RIP FOOTBALL! CAN ANYONE STOP MAN CITY!
Рет қаралды 219,506
11 ай бұрынMan City win the Champions League and the question for Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Newcastle and Chelsea is. How do you stop Man City dominating for years to come? Mark Goldbridge reacts.
@Luis-sz7ry 11 ай бұрын
Football is NOT dead. Manchester City do not spend the most money and eras come to an end. People like Mark need to accept that.
@GIBBO4182 11 ай бұрын
As long as Pep stays, it’s going to be hard to stop them! Just like it was hard to stop Utd until Fergie left…
@reddevils2052 11 ай бұрын
This was always going to happen the second they got pep just took him longer then I thought.
@ringlora2 11 ай бұрын
Except City were winning titles before Pep? 2 Leagues before him, proves it's owners not Pep.
@dustinmartin6524 11 ай бұрын
@@ringlora2 Definitely weren’t dominant without Pep though. They were a prem contender every season, not a borderline nailed on winner
@truevanpencil5403 11 ай бұрын
But it wasn’t. No one was begging for Fergie to retire. Every manager and fan in the league, bar city, can’t wait for Pep to do one 😂 Pep changed football with playing from the back. Pep has set record points tallies and made it so if u lose 2 games in a season the titles probably done. Pep has been a midtable slender for years. The guys just another level. Not a city fan and hate to say it but he is the best ever.
@dimitarNanevski 11 ай бұрын
messi
@samkkx 11 ай бұрын
That's how it has always been Mark. The reason United were that successful was because of the money. They could buy almost any players from the league and they broke the British record 6 times under Ferguson. The youth players are also because of the money because you had the best training facilities in the country and could attract the top talents. These days transfer fees has gone through the roof so people forget the 36 mil paid in 2002 for Rio Ferdinand was like the Neymar deal to PSG in the Morden era.
@RecencyBiasRadio 11 ай бұрын
Yep. Man United contributed to ruining football themselves, but their entitlement to trophies makes them tone deaf on this subject. City are what United were.
@dalebrennan7615 11 ай бұрын
Spot on forever trying to explain that to rag fans
@Tominator800 11 ай бұрын
Finally someone who speaks sense, top man
@Dopaaamine27 11 ай бұрын
So true.
@ringlora2 11 ай бұрын
Also signed Ronaldo when he was bout 18 for £18m and sold him on for £80m, but of course that does not suit your rival agenda..and by your logic, that £62m profit is like 2 Neymar's profit in the modern era.
@ritvicsingh4417 11 ай бұрын
The irony here is appalling, Goldbridge's argument is "Man City can loose KDB in the first half and bring Foden to replace him". Well, he is a homegrown player, a product of City's academy, RIP logic.
@Almstfam 11 ай бұрын
Haaland is a great striker but the most impressive improvement this season is their defence and how comfortable they became without the ball.
@jamcock8187 11 ай бұрын
Haaland is not great but a good striker who is lucky to be in a team that puts everything on a plate for him.
@thomasgundersen8975 11 ай бұрын
@@jamcock8187 Is that why he became top scorer in CL for Dortmund at the age of 20 ?
@letsRumble814 11 ай бұрын
@@jamcock8187 stupid take
@jackkelly6251 11 ай бұрын
@@jamcock8187 Like in Dortmund?
@skapenguin 11 ай бұрын
@@jamcock8187 right? It seems like most goals he scores are 6 feet away from goal. That's not really his skill.
@bombdacity4303 11 ай бұрын
is it just me or does anyone else feel that good teams have figured out how to stop haaland but they can't really stop the whole man city team and that's why they end up winning?
@leavenowitness9239 11 ай бұрын
No they haven’t haaland is just tired he’s played 50+ games could of easily scored yesterday but just unlucky he gassed out a bit to early
@wishvakrish3583 11 ай бұрын
Whenever they stop haaland Midfielders are getting space lol Look at KDB, Silva and rodri goals They had full 5D view when defenders concentrating on haaland
@mrsswindon 11 ай бұрын
i said that to my friend before the final yesterday. Against good teams, he is shut down and goes missing the entire game. He runs ramptant on bad teams. Even in the United 2-1 win against City, they shut down both Haaland and KDB in the same match.
@AndrycusGaming 11 ай бұрын
Teams are making the decision on concentration their defence on Haaland. That reduced his chances, but has resulted in a lack of defenders away from him and goals from the edge of penalty box, as demonstrated in the Champions League & FA Cup final.
@dashawnballard52 11 ай бұрын
@@mrsswindon and I’m the 6-3 match Haaland had a hat trick so what point are you trying to make. Scored against Arsenal in both games but ok whatever you say buddy
@danstabler1819 11 ай бұрын
I agree that the City story isn't a fairytale but I think you could say the same thing about United in the 90s. Man Utd executives, along with the other big clubs and Sky, pushed through the Premier League in 1992 to make sure that the 'big clubs' hoovered up all the money. It was a dodgy bit of financial manipulation that I'd argue had more of a negative effect upon football than City's manipulation. Once the PL began, Man U then benefitted from being the first in the door and winning the first title. They then were rewarded the riches, way more than anyone else had. The financial inequalities between the top and everyone else dwarfed that from the 80s. So they were able to buy all the best players from around the league and dominate. This 'football heritage/history' that Man Utd fans can tout about continuously, in a way of belittling current city success, borne from bitterness and confused righteousness, is actually just financial manipulation from the early 90s.
@aarnethn 11 ай бұрын
FINALLY someone said it like it is. 💯💯👊
@ronaldeano12 11 ай бұрын
Exactly this... Well said 👍
@markn7519 11 ай бұрын
Preach
@africancoast 11 ай бұрын
You're right but the 30-40 years olds who run sports media today grew up in the 90s and are super nostalgic about it, so they'll never remember the negative parts like this. It doesn't matter anyway, City fans don't need the validation of Liverpool, United and Arsenal fans to enjoy their team winning stuff
@dalebrennan7615 11 ай бұрын
Very well said and so true
@nigelduckworth4419 11 ай бұрын
Apart from Haaland and maybe De Bruyne, City bought no elite level players. Yes, they costs a lot of money and there are a lot of them. It was Guardiola who transformed them into superstars. But of course, Guardiola cost money as well. So you need to have the money to buy the best manager and then have the money to buy good but not elite players.
@IPxDeeKo 11 ай бұрын
Considering United “have the money” you would think they would be putting up a better fight in trying to take down their rivals
@adamburke3379 11 ай бұрын
Glazer tax
@pkugan03 11 ай бұрын
The Glazers has United’s money !
@dagzey 11 ай бұрын
@@pkugan03 united have spent more money on players than city in the last 10 years
@pkugan03 11 ай бұрын
@@dagzey again, United can spend that amount because they earned it, City falsified their earnings to spend the same hence their charges. City cant spend and wouldnt have won if they did it the right way lol
@holypopy 11 ай бұрын
City with no history came from nowhere and spend billion...
@harbster2 11 ай бұрын
Man City may have the money but the difference is that they have bought wisely whereas United's transfer policy has been nothing short of appalling. Apart from £100m they paid for Grealish all of the other players were buyable by United and other clubs.
@fromthefountofyouth 11 ай бұрын
But they were also able to write off signings that didn't work and get in new players as replacements. Few clubs can do that without the threat of financial ruin.
@harbster2 11 ай бұрын
@@fromthefountofyouth Man City’s net spend since 2016-17 Five Biggest Purchases: 1. Jack Grealish - £105.8million 2. Ruben Dias - £61.2million 3. Riyad Mahrez - £61million 4. Joao Cancelo - £58.5million 5. Aymeric Laporte - £58.5million Five Biggest Sales: 1. Leroy Sane - £54million 2. Raheem Sterling - £50.9million 3. Ferran Torres - £49.5million 4. Gabriel Jesus - £47million 5. Danilo - £33.3million Total Spent: £1.074billion Total Sold: £596million Total Net Spend: £478million ______________________ Man Utd’s net spend since 2016-17 Five Biggest Purchases: 1. Paul Pogba - £94.50million 2. Antony - £86million 3. Harry Maguire - £78.30million 4. Jadon Sancho - £76.5million 5. Romelu Lukaku - £76.23million Five Biggest Sales: 1. Romelu Lukaku - £66.60million 2. Henrikh Mkhitaryan - £30.60million 3. Daniel James - £26.19million 4. Morgan Schneiderlin - £20.70million =5. Memphis Depay - £14.40million =5. Daley Blind - £14.40million Total Spent: £1.077billion Total Sold: £242million Total Net Spend: £835million
@jarazimmerman3400 11 ай бұрын
@@fromthefountofyouth If you look at the net spends (which takes into account losses on players), City have still spend around the same as United.
@blacks5884 11 ай бұрын
@@fromthefountofyouth city has a less net spend than chelsea united and 180 million more than liverpool
@fromthefountofyouth 11 ай бұрын
@@blacks5884 I don't know where you got your stats from but that's grossly inaccurate. It's a difference of about £600m since both managers arrived their respective clubs.
@GERBOY90 11 ай бұрын
This is such a massive over reaction. When united where top nobody was saying this is the end of football or the league is not competitive, when United where dominant it was a top3 in the league, now there is gonna be around 5 to 6 teams competitive next year. If united get Qatar and start winning trophies I bet we won’t hear anything about football been over. City spent well, they deserve their success
@henrylouis8601 11 ай бұрын
I disagree with mark on this one. I think Arsenal and United have enough money to create and infrastructure comparable to city’s. In the last 15 years United could have bought the same players as city and probably could have convinced Pep to join if they really wanted. This all just boils down to extremely good management and extremely good recruitment.
@ezigwe 11 ай бұрын
Forgets our spend constrained by stadium in early period of the 15 years, forgets Man City and Man U taking our good players. However Man U have spent loads since Fergie left, just very poor strategy on recruitment so they cannot complain.
@isacmyrenandersson1670 11 ай бұрын
@@ezigwe Man U bought players that was marketable and not good on the pitch. that way the Glazers could get more shirt sales and take more dividence so they could neglect the stadium and infrastructure. Yea, I can't complain...
@bilalturkan8004 11 ай бұрын
There’s a difference between having money an d how you spend it. As if chelsea didn’t spend a lot ? Look how it was wasted. Same with Arsenal our record signing is back in France. Might sound like an excuse but have the money spend it well and you’ll get results. Ultimately it’s about consistency. Everyone saying Arsenal dropping next season etc but if the consistency stays and they compete at a high level how on earth will they drop keeping in mind good recruitment. In the last 3 years say out of 10 players we signed 7 that are very good. Keep that up
@ezigwe 11 ай бұрын
@@bilalturkan8004 Our record signing?! Pepe the only example of us spending a lot of money on a player and it going wrong. That's not evidence that's a a blip, where's the trend. BTW that deal was well dodgy anyway (Raul Sanllehi). You cannot mention AFC in same class as Man City Man U, or Chelsea in spending money and the last two teams spent sheds more too. not even close
@bilalturkan8004 11 ай бұрын
@@ezigwe fair
@western-oud1898 11 ай бұрын
The difference isn't necessarily just the money it's having the right manager and how well that monies spent...
@skhontuli2700 11 ай бұрын
money matters if Ten Hag gets Qatar money Man U are cooking
@DJBazzoMusic74 11 ай бұрын
Mark literally said this mate, city spent the money well Chelsea don’t
@marmedli9124 11 ай бұрын
Eddie Howe is the man to Usurp Pep, Newcastle will win the league next season mark my words.
@intensitybias5443 11 ай бұрын
@@skhontuli2700 lol. You struggle to create 1 clear cut chance every game. Ten Hag has not improved a single player except rashford. The football is diabolical. Eddie Howe improved every single Newcastle player, RDZ improved every brighton player. We were told ten hag is a master tactician lol. If Liverpool and Chelsea were still good this season, united would not have qualified for ucl.
@ashwilliams4959 11 ай бұрын
@intensitybias there's more to it than just a new manager, Newcastle and lascelles is more than coaching, it's coaching and money motivation. If you'd been coasting somewhere for couple years then all of a sudden could be shipped off to championship or step up and be at the richest club in world football? Brighton have a perfect setup, good coaching, manager etc but also seem a good club to be a part of, competition for places etc Keeping these overpaid, overgrown children motivated either by money or an ego boost seems quite important too
@killthomas8373 11 ай бұрын
I don’t disagree but I think Pep is probably the most integral piece of the puzzle. City signed players like Aguero, Silve, Toure etc well before Pep and that made them competitive it’s Pep who has made them dominant
@GIBBO4182 11 ай бұрын
100% it’s the main reason!
@mikedon5205 11 ай бұрын
Great manager but I'm pretty sure given the way the clubs run other great managers would do the same actually his decision to drop walker yesterday almost blew up in his face in a CL final again
@thelmaviaduct 11 ай бұрын
Horseshit. He's nothing without billions.
@dont5363 11 ай бұрын
@@mikedon5205 Just won a treble mate , only manager in history to do it with 2 clubs yet here u are complaining how u know better believe me you dont
@ringlora2 11 ай бұрын
Nothing to do with Fergie retiring when Aguero, Toure, Silva were there..Pep knew when to come, only once Fergie left.
@TheHowlinWind 11 ай бұрын
This is why Klopp era Liverpool achievements are extraordinary
@highfiveentertainment298 11 ай бұрын
Pretty much like Blackburn
@ezigwe 11 ай бұрын
@@highfiveentertainment298 Nope because Blackburn just threw money at it then couldn't sustain
@henry8239 11 ай бұрын
@@ezigwe Same with liverpool
@highfiveentertainment298 11 ай бұрын
@@ezigwe His spot on, grabbed 1 pl and dipped just like Blackburn. Most expensive gk, cb ran out of money now back to Europa where you belong
@AverageCommentor 11 ай бұрын
@@highfiveentertainment298. And a UEFA Champion's League, a FIFA Club-world Cup, a UEFA Super Cup, an FA Cup, a League Cup, and a Community Shield. Also, went for the Quadruple last year, and only lost out in the final week. Just the UEFA Europa League to go.
@obryobry 11 ай бұрын
You said it - a well run club - not money - not infrastructure - not players - not even manager - a well run club and that is where the liverpools, Man Utd, Arsenal have a problem. And the investment in Man City goes well beyond the team alone, they have rebuilt Manchester as a go to destination. I’ve been a city supporter since 1968. My family have 4 generations of City support. We deserve this. And we will rejoice in all its glory!
@seacrezt 11 ай бұрын
United have spent millions on flops what are you on about mark 😂
@GermanChickenwing 11 ай бұрын
Maybe they need another 2b pounds to challenge lol
@J12__ 11 ай бұрын
How did city get that money to spend? Getting 16 place every year😂 you hust get defensive and say united spent, the point is united generated that money off past success and having a massive fan base. your a joke
@Steven-vo2uf 11 ай бұрын
@@J12__ 😂 poor fan must be heartbroken not winnin Leauge since god knows hope u be ok 😂 😂
@J12__ 11 ай бұрын
@@Steven-vo2uf better then being a fake fan 😂
@dashawnballard52 11 ай бұрын
@@J12__ liking your own comments are horrible
@leightonp8496 11 ай бұрын
Liverpool have been able to compete with them, 1 point behind twice and beat them once but you have to be near perfect and lucky with injuries. It can be done but it's getting more and more difficult. Also think there will be a drop off when Pep leaves whenever that is.
@IbullyWoketards 11 ай бұрын
Difference is they have Haaland now for the next decade instead of Jesus or Sterling.
@jayansaini7093 11 ай бұрын
@@IbullyWoketardsbut this season city couldn't even get 90 pts, whenever lfc don't get ruined by injuries they get 90 pts+
@docholiday-lm4vf 11 ай бұрын
@ibully they got more points without haaland. Haaland does not make it more difficult for liverpool. Still have to hit mid to high 90s to win
@leightonp8496 11 ай бұрын
@@IbullyWoketards I wouldn't bet on him staying for long once Pep is no longer there. He'll end up at Madrid at some point in his career.
@hemispheres789 11 ай бұрын
@jayansaini7093 that was because city played their C squad for the last few games as they already had the league in the bag. If they played their normal squad then they'd hit 94
@elarabymohammed1 11 ай бұрын
I don't like Mark's take on this at all. I'm an Arsenal fan and yes I felt that Man City had numerous advantages compared to us last season but I can't just pin it all down on money. We saw Inter Milan, a team that all over probably costs as much as Grealish, be the better side and almost beat Man City and that's down to passion (something that goldbridge has dismissed). Also, as in life, it's meant to be that way, some teams are expected to be richer than others but you should make the most out of it. Man City are making the most out of their wealth and United aren't making the most of their stature and resources which is also wealth (they are just awfully run). If every team is wealthy then we should stop playing football and if that's the case you could find out that probably Man City are still better because they are run better.
@sammyworms 11 ай бұрын
So basically you are saying arsenal didn't have the passion to win the pl after leading for 248 days... Then it's a shame on them and they are then bottlers...
@elarabymohammed1 11 ай бұрын
@@sammyworms that's not what I am saying....I said passion still plays part in football as opposed to what Goldbridge says that you have to be "wealthy like man city" to succeed....inter milan almost beat them with 10% of their resources...Arsenal just woke up and decided to compete 2 years ago and boom they are up there with them. Arsenal are spending indeed but they're not spending money that other premier league teams can't spend. United is incredibly wealthy through their stature and fan base and they make more revenue and the only thing that prevented them from competing are the incompetent owners.
@ewilko7423 11 ай бұрын
@@elarabymohammed1 passion doesn’t win you a league over a full season
@mh8826 11 ай бұрын
SCUM fans complaining about money and the end of football 😂😂😂
@mourice1669 11 ай бұрын
@@ewilko7423 Exactly
@JamieDaGameRX 11 ай бұрын
I disagree Mark, I mean I'm a City fan but even I can recognise how hard it is to simply "win it all" again after winning the treble, there's a reason Man United won the treble once during their dominant period, you've only got to look at City's performances in the FA Cup final and UCL final to see that we didn't play particularly great and we were obviously tired after a long successful season.
@p.a.t.79 11 ай бұрын
Yea that man united team didn’t have a bench that would win the premier league, it’s different levels they’ll do it again and again until pep leaves.
@GIBBO4182 11 ай бұрын
@@p.a.t.79 Utd’s bench won them the Champions League final…as well as countless other games
@apuabimuyiwa9559 11 ай бұрын
Point of correction! United won treble twice
@nodeenine2259 11 ай бұрын
Rubbish LFC went for the Quad last season losing UCL finals and EPL by a point with less net spend than top 6 City is great but should've lost if Arsenal was Good and had they had some luck in UCL semi & Finals it wasn't a given
@Demon11238 11 ай бұрын
@@p.a.t.79 That Treble of United Is so overrated they literally Won the Prem With 1 point off arsenal at 79 .....Pep Had to beat Madrid, Bayern, Arsenal, Man Utd for this treble
@SirHargreeves 11 ай бұрын
You could just as easily say Newcastle were close to getting relegated because of Mike Ashley underinvestment for 15 years. Prior to Ashley, they were a Champions League team.
@jamienufc1236 11 ай бұрын
Spot on mate
@virtuallimit3619 11 ай бұрын
No they were not regular in UCL also Spurs are a bigger club than Oilcastle
@RossCo.H 11 ай бұрын
Newcastle a champions League team 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. Aye twice
@kloschuessel773 11 ай бұрын
Newcastles spending sure increased a lot but they could have invested so much more over the years that it isnt an outrageous amount that was spent. It just was spent well
@benllewellyn1887 11 ай бұрын
You don't know any of your history.
@enderofruina2973 11 ай бұрын
I don’t think rip football is ever a valid statement in regards to money teams. Cause realistically, rip football since the 1880s
@Akinwalesegun 11 ай бұрын
exactly, rip when the sport went professionally
@dont5363 11 ай бұрын
Shht as long as its his team he aint complaining
@theoretisch4429 11 ай бұрын
I don't think people have a problem with money itself but where it's coming from and that it's used for sportswashing.
@bb5979 11 ай бұрын
@@theoretisch4429 sportswashing not a problem when it’s lgbtq agenda though🤓
@theoretisch4429 11 ай бұрын
@@bb5979 hmm maybe because advocating for equality is different to drawing away attention from your country's human right violations. To equate the to things is laughable.
@dddffr4392 11 ай бұрын
About money, it’s annoying when people say “city bought the premier league/champions league” but that’s not really true. City bought their way into competing for these trophies not outright bought them entirely, winning these is obviously down to money but also pep and good recruiting
@davidjb1701 11 ай бұрын
I agree Mark. I have supported City since the start of the seventies. Being the best is brilliant. Every other fan of every other club would embrace what has happened to City if it happened at their club. Its always been the case that the richest clubs were the best. City just spent loads of money to catch up and then spent more to get to the next level. Its up to everyone else to catch up
@cavanriley7373 11 ай бұрын
Respect to Southampton our 20th place side stopped the Quad 😂😂
@rhino7735 11 ай бұрын
Newcastle hasn't spent big on players they have just spent big on their infrastructure first thats why they are starting to do well now
@hotrizzla7070 11 ай бұрын
newcastle had spent £60 million on Isak and look at how good he is. Liverpool spent £85 million on Nunez and people say that it is unfair?
@All-Outta-Bubblegum 11 ай бұрын
@@hotrizzla7070 Isak is absolutely bang average. He's never gonna make it to that top level.
@bradleyfynn2326 11 ай бұрын
It was a season of Euphoria, I will be convinced by Newcastle next season
@skzcnt 11 ай бұрын
@@All-Outta-Bubblegum Absolutely clueless if you think he's bang average.
@SM19158 11 ай бұрын
@@All-Outta-Bubblegum you absolute melt! 😂😂😂😂
@shanga7827 11 ай бұрын
I’m a Liverpool fan and it pains me to say it but city deserve to be where they are. They all work extremely hard for each other. They are more like a band of brothers instead of team mates. Akanji was hardly a world beater at Dortmund and cost around 15m. Bought ake from Bournemouth. Pep has disciplined that team very well and isn’t afraid to get rid if he detects attitude hence why cancelo got punted.
@ReganJ999 11 ай бұрын
Liverpool’s moneyball approach has shown you can compete with super wealth but it does come at an cost if you lose key players to injury
@luh7823 11 ай бұрын
Mark united do play a part in how football is today. In the 90s united were apart of the g-14 group alongside europes top clubs, these teames claimed more money from the broadcasting companies and created a vision of non ending glory at these clubs, attracting bad and greedy owners.
@rfdm7270 11 ай бұрын
Great comment👏 where were all these righteous united fans trying to “save football” when they were dominating? The answer is nowhere because they dont care abt the morals they just want to dominate again
@aarnethn 11 ай бұрын
@@rfdm7270 and yet they want Qatar/Sheikh Jassim to takeover Man United. Oh the hypocrisy 😂😂😂😂😂
@mikeyminit5059 11 ай бұрын
@@aarnethn Exactly this! A bunch of hypocrites acting as if their success through the years, came from doing no wrong...
@stevenmarshall5244 11 ай бұрын
@@aarnethn Yeah, but aren't all fans fickle?. City who have always been the 'real' Manchester club, bemoaning `Rags' United didn't complain when they become a rich club themselves, did they?
@KevintheKing1 11 ай бұрын
Mark just woke up and still thinking about man city 😂
@wrathfulpanic3128 11 ай бұрын
He’s a football page though lol
@Anonymous.android 11 ай бұрын
Yeah but his hatred and jealousy for city is off the charts 😂
@phantorang 11 ай бұрын
You think he's slept? 🤣 He's been sitting there all night 😆
@danielmeb84 11 ай бұрын
People are finally talking about city, only took 13 years however next season no one will talk about city anymore as it has been
@paulrichards6894 11 ай бұрын
i thought it was only man u supporters living in Manchester who hated city not people who had only visited the place once and who live 100 miles away.....thought these people hate Liverpool
@spencerwood3932 11 ай бұрын
City fans don't have a problem with people saying "You are where you are because of money" we have a problem with the sentence ending there and not acknowledging that the money has been spent well - as though there is no credit due because our accomplishments are solely due to having money, when they aren't, although it is of course the biggest factor... it's the foundation for competing at this level
@rybro2129 11 ай бұрын
Utd wouldn't be where they are without money either. His point doesn't make sense. The difference is utd's money comes from their fan base/brand which they've built through winning things over many decades. If his disapproval is the Abu Dhabi money, then just say that. But then don't go crying about the failed utd takeover in the next breath...
@ewilko7423 11 ай бұрын
It’s the foundation now because city are the problem that started it
@neilajohnstonify 11 ай бұрын
do you have aproblem with the cheating?
@rybro2129 11 ай бұрын
@@neilajohnstonify as defined by who?
@neilajohnstonify 11 ай бұрын
The rules
@rayweir3490 11 ай бұрын
Money can't always be the excuse, united and City both have a net spend of £1Bn in the last decade the difference is that City has a top manager and elite recruitment. I'm sure the narrative will change if Jassim buys United.
@J12__ 11 ай бұрын
But united built that wealth over decades city have it cos they were bought. They wouldn’t have anything without money
@kjartemis 11 ай бұрын
@@J12__you guys keep spouting this like we are unaware lol. Of course it’s the owner’s investment in the team that caused this. Unfortunately for every other team they are doing a hell of a good job
@J12__ 11 ай бұрын
@@kjartemis yeah and there a bought fake team
@vvi6426 11 ай бұрын
@@J12__So city doesn't get money for their trophies and revenues? They don't build their wealth? You're talking as if city as a club doesn't earn money at all lmao
@bidness3975 11 ай бұрын
@@J12__ Why does it matter where the money comes from? As Mark said in the video, Man City's money is well spent. If United was ran the same way as City they would be miles ahead of every team in the world, but they aren't because they are ran terribly. So it is not Man City's fault that they are successful, it is every other club in the PL's fault; Chelsea are ran terribly, Liverpool don't get funding, Tottenham are ran terribly and Arsenal are bottle jobs. So is it Man City's fault that they are the only well-ran club in the PL? because there is 2 other clubs that have a higher net spend than them who aren't even close to their level.
@immabry1006 11 ай бұрын
In the words of the great Jose Mourinho (while incharge of Man utd) "Otamendi, Kompany, Silver, Sterling, Aguero, yaya KDB ect.. these are all investments of the past. Thats football heritage".
@maxmaxie1328 11 ай бұрын
United is the one who taught success can be bought..and City copied it and now Mark is complaining..
@emuevalrandomised9129 11 ай бұрын
Goldbridge: "They're ruining football" Also Goldbridge: "Please Qatar buy us to save United please please"
@GottPoint 11 ай бұрын
As a Newcastle fan im happy with our superwealth because i feel we can compete with man city
@fromthefountofyouth 11 ай бұрын
No, you can't. You also need a genius manager and there aren't many of them.
@bon3s325 11 ай бұрын
Liverpool in 70-80s man united in the 90s early 2000s now city now football has always been the same
@thelmaviaduct 11 ай бұрын
Money from football, not money from a state sponsored oil wealth fund spent on a tin pot club.
@azrulshah4613 11 ай бұрын
But still long way city to achieve more trophy than Liverpool and m united
@alexwright9744 11 ай бұрын
@@thelmaviaduct Who cares, only Liverpool Arsenal and Man U fans do.
@UnrulyRebel-hd2pl 11 ай бұрын
The problem with chelsea they got the money but they rush the system they literally bought a whole starting 11 in 1 season and expected result the same season, it's a process, should've ease players into a system not buy a bunch of players and add a manager and expect to win every trophy
@wobbphillipworrall1426 11 ай бұрын
If Pep was to leave this summer for example, who would they get to replace him ??? There is no one on his level
@julu8407 11 ай бұрын
"Simply, CITY are immortals" - from an arsenal fan
@lfc632 11 ай бұрын
Nothing wrong with Marks and Spencer Goldbridge 😅😅😅
@elite_dc3529 11 ай бұрын
For real 😂, I just bought a new shirt from there yesterday they got a great summer range
@elohym876 11 ай бұрын
I hope you're not being serious....😂
@Gos1234567 11 ай бұрын
His friends clothes shame him 😂😂
@elite_dc3529 11 ай бұрын
@@elohym876 depends how old you are ennit
@jorisv207 11 ай бұрын
@@elite_dc3529depends how you are inclined
@Not1Dimensional 11 ай бұрын
City will only get better because they will go and buy the next player. It's hard to see others tightening the gap. Haaland has been a massive get for them.
@loobyloo410 11 ай бұрын
Maquire comes to mind
@loobyloo410 11 ай бұрын
Now shut up. 1999. Last won
@loobyloo410 11 ай бұрын
Nice seeing you gutted
@thescythe4507 11 ай бұрын
@@loobyloo410???????
@thescythe4507 11 ай бұрын
@@loobyloo410schizophrenia?? Or Multiple presonality disorder? Want a psychiatrist?
@magicsquirrell 11 ай бұрын
It wasn't RIP football in the 90s when United won 7 out of 9 titles and a treble. Or when Liverpool dominated in the 70s and 80s. Football moves in cycles and eventually another club will move into poll position.
@tomg3131 11 ай бұрын
It was a cultural heritage then which was way more important. Those Liverpool and United sides were full of local lads from Merseyside and Manchester. How many 'local' and youth lads are in this city team? No class no heritage.
@tomben6180 11 ай бұрын
@@tomg3131Erm Phil Foden with 30 odd appearances and Rico Lewis with 20 odd appearances this season???? United and Liverpool also consistently outspent everyone before they won stuff when they did. Liverpool raided Scotland for their best players in the 70s, outspending everyone with Littlewoods’ money. United used the Edwards family wealth in the early 90s before they’d won anything and outspent everyone by double the amount!
@skevinfrederick 11 ай бұрын
@@tomg3131 Phil Foden, Cole Palmer, Rico Lewis?
@vijay-jw8gq 11 ай бұрын
@@tomg3131 very easy to use the words class and heritage with no meaning
@tomg3131 11 ай бұрын
@@tomben6180 that's it's! Phil foden that's there 1#. Got more mancs in the Everton and London teams. 1 player.
@j7sportvideo24 11 ай бұрын
No other team is close to their level. Top coach and two world class squads literally in a single team.
@pnegeoff5385 11 ай бұрын
I remember the days when everyone said how do we stop United.
@GAME-zo8qg 11 ай бұрын
These days are gone my friend , and before you know it we will say the same thing with man city ,its the circle of football ,this one is on top then that one is on top and on on is going
@MrAdonis258 11 ай бұрын
That's about 3 decades ago..
@okeefedunkley3679 11 ай бұрын
@@MrAdonis258literally 2013
@okeefedunkley3679 11 ай бұрын
@@Dude0000 exactly...man utd had to rebuild several times
@asimpleguy9667 11 ай бұрын
Liverpool had won 6 champions league titles 😅
@harrybellingham98 11 ай бұрын
newcastle didnt buy that much. I'm sorry mark but the hard work and determination of the squad is what kept them up. Newcastle owners did not spend lavishly, unless like Forest
@Wavy612 11 ай бұрын
What you're not understanding is Newcastle will never be where forrest are and that's because of the owners. The consistency is the point.
@jjmeteor 11 ай бұрын
Youre missing the point actually. Newcastle 3 seasons ago would not be able to buy Isak for 40 mil and Dan Burn for 30 mil in the same window. They hardly did that under Mike Ashley. And now they are able to do that every window is the point
@myerg2977 11 ай бұрын
@@jjmeteor ofc we could of, just ashley wouldnt
@jayansaini7093 11 ай бұрын
They were in relegation zone and buying rbs from atleti, 50mil on a talented Brazilian from lyon, 25mil on a prem proven st all in January
@T_E_K 11 ай бұрын
People are missing this completely and only choosing either one side of the argument. The success is due to both the well needed injection of money, which has helped get us some fantastic players, but it is also due to a fantastic managerial performance by Eddie and his team, bringing players who had been laughed at in previous seasons, to fantastic, consistent players. Listen as a Newcastle fan I would of been happy not being in the bottom half of the table this season, this rapid success has been nothing short of mental to be honest. As long as we stay competitive that’s all I can ask for!
@sirsporox4954 11 ай бұрын
Nathan Jones was the only one to stop a man city quadruple which is insane
@tiagoalex9573 11 ай бұрын
he says this like United doesn't overspend City 😭
@stevied667iswin 11 ай бұрын
Man City rotate so well, they don't even need to make subs. They made 2 subs last night, and both were due to injury. The fitness levels are insane.
@mihirjoshi8934 11 ай бұрын
Its said Man City has the best physios in the world💙
@aymuni 11 ай бұрын
The reason why city players will play above average 8/10 games is not because of the players, but because of pep. If John stones played for chelsea or Man U he’d be below average
@IbullyWoketards 11 ай бұрын
Exactly. Pep turns a 6/10 player into 8/10 and an 8/10 into 10/10. People forgot that Stones was a walking meme 5 years ago, their version of Phil Jones basically. Pep turned him into a reliable CB and now a flawless deep lying playmaker.
@aymuni 11 ай бұрын
@@IbullyWoketards exact same with Nathan Ake at chelsea. He was terrible
@andrewphillips6853 11 ай бұрын
@@aymuni Ake was always on loan get ur fact straight
@arathan9305 11 ай бұрын
I remember Mahrez getting memed in 18/19
@hughesey009 11 ай бұрын
@@IbullyWoketards De Bruyne, Haaland, Mahrez, the Silva's, Kompany....etc, etc. Who are these 6's you talk about? 😂
@maldini3184 11 ай бұрын
Liverpool will stop them. Klopp has proven he can do it. Should be a great season next season. Pep is a genius though so it will be very difficult
@MorinoRavenberg 11 ай бұрын
As a man city supporter, I partially agree with you; money is what makes the world go round after all. But even so, money isn't everything; the discipline of players & proper management is of the utmost importance. I was sorely disappointed with the way my City played in the UCL final, horrible just horrible...but bottom-line is we won (Inter did the same, awful performance) because we were better on the night as well as overall. Still, the worst final to any football competition I've ever seen. Like, ever..
@Giovanniditessitore 11 ай бұрын
Love is what makes the world go round! 😊
@user-jd5lj5me1g 11 ай бұрын
It’s not all about the money,if it’s abt the money then why Leipzig ain’t winning bundesliga ,why Saudi clubs hasnot won any club worldcup , why chelsea are not in top 10 after almost signing more than 11 quality players, why Man U hasn’t achieved more after spending more than 1 billion.It’s abt how u use the money properly,look at Brighton ,look at city,look at Newcastle they spend the money properly on players who are suitable for the team .
@IbullyWoketards 11 ай бұрын
1) Leipzig can’t get players like De Bruyne or Haaland. 2) Because no one wants to live in Saudi Arabia and play in a camel league (see Messi). 3) Because Chelsea have an owner who knows nothing about football which is how they ended up with the worst manager ever, Frank Lampard. 4) Because United spent 80 million on a slab head who scores goals for your rivals. Point being, you still have to get all the other things right besides just having endless money.
@Nickman. 11 ай бұрын
He is jealous
@truevanpencil5403 11 ай бұрын
When even Justin Berber has more common sense and knowledge of football than Sulkbridge 😂😂😂
@user-qc8ms5wj1w 11 ай бұрын
@@IbullyWoketards all your points you listed pretty much proved his point City knows how to use their money
@AbdulRaheem-xc4kz 11 ай бұрын
@@IbullyWoketards that’s just stupid excuses
@dami8946 11 ай бұрын
I think we knew this was always coming fair play to city for winning but i think we can all agree money buys you happiness. Unless ur Chelsea or united 😂
@MK-fd7jp 11 ай бұрын
@@Charlie_Nice that’s why he said ‘unless your Chelsea or United’ lol.
@dami8946 11 ай бұрын
@@Charlie_Niceunless Ur UNITED
@mbob07 11 ай бұрын
Chelsea won the Ucl 2 years ago them and united aren’t comparable
@Liam_m7 11 ай бұрын
Lance Armstrong won 7 tour De Frances
@londonisforeverblue1022 11 ай бұрын
we have trophies 18 of the last 20 years without fail,dont group us with those frauds
@Cloud007. 11 ай бұрын
Fun fact: united have spent more on net spend vs city since city's takeover.
@francmittelo6731 11 ай бұрын
I hate the salary cap in American sports. But, it is the best way to limit the effects of money on the game. If everybody is forced to spend the same amount of money on the players, then it prevents one team from having high level players in every position and even on the bench. Consequently, buying trophies will become very difficult.
@Kitsonator1 11 ай бұрын
Newcastle were a traditional top 6 club during the 90s and early 2000s. It was the Chelsea takeover which killed that for us.
@KingofKran 11 ай бұрын
No it was Mike Ashley (who was a Chelsea fan, so I find that a bit hilarious)
@lukeyboy1237 11 ай бұрын
Was only last year when Liverpool were 2 games away from winning a quadruple in which they spent there little enough spending extremely well. It’s not how much you spend it’s how you spend it great video Mark.
@Bru88425 11 ай бұрын
Liverpool spend plenty of money! Don’t give me that!!
@eztic4694 11 ай бұрын
And it was only this year we fell off a cliff because our squad depth is second to none and haven’t got a midfielder
@deepp1884 11 ай бұрын
@@Bru88425 how plenty of money ?? We are not even 1 leg strength of united in net spent
@Dopaaamine27 11 ай бұрын
@@deepp1884Klopp spent around 1 billion pounds since he became the manager
@fromthefountofyouth 11 ай бұрын
@@Dopaaamine27 Hahaha. You must have flunked Maths badly.
@stalledstorm775 11 ай бұрын
The hardest thing to beat city in is the league. We’ve seen over the years that Pep and City can get it wrong a few times a season (for example the Brentford losses), but this doesn’t happen more than 5-10 times a season (including cup competitions). To beat city in a cup competition, you only need to be the better team on the day (or over two days). But to beat them in the league? Be the better team over 38 games. And that is why they are so dominant in the league
@nicklevitt6395 11 ай бұрын
Im not certain but i think man utd have spent just as much as city over the last 10 years
@jordantorrilla1803 11 ай бұрын
Sat here in my M&S T-shirt and my M&S shorts wondering where it all went wrong
@TheApollotd 11 ай бұрын
Bitter as per. Using City as a distraction for United's poor financial decisions.
@MK12275 11 ай бұрын
That's exactly the reason Glazers need to go . Those shiteheads only focused on commercial players and didn't back the manager
@Wavy612 11 ай бұрын
115 charges we won't forget like you guys try to gloss over it🤡 funny thing is no one is surprised they have these charges.
@eamonnfeeney1653 11 ай бұрын
115 charges 😂
@dignusfiliusabdulius1478 11 ай бұрын
@@Wavy612 expectation: 115 charges, city buy best players in the world, it's unfair reality: you lose treble to Akanji and Ake
@vlsui66 11 ай бұрын
115 charges
@benjamynmaung2970 11 ай бұрын
There is no another Pep. That’s the problem. Unless he left City or his players start to be fed up with him, I don’t see their dominance will be halted. Even then, the squad and system Pep and Co has been building is so stable, the next manager might just need to steady the ship and keep on winning, perhaps may be not as dominant (this will make PL a little more interesting perhaps). So, I think other teams should pray for Pep to not extend his contract after this.
@thetoovmeister9799 11 ай бұрын
As Spurs fan of some years ( when 9th in the league met expectation) I’m just glad the Liverpool/Utd/Arsenal domination of 70s to 90s is over. It was dull. Great to see City, Newcastle, Chelsea and even Spurs being in the mix. The EPL is the best it has been in my view. Good teams throughout.
@BallinKylian 11 ай бұрын
Yes people can stop pep and Manchester City and sadly and it makes me feel sick to say this but it’s klopp and Liverpool if they get backed this summer I think they will challenge again
@ricardotella1864 11 ай бұрын
We're the only ones who can do it because the rest of the league is too pathetic and too useless to even scratch them.
@DB-tv7kf 11 ай бұрын
nah 😂
@MK12275 11 ай бұрын
No not Liverpool I'd prefer the plastic team over them. But Madrid will be the kryptonite once Mbappe joins
@Dante--X 11 ай бұрын
Liverpool?! The refs have parted ways with u guys so sorry to say 😂
@coasters4life388 11 ай бұрын
Arsenal will challenge again
@amernoori4157 11 ай бұрын
Our only hope is Brentford.
@jackmulkerrin5637 11 ай бұрын
Spurs?
@DronManUtd 11 ай бұрын
Burnley
@unknown11215 11 ай бұрын
Yet we still won the lg..
@amernoori4157 11 ай бұрын
@@jackmulkerrin5637 Well spurs lost once and they’re historical bottle jobs, Nottingham Forest have a higher chance of winning the league than them
@amernoori4157 11 ай бұрын
@@DronManUtd that goes without saying
@bxndnxte 11 ай бұрын
Liverpool could probably have kept up with city if our owners had invested properly after we won the ucl
@StuffedItems 11 ай бұрын
United spent more than city and look at them now. they had the ability with their money to be where city is without the state funds backing them
@danbradford7127 11 ай бұрын
Manchester United outspend all their rivals to win the treble: "Greatest achievement in English Football" Manchester City outspend all their rivals (except Man United) to win the treble: "It's ruining Football!"
@nattyswede 11 ай бұрын
Perception is a remarkable thing, eh?
@redd3890 11 ай бұрын
Half the team were from the youth set up
@MehrunesDagonJM 11 ай бұрын
They ain't as good as city so the green and gold flags will be out soon 😂😂
@ItsOctoberr 11 ай бұрын
What? Half that treble team were academy graduates. How's that outspending?
@JustStuey 11 ай бұрын
Actually, most pur rivals outspend United for the longest of times. Plus, they had so many academy players and had zero charges hanging over them. I know it hurts to admit that, but City have done it the wrong way
@snuggles3645 11 ай бұрын
Football has always been about money just because the numbers are bigger Dosent meant the concepts diffeent look at all the transfer records man United broke in the 90’s and 2000’s imagine if a report came out a city player played against a player and said go get him and they got him
@truevanpencil5403 11 ай бұрын
Exactly. Cole, Yorke, Ferdinand, veron, Stam, Saha, nistleroy and so many others…. United fans had no problems when no one could compete with united for fees. Soon as Chelsea and city appeared Fergie looked average and united didn’t dominate. Lot harder to compete with teams spending the same as you than competing against wegners Arsenal who didn’t spend for about 5 years 😂
@AB-oc7wj 11 ай бұрын
@@truevanpencil5403 not even a united fan but the point is that united earnt there revenue themselves, city and Chelsea didn’t, therefore in my opinion giving them an unfair advantage against teams previously on their level.
@BeYourOwnKindOfBeautifulX 11 ай бұрын
@@AB-oc7wj earned their revenue by how… winning because of their wealthy owners going and buying them the best players so they could go and win all the titles they did.
@DM-rc4yu 11 ай бұрын
@@truevanpencil5403 Not true. SAF was still winning everything until his final season. At no point did he "appear average".
@truevanpencil5403 11 ай бұрын
@@DM-rc4yu he did win things but no where near the dominance Peps shown. He def wasn’t winning everything at the end. Fergie didn’t influence the way teams played the game. He didn’t win 5 in 6 pl titles. He didn’t get even close to peps average points per season. Fergie times u could lose a handful of games. In most of peps if u lose 1-2 the titles probably gone. Fergie won pl titles regularly but the other trophies not so much.
@MU80k 11 ай бұрын
City do not have a big squad. They have a small squad full of quality. Other big teams have much bigger squads but their squads have many average players. If United, Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea focused on quality and having smaller squads they would do much better
@dietkebab 11 ай бұрын
Mark is right but having money is the secondary issue, the primary point is .." Spending money well". This is the point that should be emphasised, not the secondary point. Brighton is where they are because they have sent money well. Atletico Madrid is another one that spent money well in the past ....
@baitkin5546 11 ай бұрын
Difference is, City bought the Champions league whereas United bought the Carabao cup. Both bought something, with different standards.
@widexawake_ 11 ай бұрын
How did City "buy" the Champions league? Are you saying that they didn't earn any of the titles they won this season? If so, how did City do that with Chelsea spending close to a billion and BARELY survive relegation? Is Chelsea's money worth less than City's?
@koketsok7391 11 ай бұрын
@@widexawake_ both teams have spent a 1 billion pounds in the last 6 seasons The next team that's close is PSG What I'm tying to say you need to spend the most to win city has the correct formula of spending but is overflating the markets for regular clubs outside the England
@baitkin5546 11 ай бұрын
@@widexawake_ you're literally the person he is talking about in this video. Buying the champions league is not an insult, its a fact. Many teams have tried and failed but you can't deny whats right in front of you. Dont be naive.
@truevanpencil5403 11 ай бұрын
City paid to catch up years and years ago. Since pep came united have spent more. City have no transfer records really. Every single city player pep bought united could easily afford. Let that sink in …. Peps the best manager ever that’s the difference here. Mid table spending for years and they still dominate. Scary
@Jam-iv6xz 11 ай бұрын
They didn't buy, it's been a building team for years..
@rayray9991 11 ай бұрын
Yes they can be stopped! they looked very human yesterday! If Inter had Oshimen rather than Lukaku or Dezko it would have being game over....
@androsc1418 11 ай бұрын
But Lukaka was the MOM for ManCity. He prevented the equaliser.
@EyebrowsGaming 11 ай бұрын
Mark, now that the season is over, are we hopefully going to see you play Football Manager over the summer? Your playthroughs of that game have been fantastic, great fun to watch, and some of the most enjoyable content you've made outside of your punditry. Keep up the good work
@Jaybadd 11 ай бұрын
If Liverpool get their signings tight in this window they can change them in the upcoming season
@2ridiculous41 11 ай бұрын
Good analysis. City brought in the best organisers and invested in the right players. interesting how much people are still talking about Haaland when he's scored one goal in the last eight games.
@truevanpencil5403 11 ай бұрын
Yet united fans are still talking about Rashford and he’s had his first good season since forever and scored way way less 😂 typical mancs
@alexandraciobanu3342 11 ай бұрын
You are surprised people are talking about the top goal scorer in the PL and UCL? 😂
@2ridiculous41 11 ай бұрын
@@alexandraciobanu3342 after the final? Yes and no. He has learned/is learning to add different actions and it shows, but probably not that you meant.
@ne48largekid17 11 ай бұрын
newcastle spent less than forest
@bilalturkan8004 11 ай бұрын
City making this league a farmers one. Imagine the league without them. Only Arsenal and Liverpool have actually gone this close to compete
@tristiancampbell7273 11 ай бұрын
Man UTD post fergi era is the best example of how to run a rich club poorly. Blueprint of poor spending and lack of vision.
@joelthomson8697 11 ай бұрын
Give Newcastle a few seasons. Our owners are on a proper mission.
@peteryong2391 11 ай бұрын
I think Liverpool will probably be the only team in the world who could match City and stop them winning further titles. In fact, Liverpool shld have been the champions last season if not for the dubious Villa defenders conceding 3 goals within 5 mins. Chelsea could also be another team that can stop City especially now the manager is Mauricio. Actually a lot of people expected Liverpool to beat City to another title but due to some unforseen circumstances where there was 'disharmony' in the team, City were miles in front of every team not only in England but also in Europe.
@virtuallimit3619 11 ай бұрын
Won't happen
@seandrew7837 11 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@vijayshankar8744 11 ай бұрын
I stopped reading when I saw Chelsea😂😂
@jouvence7549 11 ай бұрын
It's not all about the money it's about what you do with the money, Let's appreciate greatness when we see it.
@exeter1985 11 ай бұрын
There's one way to stop City... Enforce the Rules of Football. Which we all know will never happen.
@dachless 11 ай бұрын
Well lets be fair Mark. When people, especially Content Creators and pundits, are saying "RIP Football" and "Save Football [insert team here]" and "morals may be gone from football" and when you complain about how rich we are, Its VERRRYYYYYY difficult to take "You guys are rich" as a compliment... You realize you cant complain about something but then turn around and claim its a compliment. You just cant do that.
@vvi6426 11 ай бұрын
They don't credit or understand the journey the city fans had from down below in the league, the disappointment after disappointment in the UCL KO rounds to get where they are.... they say it's "bought"..... well, if city could buy it, they'd have done it long before to avoid those disappointments
@michaelwatson7605 11 ай бұрын
As a newcastle fan ,i remember a certain club dominated the 90s league titles , no coversation on how to stop them , same when a Liverpool dominated the 80s ,your argument is its not fair you have money like us and you spend it better
@stonedwizard420 11 ай бұрын
This is hilarious coming from the guy who put more man u players than city players in his premier League XI this season
@ajmolabedin5739 11 ай бұрын
Chelsea have reportedly agreed personal terms with Andre Onana as they prepare for him to become their new first-choice keeper
@bobdfgh7795 11 ай бұрын
Not sure why mark is pretending that the richest teams haven’t always won everything, Man Utd were the richest team in the world and used to win things because of ut
@martinmacfoy9173 11 ай бұрын
As a Liverpool fan, I must admit I love your shows. You are honest in your assessment, funny sometimes, and very respectful. keep up the good work
@paulrichards6894 11 ай бұрын
sarcasm??
@stevemin559 11 ай бұрын
@@paulrichards6894 as a Liverpool fan..you sure about that? I've been a red for 40 years and the bias on this guy is comical,only reason I watch it sometimes for the comedy value
@paulrichards6894 11 ай бұрын
@@stevemin559 i am saying the OP saying goldbridge is honest is an attempt at sarcasm....goldbridge is one of the most dishonest biased people on the internet
@paulrichards6894 11 ай бұрын
@@stevemin559 in a combined city\united team he had 6 united players
@stevemin559 11 ай бұрын
@@paulrichards6894 yes he is but people lap it up
@hanafitalib 11 ай бұрын
Football is like running a great commercial corporate companies! You must hv a strong Capital$, clear goals, exceptional leaderships at the top & super strong glue of teamwork via players! Infra & support systems are given as concrete foundations!
@beyondregularsavings 11 ай бұрын
Its not stopping City. Its stopping Pep. If Pep leaves, City is just another EPL team
@christiangonzalez6710 11 ай бұрын
Bro it's been more than thirteen years since they got taken over and people think that the money just got them here with no effort bro the players worked hard and you got respect them for that and stop disrespecting their club. Congratulations to man city
@reviewyourlife5358 11 ай бұрын
They wouldn’t be relevant without the money. Simple. It could be West Brom in their position if they got bought.
@edjay4811 11 ай бұрын
@@reviewyourlife5358 Makes no sense given Chelsea's spending this year and their shambolic results
@zozohd226 11 ай бұрын
@@reviewyourlife5358 what do you want them to do not spend money United fans crying because the treble ain’t relevant no more 😂
@reviewyourlife5358 11 ай бұрын
@@zozohd226 you’re missing the point. You’re telling me City would have won that without the takeover?
@akimwills198 11 ай бұрын
@@reviewyourlife5358 every team spends money
@chriscarey1879 11 ай бұрын
Well said.....by the man who can't wait for Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad Al Thani's final bid to come in for Man Utd 😂😂😂
@jaylin39 11 ай бұрын
So sad as a United fan, but I can stay positive because we have a chance to win Treple next season!!!! Let's go United!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@petrov3190 11 ай бұрын
Man City just have so many very good players. De Broyne went off due to injury and Phoden comes in and did great. This is the level Man City achieved, they can replace even their best player easily, but that doesn't happen just like that, alot of money needs to be spent over the years and Man City did it and they've done it really well.
@stikks 11 ай бұрын
Probably the 100+ allegations, if they actually go through.
@aryan.4855 11 ай бұрын
People think it’s easy to prove 100+ charges, the pl needs a lot of evidence to prove their guilty and how can they if Man City won’t give them the documents that pl requesting from them.
@Kaijufied 11 ай бұрын
I heard it will take until 2027 for the court case to be decided
@sol4r352 11 ай бұрын
We have to rely on newcastle, simple as that
@ryleighloughty3307 11 ай бұрын
Man City deserves their successes; the only way to 'stop' them is to emulate them. Different from the 'going nowhere' Man United, City's greatest strength is having few entitled and talentless UK players.
@tydoyel7053 11 ай бұрын
Its up to the rest to build a model in a similar way cos they have shown how it should be done in this era of football. As a Villa fan i look and have to admire what they have achieved. Its taken them years to mould it into something that is hard for others to challenge. Money and using it in a way that had a target from the outset, building year on year growing stronger at each level of achievement. There is no quick way IMO, all the different elements have to be in place from the start and then just keep adding and adding more to sustain it. So bloody hard but they have shown it can be done. Its up to the rest to try to emulate that. Elite owner, elite business people, elite management and coaching, club structure, ground building, elite players and academies either to sell or keep and fans who believe in the plan. There are a few clubs who may consider themselves being able to achieve this but it wont be in the next five years i dont think . Well done i say. UTV
@user-to5jl9gv4k 11 ай бұрын
Then why don’t you support a winning team like them and leave a sh*t team like villa ?
Sky Sports Premier League
Рет қаралды 491 М.
Daily Dose Of Football
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Man City
Рет қаралды 4,1 МЛН
footedits77
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН