The reason you're getting these results is because you need to shoot with a faster shutter. It wont look perfect but it will be definitely better. I recommend shooting at or over 1/1000 shutter for 120 fps recording that you would slow down to 10% to turn into 1200 FPS. I did it and the results were great. You also have a point on these softwares not having enough data to train on at the time you posted this video. I just learned about this last week and I've had some nice results so far.

You’ve been using Resolve for a long time now. You’ve got to be one of the top experts for it on KZfaq!

The future applications of the tech are really cool. Thanks for showing me more stuff I didn't know.

This can be very effective, the golf swing is an extreme case which doesnt have enough info to work with, optical flow uses motion analysis to drive the morphing between frames. The technology is over a decade old. What can help is using multiple passes 1/2 speed then 1/2 speed again etc.

This is AWESOME LOL. Hi Dave nice to see you putting out great videos. AWESOME! LOL

I couldn't agree more with you

Optical flow + speed warp is game changer in DR, quiete heavy on a weak machine. It will best give you results when you shoot actual slo mo. You can reduce 60fp to 20% without the footage ghosting using Optical flow and warp. Great tutorial

Also shooting with a fast shutter like 90° or 45° can help👍

So... What happens when you speed down a footage with audio, like a person playing a guitar solo, for example... Does it pitch correct it? Does that pitch correction works fine? Does the sound gets stuttered and artificial? What audio definitions should I use for best results? 96.000kHz maybe, so you have enough audio room to speed that down (just like it happens when you shot on 120fps)? There are A LOT of music teachers who would LOVE to know how to do that effectively!

"Traditional" optical flow methods analyze the actual pixels of the frame. By using some frames before and after, the software tries to guess the direction that the pixels are moving. With a combination of blending color values and moving pixels around according to these vectors, it's able to generate new frames to insert inbetween what already exists, thus creating a slow motion shot. This new neural engine is likely being trained on a data set of images to be able to actually "recognize" the things in the scene. So instead of a bunch of pixels moving around, it can recognize a golfer, trees, a person on a bicycle, etc. In theory, using this understanding, it will be able to produce smarter, better looking inbetween frames, and thus more convincing slow motion. You can tell it already looks better than optical flow, even in these early stages. It's not there yet, but it will be soon.

We can always count on you Dave for such interesting content! I, for one, think self driving autos is a bad idea in an already litigious society. thank you for educating us on Neural Nets.

Hi Dave, flowing water was always a challenge with early cgi, so I guess that's what we are seeing with BM's neural network. Early days, as you said. BobUK.

It is funny to see how really everyone in the proffesional world is moving away from premiere to resolve. Even the production company I work at quit the adobe subscribtion and bought some davinci resolve licenses.

twixtore will still give you the best results for those kind of scenarios. but its great to see resolve getting better and better, even in those aspects. I think it's finally time for me to switch from premeire to resolve.

Miracles don't exist. If you want good quality slow motion, you have to think it in advance and shoot for it.

isn't it better to record in higher FPS (120,240) and then slow it down? i did it with my phone at 240 FPS and put in free version of DR and its creamy smooth slow mo.

Well done. Respect. BM's fans will eat you soon :) Cheers

The is no neural processing here just morphing between frames, Ive been using similar technology for years with Autodesk Flame and the results are the same. Sometimes it works great sometimes it doesn't.

Dave, any thoughts on creating a video series on switching from Premiere to Resolve? I am on the fence, sick of Premiere and the crashes, but I have too many projects in the works to leave premiere. Any suggestions or good channels you would recommend for tutorials?

What about like 60% or 80%?, 40 is a stretch for sure.

I had no idea SW was a thing

wow it actually looks like your using a monopod Dave...

Hello Dave, im using also the studio version beta 6 now, are you having troubles playing back clips with NR applied and white balance? with beta 5 it was running smoothly for me. I might missing something

been 2 years almost, not much different

Twixtor Pro plugin for Premiere is better than all you show in here, cya!

very interesting info sir but still not decided yet to switch over from Pr

Your swing is terrible... do something about the movement with the left leg ;)