Market entry consulting case interview (w/ two ex-BCG consultants)

Рет қаралды 47,451

rocketblocks

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 28

@sandychai9096 2 ай бұрын

This interviewee broke down the question very gracefully. Great video

@zhuyan7347 Жыл бұрын

this is really really helpful! Looking forward to more mock interviews videos ❤

@rocketblocks Жыл бұрын

Thanks! We release mock interview every other week so hit that subscribe button to get notified when the neck mock goes live!

@bettybada7693 10 ай бұрын

Super helpful!

@rocketblocks 10 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@wendyyang497 6 ай бұрын

Hi! Is this an example of an interviewer-led type of interview?

@bloat4hk 5 ай бұрын

When he asks to take a minute to think, how long do you give him?

@guowei591 Жыл бұрын

Good job

@rocketblocks Жыл бұрын

Kudos to Chris and Sean on this one!

@prabhavnarang7109 11 ай бұрын

Hey, I'm slightly confused on how having customers as a separate bucket is MECE. If we're sizing the market under the first bucket, we're inherently looking at the number of customers we have? Is it perhaps fine to assume that in the first bucket you're trying to quantify the customers and in the second one, you're looking at qualitatively seeing their preferences?

@1Piece_Luffy 11 ай бұрын

It is a two-step process. 1. Can we earn money in this market environment? (1) the Market at Macro-level (Size and growth) and (2) the Market at Micro-level (Clients, Customers, and Competitors) 2. Then how much? (1) Revenue (Price x Quantity Sold) and (2) Expenses (Direct Material, Direct Labor, Variable Overhead, and Fixed Costs). For the sake of simplicity, the interviewee just mentioned: 1) Market, 2) Competitors, 3) Customers, 4) Company - including profitability framework.

@PoojaMukherjee-ci7rd Жыл бұрын

Could you please share the calculations that Sean is doing in written format? Would be very helpful for someone like me from a non-business background.

@rocketblocks Жыл бұрын

Hi Pooja, this full case and all written solutions can be found on RocketBlocks!

@ANA-db9yn 6 ай бұрын

@@rocketblocksyou would have been be better to write the calculations than refer her to your channel. Why didn't you write them and end the story ?❗

@alilahlou5509 3 ай бұрын

@@ANA-db9yn To increase number of visitors on their website haha!

@muhammadputera6593 26 күн бұрын

@@ANA-db9yn it's to drive conversion to their product offerings

@kimfacundolkim2033 Ай бұрын

I am a risign senior and i was wondering if this is MBA level or this would also be for associate level?

@amishakatkamwar4509 3 ай бұрын

I didn't get the calculation he done at 10.35 minutes

@TheVietnameseDevil Жыл бұрын

😎

@oogabooga2525 6 ай бұрын

I am confused on how he did the calculation for the graph at around 7:30?

@dhanashreegadhikar8281 6 ай бұрын

It is approximate calculation!difference between year 4 and year 5 divided by year 4(approximately) 500Mn/40Bn

@stanvanillo9831 5 ай бұрын

Should be 5bn over 40bn though, he was incorrect there @@dhanashreegadhikar8281

@bshelby2k3 4 ай бұрын

@@dhanashreegadhikar8281 That’s incorrect the change is approximately 5B not 500Mn which is how he came to a conclusion of the change being around 12%. He says 500Mn in the video but this is actually incorrect according to the chart.

@SuperFerro1990 4 ай бұрын

@@bshelby2k3 why isn't the change considered from Y1 to Y5 since that's the target? Why doing it between Y4 and Y5? The market is going to increase around 50% in the next 5 years (44B - 29B)/29B

@anastasiapignatti3169 Ай бұрын

@@SuperFerro1990 I have the same question as you

@NatPineda-mu9jx Ай бұрын

is this for an undergraduate level hire or MBA/ lateral hire?

@kimfacundolkim2033 Ай бұрын

I had the same question

@xxflow7453 Ай бұрын

Nice case. Too bad that the preparer chose to focus on employee costs. Labor force availability/shortage is a macro indicator and should not be viewed as a barrier to entry in an industry that doesn’t require niche/expert know-how. It would just impact your salary costs going forward and would result in somewhat lower margins than observed historically.