Alex Cheung noice

Hahahahahahahahahaha! Good one!

U r so damn underrated!

Mine is only 720p

What is it now

( ͡°( ͡° ͜ʖ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ʖ ͡°) ͡°)

Its so fat, long and beefy and you want it so much that you can't control yourself xD

Same meaning.

ali abdallah Diction is important here. The first part, "Just a number", is explicitly exclusive meaning it (resolution) can only be interpreted as a number, while the second part "It's a number" does not necessarily imply that it can only be a number but that it may also be interpreted as other things as well. So to be more accurate, no it does not hold the same meaning.

Gintoki Sakata thanks for that

Gintoki Sakata actually if you actually read the paragraph, in the context they used it in it DOES have the same meaning. WHEN will people learn that the words people use are only 10% of the information and 90% of the information in what people say is in the way they combine those words ie the context???

megaspeed2v2 EXACTLY. This is a textbook case of every argument on the internet.

aaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

-You're once again one of these stupid fucks who can't understand what they read.- -So: We can see past 24 FPS. We can see, how much fluid movement can be with more FPS on Screen. There must be a limit somewhere, but its not really measured by FPS, biologically speaking.- -The special thing about 24 FPS is, that from there we see movements STARTING TO BE FLUID instead of having a diashow of pictures, when you go below 24 FPS. And it's only being used for filmmaking too.- -Also: There is a huge difference between filmmaking and games (With filmmaking, through the motion blur we see 24FPS being fluid, it has to do with the actual technic from cameras. While motion blur for games is just a cheap effect that does provide as good as nothing). Linus explained it here very well. Check out the TechQuickie channel, it's one of his newest videos "refresh rates explained".- -So you can turn from being a stupid fuck to somewhat more intelligent human.- -PEACE!- *I just... fell into your trap. OMG. I'm rather stupid. **-.-* *"lol :D jk" ... Some small little characters under a text can change everything. Lol.*

Luniii737 haha lol how long did it take you to right that? :D

So you didn't go to see The Hobbit in HFR(I think that's how it's called) in the Cinema. :P

PompiTube well no i didn't....but read the last two letters :D

>not playing the original Mario kart on a PC using a emulator and a ps3 controller.

***** ssshhh keep your voice down. You don't want them finding out about this.

***** >using greentext on youtube

***** touché

>

Rip

Would be interesting for some, but here is the short version: Displayport>HDMI>DVI>VGA This is mostly based on their bandwidth, and therefore their capable resolution and refresh rate

Christoffer Nørskov surely dvi is better than hdmi as hdmi can only (atm) produce 4k at 30fps whereas dvi at 4k is 60?

Alex Sweet en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvi WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ 33 Hz HDMI also has audio and CEC

Just adding info: VGA is analog while HDMI and DVI are digital. Meaning, any VGA to HDMI or to DVI adapters are useless because of that difference.

Th3Fizzle Unless you get an active adapter. DVI also has an analog option, that's why you can find both HDMI-DVI converters and DVI-VGA converters (the two don't work with each others). DVI has both digital and analog lanes

That's merely a "lesser of two evils" choice.

Why would devs give a shit about you? Also why should you give a shit about them?

Play on pc and you will have graphics settings

SeriousPain yor kiddin right? All my games hit over 100fps. Even when console ported game has fps locked at 30 I go into the game file settings and turn smoothing factor to false and boom fps unlocked. Mobile games? What mobile games. No such thing. Yes I can play angry birds is 1080p no prob.

ali abdallah Because we are the end users and it is for us they develop their games. I give a shit because I buy and play their games. Your point makes no sense.

720p is awful, 30 fps is awful, if you want to eliminate them both, you have to make the graphics awful. There is no way to win when the consoles are so slow

i really don't understand why console games don't have an options menu for me to choose if i want high resolution or high fps

imo 720p 60fps is better than 1080p 30fps.

Th3Fizzle and i wouldn't want either, if i cant have it at 1080p and 60+ fps, i turn down the graphics a bit (or buy a new card) because anything under just lessens the experience too much

um, no. at 720p I can't see what's coming towards me and that of course is a huge impact. I'd rather lower quality and keep the resolution higher, while still remaining decent fps.

i wish 4k was known as 2160p lol

Maybe cause of marketing reasons.

2k resolution is more of a film production term. It comes from scanning 35mm film, which yields a resolution of 2048x1556. This image is then either cropped or compressed down to a widescreen 16x9 or wider format for broadcast. In broadcast the standard is 16x9: 1080p or 720p.

1080p = full hd, 1440p = 2x full hd, 2160p = 4x full ha

4k has four times the pixels than 1080p. 2k has douple the pixels than 1080p. so 1080p can't be 2k.

That blur is the result of a highly optimised low sample rate anti-alising filter. Possibly the equivilent of 2x MSAA/AMAA (Adaptive). Its still there at 1080p but you have literally increased the pixel sample density by a third so it looks much more seemless.

William Hendick The problem is that 1080p without aa still looks better than 720p with aa. Why they prefer to use their processing power on aa instead of pixel count is a mistery.

Cicciter If the game renders below 720p, you would prefer AA to the extra resolution.

Jake Surname no, aa is fake resolution. having the game at native (not upscaled) 1080p is always better.

I am a computer engineer, thankyou.

I think you're misunderstanding what Shutterestock does. Those images can be used commercially without paying any royalties. That's the benefit.

I love Linus's subtleness when he was clearly pissed off about paying for it.

Scary Orange Royalty free images and yet still demands payment. Yeah, it's a ripoff.

***** it's a scam because there isn't another choice. like sure if you get royalty free images that would be nice. but that's not how business works.

***** What? Do you know what stock photography is? The photographers take general "stock photos" that can be used by a wide variety of businesses. The photographers are payed by Shutter Stock for their photos. Shutter Stock charges businesses a fee in order to use these photos in websites, advertisements, etc. Businesses can't just go on google images and take random photos for advertisements lol. Nobody is going to take royalty free photos for free, photography is very expensive and isn't as simple as it seems.

Nope price is a word

Bruce Wayne nope, price is far more than just a word.

Linus already said basically the SAME thing as your second sentence with his explaination(s) @ 3:15 through 3:25. There is no " getting LESS than the weakest link" . That's why it is CALLED the WEAKEST link. -_-.

Raymond Tyson Nope. He didn't make the point I did and someone unfamiliar with the concept would definitely not guess it unless someone says it. Linus almost certainly knows what I'm talking about, but he never states it explicitly.

DarKMaTTeR *facepalm*. Kid. you don't have a clue what you're even talking about. Get off the net and stop wasting conversational space. You're talking YOURSELF in circles now. lol.

Raymond Tyson It's not my problem that you don't get it. Moving on indeed.

DarKMaTTeR I"m not your mirror either kid. It's not my problem you broke all of yours with your stupidity. I'm ignoring you now. Cry more. Flame on. Enjoy

Maybe the editor just did it for fun

Neon Blade I've noticed him talk about ponies and such in other videos too. Also, he has talk about it on the forum. I'm pretty confident he is a brony.

***** Hinting towards Lengends of Equestria!

some pictures on google images are copyrighted.

I think there are options for filtering out copyrighted images.

+arkadiem No, they dont. They dont care what is what, you could be looking for "The Fourth Wall" and you can find ponies FCOL.

You are just a number.

Ron Calara Most movies record at 24 frames per second (peasants) if that's what you're referring to.

Honestly, I'd prefer 30fps 1080p for cutscenes and cinematics. But for actual gameplay, anything higher than 50fps is recommended.

If you're saying to yourself... "Dude, it's high time I had quit BO and stop trading with the markets!" then listen to me. At one point, I would've said the exact same thing. Really. But then one day, a mentor who offered me a similar chance to the one I'm offering you today said to me... "Barry... Isn't that the reason you're here? To make a change in your life so that you CAN afford to do what you want to do?" - and in that moment, I knew I had to remain focus and make this work. So I did and today I finally have a dedicated style of trading, which has earned me so much profits I never would've imagined of. So I say to you... Isn't this the reason you're here? To make some REAL money? Well, you need a very small investment to make that change in your life. If you are still seeking for help to succeed, feel free to contact me with my Skype name: mr-barry101, Email: barry101102@gmail.com

+Assasinpiggles You shouldn't underestimate the movie producers. They have a higher budget than you can ever acquire in life. They can record 4k or even 8k if they wanted to, but there is no reason for that because the world still does not fully support such high resolution, so they stick to the standard worldwide 1080p for convenience. They record the movies at 60fps or even higher btw, its available on blu-ray, they just limit it at 30fps to give the movie a cinematic feel.

TrixD Ah, well most movies before real recently (even Hunger Games) were recorded in 24 FPS

This video is 1080p.

On my 1440p monitor, 720p is unbearable. I think if you run the reselution at less than half of what your monitor supports, it becomes much worse. 720p wasn't so bad on my 768 x 1333 laptop.

laptop screen is too small to notice anything other than a small contrast improvement, on a big tv or monitor, you can definitively see the difference, also on pc you play shitdogs at 1080p @60fps on most configuration, while on ps4 is 900p@ 30fps ...to play at 60fps they should lower the gfx at ps3 level.

Their camera records in 4K, they just downsample it to 1080p and KZfaq does the rest.

it has 1080p option for me

I didn't get it..

Malinda Alahakoon hes one of the few legitimate game reviewers on KZfaq AND a massive resolution and graphics buff. Check out his channels TotalBuiscuit and CynicalBrit. hilarious!

:D

Malinda Alahakoon Just don't get him started on FOV. He loooooves his FOV.

Mohd. Hakim Bin Abdul Rani What about console ported menus? HAHA! he eats that shit for breakfast!

Not true, you can absolutely see the difference of a 1080p and 900p screen at normal monitor distances. Sure a lot is marketing but in the pc perspective resolution is not maxed out.

This is the modern age mate, things and times are changing. 1080p looks terrible on a 50" tv when you are close like super bad but from a good distance looks fine. Right now im using my 32" TV for a monitor for my pc and its native res is 1360 x 768, low reso but looks pretty good at the distance i am away from it and all games look and run sharp. You wouldnt want resolutions just not to get better would you? Big resolutions arent just marketing it has been used in photography for years even before 1080 and 4k resolutions were a reasonable priced option, For example a 8Mp camera commonly found on phones is double the resolution of 1080, and a 14 mp camera found on some photos are more than 4k. 1080p is the current standard for most things these days be it monitors, tvs, and even phones to an extent. The next viable standard within a few years will be 4k as the prices drop and hardware available to run 4k displays are cheaper. I dont know what i was trying to achieve when i made this comment, just remember we live in a ever evolving time were technology is growing by the day lol. Sorry for rambling on XD

That's a heap of bullshit in my opinion. How often do you turn on different AA settings in games because edges of objects with high contrast really are jagged. He explained this in the AA as fast as possible video. Also, you clearly didn't hear what he said about display size (DISTANCE matters a lot) a 1080p screen on a phone (5") is not overkill, since you are looking at it very closely. Such a high pixel density eliminated the need for any anti-aliasing to be done to make edges look smooth, since you cant perceive any pixels. On a 50" display you are sitting much farther away (normally) so 1080p would still fit well there. On a 24-30" screen you sit a little closer than a TV, so you need the extra density (and honestly, 1080p on a 24-30 inch is just nowhere near enough for a truly satisfying experience, so AA is still used at those resolutions). Upping the resolutions has never been about selling more stuff, it's been about increasing the usability of the display. Even when 8k rolls around, there would still be tangible benefits to using that over 4k.

are you blind or do you need glasses or are you wearing glasses? if you want 1080P on a 19" monitor you can have it cause they make them. And yes, for us normal people with good eye site and as for me I can defiantly see the difference from a crappy res to a good one. Yeah 1080P is a bit ridiculous on a smart phone but for any monitor over 17" should be at least 1080P or 1080 144HZ.

Eric Marcus I would argue that 1080p is fine for a 5" smartphone. I have tried everything from 1080p, 720p, 480p and below, and i must say, every step up does make a tangible difference. You plain and simply don't get the same smoothness of edges (especially text) on a 720p phone as you do on a 1080p phone. I might argue that 1440p on a phone might be ridiculous, but i haven't tried it, so i wouldn't know

You are the reason why sometimes I hate being a PC gamer.

Come on now. Console mgamers aren't the enemy, console gaming is.

InsaneDweller Better don't look for morons in other parts of your existence, might eventually make you put an end to it, my dear.

Peter Lustig What are you talking about?

InsaneDweller this is the reason why i hate myself too lmfaooooooooooooooo

Say "HEY" to P. W. for me, ok?

P.W?

P. W. Botha! ugh

uhm ok

I feel you. Canada doesn't have the best internet in most places and if we do it can be pricey with bandwidth caps depending on the ISP

+Skysper 2033 Here! (spoiler, trump becomes the next hitler)

+FalconPlaysMinecraft aaaaaiht

I'm in 2050 watching this in over 9000k

+Sean .Lyons iPhones in 2050 will still have QHD screens

ye

The last one was already used at the PS3 launch.