Right after the Terrence Howard interview on JRE 😂😂😂😂

It makes perfect sense; just folks get confused on the meaning of "fundamental" within this context. "Not fundamental" doesn't mean "not real", it means "emergently real". In the same way as a bird isn't a flock of birds, and a cell isn't a human; but if you put enough of them together in the right way, you get this new thing which while not fundamental to its individual parts, is emergently real to its collective parts.

debating gravity always has its ups and downs

Terrence Howard: “I’ve been trying to tell y’all mayne”!

Ever since Terrance Howard went on Joe Rogan

Ive learned the only thing Neil Degrass Tyson is an expert in is : interrupting people while they talk.

Glad to see science being shared on MSNBC 👍

Terrence Howard got the masses talking.😂

sounds like Terrance Howard called it. Interesting timing of this interview

Terrence Howard just said that. . .

Terrence Howard was speaking about this on Joe Rogan’s podcast. Terrence Howard said gravity is a byproduct. Yall should watch the podcast. For some again.

My favorite idea about gravity is that it's an effect of entropy. PBS Spacetime did a great video about it.

Conversations about gravity always pull me in.

There is, however, a Santa Claus.

If you listen carefully, you can hear my head exploding

The universe is so confusing

Terrance Howard - there is no such thing as gravity, its just electricity and magnetism. We literally are on an enormous magnet with a huge magnetic field

Why do interviewers have to act like physics is beyond human comprehension and also ask meaningful follow up questions like "Is there experimental evidence yet to support your claim or when will there be?"

This isn’t a new idea, I was taught that the laws of gravity break down at the quantum-level while taking physics in college back in the 90’s. This physicist just explains it in a slightly less broad of a term.

"rethinking the mystery of gravity"... shows the same illustration everyone always uses when they explain gravity lol

The only thing I know about gravity is that it's a real b*tch after you've had more than three margaritas.

Can you remove an object from quantum entanglement and if so, what would happen to the object? How would it interact with everything else?

Janna Levin is awesome. So articulate.

She sounds like the kind of professor who might come up with a theory of everything. Merging quantum physics and classical physics together I'm starting to wonder of all laws of nature only exist on a macroscopic scale

🎶"We've only just begun..."🎶

This is so beautifully and understandably explained in these two clips, although mostly by analogy. I would love to know more about what kind of experiments or observations are behind this hypothesis. How do they know or hypothesize this? But I probably wouldn't understand it anyway even if they told me 😅

The confusion to most is the idea of emergence in the first place. Most things we experience are manifestations of many, simple things happening. Also confusion to most is the idea of process itself - related - as we once believed life was a thing not a process.

Terrance Howard has started a tidal wave

I had this idea more than one time, but since I'm not a physicist it was just an idea. Am I the only one? It feels hard to believe to me that this is the first time anyone else had thought of gravity as an emerging force..

It’s crazy I was saying this a decade ago, thank you for greater minds trying to explain and rationalise for the masses.

Totally makes sense. Thank you.

Just a point of clarification for the record, the “planet” you see is reduced to a point like object in the math and the visualization only really allows for 2 dimensions of interpretation.

I love Janna Levin ✨

I understand this, a basic approach to gravity, because just the other day 5 18 24 I refined my 'letter' concerning the origins of gravity

If I look at my pillow at a quantum level there's also no pillow anymore

Gravity worked pretty well on me a few times.

The painting example is 💯

So Terence Howard ISN’T crazy like people are trying to make him sound????

Fascinating. Just learning about emergence theory. Is this an example of it? What about unification theory? How does that tie in, or does it? Interesting stuff 🙂 Thanks for sharing.

My friend once said,, "I've a gut feeling that image kinetics doesn't exist. "

Georges Seurat would thank you for describing what gravity means using the collective of his "dots" which shows his painting as what it is. Very eloquent way of describing a theory of gravity. 🙂

There is definitely a gravitas to this argument

Pretty interesting analogy. Like saying one water molecule is not “wet.” I don’t know enough to say how accurate another physicist would say the analogy is, but I can wrap my head around it. But I suspect there are equations that can describe wetness in fluid dynamics or whatever the field is called. It’s just fascinating to speculate that what we call gravity has the same relationship between describing it in the aggregate versus describing it at the tiniest possible scales.

Time = Gravity = Time

Terrence Howard just said this…. 😑

Einstein’s equations of General Relativity spit out zero as an answer at point of a singularity inside a black hole, which is nonsense. She’s essentially saying the math was never intended to be taken so far in the first place. The problem is we still don’t have any mathematical insights into the inner-workings of a black hole without a theory of quantum gravity. I get the logic of what she is saying but we need be able to describe a singularity mathematically. The same problem exists on that end of the spectrum even if we let General Relativity off the hook.

Terrence Howard called it..😂 gravity might not exist as a fundamental force..😮🤯

Now how do you influence a proton to collude with other protons to create temperature?

The macro to micro concept lens?

I like the description of "matter" being "frozen" light. Light being tied to Electromagnetism might be another explanation. Chilling!!!

Why did I know this a long long time ago. I can’t be the only one.

if quantum is behaving at that level, fractal reality or quarks , either or, then it would be apparent to me that the mystery still be unsolved. Rather more fundamentally I would say its not only a consequence, like water, rather a principle that gravity is still a possibility that energy can come together to create gravity as a structured energy or wave rather than gravity as a consequence of the whole of reality. Is it a source or a consequence? I couldnt imagine for example gravity being a particle or a wave like neutrons or quarks, however at that level I have to ask absolutely absurd questions that are which not so absurd. If I am to create certain rules. I have special interest in wondering if gravity is a thing, or a wave rather than a consequence.

Generally spealing, the 10th house follows the 9th, therefore without "structure" there will be no ways to organise materials to manifest weight.

It’s an emergent property created by the incommensurability of the atoms. A magnetic field emerges from commensurate atoms.

So the universe is post-impressionistic! 😊Very beautiful. ❤

I'm a biochemist. Terrance Howard wasn't saying anything that made any sense but people that don't understand the most rudimentary concepts in science think they have the wherewithal to give their 2 cents about how "brilliant" his perspective was. I'm going to give the science laymen a very easy example. You know your job very well, right? You understand how it functions in your field pretty well, though you may not know everything about it. Imagine a person comes in and starts talking crazy about it in ways you know are incorrect, however, because the local population doesn't understand much of anything about your job, they think this person is incredible even though you know this person is wrong about the procedures, nomenclature, functionality and explanation of your job. Now you've got to convince people that know nothing about your job that this person saying these crazy things are incorrect... 🥴

Startalk is a great podcast. Neil and Chuck are always entertaining, but their guest on this episode was amazing. ✌️

Gravity is described as an acceleration, not a force... So how it could be fundamental?

Very small things act differently to much bigger things. Life just depends on your perspective

This is why there must be so much space in space, otherwise it would collapse

My answer is gravity is magnetic polarity

Even my Dog understands Gravity ball goes up ball goes down

Thank you Terrence Howard

So, what, there's a force that is pushing or pulling on space itself, and that then causes some sort of pressure resulting in gravity?

The 'mystery' of gravity is something most will find difficult to believe

and what did Terence Howard trying to say us ,.... but they called him mad

Love seeing deep science and Jana Levin being showcased but at 3:43 why wouldn’t you show the dots

Lollll Terrance has clearly shaken up the scientific community

In short, the laws of physics change at the smallest scales. This isn't a revelation more of a potential framework for thinking

She's not saying gravity is not real. It's like saying nothing is cold, it's just the absence of warmth.

So all 4 fundamental forces are actually all emergent properties then?

She said this a week before Terrance said what he said. Im not saying he saw her Interview but it is weird that he was speaking on no gravity as well.

This a very old idea, set up by Ted Jacobson in 1995. His set up of gravity as emergent is a very well known research topic in physics.

yea Neil's underwear was spoiled after that comment from Janna

So if we can disrupt the field or process of it's interaction with itself then we can manipulate it at will and discover ftl travel

There is some kind of network for communication going on that we can’t sense. Living cells do the same.

The 'rationalizations' make a lot of sense. Would this imply there is no photon "force carrier" for gravity? If so, why would gravity waves 'appear' to travel "at the speed of light"? Coincidence?

The leading edge idea that blows my mind is that quantum entanglements are the threads that make up the fabric of spacetime.

Terrance Howard has said the same.

“I killed gravity Mayne “

I have literally always said that gravity isn't its own thing. It's a combination of gyroscopic procession and mass and the directions that we are spinning against the magnetic current, which is holding us down.

Highly recommend anyone who's interested to go watch the quantum gravity episode and other quantum episodes from PBS Space Time

Terrence Howard really about to break the internet

That's the same concept Terrence Howard was explaining, yet people in the science community called him crazy.

The quantum interactions manifest in what we call gravity Gravity might not exist as a fundamental force

Always said this...its like a bowl of minestrome soup. What people think gravity is on earth is just weight against external atmosphere. In space more magnetism and energy/heat deflection.

curved spacetime is due to vibrational shockwaves from star activity compressing around solid objects and pushes downward on atoms and by downward i mean pushing towards the middle of the solid object

I just wanna copy and paste this link to this video on everything Terrance Howard is on inside the KZfaq world lol

Gravity is love, and love is gravity....

If you want to think about it a certain way, gravity is a collective van der Waals force, as opposed to an individual van der Waals force. Quanta of van der Waals forces, if you will, although renaming "gravity" to "distributed van der Waals force" isn't as etymologically satisfying.

Yay for having her on.

I hypothesized this after learning basic college chemistry. It's a wonder to me how this is even a debate anymore. You think someone would have proved it with mathematics. A vast accumulation of charged particles should then result in forces similar to gravity. Same way intermolecular forces work.

Neil deGrasse Tyson and Chuck Nice on StarTalk doing so much for creativity, and opening up the dialog in fascinating ways, also mention having super guests!

Time is emergent. Gravity is emergent.

The Higgs Field is the atmosphere of Space. Galaxies and their stellar bodies are turbulently swirling, moving through this atmosphere of space at several million miles per hour. There is turbulent disruption of the Higgs Field, with vast compression increasing around all massive bodies. This is the dynamic reality of the universe. "Curved Space" is a photographic snapshot of the compressing of Higgs Field, frozen in time, just as a photo of an ocean wave looks like a solid ramp. But no curvature. The Higgs Field is forced into each body, interacting (colliding) with the quantum fields of the stellar objects, pushing them toward the center of mass (but the mass of objects resist each other, giving the "gravity" appearance). Only light waves seem not to collide with the Higgs Field, but it does curve as it passes through the collapsing density of the Higgs Field around massive objects. No gravity. No curved space/time. All material motion is from collision, of matter, of fields, etc.

not sure why his mind is blown by this information. This makes a lot of sense, especially how Dr. Levin explains it, but it's something that has been talked about for a long time.

This is actually going to be a prevailing paradigm for the explanation of reality. The analogy she gives of a pointillism painting is exactly how the hologram of our 3D reality works. At a micro level, nothing actually exists and there is no meaning. But at a macro level, it’s all there to make meaning from in our consciousness.

Time also not fundamental, depends on scale and distance. Perhaps this is also a quantum additive emergent property.

Well, we knew this from a long time ago, didn't we? that the every-day laws of physics that we're all familiar with don't actually work the same way or at all at the quantum level. Though now that she has worded it this way, it does make a lot of sense.

Right after the episode on jre is crazy to me lol.