I felt like I needed to respond, defend my channel and speak about the toxicity, high standards and the negativity in the gaming space. LIKE and SUBSCRIBE with NOTIFICATIONS ON if you enjoyed the video! 👍 💪BECOME A MEMBER OF THE CHANNEL - kzfaq.infojoin 👕 PICK UP A T-SHIRT & MOUSEPAD: ttkapparel.com

I tend to give Blue a bit of a pass because it seems like he is genuinely excited about whatever it is he is talking about. Granted, that's the same reason I don't pay much attention to him for news or upcoming stuff. His optimism borderlines on naïve. And I don't say that with any offense intended. It just seems like every game he talks about is just this ground breaking genre changing affair. I think he tends to look at the potential of something, rather than what is currently presented. That can be a problem for consumers who take his thoughts seriously and buy in on whatever it is he is going in on. Again, I think Blue is a genuinely good dude, just very excitable.

Gamers have a problem distinguishing a game that’s bad, and a game that’s just not for them. A game can be great, but that doesn’t mean everyone will like it. I’ve got mid standards, not too high or low, as long as I can have fun and escape real life stress, it’s good enough for me.

" a game that's 95% assets goes into early access, and claim they're going to develop it further when they haven't proven they can develop anything, because nothing is original" That was a bar. So damn true

The problem with indie devs is a lot of them over promise, over hype, and don't deliver

The problem is the tactical shooter market is so oversaturated now that you really have to make a game innovate in order to stand out and if it doesn’t (or if it’s subpar), people will just look the other way or criticize it. In other words, your product has to be able to survive in an extremely competitive environment.

I have to wonder what kind of content the two of you could do if you collaborate!

Blue is a bit of a goof with the click-bait and stuff but hes a good dude overall. His sins are so minor and he does actually put his money where his mouth is with the development of harsh doorstop he is actually trying to make a difference with a new product I respect that alot.

I think so much of the problem with indie games is that they seem to so often over promise and talk about stuff they want their game to do but still haven't implemented or even figured out how to actually implement it at all. Also the constant use of corporate marketing speak is mind numbing

Yes, bluedrake could be wrong, he can do things that really annoy us like: clickbaits and the fact that protect games that look awful. But in my opinion he only does it because he sees a future in the game industry and that's good, he's an optimist and he's a game creator, people these days should think about that too. I think that's why he was so upset by the bad comments behind about the game.

I’m so glad you covered Ground Branch a while back, because of your channel I found my favorite current tactical FPS and even though it does still need a lot of work, I’m so excited for everything they have planned. Even the current state is fun

Imagine that, people can disagree and still be friends and act like adults?!?! Good stuff, need more examples of this online. Would love collab videos from you two!

You are the Yin and Bluedrake is the Yang, both are needed to keep the industry moving forward, we need heavy criticism and we need incentive. I'd rather watch you roast a game but everyone has their taste. keep the bangers coming bro

The biggest issue I see is that people hold games up to the same standard across the board, regardless of price. They'll hold a $15 dollar game up to what they'd expect quality wise out of a $60 game. Then, the same groups of people will shit on the $15 game, then spend $100 on a regurgitated yearly release. We need to stop looking at the developers at this point, and begin looking at the gaming community itself. We did this to ourselves. Indie developers are beat to shit for having a game that might be buggy on a early access, but then we sit and buy new releases from big name publishers that had hundreds of developers with millions of dollars of funds to develop and it releases with bugs galore, or completely misses what was promised. Black One Blood Brothers seems like a game that is worth it's $18 asking price. Was Ready or Not when it first was released? One of your first videos for Ready or Not from 2 years ago had a comments with high vote count that was "literally an early access game with a good trailer..." and "I'm convinced this game is just an elaborate prank, who in their right mind would release a game in this state to the public" So why are we now holding Ready or Not up on a pedestal, while looking at Black One and not going "Has it improved?"

10:40 mathchief does the same with overhyping games with little substance until I called him out on that "the day before game." I'm glad he toned it down but he still does it. 12:40 that's why I sub to you. Bc you call it how it is! Nobody should be excited about an UE5 simulated gameplay teaser. You even made a mock metaverse trailer in UE5 that looked good. Game devs think they can scam us again after Battlefield and cyberpunk.

I’m so glad both your and BD’s video were made because I agree with both of you. I do think sometimes BD is too excited and easy on some games and I think you bigfry are sometimes Tom hard on some games but I also agree with both of you. I think the big problem is too many people go to the extreme and won’t recognize anything but their exact point of view. And that’s where all the problems stem from. Great video glad you talked about all this

12:10 **"When I look at this project and I look at what were seeing on screen, its somebody walking though a nice looking environment with some backpack physics."** This is hilarious because most of the time these are the types of games Bluedrake is trying to hype up. Just concepts of what could be, but what not really is.

Game criticism awards: 1. Bigfrytv 2. The Act Man 3. Bluedrake42 We need all of them!!

I love that you actually make sense its why I keep watching, you are an actual honest person when it comes to gaming so thank you for that!

I think you said it best Fry, most of the comment section are babies. They’ll back a popular opinion, but crucify you for the unpopular ones. Huge respect to those who can actively disagree with each other and STILL have a civil fucking conversation.

Dont change your style, Bigfry. Keep roasting shitty games, I love it and love your channel bc you are realistic...

I think Bluedrake tends to project his vision onto games. As a hobbyist game dev myself, I can understand. He sees a game with even a sliver of potential and starts to think of tangible ways to improve it and this tends to obscure the reality in front of him. The problem is that even if there's potential, 90% of these games are made by unexperienced people who don't follow proper software development paradigms, so the whole development process is compromised and the game ends up being an unsalvageable mess, so devs end up in a dead end and have to either give up or start from scratch. But hey, I like his optimism. The fact that he boosts indie games he believes have potential is great and he knows his audience is smart enough not to support something just because he endorses it.

Just recently found your channel BigFry, I love your viewpoints, and as an aspiring indie developer myself, I really appreciate your videos from a critical standpoint. Its helpful to see the mistakes of others and just hear the thoughts of someone with good analytical thinking about games and the industry as a whole! Keep it up bro!

Its adorable watching grown men argue about video games for the attention of strangers.

Bluedrake is a pretty textbook definition of throwing shit at the wall hoping it sticks. But I think he has good intentions

The gaming community as a whole is in both a disconnect and contradiction combined. We ALL can agree that gaming is at an all time entertainment low and the games themselves are just mediocre. But as soon as someone like you, Drake, Abel, Riot say anything bad or good about a game and someone has a differing opinion from yours, you're called every name under the sun, threatened, etc. it's absolute bullshit how no one can just agree to disagree or even have a civil debate about differing opinions. WE as the gaming community are our worst enemies. Loved the vid as always brother

Maybe gamer expectations wouldn't be as high if every one of his videos didn't have the title, "This is the Best Game I Have Ever Played!"

This is how internet discussions should be. I love this. I love Blues enthusiasm, and I love your bitterness, because you're both right. And this is such a grounded response. No anger at blue, just a statement of "agree to disagree" and still being friends after. Wild. So refreshing, the whole thing.

Tbh I mainly watch you to see you roast games but it's quite clear you give props where it's deserved. Keep up the good work mate

“Hot goss” Lmao

I feel like this is a big issue of not being able to divorce yourself from your enjoyment of something when talking about it's quality. People are free to enjoy whatever the heck they want, I like plenty of not so good games, but you need to realize this. after seeing a few clips from the game you guys are talking about, it looks bad. If you're a studio and you don't have the resources to make something good maybe scale it down. There's quality out there to compare to, and if you can't live up to that quality if you're one dev living in your basement working in a 10 year old computer, you need to scale it down. Quality isn't subjective, if an amateur chef serves you a shit quality burger it's still a shit quality burger independently of the person who made it and the hurdles they had.

This is the trouble with all social media (KZfaq included) now. It's impossible to have an opinion about anything without being attacked for it. Civil discussion or debate is such a rarity. It's anonymous people feeling safe to attack another person for simply having a different opinion, on any topic. I have to hold myself back from replying to comments, no matter how nice I try to be, because I know that people will go for my throat like a rabid dog.

Him encouraging these low effort products saying basically “it’s good enough stop bitching” is the attitude that is destroying the industry.

I am a gamedev too and I love both of you guys point of view

I like watching both you and Bluedrake. I think it's best to have the perspective from both sides. From my KZfaq experience, most of gaming journalism or commentary channels capitalize on negative comments about games that are below expectations. Having Bluedrake balancing out the scale makes me still hopeful for the gaming sphere.

Well said Bigfry! Always appreciated your honesty. Certainly an opinion I can trust when it comes to criticizing new games 👍

This is why its very important to always try different view points on things. Especially if you are unsure about either the product or what its result might be, etc etc. Because everyone can have a differing opinion and thats OKAY. But simply altering your opinion just because someone you follow or watch has that opinion is wild behavior. I'm glad you can have KZfaqrs like Bigfry TV and Bluedrake42 that can have those differing opinions but still have a civilized conversation about it. We need more of that in communities when it comes to simple discussions like "do you like this game y/n and why?". Thank you Bigfry as always for the video and the time you took to discuss and analyze it from your POV.

We don't have "unreal expectations" for AAA games. We just expect them make use of their ENORMOUS BUDGETS (especially now that they're charing $70 for everything.) Smaller studios like FromSoftware consistently make most western AAA developers look downright incompetent. Just look at the current state of Halo and BF2042.. What the actual fuck?

One of the reason why i respect you, Bigfry. You are straight forward, toxic even but you are fair and know about the subjects you are talking about. Need more youtubers like you exposing garbage indie games and criticize any fake hypes instead of jumping on hype train.

I remember playing with BD42 back in the day in Project Reality, I think I was the first guy to buy his piano music CD back when I was a R-DEV (so...long...ago). He's such a nice guy and gets very enthusiastic!

I remember when I last seen an amazing trailer that blew my mind a looked good but was not anything similar in looks when it came out. For all my Anthem enthusiasts who really wanted a better supported game

Game developers are inherently optimistic, lately, gamers have been inherently pessimistic. It’s kind of a balance

I'm 35 now and there's whole categories of games that I won't play simply because I don't have the same amount of time or interest for games than I had when I was 20. I have maybe 5 to 8 hours for games a week, so my interests are less in big open world story games or large MMOS, and more in multiplayer fps or indy roguelikes. Something I can pick up for an hour in the evening and not loose track if I don't play it for a few weeks. BUT the main thing is, I don't want to waste my time with "okay" or even "good" games. I want to invest the few hours I have in GREAT games. It's not toxic to have standards that fit my gaming lifestyle.

I mean so many of these big companies treat us like idiots, so many indie games ARE scams and I don't think it's our fault for being upset when people don't show any passion for game making. I just want game makers to TRY. Show me you want to make a game you're proud of and I'll support it.

The fact that smaller devs don't use AAA companies failed games as an example and comit similar mistakes is trully amazing, I completely agree with BigFry, praising a game only for what it does good won't make it improve, it just gives false hope making it stale and repeat.

Bigfry “they see me roastin, they hatin”

I watch Bluedrake every now and again; and I am sure he means well, but I have noticed he covers something, and I think 'alright cool; he covered some mod or game no one has played in a while.. I respect it, it's not the usual content you get on youtube.' But then a week or two later he covers the same thing. And yes he is very optimistic and that has it's merits, but it's every video. (In regards to the optimism) While I respect his content; because some of it is genuinely solid stuff; I can't bring myself to stay and engage in it often enough. The content is so optimistic that you can't help, but think it's a charade. Rather than something genuinely informative. With that said, I look forward to operation harsh doorstop

This reminds me of why I love your channel, keep informing and entertaining us big guy 🤘

I think the bigger issue is the dichotomy of a game either being ‘a masterpiece’ or ‘unplayable garbage’, two completely hyperbolic ends of the spectrum. We’re at a time when a game getting a 6 out of 10, or an above average score, is considered a failure. And as a result we end up with 8’s, 9’s, and even 10 out of 10’s for way too many games, when those ratings should be reserved for games that are excellent and really something. People kind of have roae colored glasses about the 360 era especially as people who grew up during that time get older. Same as how for every generation ‘they don’t make good music anymore’ when they get older regardless of the era they grew up in. We used to get a ton of generic trash games. We just remember the good ones and forget about all the mediocre games of the past. People just are way too divided these days. Either a game is a masterpiece or unplayable trash. And if someone disagrees with you they’re wrong and you’re going to tell them why. Every release seems to be you either love it or hate it. Every game is ‘a bug riddled mess’ or ‘goty contender’. This lack of any in between makes expectations entirely unrealistic most of the time. And in a space where indies and double A games, and we used to get a lot of double A titles people forget this, are more visible than they ever have been, people make the mistake of comparing those games to polished triple A tentpole games. I think Bluedrink, and I’ve never heard of this guy until now, can say a game is great and mean it if we’re taking that game as it stands within it’s weight class. Even if it doesn’t hold up to triple A standards. And it’s all so subjective anyway there is often no objective reality for how good or trash a game is. But people take so much offense to someone disagreeing with them nowadays they take it as a personal attack. You’d think if someone didn’t care for a game they would just not think about it. But these days if someone sees anyone at all enjoying a game they ‘hate’, especially if it’s a complete stranger, they lose their mind. And the other way around. If someone likes a game and someone else criticizes that game in any way, you’d think they spit on their mother or something. It’s just wild and it’s a really toxic landscape.

I really appreciate you keeping it real when you talk about bs pay to win monetization in games. A lot of channels kind of gloss over those things, but the way you talk about it is like hearing one of my friends trash talk lol

I'm came for the hot Gos. Stayed for the hot studd.

I like the way you think regarding differences and having a good convo

Great video, I appreciate that you understand that you may fall on one end of the spectrum opposite to bluedrake. I think it’s great to have such differing opinions on opposite ends because it does help people who want to form a valid opinion. Never change 🤙🏻

What it boils down to is that people CAN NOT think for themselves. And the mindset has been developed in todays world for everything is that if you have a different opinion, you’re a lesser person and deserved to be attacked, rather than discuss different opinions. I don’t blame any KZfaqr for giving their opinion, if you can’t decide if you want a game and then go watch ONE KZfaq video and instantly make that decision then that’s your own fault. Bluedrake sees pros and BigFry sees cons and that’s okay.

Thanks for keepin em honest Big Fry. Your words are a blessing in disguise and they dont even know it yet.

Yet again reinforcing why I follow you. You put words to how I feel as a gamer better than I can

The Motion Blur alone is enough to keep me away from this game lmao

In my eyes all Indie projects these days are considered and labeled into folder called "Scams / Frauds". Because that is what indie game developers are mostly... Asset flip flopping scammers.

if this game woud have been released 2007 we would call it a masterpiece

And this is why we need good and bad, everything needs a balance

Youre honestly the go to guy when im going to buy a game ... I respect your honesty :)

14:28 This is the point that I felt most compelled to say something about. I think im of a similar mind to Bigfry on this one. If we consider being playable to be the bar for a good enough game, then do "bad games" even technically exist? "It wasn't fun, and it was massively overpriced, but it was playable and they didn't lie about the state of the game so you shouldn't be shitting on it." No. It's like saying "A horrible book is still words on paper so what's the issue?" I get that potential is there for a lot of these types of games, and a developer can kind of envision what type of progress a game could make to fulfill that potential, but at the end of the day the consumer isn't paying for what could be, they are paying for what is there. That being said criticism in the comment sections of the internet is absolutely toxic. Not a lot of mature conversation to be had down in these bowels unfortunately.

You know on the note of people not liking ur channel, it just doesn’t make much since. As u said in terms of yters being different and having different opinions, I don’t see how u criticizing a game can be that bad to where someone could hate ur channel. At the end of the day anyone can tell that ur passionate about the gaming industry and are only hard on it because WE ALL have witnessed how cutthroat, scummy and plain unfair the industry can be. Wether that’s getting burned on buying a new title or what ever it may be it’s good to have someone who’s willing to voice the more harsh opinions. Love ur content because u never seem to have conformed ur opinion around the popular opinion. Keep up the good work my guy 👍

I wonder how long it would take to normalise a distinction between a game and a product. As consumers we buy and evaluate software products, but games are a process of playing in something these products allow to play (like a chess set allows to play chess). Some aspects of a product do affect the gameplay experience, but a game can be payable and fun in an unfinished and greybox state.

Ayo pretty off topic question here, but can anyone link me to the vid where BigFry was talking to some dev of a game, and found out the assets he "bought" on the marketplace were actually made and uploaded by him?

Passive Aggressiveness 101

Lowering standards to survive is a way of life for many of us.

I gain a little more respect for you every video. Keep up the honest, free thought, open minded opinions, brother.

You just tell it like it is....but your not "Vague" about it, your brutal honesty is highly valued and appreciated. Some people have a hard time hearing the honest truth, rather trying to sugarcoat a game. Fav games (Ground Branch, Zero Hour, Session)

You are totally right here. I think his statement sounds a little like that we aren't allowed to have a different opinion. And that different opinions are a problem. Eventually he got a little overwhelmed by the negative comments or whatever... I don't know

your talk on marketplace assets is perfectly on point.

Fucking preach Fry Man! love it, keep it up bro

to be fair there is mods in Arma 3 that allow you to do all the things that are mentioned as features of this game. not nearly as fleshed out but its really close and its just a workshop mod and to me that's why I believe blood brothers is not good as a standalone game

what game is the one at 0:37?

I Love BlueDrake, dude is like a Kid in Christmas. And i also appreciate the negative Nancy side of BigFry. Yall complete each other

could we get a top 10 most innovative indie fps games still in development

I think the biggest problem in gaming is updates. If you look back at all the great games that we had in the 90's they came on a disc or cartridge and the game that you bought is what it will always be and devs had to live with what they released FOREVER and now it's just oh well just push it out get the money and we may or may not fix this or that

My only 2cents is.. I think gamers are not willing to pay extra for games is the main industry has not given the gaming community what they feel is the fair price for a game half finished to be finished 6mobths after release

People just can not take criticism what so ever. But tbh, KEEP IT UP BigFry, you always keep things real and see things from a REAL gamer view as a consumer and call people out as they are. Again my opinion as well, but I feel like ppl are used to live server games instead of games with actual content that matches what we pay for like back in ps2 ps3 eras..but im just another gamer that is the one to decide what I pay and fall for. But when everyone keeps accepting bullshit games, of course devs will just keep shitting games out of same quality.

I think that back in the PS2/Xbox/GC days before online play was super prevalent that a lot of these smaller projects like Blood Brothers would be something you'd see at a Blockbuster or some other local rental location, and you would play for a week and think it was somewhat fun if not to the standard of Halo, or Jak and Daxter, or Windwaker. And there are plenty of people today that if you'd ask about, say Freedom Fighters, or Star Wars The Clone Wars, or Timesplitters games there would always be a large audience that says they had fun with games like that. I think that maybe the amount of poor AAA games the last decade have changed a mostly now older audience who now may have a more pessimistic or practical view of what is a good product, and with people getting into the indie space, or even smaller professional studios pushing out smaller and maybe not as polished games because of a lack of resources or experience make people more upset because they've been told indie games are where the quality gaming is now. So instead of seeing a smaller project and thinking, "wow I want to see these guys do this again, I want to support them bringing their ideas to a bigger game or a better funded project" they instead, even if its in pretty early access, say its awful and its not worth your time. Which I totally understand, if it's not to what you think is something worth your time in the long run ,why would you want to keep playing it? I see all the time that players are very conscious with how they spend money playing games. Does The Division or Ghost Recon give me more hours played to make it worth it? Is Hades a better choice for my money or is Crypt of the Necro Dancer? I think as a community need to remember the fun aspect of the time spent in the game, not just "It takes me 80 hours to complete this game so I'll be better off getting this." And that it is also highly subjective, so something that BlueDrake likes may not be something BigFry, or JackFrags, or any myriad of other online personalities say is good or not, may be something you yourself may end up enjoying. Essentially I'm saying take just because one or a couple of people say it's bad, don't take their complete word for it unless you see some extended gameplay or try out a demo (as rare as those are these days depending on what platform you play on). And just because a game doesn't reinvent a genre, or add in a new unique feature to make the title stand out doesn't mean its not worth your time. I'm sure many would not mind chilling with a game like Blood Brothers and playing the missions even if it isn't the most polished experience. It's like watching a tv show that's not very great, but you like a character or actor, or the plot is entertaining enough that while it's not anything new, is still enjoyable. A lot of tv shows get a second life because of this, but it seems like games don't really get that chance to really sit there and say "we aren't making anything amazing, but this is what we have, we hope you enjoy" and players get upset or guffaw at it because its not the latest hype train title, or doesn't have the current trendy thing like zombies or a Battle Royale, or a non-sci-fi setting. I understand that many may not like Drake's verbiage on his titles, and that's okay. He's trying to shed some coverage on titles that are up and coming, and draws viewers in on titles like that. You don't have to like it, but it obviously works because people watch and then get upset by it. Maybe he could tone it down just a little bit, or change the words used like it has the potential to be great, or "keep this one your radar even though its really early." At the end of the day if you don't like the way one KZfaqr does things, there's always another you could watch only a couple of clicks away.

Keeping it professional boys. Big respect.

Just seen Bludrake42's message to BigfryTV here in the comment section. Now let me say this: If it's not just a public PC response to Fry's video then I want to say thank you. Thank you for actually being an adult and recognizing that alternate opinions are important. SO MANY people now a days hear a differing opinion and IMMEDIATELY shut down or write them off. Its SO fucking sad and it's nice to see this message from Bluedrake42. Bravo bud, bravo. Great video and well presented opinions Bigfry! Thanks for the content, keep inspiring the little guys!

Remember that beauty lies in the eye of the beholder..

"A dollar an hour" - spool

There's only one "next gen" title in development that is actually doing anything I find impressive. And it still is mostly a buggy mess in context of a "finished" title. But mechanics and gameplay are king, always. And the more you're doing something substantial there, or are demonstrating (constantly) that you can, the more future value you have. Which is the only thing to be looking for until it actually releases. That, and progress.

as a consumer perspective, our/money is not for charity i want a great product either indie or AAA not some "look at this indie game trying to imitate already release game with UE4 and early acess" No.... i want great game and fine game also better, and competitive should be like making better game than last year game... not looking at 2000 era game and imitate that in current engine. look at Resident Evil 2 they imitate the old game but make it better and finer and greater. what bluedrake saying that scares me is Downgrading the Gaming Development competition.

I know I'm late to this video, but I, like a good majority of the gaming community, am so tired of seeing the same things being pushed out. I am tired of seeing games that were promised to be really groundbreaking then come to find out they were not ready to put the game out in the first place. I am tired of developers saying they'll have a game out by a certain day and end up having to postpone that game to a later time (on a side note, I'd rather see that than a buggy POS game) I am slowly, but surely losing my interest in gaming these days. It's really sad since I've been playing since around the age of 3 or 4. I am just hoping one of these days a developer will come out of nowhere and completely blow us away with a really amazing game. Until that day comes, I look forward to nothing coming out for the rest of this year.

Our standards are higher now because the AAA gaming industry standards are so low. Personally I am generally more lenient on indie and AA games but it doesn't mean we shouldn't hold them to a higher standard as well, when we have indie devs making games like escape from tarkov, valheim, the ascent, RoN, Ground Branch and many more, you can't help but look at some games and see the flaws. At the end of the day our time is the most important thing, meaning we don't want to spend our time on games that are not ready but have potential, and generally harsh criticism happens because we can see the potential and we want it to get better. I honestly don't think black one looks even close to ready and I wouldn't play it, but the concept of it is really exciting, since it reminds me of the old ghost recon games and I hope they can achieve their goals with it.

this video was on pointi want a gane that i wont regret buying , i want a game that i will look back on and think "Man i miss that game i should play it again" not "i should never have bought that game"

This is a great rebuttal and it’s earned my subscription.

It's funny because it's when i watched you diss BOBB that i tried it, not payed it of course, cracked it. And for a free game i got hell of a fun. And i would be agree to spend 10 euros in this. Don't remind the Steam Price. And i spend a lot of hours in this game, managing my team, create attack plans, etc, a lot of fun despite the alpha feeling. So i decided to jump on the other game u said it was shit from him and guess what i enjoyed it too, less than BOBB but still, i was suprised on how some functionalities he inputed in his games that i've never seen been use the same in other games, was working so well. To me this developper need much more support. And i agree with you on the fact that YEAH, the prices and how he abandonned the poly survival game is not legit. But to me, this is the only developper and the only 2 games you were wrong about. For Bluedrake i agree too, too optimistic and naïve as i've seen in comments. I watch some of his videos cause he got me discovered nice video games, rarely cause for the most parts it was just not as good as he said. So in conclusion i suppose, for jumping on one the subject of those videos "the expectations", i'm kind of between you and him. Kind of equilibrate. I want to have return on investments for sure, but even if i'm not a developper, i've tried UE4; map making, and watch a suffisant amont of developpement videos to say that i realize how hard it is to make a game, and the talent developpers need to pull out a great game very polish depending on his complexity. And believe me i've been angry about many projects that were absolute scams but i've also been moderate about many. And i think it's what people should look up too, being really more moderate in everything. Ying and yang shit. It gives happiness, stable and yeah i pretty council it.

I got this game because of Bluedrake , I actually quite enjoy this game and wish there was more of a community for it. I'm an old man OG gamer so a lot of the issues a younger modern gamer may have with it, I see as a call back to the old days. I love you can do random missions and I'm surprised how the AI is decent(better then OHD's right now atleast) and the game is better then I thought it may of been for a small early project. I;d love for this to have enough of a community for a modding community to come about.. but these days everyone and their mother makes a game so who knows if it will ever take off.

So basically, "Someone is wrong on the internet".

I recently unsubscribed from him. His videos are the same speak about how this one game is gonna change the FPS genre forever. The same garbage that has zero back up to the claims. I just got so sick of it. I appreciate his enthusiasm, but he repeats himself all the time.

There is a golden eye type game in development. I played the demo. It's called Agent 64: Spies Never Die on Steam

I just want to know what game was being showcases at timeframe 30sec = 50 seconds in the beginning of this video

Ok since you've brought this up, I gotta say that I've learned about his channel through yours and I've been dipping my toes in his content here and there but what keeps me from wanting to keep coming back is his some sort of bubbly hopefullness which I often enough simply can't share and I understand that he is a developer and I am not. It's like going to some yacht gathering with a friend who is yacht enthusiast who'll be exclaiming about every yacht he sees but you'll be there like wow that's crazy😄 Anyway, this video made me feel less cynical since you were able to explain to me what exactly I feel about his content🤣 P.S.: you're an asshole for ignoring your non members on your live streams. Other than that, I don't miss a single vid.

FACTS brotha! That’s the problem is that every game is GREAT now, even when there 2 out of 5. Which is fine for some peeps but not for most who look for the hardcore FPS! Like Ground Branch, Ready or not. Fantastic animations with the ability to mod your gear and weapons and have fantastic frames! There needs to be a precedent set for what makes a great game. Or a better scale that gamers can use. Great vids guys love Big fry and blue drake been watching u guys for years!

The games in my library that have the most playtime are the 10-20 dollar titles, id say thats more of a personal quirk but when i can spend 600 hours in a good indie title versus maximum 100 hours in a AAA game.

This is what happens when people try to play professional in something that they are not! He doesn't get it. It doesn't matter if it looks gorgeous everyone of this so called developers can make a full motion cinematic trailer but the catch is if the game is really polished, well made and if they actually know how to complete it, if its not clunky on the movement or if it is no optimized and all.