I have to admit Rolex has made a decent homage to Steinhart
@ahtoh8274 Жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@iOllie7 ай бұрын
💀😂
@herrk5651 Жыл бұрын
If I would look at them without knowing anything about watches I'd say the Steinhart is the better proportioned, better looking watch.
@obiyahu8889Ай бұрын
Right on...I agree 💯😊
@jamesejudy34 жыл бұрын
Great comparison. I swear so many people call a Steinhart a "one-to-one copy" of a Rolex sub have never seen the two side by side.
@henriklmao3 жыл бұрын
Compared the two myself, they do look different. I like a couple things from the rolex more but also a couple things from the steinhart
@TheFlyrodder68 Жыл бұрын
It looks like the Steinhart watch is the winner here.
@ClassicalProtestant3 жыл бұрын
2 Steinharts...and I’ll be grabbing a 3rd. Not for the price for the QUALITY.
@jeremya72997 күн бұрын
I have had my Ocean One for 9 years and I haven’t had a single issue. I am ready for another one.
@maffintono77903 жыл бұрын
If you read this. than GO for the steinhart. The rolex prices is absurd. Its NOT worth for what you get! Sure in a few years you can sell it for more money.. but what does that mean emotionatly? Nothing. I had 6 rolex models. They all got boring. I own a steinheart ocean one. And get the same joy out of it.
@oaoaoas3 жыл бұрын
you lie
@maffintono77903 жыл бұрын
@@oaoaoas why you think that...?
@saddiqjeelani5632 жыл бұрын
@@oaoaoas expensive does not mean better.
@rodm2895 Жыл бұрын
ive had the steinhart ocean 39 for over 5 years and its a fantastic watch,never had any issues
@viplivesmatter Жыл бұрын
Bracelets is not so flashy, what a pity. Is it possible to change the bracelet?
@EastCoastPGS Жыл бұрын
@@viplivesmatter Yup you can change out the bracelet on the steinhart pretty easy. I have both a rolex sub that I wear on special occasions and a steinhart I wear as a daily watch.
@viplivesmatter Жыл бұрын
@@EastCoastPGS very interesting! thanks for answering🙏🏻
@flyingrocket3879 Жыл бұрын
An 8/10 watch vs a 10/10 watch. Clearly Rolex shell’s out 100,000,000 per year in marketing. So we all fall victim to brain washing. But Steinheart is an amazing micro brand.
@eustab.anas-mann95107 ай бұрын
The Glashütte SeaQ is so much better than a "10/10" Rolex Submariner.
@patricj9512 жыл бұрын
2 months ago I got a Steinhart 39 Ocean blue ceramic. So excellent finish and quality. Yes, it's pretty small on my 17cm/6,7 inch wrist. I would like 42mm version but Steinhart's 50mm straight lug to lug distance will likely be too much.
@patricj9513 жыл бұрын
Thanks for review! I think we can conclude: you get what you pay for, is valid when it comes to Steinhart. And while Rolex is better, you pay far more than what you get. And while I am very interested in Steinhart 39mm "Pepsi"-version I wonder if such a watch makes too much attention in some places. At 1 or 2 meters distance it looks like a Rolex, and a black version is more discrete, I think.
@DJSIC824 жыл бұрын
Thank you!! i am glad i finally found a video with this watch next to the Rolex. They do look very similar in my opinion but that's not a bad thing. I replace the Ceramic bezel on my Steinhart to a aluminum one and the watch Looks hell of a lot better in my opinion it does not look anything like the newer Rolex sub, it looks more like the older vintage ones due to the case not being as wide and i love it!
@davidsonviray14032 жыл бұрын
did they update the bezel of the steinhart? because i saw some reviews of this watch it has "ghost bezel"
@imranbecks4 жыл бұрын
I have the Steinhart. I really like the polished edges of the bezel on the Steinhart. And not forgetting the slimmer lugs. Hate the maxi lugs of the Rolex.
@martin-drt Жыл бұрын
What’s the differences between steinhart ceramic bezel vs aluminium bezel especially in terms of visual/look ? Thanks !
@achannel127 Жыл бұрын
Salve Michele, secondo lei la differenza di qualità tra i due si sente molto?
@jollyrob4 жыл бұрын
Great review/comparison. I have the 42mm version of the Steinhart which I prefer to the 39 but I think it's good to have the choice. It also has metallic numbering on the bezel like the Rolex. I prefer the Steinhart lugs - the cyclops is adequate but nowhere near as good as the Rolex.
@vichardy3504 Жыл бұрын
I recently purchased the Steinhart Ocean One vintage Military Diver (I think that was the name) while waiting for my number to come up on the Rolex "registry" for the basic no-date version (as pictured). The AD is vague about delivery date, but says 1 to 2 years, maybe. The Steinhart is a 42 and no date (which I like). I have to say this is about my favorite watch now and I'm really wondering if I should spend $9K plus tax on the Rolex.
@robbiecleighmarks30884 жыл бұрын
Hey nice review buddy, I love my steiny gmt pepsi.
@MrWayneploof3 жыл бұрын
I have a Steinhart ocean one vintage 42 mm i love it. was nice to see the two side by side
@LaberintoAzul3 жыл бұрын
I'm thinking getting one. What movement has, do you know? Thanks.
@MrWayneploof3 жыл бұрын
@@LaberintoAzul it's ETA 2824-2
@LaberintoAzul3 жыл бұрын
@@MrWayneploof Thanks , man.
@jamiehayn2 жыл бұрын
Nice, I got the Ocean One 39 Hulk
@mr2bmw Жыл бұрын
I don't own any of the 2, but the Steinhart looks nicer.
@Beck-Stein2 жыл бұрын
Ocean is the older case body. I prefer the newer rolex case with beefier lugs.
@carlkim2577 Жыл бұрын
Which Rolex reference? Thanks.
@Ahcelaht4 жыл бұрын
How is the bezel on that Steinhart? Is it stiff? Does it have a lot of wiggle?
@maxbrenner64264 жыл бұрын
No wiggle, but mine is rather stiff... Difficult to rotate, but that's not a problem for me... At least it stays in place that way...
@jollyrob4 жыл бұрын
The bezel has very little wiggle on my 42mm version.
@Dochorahan2 жыл бұрын
add a drop of boca bearings high speed oil to the side of the case where the bezel gap, it will make it turn like butter...smooth and quieter. Or any synthetic or high quality mineral bearing oil.
@soulman1419 Жыл бұрын
Pound for pound the steinheart more value for money.
@bernardwadding3 жыл бұрын
The Crystal is far more reflective on the steiny, despite the double ar coating. There’s definitely a better quality Crystal used on the Rolex
@Strix0611 ай бұрын
Well yeah. It costs 10k compared to 500 euros.
@kkrsnn56323 жыл бұрын
The Tudor is missing here 😉
@Dani-mn4qg Жыл бұрын
Avendo posseduti entrambi, la differenza a polso fa la corona. Sullo Steinhart infatti è molto più sporgente e si scavava nel dorso della mano.
@jonharry62933 ай бұрын
At lease the Rolex does not leak water, my Steinhart ocean one has…….😮
@lenjames2 жыл бұрын
Watch snubs probably fell on the floor with the Rolex next to a simple man's watch...lol
@Rapparini4 жыл бұрын
Lo Steinhart é un homage al vecchio sub... non al nuovo...
@korenglik46344 жыл бұрын
is this rolex a replica?
@SkyNikita3223 жыл бұрын
no, it's a rolex improvement by krauts technikerz
@picassoboy523 жыл бұрын
If it was a replica it would say Rolex, not Steinhart, get it?
@korenglik46343 жыл бұрын
@@picassoboy52 I asked if the Rolex is a replica, get it?
@henriklmao3 жыл бұрын
@@korenglik4634 looks pretty real, but I cannot confirm a 100%
@Super3xtr43 жыл бұрын
@@korenglik4634 its a replica 100%, look at the numbers on the bezel, way too dark
@randyreynolds1045Ай бұрын
The STEINHART is much better❤
@soulman141911 ай бұрын
Value for money steinhart wins all day long .
@retardbusdriver2752 жыл бұрын
steinhart is almost better
@bryanryan45042 жыл бұрын
I think the quality of look and feel overall the steinhart falls short ..lot of people say the look and feel is almost same. I don't agree.
@Dochorahan2 жыл бұрын
no one says it's the same. I have 3 steinharts, it's not close to a rolex, but it is a damn good watch for only $600 USD and beats every other watch in this price category. It is nearly impossible to find another watch at 39mm or smaller with a SW200 or even SW330. Except maybe C60 38mm. But my CW is still better quality than steinhart. Even NTH is a little better in case finishing. Zelos is good too. But a Ginault or Monta would blow away the Steinhart.
@bryanryan45042 жыл бұрын
@@Dochorahan oh yes I agree w you on ginault and monta and cw ..don't know much about zelos but heard good things Have you ever looked at gevril? They have a few divers (I own 3 of them they're that good) they can be had for 500 and I believe are on the level of a 1500-2000 dollar diver in fit and finish quality.
@Daytona893 жыл бұрын
Ferrari VS Wheelbarrow
@martinkosicek12244 жыл бұрын
This sub looks shady :)
@jollyrob4 жыл бұрын
Very easy to say that but can you give a reason why or are you just pretending to know what you're talking about?
@waterhead10294 жыл бұрын
If it's a replica, it's a really good ZZF or a Noob. I can't spot anything, but my only skill in noticing things comes from YT video watch geeks :)
@martinkosicek12244 жыл бұрын
Bezel engraving way too dark also sel gap.. just look the bezel number how dark thay are compares to steiny - they should have been platinum
@waterhead10294 жыл бұрын
@@martinkosicek1224 I think I read that to the trained eye, the lack of platinum fill it a tell. For
@garyarnold6024 жыл бұрын
Definitely shady...the bezel markers
@KevinSmith-wp9qs3 жыл бұрын
This is like comparing a VW Golf with a Porsche 911 Turbo
@MrVaeron2 жыл бұрын
No, not really. Actually its like comparing an Audi A4 with a BWM 7, but the A4 only costing as much as a Polo.
@KevinSmith-wp9qs2 жыл бұрын
@@MrVaeron The craftsmanship that goes into a Rolex is light years away from Steinhart. Don't believe the hype that the cost is marketing, you are paying for true quality.
@Super3xtr43 жыл бұрын
That Rolex is a fake.
@rjac0012 жыл бұрын
That's the problem with Rolex too many fakes around
@fvlok5 ай бұрын
95% of Rolex’s are fake
@litez8459 Жыл бұрын
I wish rolex would just sue Steinhart. No creativity amongst brands anymore. Hardly anyone comes with creative/new ideas or designs now.
@user-xg3vg3tw1x3 ай бұрын
Steinhart the best ❤
@shaunmackinga50122 жыл бұрын
Bad comparison no date magnification comparison on the sapphire crystal. Nope not good enough. Sorry! Disliked video.