Nice review! That's the clasp from 116660 Deepsea, not a 116600 Sea-Dweller. The dial is also not deep black as with the Submariner, but has a subtle vintage touch. It is very likely that Rolex chose a cyclops for this Sea-Dweller because the movement is actually too small for the dial and without a cyclops it would be noticeable that the date window is too far to the center. Another fun fact, the Mk1 (the real 50th anniversary model) can be distinguished from the MkII by the lack of the crown between Swiss Made at 6 o'clock and missing a dash at 1 from 1220.

Good information, thank you!

Had this piece, Loss of symmetry , bezel too large for dial, ran slow after a year, good points: glide lock clasp. Sold it and wear the better More

Nice job!!

I love my 23 Sea Dweller! The watch is made for large wrists.

Does the 2023 SD have an 'anti-reflective coating'ÉÉ I heard on one of hte mrecent iterations of the Ausb---Rolex finally added it. :) But noone mentioned which year 'from--" or if itès true....I would have thought all Rolex dive watches or any of hteir watches would have an AR coating by now....like every other brand....i heard the 41mm Sub now has an AR coasting...better to have than not...

Really enjoyed this video 👍

Best

J'AI

Is it better then Casio?

The Bezel is to big in my humble opinion.

Nice details. Thanks.