Igen csak az nem mindegy ha az egyik lemészárolja a másikat

​@@matejozsa6341exact ! Transilvania sub ocupația austro-ungară a fost transformată într-o sângeroasă măcelărie! Popoarele nu uită! Cehii spun "în Dunăre cu ungurii!" ... Ungurii se fac că nici usturoi n-au mâncat, nici gura nu le pute!..deși duhnesc duhoarea lor până peste hotare 😅

Din pacate taci malc si inveti istoria extremistilor maghiari, non-universala! Remélem megengedi a szólásszabadságot! A videód durva hamisítvány, nehezen hiszem el, hogy nem ismered a történelmet. csak 1 percet néztem. Például azt mondta, hogy Románia megtámadta a korábbi szövetséges Oroszországot. Az egyetemes történelem katonai beavatkozásnak tekinti. Azt nem mondod, hogy Oroszországot a bolsevikok hódították meg, Románia megtámadta a Moldovai Köztársaság bolsevikjait, akiket még mindig Orbán Viktor dicsőít! ROMÁNIA VÉDELEMRE KÜLDTE A NEMZETI KINCSET ÉS SOK ARANYOT MOSZKVABA. OROSZORSZÁG ELlopta.

Balkan power bre!! Romania!!!

igaz, de azért vannak gerincesek és gerincesebbek.

az a vicc, hogy most az aktuál politikát ismervén arra jöttem rá, hogy hiába érettségiztem le 4-esre, voltam végig 5-ös, lófaszt nem tanultunk, mindenki a wermachtra, ss-re és ezekre gerjedt, de a valóságot azt sose adták le úgy érzem.

Egyetértek! Ideje végre felébredni... Meggyőződésem, hogy a román hazugság áradat nagyon gyönge lábakon áll. Csak ostoba, hamis és szándékosan rosszindulatú érveik vannak, amik tarthatatlanok! (Persze tudnék kevésbé szalonképes módon is fogalmazni...)

P

Abszolút. Biztos vagyok benne, hogy fizetett kommentelőik is vannak. Meguntam az időpocsékolást velük. (Sajnos, ebben a mai napig százszor jobbak, hogy mit kell tenni ahhoz, hogy jól eladd magad.)

@@militaryorchid7937 Ezt én is tapasztalom! Argentínától Malajziáig rajonganak értük!✌👍🤲 Bukarest a világ legfantasztikusabb helye, a parlamentjük világbajnok (cigánybarokkban valóban!), a nyelvük ősi és természetesen imádnivaló igaz lelkek...🤣😂🤣😂 Akkor sem szabad annyiban hagyni a dolgot. Nagyon hamar kifogynak az érvekből, mivel azok nem észérvek, hanem emocionálisak! Ezt a szennyet kapják születésüktől fogva a képükbe, fülükbe. Az (ottani) magyar pedig örül, hogy hagyják "élni"!

@@benyovszkyistvan408 Ez igaz, csak amatőr szinten, intézményesítés nelkül nem fogjuk felvenni a versenyt velük a tudatiparban. Pedig bizony kell a cégér, a jó bornak is.

Aranka Köller,idáig is mindenkit mi fogadtunk be ahogy a cigányokat is akiket indiából basztak ki,sok szar szlávot is akakik a a háboruk után itt maradtak,csak a magyarokat kergetik el a szülő földjeikről ami soha nem volt az külföldieké !

Megint igazad van. "Adj szállást a tótnak, kiver a házadból." Régi jó közmondás és milyen igaz! Öreganyját - így helyes. Dupla nny-nek ejted, de nyj-nek írod. (Bocsi, nem tudtam megállni.) 🤭😆🤗

Mi az, hogy nagyserű előadás? Ebből csak ennyi jött le?

Sunteți o iulizie întrutotul cotropitorilor visați visați pana va ia coșmarul vorbiți indodi cum se zice. 🤮

valószínű h ott azért ezeket jobban tudják, mint itthon nekünk tanították.

Isten meg fog büntetni hazugságért! Rengeteget hazudott, nézz az arcába.

Köszönöm a jókívánságokat!

Az on tortenesze a tortenelem melet jar nem ismeri a sajat tortenelmet nem hogy a masiket

@@zoltanhegyi2328 Exactly Hagi Sultan :) "mihalysardi7308" = may not know but i do know "your" game!

A román politikusok nem zseniálisak voltak, hanem rabló hódítók.

Mármint hogy ilyen erkölcstelen ganék? Várd ki a végét, a mi politikusaink 1000 évig uraltak egy területet, ahol 500 éven át nem volt többségben a magyarság. Az Oláhoknak van idáig 100 éve, mióta lenyúlták Erdélyt egy trükkel. Várd ki meddig lesz így, a történelemben semmi sem örök!.

Pont ilyen erkölcstelen ganék, csak épp a saját nemzetük ellen dolgoznak:)

@@bizalom77 Van nagy román nemzetállam vagy nincs? Van. Van minden magyart magába foglaló maygar nemzetállam? Nincs. Ennyi. Politikában, háborúban nincs olyan hogy "jaj ezt nem illik..". A román nemzetállamiság megszületésétől kezdve 60(!!!!) év alatt végrehajtották a román nemzeti egységet a semmiből! Mi 103 éve kesergünk ennek hiánya miatt! Lehet gondolkodni. És ők a hülyék????

Pontosan, persze azt elfelejtik hozzátenni, hogy semmi közük nincs a dákokhoz, sem vérileg, sem kulturálisan...

@@Vengeance22 we are dacians you mongol

@@getbget9244 The true descendants of the Scythians called by Strabo and Ptolemy Dacha - the Dacians are among you, but they are now called Hungarians and Szeklers! Lucius Flavius ​​Arrianus wrote in the 2th century AD: "The Scythians, once they were farmers and lived in houses, they had several cities..." Or the Roman historian Dio Cassius who wrote the following in the 2nd century AD: "Dacos Scythicam quodammodo nationem suisse" - The Dacians were a Scythian nation. Or the 1st century Roman historian Caius Plinius Secundus, who also wrote about Getae and Sarmatians alike: "Ab eo in plenum quidem omnes Scytharum sunt gentes, varie tamen litori adposita tenuere, alias Getae, Daci Romanis dicti, alias Sarmatae, Graecis Sauromatae,..." - From Scythia are all the nations, however, in various ways, they were attached to the shore, they are the Getae, called Dacians by the Romans, or the Sarmatians called Sauromatai by the Greeks. Vibius Sequester wrote in the 4th century that the Dacians were European Scythians: "Daci Scythae Europae." Or Isidore of Seville in the 6th century, who wrote of the Getae in the same way: "Getae quasi Scythae are nuncupati." Procopius also wrote about the Massagetae and the Huns: "Massagetas, sive ut iam vocant Hunnos, Atillam, Massagetarum, Scytharumque exercitu armatum adversus Aetium processisse..." Anonymus clearly wrote that the Hungarians came from Scythia: "Gens Hungaritaqueorum fortissima at bellorum laboribus potentissima , ut superius diximus, de gente Scythica,..." - The nation of the Hungarians is the strongest, but the most powerful in the labors of war, as we said above, of the Scythian nation. And Coccius Sabellicus wrote the same about the Hungarians: "Nemini dubium sit Unnos, sive Ungaros Schytas esse." - No one can have any doubt that the Hungarians are Scythians. Eşti îndoctrinat la maxim cu poveștile fantasmagorice despre "daco-români" şi "geto-daci", care în realitate n-au existat nicodată! Cu "teoria continuităţii", cu care toți românii au fost păcăliți de mici copii, doar ca să se simtă acasă pe un pământ cu o cultură total străină de balcanisme! Ardealul era la origini Erdőelve, un cuvânt străvechi maghiar, ce doar în maghiară înseamnă dincolo de păduri, de unde vine şi traducerea în latină Transylvania! Tot aşa şi Banatul provine din numele maghiar Bánság, sau Crişana provine din Körösvidék și Maramureşul din Máramaros (toate au nume explicate doar din limba maghiară şi proto-maghiară!), care au fost dintotdeauna țara străveche a sciților ugorieni și magorilor - maghiarilor, pe care nici perșii, nici macedonenii cu grecii, nici romanii, nici pecenegii şi cumanii, nici tătarii și mongolii, dar nici turcii - otomanii nu le-au putut vreodată cuceri complet! Nici coaliţia franco bavareză din Evul Mediu n-a putut să-i învingă niciodată pe sciţii ugori şi magori, dar nici austriecii de mai târziu nu au putut nicicum să ne cucerească sau să ne asimileze până la urmă, nici măcar rușii şi sovieticii n-au reuşit niciodată asta! Şi unde sunt acum aceste "mari puteri" sau "imperii"?! Gândește-te bine, pentru că astfel de profeții există de multe secole, doar voi nu ştiţi despre ele, că până la urmă vor suferii şi vor pieri cu toţii care ne-au atacat şi au vrut să ne distrugă, nu degeaba maghiarii și-au încredințat întotdeauna țara Dumnezeului și Maicii Domnului!

Hát lehet hogy jobban járnánk, ha a Tiszántúr Románia része lenne. Mert Románia legnyugatibb része már most fejlettebb, mint Magyarország keleti részei

@@ferencnagy5502 ebben ne legyél olyan biztos..😂

I Péter orosz cár 1712-ben oláhokat telepit a Don mellé 12 kozák falut alapitva. Ennyiven. De az ukrajnai kozákok zaporozsjei kozákok voltak nem doni kozákok.

Nincs, bár tudom mire gondolsz.

Cossaks were not a ethnic monolyth,they accepted free people regardless of their ethnicity and even the word Cossack itself is of Turkic origin !

A kozak az egy hajdukhoz hasonlo szabad zsoldos nepesseg. Etnikailag es vallasilag is vegyes, bar kereszteny.

És mi lesz ha szétesik?

@@dezmazde3462 Erdélyt vissza!

@@koczeka ugye csak vicelsz? Erdély, egyesülése Magyarországal, Magyarország szarrá menéset jelentené.

@@dezmazde3462 dehogy viccelek, véresen komolyan akarom vissza.

@@koczeka hol élsz?

Germánok,gótok címszó alatt kellene keresni őket. Dr.Obrusánszky Borbála talán jó forrás lehet,a youtube-on több videója is megtalálható.

Kezdetnek ez is jó: hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erd%C3%A9lyi_sz%C3%A1szok 🙂 üdv

A britek is angolszászok.

II Géza idején jöttek Magyarorszagra elöször az 1150-es evekben...

Én is ! Nagyváradi vagyok .! Élezsdtől Szentjobbig ! És minden településen van gyász és ...tán most se merik elmondani ! Hogy hányat mészároltak le család tagot .S rokont ! S sorolhatnánk !!!!!

Köszönöm.

@@szilagyibelalaszlo1857 nem csak gyulafehervari nagygyules volt , kolozsvari nagygyules is 1918. december 22.-en , ketto nappal a roman fenyegetesek es megszallas elott ahol 80000 magyar tiltakozott a roman megszallas ellen. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bLR7lZZ4xJyreYU.html

A romanokra nem jellemzo az igazsag halvany erintese sem megis ezen a videon beismerik , hogy nem volt olyan konnyu a birodalom epitesuk 1918 utan . kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pt6Jp9Ca37PcaJ8.html

Egyetértek.

Vezi bine?! Sigur țărani ca opinca de pe parlament la budapes😊ta era de țăran.

The Greek Plan or Greek Project (Russian: Греческий проект) was an early solution to the Eastern question which was advanced by Catherine the Great in the early 1780s. It envisaged the partition of the Ottoman Empire between the Russian and Habsburg Empires followed by the restoration of the Eastern Roman Empire centered in Constantinople Like her predecessors, Catherine concerned herself with the Orthodox Christians under Ottoman rule; she sponsored the Orlov Revolt in the Morea during the Russo-Turkish War of 1768-1774, and invited many Greeks like Ioannis Varvakis to settle in Russia, mainly in Crimea and New Russia. She conceived that one of her grandsons, appropriately named Constantine, would become the first emperor of the restored Byzantium. Another important consideration was Russia's goal of free access to the Mediterranean Sea through the Bosphorus, which the Ottomans controlled. For this plan to succeed, the Great European Powers would need to agree to it and the Danube powers to cooperate. In May 1780, Catherine arranged a secret meeting with Joseph II, the Holy Roman Emperor, in Mogilyov. In a series of letters from September 1781, Catherine and Joseph discussed their plans to partition the Ottoman Empire and restore the Byzantine Empire. The Austro-Russian alliance was formalized in May 1781. The Greek Plan was masterminded by Prince Potemkin who gave Greek names to the newly founded towns in New Russia (e.g., Odessa and Kherson). Byzantine symbolism was highlighted in new churches such as Kherson Cathedral. Another meeting of the Russian and Austrian monarchs was arranged as part of Catherine's Crimean journey of 1787. Both countries declared war on the Ottoman Empire later that year. Joseph's death in 1790, followed by the Treaty of Jassy and the Treaty of Sistova, in which Austria gained little, effectively ended the agreement. Austrian and European interests also had moved westward with the beginning of the French Revolution in 1789 which would occupy European affairs and alliances until the eventual fall of Napoleon in 1815. The new Concert of Europe was more concerned with maintaining the territorial integrity of the nations that occupied the Balkan peninsula. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_Plan Itt nincs leirva teljesen. Romania=Bizanci birodalom. Csak aztan rajta ragatt az új államon es szepen kijatszottak Katalin, a törököket, bulgarokat és.minket magyarokat is.

The teacher is lying like hell, I can demote most of his lies. This is how he brings Hungarians to darkness!

Dehogy nu....Istoria adevarata a Rumuniei...kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aMd4irR-tcrZnI0.html

Mercea Monica@ A magyarság őseinek nagy része már a "honfoglalás" előtt is itt volt több ezer éve a Kárpát-medencében, sok kutató szerint itt alakult ki a magyar nyelv is! Erre már nagyon sok bizonyíték van, nem hiába írta azt Grover Sanders Krantz híres amerikai antropológus és kriptológus "Az európai nyelvek földrazi kialakulása" című könyvében, hogy a magyar nyelv és a magyarok ősei régebb óta itt vannak Európában mint az indoeurópai népek. Szerinte az indoeurópai nyelvek igen késõn alakultak ki Európában, ezért szókészletüknek a 30 %-a nem indoeurópai eredetet mutat, és Európa korai görög és római térképein indoeurópai eredetű folyónevek még nincsenek! Ehhez hozzáteszem, hogy csak Kelet-Magyarországon és Erdélyben van legalább öt olyan folyónév amit már az ókor óta hasonlóképpen emlegetnek a mai napig is, de ezeket csak magyarul lehet logikusan értelmezni és mind a vízzel kapcsolatban, de akkor ez itt minimum egy nyelvi kontinuitást mutat! Például a Maros neve másfelé is előfordul, mint például Máramaros megye, Nagymaros, Kismaros, Siómaros nevekben is teljesen egy és ugyanazon szó, de ezek mind nagyon messze vannak a folyótól! Akkor miért nevezték volna így a magyarok ezeket, ha nem a mar - maros jelentése miatt?! A Körös szó töve a kör, szintén egy ősi magyar szó, és megint egy gyakori név a Kárpát-medencében. Például, a Marost értelmezhették úgy hogy marja a partot, a Köröst meg, hogy kör - körül folyik. Még ott van akkor az Olt neve is, mely így ebben a formában is csak magyarul értelmezhető, és sokféleképpen, mert lehetett a víz amely szomjat olt, de a tüzet is oltja, vagy oltalmaz - gyógyít a víze. A vlachok is a magyar Olt nevét vették át, és ez bizonyítja, hogy nem tudtak a rómaik által leírt Alutus nevéről semmit, mert még egy megyét is Oltnak neveztek el, és még Havasalföld egyik felét is Olténiának nevezik a mai napig is! A WikiSzótár szerint az olt szavunk eredete - ómagyar, és az ősmagyar változat az alot (altat) < alud (alszik). Tehát akkor itt van az alot - alutus latinosított név régi magyar értelme is?! A Temes folyó neve megintcsak magyarul értelmezhető, mert a temet vagy tömít szavunkkal van kapcsolatban, és érdekes módon a dákok is Tamisnak nevezték a görögök szerint. De kevesen tudják azt, hogy Erdélyben van egy Tömös-patak és egy Tömösi-szoros is Brassó megyében! A WikiSzótár szerint a töm szavunk ómagyar eredetű, és az ősmagyar változata a ten - tem (töm), tehát a ten - temes - töm - tömös szavak egy tőről fakadnak. Vagy ott van az Aranyos folyó, amely név így csak a középkorból ismert, mert az első emlitése a XII-dik századból van, - iuxta Aranyos - néven. Nevét aranytartalmú hordalékáról kapta, és nagyon valószinű hogy már az ókorban is hasonlóképpen hívták, mert a Kis-Aranyos és Nagy-Aranyos forráspatakok az erdélyi aranybányák közeléből erednek. Hogyha csak a Maros, a Körös, a Temes és az Olt szógyöke, a mar, a kör, a töm és az olt alapszavak mind magyar eredetűek, és ezek már a honfoglalás előtt több mint ezer évvel is itt voltak, akkor ez egy kontinuitást mutat a Kárpát-medence keleti felében! Akkor kik beszélték itt ezt az ősi nyelvet a Kárpát-medencében, ha nem a szkíta magyarok, akiket később hunugoroknak-ungaroknak és székelyeknek is neveztek?! Grover S. Krantz a következőket írja a magyar nyelv eredetéről: „....a görög nyelv tehát jelenlegi helyén Kr.e. 6500-ban, a kelta nyelv Kr.e. 3500-ban alakult ki Írországban. A magyar nyelv ősisége a Kárpát-medencében hasonlóképpen meglepő, úgy találom, hogy eredete a mezolitikumba vezet, a kőkorszakot megelőzve.”

I guess you don't speak Hungarian very well, so that's why I don't use our fantasitc language. I don't give a fuck about the borders (bc the treaty of trianon was a bullshit, and expect of Romania, Slovakia, Ukraine and some more countries, literally every country agree with that), the demography (check the real demography datas from 1920...oh sorry, there are no real datas, just the fake ones, that helped to accomplish the trianon borders). And same with the childish question "Who was the first?". I think the only one thing, that actually matter, is the culture. And you don't have. 😊

Lot of stupid people. They fight each other, without any war, for what??? They are arguing about the past, and they are missing to live the present. Fortunately. I know bunch of Romanian, and also in Hungarian inhabitants, who dealing with the others, like another ordinary people, and they do not care about the nationality. We are looking for the common part of us and we are trying to work and live together, without any quarrel. As far as I am considered, I condemn who behaves as a blindfolded nationalist, who put that stupid big Hungary map on the trunk of their cars. They are poorly educated... If you understand this, you are my man. If you don't, I am sorry for you...

Județul Mara-Mureș, adică Maramureșul Istoric! ;) Românii au o identitate unică în lume, sunt singurul popor cu o limbă unică omogen distribuită pe întreg teritoriul țării! Niciun popor nu are așa ceva. Chiar popoare mici ca luxemburghezii vorbesc 3-4 dialecte atât de diferite că nu se pot înțelege dacă nu se referă la o limbă principală! Precum în Italia, piemonteza, în Spania, castiliana, în USA , engleza, în Anglia, york.. Limba română are graiuri, ea este o limbă străveche , bine conturată , agilă în captarea neologismelor, evită instinctual cancerele lingvistice! Vezi fostul consilier și șef de cabinet al Papei Ioan( Ioan și nu Janoș:)?)-Paul al -II- lea, un episcop catolic american , care a declarat pe la toate televiziunile că Limba Română nu se trage din Latină, ci latina se trage din Limba Română, sau amândouă din aceeași sursă! Identitatea este aia care vine din Istorie! Nu ai istorie, nu exiști! Ungurii se zbat cheltuind milioane de dolari pentru să-și creioneze identitatea...ba sunt mogyori, ba huni, ba uiguri, ba vor Ungaria cât mai mare:) care era o monarhie multinațională!:)) în care ungurii erau minoritari( ei sunt minoritari și în Ungaria actuală, creșterea populației este pe minus de sute de ani, ei caută salvarea în maghiarizare...sunt numiți sugativa popoarelor!) Dar nu-s singurii...americanii încă și-o caută pe internet, istoria lor de 2-3 secole.. Bulgarii la fel, se dau traci și nu sunt. Se bat cu pumnul în pieptul lor turco-mongol de avari, și urlă din toți bojocii, că ce traci sunt ei...dar nu provoacă decât zâmbete înțelegătoare, încă mai au pe haine, așa ca voi, praful stepelor asiatice ridicat de trapul copitelor de cai în goana sălbatică...alergând să distrugă tot ce le iese în cale, Dinogeția, Histria, Tomisul, Calatisul, Ulmetum , Noviodunum, praf și pulbere le-au făcut! Fioroși da, dar civilizație ioc! Să fiți sănătoși!

Igazad van, de így nem jó. Amennyiben többesszámban kezded, úgy is kell befejezni. Vagyis: "románok mindig napraforgók voltak." vagy, egyes számban: " a román mindig napraforgó volt." Amúgy sajnos nagyon igaz.

@@juditdemeter1683 Tudom Judit! Csak net adja a szavakat,sokat kínlódtam a javítással és a végén így küldtem el !

@@arankakoller329 🤗Legyen szép napod! 🤗

​@@juditdemeter1683help me understand.. what sunflower!????

Azért nem esett szét Románia, mert ott már 1920 után tervszerűen mindent elkövettek a román hatóságok, hogy megbomlasszák a tömbben élő nemzetiségeket, áttelepítésekkel, átszervezéssel, földreformmal, nyelvtörvénnyel és mindenféle olyan intézkedésekkel amelyek a bárhonnan beköltözött románok előnyére váltak az őshonos nemzetiségekkel szemben! De ezzel párhuzamosan bevezették a történelemoktatásba a románság dákoromán eredettörténetét és így beültették már a román gyermekek agyába ezt a hamis büszkeséget, ami arról szólt leginkább, hogy nem számít az amit építettek itt az évszázadok alatt a magyarok, a székelyek és a szászok, svábok, örmények, mert ezeket mind áthidalja és fölöttük áll a románság ősi dák és római eredete és múltja! Ezért is van az, hogy szinte minden vegyes családban a gyermekek már a románsághoz húznak, mert a dákoromán eredet az ősibb!

@@Arpoxais1Ateas2 Meg bizonyos nagyhatalmi érdek, hogy ilyen formában ez az ország létezzen.

@@Ftibor7 Igaz, de ez volt az érdekük a Csehszlovák államnál is, ahova tartozott Kárpátalja is még 1920 és 1939 között! De mivel a cseheknek nem volt egy ilyen egységesítő tervük mint a románoknak, és a nagymorva néptudat sem volt kidolgozva még olyan jól, ezért nem alakulhatott ki még annyira mint a románoknál a dákoromán identitás, és ma már három országban élnek az akkori csehszlovák polgárok utódai!

Nem sok van már neki hátra! Az Oroszok szét fogják atomozni a 3. Világháborúban! A Románok kifogytak a barátokból! Amerika meg messze van,hogy segítsenek nekik! Ennyi! TRIANON nincs köbe vésve 👆🏻

@@Ftibor7 i

Hááááááátttt...? ha Franciaországot egy amerikai gyarmattal azonosítjuk, akkor Románia egy gyarmat gyarmata.

@@laszloferencz9433 A támogatást már Lajos idejében is várták a keleti szomszédaink , nemcsak Felvidékről, ,lengyelektől, törököktől !, a monarchiától ! ..

Nem//

Max annyiban maradt szerintem meg, hogy Bukarestet szokták a kelet párizsának hívni, legalábbis azok akik még nem jártak se Párizsban, se Bukarestben.

A franciák célja a Kis Antanttal az volt, hogy majd kelet-közép-európai térségben a francia hegemóniát fogják biztosítani. Ezt a feltörekvő III. Német Birodalom tette semissé. Ekkor a románok Hitler egyik legbegbízhatóbb szövetségesévé lettek. Egészen addig, amíg a Szovjet Vörös Hadsereg el nem érte Románia határait. Akkor megint átáltak, és hadat üzentek Hitlernek, hasonlóan, mint az I. világháborúban Oroszországnak. Erre mondta Sztálin, hogy a román nem nemzet, hanem egy foglalkozás.

A kedves fari-ank és a nyugati bukott angyalok megoldották!

CSALÁSSAL HAZUGSÁGGAL

A magyar nemesek segitettek hozza oket.Egyre tobb roman jott be dolgzni nekik...addig addig jottek mig vegul ok lettek tobben.

@@Soulbursting Nem teljesen. Az igazság a félúton megtalálható. Én nem tartom a nemességet egyedüli okozónak (17.-19. századok között). A románok egyszerű helyi nomádok voltak, nagy szaporulattal. Ellentétben mondjuk a szászokkal, kik inkább városi lakosság volt és még ráadásul a felük kivándorolt Amerikába. Szóval, ne csak a hangzatos dumákat hajtogassuk. Hanem vannak ok okozati tényezők. Nézzünk utána dolgoknak, mielőtt vmit biztosan állítunk!

@@Ftibor7 A baj az 1241.-es tatárjárással kezdődik, a magyarság kétharmada ki lett irtva. Innentől kezdődött a románok betelepítése a németekkel együtt, de a török uralom és a későbbi tatár betörések miatt falvak százai néptelenedtek el, emiatt megint románokat telepítettek be...arra lehetett volna esetleg törekedni hogy a Magyar Alföldről telepítsenek be, viszont azok nem dolgoztak volna olyan olcsón, mint a román.... s még lehetne sorolnj a pestisjárványokat, Giorgio Basta mészárlásait, a Horea és az Avram Iancu felkelést, ahol szintén falvakat mészároltak le...

Köszönöm, igyekszem. :-)

​@@szilagyibelalaszlo1857Igienă morală, obiectivitate și realism istoric, ZERO!Bravooo...aplauze...aplauze... Acum puteți să expuneți și versiunea ne-cosmetizată și ne-botoxată atât de hidos ca un trans nereușit ? Uram...

Boci... Köszönöm! Sunt româncă! Ozer is, tudom köszölnj seipen! ;) Vis lat! Alles Gute und Auf wiedersehen!

Or rather, you are more dishonest. You betrayed everyone you could. Who wants a friend like you?

@@szilagyibelalaszlo1857 Look around ... everyone! what friends Hungary has!

Now we're talking about you. How can we trust those who stole from us?@@stanciuflorin5328

​@@szilagyibelalaszlo1857 just spreading fake

KülöNbség. A román pedig kisbetű, nem csak szubjektív okokból... ;)

​@@VCsaba-vl4du Greetings from Romania!

@@stefanodobleja6923 Do we know eachother? 🤪😄

@@VCsaba-vl4du We're on the internet bro:))

@@VCsaba-vl4du When Romanians and Hungarians meet It's like:Palinka? Igen :)) !

🥴Igen, felsorakoztatta lütyő prostiait, meg is lett az eredménye, Románia elérte amit akart, haszonleső, köpönyegforgató népség. Na de ami könnyen jön, az könnyen is megy.

@@juditdemeter1683 Book of Judith / Greek Demetrios (Δημήτριος Dēmētrios [ðiˈmitrios]). You "Hungar" :))).

Mondta Sztálin aki Giorgiana:) Lenin aki román volt mit mondott:)

egy terület nem azért lessz jogos mert elfoglalják...

1. Van. 😉 2. Látom a magadfajta hülyegyerek képtelen különbséget tenni az ország és a birodalom fogalma között. Tehát a "nagy török" zászlóval a nagy lajos-i, hunyadi mátyás- i vagy épp attila király-i stb idejében létezett magyar birodalom lenne "pariban".😉 Konkrét példán megvilágítva egy valódi nagy-magyar térképen egész romániának szerepelnie kellene, hiszen a terület történelme javarészében magyar hűbéres tartomány volt (amikor nem akkor lengyel, török, orosz) Örülök, hogy segíthettem, te kis nyomi.😉

Rúzsos szájú főnökük is kilógott a sorból, már nem a normálisak sorából, hanem a szocialista blokkból.

We know the reality. Thank you for your blessed words. I assure you that you are the noblest of them all, if that is the case. We, the Romanians, on the other hand, are more beautiful, we settle for a little.😌

Szerintem túl kell szaporodnunk őket. Kb 100 év alatt kellene 150 millió főig a létszámnak megnőni. Utánna vegyes házasságokkal további 100 év alatt a kárpát medencében a legtöbb ember magyarrá válna önként.

@@escorial9305 Hát .....így is lehet ! De Én inkább szaporítanám a sajátomat tiszta vervonalból ! ! Ha Régen tudtak .szűlni hat ...nyolc gyermeket akkór mi elszaporodnank! ! Én is ilyen nagy csaladból származom ! És ez természetes volt abban az időben ! És még kézzel most az Édesanyám ! Nem volt ennyi háztartási gép .! 🙏

@@anikofarkas7756 Milyen tiszta vérvonalról beszélünk? A magyar nép már a honfoglalásnál is kevert volt, utána a tatár, majd török pusztítások miatt a betelepített németek, kunok, jászok, szlávok is mind beolvadtak a magyarságba.

@@szilagyitamas2823 Üdvözlöm Ezt én tudom !!! De a keveredés ! Olyan annyira letisztult eggyé vált .hogy mostmár lehet azt mondani !!! Hogy magyarok vagyunk ! Mert kezdetben még frissiben mindegyik kitűnt a maga fajtákban De mikor már eltelek az évek .és ugyan úgy házasodtak folyamatosan úgy eggyé alakult hogy mostmár Hol van az már ! Csak ha utánna néznek akik még nyilván tartják ! Még a vezeték név Ha meg van és nemmasitottak meg . Teszem az csak ! Petőfi Sándort és kitudja még! Hányan vannak Na én erre gondoltam ! Mert a hetedik leszármazott után már az gén össze mosódik .és eggyé válik ! Jó egészséget kívánok 🏵️

Of course,does the truth bother you? :)

@@Abyss.44 truth?!? maybe yours. not the scientific one, based on proofs. as an opinion, is ok, you have the right to say anything you want.

Potyka se legyőzhetetlen,csak sok a katonája de a cuccai elavultak.

Putyin nem fog semmit a helyere tenni mert az orosz hadsereg egy tehetetlen csöcselek. Különben is Putyin ravaszul csak kihasznalja magyarorszagot igy probalja a gyalazatos arulo Orban segitsegevel gyengitteni az EU t es a NATO t de ugy nez ki hogy nem fog sekerrel jarni.

A Russian victory in Ukraine will not be in Hungary's favor,I wish you all the best from Romania!

Úgy legyen!!!

@@stefanodobleja6923 Te nem tudod romániából, mi lenne jó nekünk!!!

Nem érted! Az Antant szállta meg Magyarországot. Aztán az Antant köttette meg Magyarországgal a trianoni békét. Ami egy diktátum. Rákényszerítették Magyarországra. És az Antant adta oda Erdélyt Romániának. A nagyhatalmak. Románia ajándékot kapott! Ki tudja meddig maradhat a románoké? Hiszen nagyhatalmak másként is dönthetnek.

@@szilagyibelalaszlo1857 The smartest among you know that the genetic print of the Asian people that imposed their language on you is 0. You are as European as your neighbours, just unfortunated enough to leave in a flat region which alowed a few determined Asians to conquer you... So few that they infinitelly diluted themselves into the European DNA...

Salutari din oltenia!

Pasarea mălai visează!

@@redtechnic7734 Ti álmodoztok hazug történelem hamisítók! De lassan kénytelenek lesztek felébredni, mer a világot nem tudjátok sokáig becsapni.

Mi hiányzott belőle?

@@atticusfortezza A "j" betű. 🤣 Bírom ezeket az analfabéta maximalistákat...

@@atticusfortezza az olahok allando magyarellenessege es megvalositott tervszeru romanositasuk Erdelyben . Destroy everything - Elpusztitani mindent /documentary/ Transylvania / Erdely 1848 -1849 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bdeIoNmWnNbUZ6s.html

@@atticusfortezza mar a gyalazatos Trianoni Diktatum utan megkeztek a roman telepek epiteset a gunyhatar mellett Szatmarnemetitol Temesvarig . Ezen a videon a Nagykaroly kornyeken 1923-ban epult roman telepek lathatok . kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jNt2ac2m0tyUe5s.html , Marosvasarhely elromanositasa kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fclkrMh00NbJops.html Erdely elromanositasa kzfaq.info/get/bejne/lbt9epZlutq3iJc.html

@@atticusfortezza Az 1848-as „forradalom“ valódi háttere.

Diferența constă în faptul că pe atunci doar ungurii o duceau bine, restul etnicilor mureau de foame, in Transilvania românii erau majoritari, dar locuiau în case de lemn și munceau pentru mâncare. Acesta este adevărul, stai liniștit Attila.

@@dianaveres9354 lie.....we protected the peoples from the Tatars...from the Turks..and from the Balkan chaos for many 100 years....in the monarchy, anyone who did any work received more or less the same wages....if they had starved....then they wouldn't have multiplied...and they wouldn't have been in the majority in many places..in the monarchy, anyone who did any work received more or less the same wages....if they had starved........this starvation is a historical lie....they want to deny the injustice of Trianon with this...!!

@@attilakovacs1415 No, we protected you from the Tatars. In fact, the Romanian principalities of Wallachia and Moldova were created specifically to defend the Hungarian Kingdom against Tatar invasions. In the 13-14th century, the only chance for the Romanian nobility in Transylvania to preserve their titles and land rights was to either assimilate into the Hungarian elite or cross the Carpathians to the newly created marches (Wallachia and Moldova).

@@danoprea3066 we stood in the way of the Turks....the Balkan peoples merged...they became vassal states....for 400-500 years....en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Hungary

@@danoprea3066 we protected Europe... but we shouldn't have....In 1526, the population was 5-5.5 million...in 1700, 3-3.5 million....

Lier!

Dream on ...

@@getbget9244 Tudod e mi a különbség Oroszország és a Szovjetunió között. Az első most van, a. második 30 éve megszűnt. LOL!

Nem. Ez az igazság.

😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😁😁😁😁😁😁😆😆😆😆😆😂😂😂😂😂

​@@romulusbuta9318Chiar și așa, în Transilvania erau și sași....sau stai puțin...pentru voi nu contează altă nație. Voi să fiți primii, în rest prăpăd.

@@dianaveres9354 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔😏😏😏😏😏🤨🤨🧐🧐🙃🙃

Ameddig a Balkán ennyire egy nacionalizmustól szétszaggatott, és sok helyen elmaradt terület marad, addig egy nemzetközi szintű konfliktus esetén egyből egymásnak esnének és csak a lerombolt maradékba tudnál bevonulni.

@@gel_rt pont ezt akarjak az oroszok is. Oket nem erdekli az ott elo nepek sors,oket a terulet,a tengeri kijarat,a "Lebensraum" erdekli,mint a nacikat.

@@Bonewerkz Ettől függetlenül ameddig nem törne ki egy világháború, vagy legalábbis valami nagyobb nemzetközi konfliktus, nem támadnák meg a Balkánt. Ukrajna lerohanását meg tudom érteni, egyrészt ne baszakodj azzal az országgal, aki a fennállása óta nem vesztett még háborút, ráadásul rabszolgatartó módjára kezelték nagyjából az összes kisebbséget az országukban. Másrészt az ukránok lényegében az orosz egyik barbár népcsoportja, mint pl. a csecsenek.

Mindig mondják, nem jó kannás borra a gyógyszer...😛😛😛

@@tamasszakal9834te biztos kompetens vagy akkor e teren. akkor a pohar alja helyett a terkepet nezd,es gondolkozz.

Every forest has It's rotten trees

The problem is that the Romanians were completely misled about the ethnogenesis of the Hungarians, without knowing, for example, that the medieval Hungarian chroniclers traced the ethnogenesis of the Magor-Hungarians back several millennia, which begins with Nemrót - Nimród, who was the first king in the world! Nemrót had two sons, Hunor and Magor, from whom the Huns and Magyars came! Foreign chroniclers also wrote about them, and historians agree that this mythology is much more ancient than the mythology of European peoples in general. There is a huge difference between the mythology of "Romulus and Remus" and "Hunor and Magor", not only in time and space, but also in terms of cultural ethnogenesis, because Hunor and Magor have always lived in brotherhood and sought peace between peoples. they were never at war with each other, but their peoples were never in conflict either! The authors of Antiquity also wrote about Magor, but it is also mentioned in the Bible as Magog. Titus Flavius ​​​​Iosepphus wrote in the 1st century AD. that all the Magorians come from Magog, who are all Scythians! New historical data and archaeogenetic data proved to us that the people of Magor are European, probably European Scythians, and the people of Hunor are Central Asian, and the mythology of the brothers "Hunor and Magor" was born from these two unions! However, the archaeogenetic data made it clear that even those who came from Asia were mostly Europids and were always in the minority compared to those who came from Europe, so there is no trace of them in the DNA of today's Hungarians. Iordanes describes in the book called "Getica" that "Hungarians, who are also called Sabiri, lived first in Scythia and in Dacia, then again in Scythia." Jordanes describes in chapter 28 that the Goths arrive in Scythia, and in Book 29 he writes that those who live here are the people who come from Magog, and who belong to the Scythians and speak the Scythian language! In chapter 33 he mentions that the Gepids arrived in the west of Scythia and describes that there are two big rivers here, the Danube and the Tisia - Tisa! So, Western Scythia was located here thousands of years ago, in the Carpathian Basin and in Moldova, and Romanian historians did not and do not want you to know about this! The Romanian country entered Hungary and Transylvania, exactly as they entered Russians a year ago in Ukraine! All this happened without consulting the Szeklers and Hungarians, who, according to all the new data from genetics and archaeogenetics, were natives of the Carpathian Basin! Then it is understandable why Anton Verancsics wrote the following about the Hungarians and Szeklers from Transylvania in the 16th century: „They have the same wearing, the same customs and the same laws and language as the other Hungarians in Pannonia..." „...the Hungarians who live In Transylvania, they are often called Dacians, while those in the kingdom are called Pannons, but they still have the same language." Michelangelo Naddeo, an Italian researcher who studied the origins of European peoples for decades, believes that the first civilization in Europe had already appeared in the Neolithic and it belonged to the ancient people living in the Carpathian Basin, the Hungarians! He says: "Decebalus was a Hungarian!" Since then it has been proven that the name "Decebalus" written by the Romans was actually Décsebál or Dicsőbál in the Proto-Hungarian or European Scythian language if you like, because this name has a clear meaning in Hungarian even to this day. Dicső means Glorious in Hungarian, and Bál looks like it was a dignified name that was derived from the ancient Babylonian or Sumerian deity Baal, but this word has a derivation in today's Hungarian language. Then what could be a more worthy name for a king's son who will hopefully become a king than GloriousBaál or Glorious dignity?! Some Dacian fortresses with meaning only in Hungarian: Napoca - Naposvár - Suny Castle, Sarmisegethuza - Sármiszegetháza - Upper white Castle, Piroboridáva - Pirosborvára - Red wine Castle, Utidáva - Utivára - Road Castle, Tamasidava - Temesivára - Thames Castle, expl. Temesvár - Timişoara. And Zargidava - Zergevára - Chamois Castle, Ziridava - Zeredavára - Wednesday Castle, expl. Csíkszereda - Nyárádszereda... These all refer to the old Wednesday fair, which was held in some castles, apparently even the Dacians! It is definitely clear from these names that the Dacians also spoke a language related to Hungarian, because we take these words that are still present in the Hungarian language such as nap, szár, szeg, ut, uti, pirosbor, zerge, temet and szereda, these can't be coincidences at all! It is certainly clear that the Dacians also spoke an agglutinating language, just like the Scythian Hungarians, because they added the suffix dava - vara to the name, which is not common in Indo-European languages!

@@szakaattila7899 The Scythians were tribes from the Persian side, from the area of present-day Iran, from where you took out your chronicler history that you were descended from the first king on earth. You have a history made, to create the impression of a great people, but you are only the rubbish left by the Mongols in Europe.The Dacians and the Thracians do not come from the Mongolian rubbish, you can see by the port and the drawings left behind them, it has nothing of the so-called pre-Hungarian port, You have come up with some illusions and assumptions that no historian will believe or impose historically. You're trying to make a credible history in Europe but you've never been able to be credible and Europe knows that. Inventions and assumptions of a country formed in the Pannonian Plain, where the water was up to the knees, and beat mosquitoes, there was born the Hungarian people, from the remnants of the Mongols, Tatars, Turks. In the Roman chronicles, it does not write by the Hungarians, and on Trajan's Column are represented the Dacians and the Thracians.And Decebalus does not come from the Hunic peoples e, it is the greatest aberration and gross lie. Pre-Roman history, it is a whole chain, that of Hungary has missing links, that's why you try to break the history of other peoples by false information to create you one, which does not exist and you know it well. Ask archaeologists in Hungary who are digging for information and can't find that missing link. Stop posting fakes and fantasy movie ideas like the Brotherhood of the Ring and that you draw on the biblical line. It's a shame that you could post it so aberrate

@@b.alexandru2390 It's clear, you're zero in history, you've heard something about a worn-out theory from the 19th century about Iranian Scythians, but since then no serious historian in this world supports such aberrations! All archaeologists dealing with the Scythian period agree that the Scythians were from a large culture of the Eurasian steppes from central Asia to central Europe, which even included the Carpathian Basin in the west! But the archaeogenetic data published in the last decades clearly showed us that the Scythians originally came from central and eastern Europe, so historians say that according to the new data the proto-Scythians were mainly the descendants of the Baden, Corded Ware and Jamnaja cultures! But these data also coincide with the archaeological data from recent years, which demonstrated that the first to domesticate the horse and became riders were the Europeans, especially from central and eastern Europe, from the current territory of Hungary, Romania and Ukraine. These dates also coincided with the appearance of the Jamnaja culture, who were also the first mounted fighters, therefore the predecessors of the Scythians, because genetically they are the same population! And the first kurgans were also built by the Jamnaja culture, which again has a perfect continuity with the Scythians! So the whole theory with the Iranian Scythians is absolutely false, because they reversed the chronological order, because the European proto-Scythians migrated to the east and south of Asia 3 thousand years ago! And all these data coincide with the data of the Hungarians about the European Scythians called by Strabo and Ptolemy "Urgoi" in ancient Greek, who according to the archaeogenetic data seem to have been the Ugrians - the Hungarians who spoke the Ugric-Scythian language!

@@b.alexandru2390Trogus Pompeius wrote in the 1st century BC: "The Scythians, for one thousand five hundred years conquered Chaldea, before any people, they are the oldest people in the world, older than the Egyptians." Lucianus writes in the 2nd century: "Ateas, king of the Scythians, fought with Philip near the Istru, being 90 years old." It is interesting how similar the name of the Scythian king Ateas is to the name of Attila, who in Greek was called Atilas or Atias. And the Roman author Arrianus wrote about the Scythians in the 1st century: "The Scythians used to be settled, lived in houses and had cities..." Later Desercius wrote about the Scythians: "let us describe for posterity the way of life of the Scythians. Only foreigners don't know that the Hungarians, as descendants of the Scythians, are very talented." And Ortelius wrote in the book: Theatrum Orbis Terrarum - "The inhabitants of Hungary speak the language of the Scythians." In the Bergomense chronicle, this reference to the Hungarians was discovered: "Ungari, qui et Hunni, gens Scythica" - Hungarians and Huns come from the Scythians. Anonymus writes in the "Gesta Hungarorum": "The Hungarians, who in bravery and war skills being a great nation, as I stated above, their origin is from the nation of the Scythians..." Coccius Sabellicus wrote in the 14th century: "Nemini dubium sit Unnos, sive Ungaros Schytas esse" - there is no doubt that the Hungarians are Scythians. Werbőczy István, another 15th-century Hungarian chronicler, wrote about the Szeklers in the same way: "The Scythians from Transylvania are what we call Seklers today. These Seklers from Transylvania, who are all privileged nobles, come from the people of the Scythians... they were wrongly called "Siculus", they who live under their own laws and customs , and in battle they are the most skilled." And another text from the laws of the Hungarian King Endre I. (1063) "All Hungarians and newcomers to the Kingdom of Hungary, who still practice the old customs of Scythia, who do not respect the true religion of Jesus and do not respect the holy laws, which were given by King Stefan, to be punished with death and confiscation of wealth." We already have hundreds of accounts about the Hungarians or Magorians who were European Scythians, but your problem is that the Romanians do not have such a thing, because you are a young people, formed only in the last 800 years mainly from the families of Wallachian and Slavic shepherds from Balkans, who mixed with Asian peoples like Pechenegs, Tatars, Cumans, Uzians and Mongols!

@@szakaattila7899 The theory and hypotheses that give you a place for a country, to seem like you have been on these lands for thousands of years.The Huns were a tribe of the 9 Mongol territories that stopped in the Pannonian Plain, and present-day Hungary is looking for a place in history. You will be missing a lot, and try to steal from the history of others to make a history of your own. I would like to inform you that you are no longer part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

it too could only come about through betrayal and its consequences.

Dear Romanian user! Romania who oppressed everybody, Hungary had 2,8 million Romanians in 1920 after "allegedly super cruel Hungarian oppression", even Romanians had much more Romanian schools in Hungary than in Romania for higher Romanian population... this is the logic of the Romanian propaganda. Comparing, fast growed imperalistic Romania (territory from their neighboars, so nobody likes Romania) had only 60-70% Romanian population in 1920, today Romania had much less ethnics, it means the ethnic number shows who is the real suppressor. You can talk about what Romanians did in the recent century.

​@@aliengalaxy6096 Hello, dear Hungarian user! Thank you for your reply. "Romanian propaganda?" I just quoted a French general from 1920, not a Romanian one, or a Romanian / Slovak / Serb historian... Anyway, I shall post soon some enlightening comments from Hungarian and Western historians and scholars, about the historical aberration of Magyarization that targeted non-Magyars in the Kingdom of Hungary. Until then, please take a break from hating Romanians and meditate over the facts and realities that I am explaining here, for you and everybody else. Indeed, Romania of today has a lesser proportion of minorities than in 1920, but not because the minorities were suppressed. The real explanation, that you didn't notice (being so eager to insult us...) is that unlike in 1920, Romania of today is missing the Southern Dobrudja (today in Bulgaria), Northern Bukovina and the Hertza Region (today part of Ukraine) and the Bessarabia (the part of Moldavia Republic that is bordered by the Prut and Dniestr rivers)... Also, many Jews left for Israel starting with the 60s, and also many Germans left for Western Germany starting with the end of '70s. There is an old saying in the Bible: “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?" (Luke 6:41) Or, even better: "You hypocrite! First, remove the beam out of your own eye, and then you can see clearly to remove the speck out of your brother’s eye." (Matthew 7:5).

@@CborgMega I can quote an american general, General Harry Hill Bandholtz, 1919: “the country had hardly had time to regain consciousness from a stupor caused by a period of terror when the darkness of renewed horrors covered our souls; the Hungarian capital, occupied by foreign [Romanian] troops, was turned into a death chamber.” “Personally I came here rather inclined to condone or extenuate much of the Roumanian procedure, but their outrageous conduct in violation of all international law, decency, and humane considerations, has made me become an advocate of the Hungarian cause. Turning over portions of Hungary with its civilized and refined population will be like turning over Texas and California to the Mexicans. The great Powers of the Allies should hang their heads in shame for what they allowed to take place in this country after an armistice.” “The Roumanians on their part immediately began to loot Hungary, removing all automobiles, locomotives, cars and other rolling stock, took possession of and shipped to Roumania all the arms, munitions, and war material they could find, and then proceeded also to clean the country out of private automobiles, farm implements, cattle, horses, clothing, sugar, coal, salt, and in fact everything of value; and even after they were notified by the Supreme Council of the Peace Conference to cease such requisitioning, they continued and are still continuing their depredations. They have taken possession of all branches of the government, all railroad, telegraph, telephone and postal systems, and at this date have all Hungary completely terrorized and at their feet.” And Italian prime minister, Francesco Saverio Nitti, 1922: “This poor great country, which saved both civilization and Christianity, has been treated with a bitterness which nothing can explain except the desire of greed of those surrounding her, and the fact that the weaker people, seeing the stronger overcome, wish and insist that she shall be reduced to impotence. Nothing, in fact, can justify the measures of violence and the depredations committed in Magyar territory. What was the Rumanian occupation of Hungary: a systematic rapine and the systematic destruction for a long time hidden, and the stern reproach which Lloyd George addressed in London to the Premier of Rumania was perfectly justified.” You can tell us what Romanians did the ethnic groups in the past 100 years, and you can tell us what was the life of ethnics in Romania before 1920 and compare with Hungary. You can talk also about the romanianization. For example when Hungarian cities 10km from today border with zero Romanian history (for example Nagyvarad/Oradea) has only 5% Romanian population, now 70%. For example in 1913, Dobruja was all made part of Romania in the aftermath of the 1913 Treaty of Bucharest which ended the Second Balkan War. Romania acquired Southern Dobruja from Bulgaria, a territory with a population of 300,000 from which only 6,000 (2%) were Romanians. In 1913, Romanian-held Northern Dobruja had a population of 380,430, from which 216,425 (56.8%) were Romanians. Thus, when Dobruja was unified within Romania in 1913, there were over 222,000 Romanians in the region out of a total population of 680,000, or nearly 33% of the population. By 1930, the Romanian population within Dobruja had increased to 44.2%.

@@aliengalaxy6096 The allegations regarding the Romanian occupation of (Bolshevik) Hungary are exaggerated and blown out-of-proportion... The Romanian Army recovered the goods that Austro-Hungarian troops confiscated already from the Romanian Kingdom during the occupation by the Central Powers, and also returned to Transylvania what was taken by the retreating Magyar soldiers, by force and intimidation of the local Romanians. It may have been that abuses were perpetrated in isolated cases - as it happens in every conflict, with all the sides involved - however most of the complaints were instrumented by Magyar nationalists who wanted to use this opportunity to slander Romanians in front of the representatives of Allies in Hungary (and by doing this, avoiding the delicate issue of how Bolshevism was supported by many in Hungary, based on the idea that the alliance with Communist Russia will help preserving the territories inhabited in majority by non-Magyars). Speaking about looting an stealing, one should have in mind how Central Powers operated the systematic plundering, pillage and confiscations in the occupied part of the Romanian Kingdom, from December 1916 to November 1918. Even church bells were confiscated from Romanian Orthodox Churches and transported to Budapest and Vienna, to be melted and the resulting bronze to be used for making bullets. (see a picture in this article: legionmagazine.com/en/2018/11/the-seizing-of-europes-bells/). The following quotes are from a book authored by a Westerner scholar and historian, Alexander Watson (Ring of Steel: Germany and Austria-Hungary in World War I, Basic Books, New York, 2014, pp. 410 - 416): > Another interesting article about the plundering of Romania by the Central Powers was authored by David Hamlin, “Dummes Geld”: Money, Grain, and the Occupation of Romania in WWI" (Central European History 42, 2009, pp. 451-471) - it should be easy to find it online, via google. Hamlin writes that up to October 1917, "the Central Powers extracted 1,508,705 tons of grain from Romania, of which 649,668 tons were delivered to Germany", and later, in December, "all church bells were seized" by the occupying forces. This was part of the official policy of looting Romania, even of the resources that Romanians needed to survive: in January 1917 - writes Hamlin - *"the Austro-Hungarian members of the Economic Staff [of the Military Administration] made clear that supplying the Romanian civil population with flour could only be considered as the provision for the troops and the critical exports back home permitted.”* Brian Jenkins, retired Professor of Politics at University of Leeds, UK, has collected several sources of information on his blog, under the section "Systematic Extraction: Exploitation of Romania during the First World War" ( hist373fall14.blogs.wm.edu/minorities-under-occupation/systematic-extraction-exploitation-of-romania-during-the-first-world-war/. Jenkins points out that "when the vast majority of Romania fell to the Central Powers only a month after the country’s declaration of war, heedless imperialism and abuse of resources began.(...) As the closing battles of Europe’s Great War raged across the continent, the Romanian population experienced drastic economic abuse by the Central Powers. Led by Germany, Romania’s enemies extracted agrarian resources and oil while also manipulating the country’s currency. Results of such exploitation were more than economic; Romania, once the breadbasket of eastern Europe, was driven into widespread famine by its German oppressors."

@@aliengalaxy6096 Source: G. D. Feldman (ed.), German Imperialism,1914-1918: The Development of a Historical Debate, London, 1972, (pp. 32-33).

És ki a faszt érdekel ?!!!

mindenki telibe szarja

Az oláhoknak akkor se hiszünk, ha kérdeznek!

@@MrFefefofo a magyarban meg alapból nem lehet megbízni mert mindenkit átvernek és kerülik a munkát

Éljen ROMÁNIA! Éljen csak ne Erdeybe. Gazeemberek haza fele!

@@peter-df6wl Erdélyben sokkal több a román, mint a retkes magyar!

éljen, kenyéren és vízen ... mint eddig :-DDD

Wikipedia. Ahhhaaaa,thanks 😂😂😂😂

Bolsevikipédia. Hát persze.

Wikipedia is generally pretty good, but even it states that its debated whether the ancestors of Romanians were present in Transylvania and Wallachia before the 13th century.

@@leventehorvath8562 OK, what about hundreds of archaeological sites existing under ground with more than 1000, 2000 years old found it in Pannonia, Transilvanya, Old Dacia area?! Empty territories before 13th century, no? No Sarmisegetusa, no Napoca, no Tapae, No Ziridava, and more other unnamed and undeclared old villages. Or do you think people moved to south Danube, or just disappeared from the lands? Having mountains, rivers and good agriculture lands?!

​@@lucianadrianbalan4833 Not sure what your point is here. Why do you bring up ancient dacians? I'm talking about Romanians/Vlachs now who are only mentioned here in the middle ages.