2023 now the cost 100k times change

@@tinleo3339 5.8 V8 32v, supercharged, 662 hp, 631 LB-FT torque

$140’000 with inflation costs recently in Canada. Everything in general is overpriced cause governments want more money from us, to do absolutely nothing with economy. Looking for a new car soon and even the most basic cars are like 30’000! I own a bloody Mini and it costs less than a freaking Civic. 😂

​@@tinleo3339you're lying, I can literally see some at auctions going for 50k, unless you're buying a REALLY expensive version/newer model but I HIGHLY doubt anyone would buy it for that price. Insane.

@@Kiule2 I've seen some go for about $65K at auctions (after a few bids..for really low mileage 2013 models). I have seen some '14 models go for about $55K (which is strange since it is essentially the same car with very few differences and one year newer). The track pack cars and also the glass roof equipped ones seem to run higher. I haven't seen any convertibles at the auctions though...

Jennifer Wilkerson not just the girls love the gt500, kids , young adults, elderly people also teachers, doctors, surgeons, police oficcers in first place, and basically all americanos should love this car is even more american than the camaro just remember this camaros where invented to beat the mustangs just keep that in mind back in the day there where only mustangs until Chevrolet said thats enough and came up with a hotter and more attractive to the eye car the camaro but in reality is not but im not hating on camaros either you know i had a 2012 ss 6.2 and a 2014 zl1 and they both where my babys but when i got to the gt500 it was in another level shit i was in aother galaxy when i first step into the pedal. just in conclusion Chevrolet makes good pony cars but ford makes the better cars since day one.

Jennifer Wilkerson I love you for getting the Shelby

Made you a little moist in the undercarriage didn’t it?!

Jennifer Wilkerson This is an old comment but do you still have the car??

Just wait till the 2020 shelby gt500 comes out suppose to be faster than a hellcat

Im always like what year did this car come out in is this 1998?

Mustang started In 1968 and Shelby came a little after

*65

*64 1/2

John Davis is a legend..been doing this for 40+ years.

Garage queens are always in good health

Shut up car is just well made

That 3.7 is a decently reliable engine but it doesn’t do you any favors at the pump. Even in the V6 Mustangs back when they sold them with it they had nearly the same economy as the V8 GTs with far less thrills.

Me too!

@@glzarmy $33k for a 13/14 f Gt500? Has over 100k miles or a branded title.

Now 40s.. 45k plus

Future classic (along with the S197 Boss)

2021 and the average is 49K. I think it's about time I scoop one up.

Yep these cars will continue to rise in price. They where only built for 2 years... well at least with the 5.8 trinity, anytime a car is built for just a couple years with a special engine the value is always going to climb, just like the 03/04 terminators

i have same car 15000 miles like new still very happy with it. the 11/12 don't get there due like the 13/14 does its like 550 hp is not good enough

@@searaydrivingguy it's like 95% due to the different blower. Not only did the 5.8 receive a better 2.3 tvs vs a 2.1 non tvs on the 12 its also spinning a decent bit faster doing like 14 psi stock vs 9 psi for the 12. Put the same blower on a 12 it makes comparable power to the 13 with the 5.4. Imo the 5.4 is the better motor once modded. They can all take about 800 hp on a stock motor but the 5.4 seems to hold up better from what I've seen at higher power levels. With all that said people see stock hp is lower on the 5.4 cars so they automatically think potential must be lower that couldn't be further from the truth. Swap that head unit out for a trinity 2.3 or even better a vmp tvs the 5.4 is every bit as good. On paper the 5.8 had various small changes but in the real world the better blower and the fact it was pushing more boost stock was 95% of the power difference. The 5.4 cars have the same badass tr6060 trans and the motor is just as stout if not more so. I am very familiar with how over looked the 5.4 cars are being the owner of an 07. Mine is at 550 rwhp with simple bolt ons I don't even have headers. I have a vmp gen3r 2650 tvs I got on black Friday from vmp for 3499 brand new when I swap the blower in the spring it'll be more than a match for most 13-14 cars with similar mods. The earlier cars were just more restricted stock ecspecially 07-09 but once modded they're all just as capable. The 5.8 is overrated and the 5.4 is underrated.

@@michealortiz3350 And the Shelby engines can hold more. They are made to be.

225 horse in a light weight fox was pretty good in 1988. They were one of the quickest cars around ecspecially for the money. It isn't always just about hp. The old 5.0 has 300 lbs ft of torque and had alot of potential. Yea hp wise they have alot more these days but so does everything. Every manufacturer has came a long ways in 33 years lol

300lb of tq was it's strong point. I had an '86.

They're not gonna answer you stupid bitch...

yea wtf lol

Arthur1992 yeah, motor week has never changed its review style and I think it's pretty cool

The best part about it. Reviews have remained the same since the beginning.

Arthur1992 So?

It's a red Saleen

4 years later and I gotta say: Wish granted

...And now we know they added weight *everywhere* and made a 4100 lb Mustang. 😕 They managed to make a car that can turn some fast lap times, and still feel ponderous doing it.

Robert Smith: I thought Ford dropped the 5.0 in '96 for mustangs and moved to the 4.6 initially for the 96+ Mustang years and then put a 4 valve 281 (still 4.6) Supercharged motor in the '03/'04 Cobras? From 2002-2009 due to low sales the camaro was dropped and the mustang had no camaro competition. The SS/Camaro was brought in because it really really needed to (mustang had no camaro competition since 2002 and since the modern GT500 came out in 2007 with 500hp). The ZL1 was brought in to eclipse the then current GT500 (had 550hp at the time) with the new 580hp ZL1. Unfortunately Ford crashed that coming out party by announcing the 662hp '13 GT500. I think both car companies have to thank each other for the competition. It did not look good for Camaro since 2002 and it did take while, but I am glad the last generation of ZL1 came out with 650hp. Without that competition the 2020 GT500 (probably 775hp) would probably not be coming out.

With an automatic transmission, it would suprass 130 mph easily

Mr dark man never been done wit some slicks it can go over 130

@@Steve_Milo well if it should be that way, why does the 2020 gt500 come in automatic only? Not to mentikn its a dual clutch which is ultra fast. And i dont care how professional you are. You can still get beated by a well made and programed automatic like the 10 speed in the zl1 1le vs a 6 speed. Btw, we have paddle shifters to keep the rpms within range in the corners. And what if someone just wants to have a auto to let the car do what its supposed to do and you just sit there and chill while you cruise down the road. Its my money. I shouldnt have to buy an automatic and get ridiculed by you or others that oppose automatics for some stupid reason. Ive driven a manual before and the only thing that happened was me cutting off the engine like 9 times. Even when i got it in gear and started shifting (i was driving a 2017 challenger scatpack manual), i didnt feel any sensation or fun that alot of ppl speak about so much. So i basically did not enjoy my time driving a manual. I can just put the automatic gear shifterinto manual mode and change geads using the paddle shifters. And since ive got 8 gears or more to play with, it in a way adds more fun because there's more combinations than 6 gears. Yes you have the 3.73 gearing to a rather shorter gearing set that autos typically have, but the extra gears compensate for that. Not to mention you can get better mpg if ur cruising with an auto than with a manual. Yes ur not concerned with fuel when you have a muscle car. But who doesnt wanna get the best out of their cars when it counts? I do. Also a final thing. Autos nowadays come with remote start and not manuals. Most cars will automatically turn on the ac and vented seats if equipped when its hot outside (like here in houston where its almost always hot and humid) and in the winter time will get the oil running to operating temp while the heater and heated seats and sterring wheel (if equipped) will get started and warmed up. You cant do that with manuals.

@@Steve_Milo im talking about remote start. Cars equipped with remote start must have a automatic transmission for obvious reasons. It might be a feature worth having for someone who aants to either just start up their car from a distance or to have a more comfortable inside. Its just a feature that manuals dont get to have. So if someone wants remote srart, they have to sacrifice the manual. And why is it that across the board on the 3 american muscle car brands, the automatic variant has a higher rated mpg in city and/or highway than its manual variant - even if its a gain in 1 mpg? For example, the challenger manual scatpack is rated at 14/23 while the automatic is rated at 15/25. And for the manual scatpack, you have to pay a $1000 gas guzzler tax. With the auto, you dont

@@Steve_Milo 2016 camaro ss with the 8 speed is rated at 17/28 which is very impressive while the manual is rated at 16/25. And the mustang with the 10 speed is rated at 16/25 while the 6 speed is 15/25

DId you ever get the shelby?

Or just slap a VMP blower on that GT

Carroll Shelby's degree of involvement was to give them permission to use his name. ...Since about 1967. It was no secret this GT500 was 100% an SVT product, and their successor to the "Terminator" Cobra.