard that they were gonna release it barely one year after the Re2 remake, smelled like rushed development from a far

They also left out Mercenaries 🤦

Yeah I’d say Jills nightmare with Carlos in the hospital was the last part of it. Overall contained in the beginning cutscene and the hospital scene.

But Jill never had PTSD to being with, thats just a theory that some delusional person created when the first trailer for the remake came out. If she had PTSD she would never had formed BSAA with Chris, never would had went on her own missions or with a partner, because she would be a hinderance with her PTSD episodes. If anything, after RE1 she got even more determined and focused on her mission. A person with PTSD would never do that, thats the whole point of this disorder. That bathroom scene on the remake was just that, a nightmare. Something she just brushed off like anyone would do.

@@abnnizzy she had ptsd and nightmares, it’s in the novel

@@weepop8291 The novel isn't canon.

@@abnnizzy then just nightmares then connect the first and third game

you must have a poor family... cause re1make is fine dining.. re2 is fucking trash as a remake.

RE6 did that better than RE3 Remake.

@@DevaPein yes! 😎

@@TheRealSephiroth its a alright game dont get me wrong... but it just gets stroked off soo hard and im honestly sick of it..

@@DevaPein meh, i thought it was trash through and through so i enjoyed 3 cuz i went in expecting trash 😂

RE2R didn't just had some things cut. They literally changed the whole RE lore with that game. While it was a fun game, it should be treated like and "what if" scenario or different universe because of how much they changed. The same thing happened with RE3, but those changes was way more noticeable.

@@abnnizzy That's true. I guess the remake of 2 just paid homage to and kept true to the survival horror feeling of the original more than 3 paid to its own counterpart. R3make just gave up on the very thing that DEFINED the original: the feeling of being constantly stalked by the Nemesis.

@@abnnizzy i doesn't help that the main heads of the re2r development team, don't really hold the original game in hight regards either

@@dralakba-dusk31 Yeah, that was my biggest disappointment when the game was announced. Capcom didn't made that remake out of their love for the franchise, they only made it because some fans was making some kind of remake for it, so they didn't wanted to lose money, striked them with a cease and desist and made it themselves. The bitter truth is that in the hands of those fans, the franchise would've been given 100% more respect and love. And all the people praising RE2R as their lord and saviour isn't helping things either. It just sways capcom even more towards erasing the classics even more. Now that they made a new protagonist with 0 charisma or backstory, a character that doesn't even makes sense and shitting on the old ones, they're even adding werewolves into the mix out of nowhere. They're really hellbent on destroying the franchise.

Even if I have never experienced the original RE2 (which I actually felt was flawed, so this is not meant to worship it), I still would have been ticked off by the RE2 Remake’s broken/unfinished campaign structure, scarcity of default ambient music, and some traditional recurring enemies being absent. Rather than doing everything right, I would rather describe the RE2 Remake as “doing enough things right or better that it is still worthwhile, in spite of a few other things being cut or downgraded”.

I don't think they'll make a Director's Cut so soon, if ever. They didn't even gave us the original soundtrack like they gave us in RE2R.

What's crazy is that RE3make had a development of 3 years, idk what the hell they did in that time span

@@LeeEverett1 Considering how the final product ended up, I think they did and remade it a hundred times during those 3 years due to different opinions, thats why it feels rushed and out of focus, totally different from the classic. Its no secret that the director for both remakes didn't held the classic in high regards, so after getting some more control for RE3R he went full derp with it. I say derp because I can't even say ret,ar,d. Fuck you youtube.

What happened was that the RE3 remake was being developed along side the RE2 remake by a separate team hired by Capcom if I remember correctly. They were basically developing the game along side RE2 but had to wait for that game to finish up because that was the foundation needed for the project. So even if it had a dev time of 3 years it basically fully was in development after RE2 came out. It didn't get enough actual time to cook in the oven due to Capcoms deadline and remember, entirely different smaller team seprate from the main RE team. We know this because before even RE2 remake came out a leaker leaked that RE3 remake was also in development along side 2.

And it's not even as if you need a remake of Resi 4, still looks perfectly good on PC to me... Code Veronica is what should be given a remake if anything is..

Nail salon?

Capcom outsourced the game too. Clearly they thought people would just gobble it up because it said capcom

@@fillerbunnyninjashark271 When will companies learn that outsourcing your IPs is hardly ever a good thing?

"It's not ludonarrative dissonance; you just have to git gud, scrub" - CAPCOM, probably

Devil May Cry is the same way. The canon run is that Dante never gets hit and he gets SSS rank on everything, unless he's fighting someone like Vergil or Mundus.

@@doomzillaX25 Welllllll Dante did get hit by some low level demons (intentionally) in the Intro of DMC3 and against Beowulf

That's almost every game in a nutshell. Almost every videogame protagonist canonically never gets hurt. Assassin's Creed even plays on this topic. Every time you get hurt, you start to "desynchronize" because your character canonically shouldn't be getting hurt. It was a pretty clever mechanic at the time AC came around.

I think it was explained that the rate of infection from bites is actually really low

Nah you are just blinded by nostalgia. Mr. X was also scripted.He cant follow you in the sewers and scripted encounter in the lab. Much non existent after Claire run through.

@@casdomdomcas5214 oh no i know you mean i meant the re2 remake mr x

The remake is better than the og

@@casdomdomcas5214 To clarify, RE2Remake Mr.X was like classic RE3's Nemesis but just a bit better at that job. While RE3R's Nemesis is basically just Classic RE2's Mr. X, when people were hoping he would be RE2R's Mr.X but EVEN BETTER. Meaning, people hoped he'd be even LESS scripted and more intimidating. But the Approach they made for him, actually limited him so much that his impact in the game from a player's perspective is less than Mr. X's. So now people have more of an attachment to Mr. X than Nemesis as a character.

@@casdomdomcas5214 Look he was scripted and there was places he couuld not follow you or enter BUT: When he appears he stays on the RPD the entire time fucking you up, and untill you learn how to deal with him, he's a headache. Nemeses will ONLY appear in two small segments where he chases you and you have to be careful around him, and even so, it's easier to go around him. After that,e very single segment he appears is fully scripted. That's the difference. Mister X only fully scripted where you have no choice BUT to fight him, is at the end of the game, when he appears and you have no choice but to fight. So, what people want to say is: Nemesis is not as scare as Mr. X on RE2R because Mr. X do give you trouble and make you aware of him constantly while on RE3 after you go around nemeses, he won't show again. Of course, I love the OG Re3 and when you see they changed for the worse RE3R instead of sticking with the defining features, and when people break the bounds and you discover there's more places you can play but somehow they were cut for some reason you can see why Capcom didn't want this team on RE4R.

*My list of issues, big and small, would be similar to yours:* -Materials for crafting bullets and grenade launcher ammo are segregated, limiting players’ decision-making. -That subplot where Nemesis foils Jill’s escape at the clocktower, by shooting down the U.B.C.S. helicopter, is cut out and shoddily replaced with an RPD helicopter exploding for no reason at the beginning. -Almost no alternate costumes, and the figurines no longer have animations, for some reason. -You cannot immediately use recovery items if inventory is full, nor can you put down items to pick back up later, like in a few previous RE games. -The intro and ending is very dumbed down, especially for the opening battle scene. -There is a low quantity/variety of special items dropped by Nemesis and lack of an alternate shotgun to use. -No crows, spiders, Gravedigger larvae, and Brain Suckers (it could work better to have the new enemies be in addition to those four original enemies, rather than as a replacement). -Nemesis transforms into a feral beast way too early and skips over his damaged multi-tentacled human form, his actual final form becomes overkill as a result, and the adult Gravedigger(s) became absent (I would have liked the redesigned Hunter Gammas in addition to the Gravedigger, but not as a replacement for it). -Likewise, the expanded hospital and new warehouse/laboratory areas would have been fine to have, but not as a replacement for the clocktower interior, park interior, and most of the Dead Factory. -The Lickers, Zombie Dogs, Drain Deimos, and Hunter Gammas are underutilized. -No branching paths in the campaign (which could have even helped the remake have its cake and eat it too, such as how Brad dies, whether Jill/Carlos explores the RPD, etc.). -There is no penalty for using infinite ammo firearms on your campaign score, making a lot of of the other unlockable tools utterly obsolete, once you buy the infinite rocket launcher. -Some of the Nemesis forms' abilities and stats are not scaled well with the varying difficulties and how overpowered those frag grenades and explosive barrels are. -Little to no puzzles. -No Mercenaries Mode or new singleplayer bonus mode to adequately replace it. -Raccoon City’s uptown and downtown areas are far too linear and on-rails.

You sir, nailed in on the head. Cheers! ✌️

Or not putting the game with a B team while the A team worked on the village.

they stated they didnt want to make it all the same because then for them there was no point in a remake if it all looks the exact same.

@@Marcustheseer Doesn't make any sense considering how they did the remake for RE1 in 2002 which is the most faithful to the original. If they're going to remove every feature from the original as well as certain things in the story such as locations, enemies and puzzles then they have to compensate by adding other things to balance it out. There's no point in making a remake if you're not remaking it. I guess you can pass RE3 off as a re-imagining rather than a remake because a lot of story elements playout differently but even then it's still inferior.

@@BumDurge Ive heard that theory too. Thing is though, they would have to have been bitten to prove thats the case. And theres no evidence of any character having been bitten nor mention of a bite from any of the characters. Bottom line is, if it were up to our individual gameplay experience, none of the characters would have lived to see a sequel lol.

But thats not how the T-Virus works. This thing about how a person turns into zombies by only a bite or a scratch is something that horrible RE movie came up with and all the other pop culture zombie movies. Umbrella wanted a virus that had to be highly-contagious to the point of infecting an entire target population and guarantee a 100% mortality rate, but such thing was impossible because if it was this contagious and lethal, it would kill the subjects too fast and would stop further spread of the virus. So, they designed the T-Virus in a way that it wouldn't kill the subject with a single wound so it would propagate further and mutating when the subject experience organs failure and/or severe brain damage. In other words, a person only turns into a zombie if he dies, turning back to "life" to continue spreading the virus, leading to murderous aggression and an obsessive hunger to the state of cannibalism. Of course, there is also something called "viral load", which means that if someone gets a huge load of the virus he would die from it, but it had to be injected directly and not through saliva or a break in the skin. Jill got this viral load when Nemesis injected her directly with his parasite. And there is also a mention of this on the Outbreak Files #1/#2. While Umbrella discovered that a statistical 10% of any population is naturally immune, there is no way to know who is and who isn't because of the fact that a person only turns into zombies when they die. Thats why Umbrella made the Hunters, to kill the survivors because they don't know who is immune and who isn't. It was faster than making a strain of the virus with 0% immunity. Also, in RE5, Wesker controlled Jill through the T-Virus still present in her system. It was just supressed because of the vaccine Carlos injected her. This means that Jill was infected and if she had died before getting the vaccine, she would turn into a zombie, so she wasn't immune. So, yes, they can get bitten and still survive the virus if their wounds get treated immediately and they don't experience any kinda of shock, like heart faillure or blood loss.

@@abnnizzy T virus zombies aren't dead, the T virus is incapable of reanimating dead tissue. It causes brain damage and necrosis but they aren't actually dead.

​@@BerryNiceToMeetYou They aren't dead because they continue living after the host of the virus dies. The zombies lack a pulse and their respiratory and cardiovascular systems are shut down due to the death of the host, but they continue living even though they're completely, objectively dead. The final mitosis will only occur when the host suffer organs failure, meaning, again, that they died. The virus won't activate this state of living dead if the host suffers brain damage, but the virus itself will cause brain damage when it turns the host into a zombie.

Yeah, but don't the herbs contain a viral-killing property? Could explain why players don't get infected after being bitten.

Re3 was very much a action game like dino crisis 2. They wanted you to run and gun😆

@@fillerbunnyninjashark271 Having finished beating Dino Crisis 2 recently, I found the movement to be quicker compared to RE3 Nemesis. It also helped that you could move & shoot at the same time. RE3 Remake action wise it was good, but I find RE4, RE5 & RE6 better in the action department.

@@doranmitchell1700 pretty sure dino crisis 2 came out after. It was a natural revolution of what was started there. Too bad dino crisis 3 was trash

@@fillerbunnyninjashark271 Lol, I kind of want to play Dino Crisis 3 but I don't have an Xbox. That's the one that takes place in space right?

@@doranmitchell1700 yuurp 😆

Its interesting that these remakes have swapped the iconic aspects of Nemesis vs. Mr. X in gaming publics eyes. Basically, when the originals came out, Nemesis overshadowed Mr. X entirely and became such an iconic part of RE where even people on the outside were aware of him, and he got guest appearances all over too. Now with the remakes, especially when so many people got into the series through these games, Mr. X will be living that legacy from now on. He will be the one everybody remembers, he will be the one that fans will want to see as cameos in games like the Capcom VS. series. There will be some who still have atttachment to Nemmy, but Mr. X is now the Tyrant king.

Yeah they fucked up the difficulty

Yea thats why Nightmare is way better, it takes like two or three grenades to down him there, its sad that the best way to play the game has to be unlocked after beating it first

It was over far to quicker resident evil Village is a lot better hopefully

have you ever played the game on nightmare or inferno,nemmy is allot more scary then and faster.

Adding a bunch of missing areas and gameplay elements isn’t ‘easy’ lmao

Yes, that’s how you build tension and suspense. Did well for nemesis to make him an intimidating enemy

Not to mention Brad giving you a cryptic warning in J's Bar about some unstoppable monster killing STARS members. That shit got you paranoid because you knew sooner or later, it would be coming for you. The buildup in the classic was amazing.

@@artemis1993 yeah and the discussion with brad in the remake feels like he’s brushing nemesis off it’s terrible, expanding the apartment sounds cool if done right but no it’s nemesis’s introduction.

Brad in the original:"I'm literally getting hunted down by an overpowered monster assassin/one man army!" Brad in the remake:"Lol, Zombies."

not really i just don’t find the re2 to be as good as people say either, So many of the faults re2 made is more apperant in re3, But at least re3 had a run and dodge which i felt i really could have used that in re2 when mr x came and leon is almost just walking away from him

The irony is, I liked Sasha's Jill fine. It's the game itself that irks me.

I like that comparison, I've never thought of them like that

Very interesting comparisons for sure

So true, it was scary playing as an unfully trained Claire & Leon.

Leon and Claire weren't really rookies.... Leon has police training so he somewhat has some sort of knowledge on how to survive an event like Raccoon City even though it was supposed to be his first day. Claire's brother is Chris Redfield who was a Stars member of the police force so I'm sure she learned A LOT from him as well which is why she survived the outbreak.

@@Multifacted_Brotha you are correct. Claire mentions it in Darkside Chronicles.

Canonically, they never get bitten, but i personally prefer the first explanation.

Hunter Betas.. Fuck. Hunter. Betas.

I prefer the day stages more. The sense of speed you get with it was just amazing and I think it is kinda a standard on how sonic should be imo

@@afrofishog I personally think Eggmanland day PS2 was worth all the needless night stages that version had

Are you serious? The warehog is garbage, there should be no debate about this.

@@VincenzoMGREX it isn't though.

@@scumfuq4104 ok then, do you want to see it again in potential future installment?

Capcom didn't make 3make

My bad... 😂 after I guess. Man... you were you wrong to do that in the end of video 😂😂😂. Those horns tho...

Facts. I bought re3 remake day one. Can't tell you how disappointed I was that there's no build up to the nemesis and,all the cut content like the dead factory, park and clock tower (the removal of the clocktower pissed me off the most) It's not horrible but, it definitely wasn't worth $60 bucks. I'd advise people to play it if it was $30 or less

Yeah and doesn't Jill get poisond by nemesis and had to be cured before she died?

Except they're not because Jill gets infected by the same virus she's supposedly immune to. All in all, it's RE's shitty world building rearing its ugly head

@@pimpjuice192 Touchè. I sort of believed Nemesis had a stronger version of the virus... I... guess? lol

@@557deadpool True that.

@@razielvalentine4076 Same with me. I always assumed RE protagonists are extraordinarily immune, and Nemesis was an exception because he had a different, rarer strain of the virus. I am no virologist, so this probably doesn't make much sense, but it's works good enough to suspend my disbelief lol

One thing that is disputable, though, is the number of enemy types... Although the RE3 Remake left out the Brain Suckers, Sliding Worms, Infected Crows, and Giant Spiders, it added in Lickers, Pale Heads, and Nemesis Parasites. Plus, the Hunter Gammas in original RE3 were barely more than a re-skin of the Hunter Betas with a different kill animation, while the remade Gammas behaved like a unique new enemy. So speaking strictly in terms of the roster, the remake cut four enemies, but at least added four new enemies, which is more than what I can say about how RE2 Remake cut enemy types. However, it still fails to live up to RE1 Remake, which both retained all of the old monsters and added new ones. For me, the biggest problem is how half of RE3 Remake’s enemies are barely in the whole game. Meanwhile, the original RE3 gave the zombies, zombie dogs, crows, Drain Deimos, Brainsuckers, sliding worms, and Hunters all prominent time to shine, with the spiders being the only enemy that felt limited to a select few rooms. It helps too that Mercenaries mode and the campaign randomization allowed more occasions for certain enemies to appear.

@@markcobuzzi826 Plus forgot about the decision making and taking certain routes that can change enemy locations as well some item locations.

So a glorified health bar

I think its just that they still have "safe" areas in the game that he can't go into so the player isn't too overwhelmed. However he does go into 1 of the Save Rooms, so perhaps the toy store is "conditioning" the player to assume that Nemesis plays by the rules, so that him going into a "safe" area later would be more surprising. But that's just a guess.

@@GBDupreeAlso, considering how quick this came out, it's possible that the room is to small for him to do his animations properly and they didn't want to make more. They should have made it a save room, at least it would have made sense or no put a window there.

I mean 2 had multiple playthoughs where you play as different characters and the b-sides (or whatever they are called) which adds replay value and makes the game feel longer while re3 is a game that is only worth playing once.

@@tombstonepizza2299 RE2 is longer and has more content however by resident evil standards RE3 remake is about as long as any other RE game. I honestly think the only RE that felt long was RE6.

I say its too short because even on my first playthrough I beat it in roughly 3 1/2 hrs. It felt unfulfilling as hell and ended way too quickly for me. Most other RE's are about twice as long as that on first playthroughs.

Yeah that's a valid point. I mean technically it's roughly the same length as alot of other RE games taking about 3-5 hours. However the shorter RE games always had great replay value. I constantly replay Remake, 0, 2, 3, Re2make. However RE3make, I have no desire to play that game again any time soon. I liked the game, but the way it's designed, doesn't offer anything for repeat playthroughs. In that sense the game is short...

It likely has to do with 2 factors: 1. 2 remake had a few areas removed from the original, but still felt okay in length, though people hoped it'd be longer, but replayability helped it a lot. HOWEVER, 3 is not only shorter than 2, but also cuts out a lot more from the original than 2 did. Making it seem noticeably shorter by direct comparison to a game that already felt short AND has no side content at all. 2. The game design itself makes it feel shorter. since the game has so many setpieces and linear design that constantly pushes you forward. This means that even on your first playthrough, you will be coasting through the game at the same pace you would play through 2 on your 5th playthrough, and the game rarely if ever allows you to just explore at your own pace. its much more linear too making replays more same-y and then you start noticing other parts of the game that are lacking that way. For instance, the more you replay it, the more you notice the majority of your time isn't playing the actual game, but playing set pieces. So more of your time is wasted not playing the game. So in your mind, when you only think of the gameplay sequences, and remove the setpieces, the game is even shorter. So basically, the game is already "only" 1 hour shorter than 2, yet the percentage playing it as an RE game versus playing it as an Uncharted game is significantly less. So if you think about it, its more like 2 hours shorter than 2, and its only a 2 and a half hour game. That's short enough to be 10 or 20$ DLC for most people.

Same, I enjoyed it quite a bit. Sure, could have been better but by no means would I call it a bad game.

play inferno problem solved.

@@casdomdomcas5214 only problem with Inferno is the very last boss. Doable for sure, just seemed kind of cheap. I played through the game quite a few times ramping up the difficulty on sequencial playthroughs. Had a good time with it through and through, regardless of my nitpicks and frustrations.

is re3 a good game? yes is it a good remake? hell no making a game short doesn't hurt it I love games like little nightmares which are very short however the price is a problem paying 60 bucks for a 3 hour experience isn't really a good thing

That was something I thought was weird. The trophy/achievement has Jill’s model attached to it, for a game that wouldn’t release for another year. That makes sense.

Thanks for watching! I’m glad you liked the video. I thought your RE3make video was really good as well.

I hope I’m not the only person who thinks the Jak 3 ost is really underrated.

@@JsReviews I've been watching so many Jak videos lately I thought I was just going mad

Play resident evil 4 1st before you play the other games

If you want to be scared, try the 2 remake. It got me pretty good.

@@schemar17 okay thanks for the tip.

big facts

I've beaten original PS1 RE3 over 20 times in my life.... still haven't bought RE3make.

With neat little Easter eggs and call backs to the originals in the environment MTWO sprinkled out the city, but capcom had a list of things not to make a reappearance in the remake, for the sake of their “reimagining” story line. Fortunate enough to not have CVX or outbreak remade anytime soon or at all

@@weepop8291 Outbreak's my favorite, I hope they don't touch it. Unless they're gonna give it the time it truly deserves.

It’s not THAT bad lol. I’d much rather play through RE3make than RE6 any day.

@@lindblumpickles3407 yeah re3r is so much more enjoyable than re6 will ever be lol although it is a bad substitute for the original

@@goodnightale agreed!

Yeah. It's a fun game even if its not amazing. Very disappointing but it's much more enjoyable than RE6 and even RE5 in my opinion.

For all of this game's flaws, I don't think it's anywhere near as bad as RE6.